All Channels
Popular
200°

Nvidia: No Difference Between Core i7 and Core 2 Duo in Gaming

The relationship between Nvidia and Intel couldn't be any more chilly. At odds with each other over Nehalem licensing, netbook platforms, and other tech related spats, the two sides seem all to happy to take digs at one another when the opportunity arises. For Nvidia, that means calling to question Intel's claim that its Core i7 processor can improve game performance by up to 80 percent.

Read Full Story >>
maximumpc.com
Nihilism6094d ago (Edited 6094d ago )

After seeing articles for and against i7 vs c2q, it seems other benchmarks i've found show that

1. The i7 doesn't perform better in games ( when compared to similar speed C2Q's)

2. That the i7 under-performs with single NVIDIA gpu's

3. That the price difference for the i7 over c2q isn't justified for the small gains in some games ( especially seeing as there is a decrease in performance in some, and the cost of the ddr3 ram+ new mobo)

So i will wait it out, and get the GT300 before a new cpu. I'll sell my gtx280 for it, and get a new cpu when across-the-board gains are noticed.

some more benches and comparison reviews:

http://techgage.com/article...

http://www.insidehw.com/Rev...

http://www.legionhardware.c...

badz1496094d ago

it's not that it's not powerful when we know it really is more powerful compared to C2D/C2Q but in games, I don't think they will perform that much better! afterall, I use my pc for surfing, watching movies and gaming! most game devs put a lot of loads on GPU rather than CPU for their games. even Crysis is not utilizing the quad core CPU to use more than 2 cores but was making the best GPUs cried to run it on high when it was released! and those PCs or laptops with integrated gfx can't come even close to run most newer games with demanding graphics! so, as long as dev keep making games the way they are, a PC with a more powerful GPU will always perform better than a PC with even the i7 but with integrated gfx!

IdleLeeSiuLung6094d ago

that it no longer matters what CPU you have. That level is usually fairly low relative to the newest CPUs out. The graphics card usually makes the biggest difference and any gamer can attest to that.

FantasyStar6094d ago

Of course Nvidia will say that! And they're right as well! There's barely any difference in the i7 and the C2D platforms because most games are GPU intensive, which means even the C2D E4400 will run very nicely alongside a high-end GPU without bottlenecks.(exaggeration)

However when choosing CPUs, one should think outside of the box.

Syronicus6094d ago

Instead of spending almost three times as much on the i7. I got a screaming chip at a third the cost and it works beautifully with my GTX275.

Raf1k16094d ago

Good thing I didn't splash out on an i7 when I upgraded.

My E8400 should last a few years.

Kakkoii6094d ago

Yeah, I wouldn't be getting an i7 system if I was just going to be using it for gaming. Not really worth the cash at this point since no games can really take advantage of it.

adsaidler6093d ago

my e8400 does the job perfectly :) i don't think i'll need an i7 for the next 3 to 4 years

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 6093d ago
Nihilism6094d ago

it's still relevant though, which is why i posted it, i7 is the newest cpu from intel( and along side the i5, several new i7 models have come out)

and alot of people including myself have been tossing up whether it's worth upgrading, and this is helpful

champ216094d ago (Edited 6094d ago )

well tbh.. it depends on the game you are playing.

GTA 4 was very badly optimised. I had a core2 running at 2.4ghz (gpu you was 4870 x2) 2gb of ram and i was struggling to get 30 fps at max 1900*1200.. almost everything maxed out.

i upgraded to a I7 920 OC'd 3.5 ghz 6gb ram 4870 x2, and i was able to play the game near 60fps same settings.

so i would say it depends on the game

on my older rig i was barely getting 50fps on farcry 2 1900*1200

with the new rig i get about 80fps same settings as above. so i would say I7 can make a difference, though a powerful gpu is more important.

GamerPS3606094d ago

2.4 and 3.5 is not same speed :D

zagibu6094d ago

What he is saying that you can't apply the rule for all games. There ARE CPU-intensive games (try Supreme Commander against 7 CPU opponents), and in those games, i7 CAN make a big difference.

But in general, games don't profit much from blazing fast CPUs. It's usually smart to buy a current mainstream model and invest the saved bucks into a better video card.

Aft3rKill6093d ago

You can state that you had a performance gain only because of your i7 since you upgraded your other hardware as well. But still those numbers are quite promising. I would get an i7 if my wattage could handle it. DAM YOU DELL!!!

Avto6094d ago

Well, sure i7 is not getting any more performance I mean if you don't make the game in such a way that it uses the extra power, how will it run any better?

Aft3rKill6093d ago

its over hyped and over priced. I am not willing to pay such an outrageous about of cash. What he said was right but I would not spend it on 16 games rather 2 GTX 260 or equivalent cards.

70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio16d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing16d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9216d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit16d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing16d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9216d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
50°

Report: Injustice 3 in Development at NetherRealm Studios

Thanks to the slip-up of an artist working on the title, we now have more evidence that a new Injustice game is in the works.

50°

Spiders Studio, Developers of GreedFall: The Dying World, Announce Liquidation of the Company

Spiders: "We're going to cut straight to the chase so you're not left wondering: After a long period without clear answers, we have received confirmation that Spiders is being liquidated.

What does it mean? This means the company as a whole no longer exists. We'll cease our functions immediately. The planned DLC will release via Nacon, and then-- well, that's it.

We're sorry that it's come to this and would like to thank each and every one of you for your support over the years.

If you have any questions or run into issues with your games, please contact Nacon directly as we'll no longer be able to reply."