I hate FPS controls on PC too. The only thing I like to play on PC is RTS games.

its true pc's can achive higher graphical settings then consoles, and have the advantage of tons of mods for the game.

But i still find it more enjoyable to play games on my ps3. Its just something about it could be; the controller, freinds list, the envoirnment which i play, its just something about it thats better.

and i know u can have freinds lists and the controller on PC, but idk its just diffrent.

But a good PC could definatly out do ps3 in graphics and loadtimes easily

So you think RTS games are better on a controller? If so hope you enjoy your lack of microing then which is essential in RTS play lol

As for other games such as fighters, action, rpgs, etc. Well you know...PC's do support controllers, it's not like you're bound to just a keyboard and mouse...hell you can even use your PS3 or 360 controller on your PC if you wanted too.

I said VALID counter-points, not stubborn, fanboy babble.

Sure you have to have a nice computer, but PCs are getting cheaper and cheaper, and if you have one already, upgrading your video card is a really inexpensive fix.

You can use a 360 controller for your PC games. I dont know about PS3. Someone should totally google it and find out. :)

This isnt about PC vs Console gaming---b/c they are 2 different realms, so dont try to relate them. This is about PC versions of games LOOKING better than their console counterparts.

Uncharted 2? Seriously. Sit down. You've been out in the Sony Sun for too long. Here, drink this nice cold glass of REALITY.

Uncharted 2 does look amazing graphically and will be a day one for sure but to say we haven't seen anything on PC that looks as good as UC2 is stuuuuuuupid...

Arthur, put a straw in their drinks to help'm get it down a little easier. Free refills are available as well.

OT: I can't wait for Batman to come out. I've played through the demo a few times already to calm my fix. And I'm not gonna lie, that high-res image of Bats looks awesome. Bout time comicbok fans get better comicbook video games. Even Marvel's UA2 got a graphic boost. I know it's not anything on this scale but damnit, it's still welcomed haha.

And not to mention DC Universe and Champions Online are on the way. It's gonna be a good time for comicbook fans.

Come on Arthur. Tell us which your point is. High PC hardware more powerful than consoles?. Yeah of course they are, well not if you got a 2006 PC but a new relatively expensive rig outperforms consoles. However, that is to be expected, dont you think?

In any case, console gamers get MOST PC games, but a PC only guy is seriously missing out. UC2 is definitely a looker and you CANT run it in the most powerful PC. GT5, Forza3, KZ2, Gears2 and many more games are just available on consoles. Does it matter how powerful your rig is when the games you want to play are on consoles?

I would love me some batman:AA on PC but mine just can run it up to consoles quality (720p, no physx, and medium settings) so I rather to play it on my PS3.

the same video card i own..the Geforce GTX 295 ...what a beast :)

"But we still havent seen games on PC looking as good as Uncharted 2."

Rofl, just stop, right there.

http://i4.tinypic.com/7y5ue...

http://media.photobucket.co...

I'm absolutely blown away by Uncharted 2, but anyone with common sense will tell you that a PC has more capabilities than any console, and always will, unless the console allows you to actually change its hardware.

The part that annoys me is that every time someone says PC hasn't outdone KZ2, UC2, GT5, etc. the only game people comment on is Crysis. Crysis is the best looking game available in terms of realism, but no other PC game reaches that level. Sure, resolution and AA on PC games is higher, but that does NOT mean they look better. Again, Crysis is the only game able to match up (and pass) to the console's best (although it has zero artistic value and is an average FPS apart from graphics).

PC = FPS, MMO, and RTS

Console = Pretty much any other type of game.

Some games just play better with M/KB and some are more comfortable(for me) with a controller. Having superior graphics on the PC depends on your rig and honestly while having the best graphics possible is nice, it isn't a HUGE deal IMO. I have a GTX 285 and can run pretty much anything full on, but I would still get Batman: AA on the PS3 over the PC.

Yes I know you can get a game pad for PC but every single one I've ever used I hated. :P

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

100% ingame, 100%real time 100% not crysis :D

Only possible on the pc :D

have a nice day :D

If you knew how big the maps are in this game you would understand why the PC makes console gaming its b*tch.

This game is nowhere near optimized sadly. But as they continue to patch it...It's only going to perform that much better and faster.

@Nikuma

Your aware you can use a ps2, ps3, or 360 controller on the pc right? I myself use a 360 controller for my non fps games.

@evrfighter

I've played ArmA 2 actually and really enjoy it, and yes the amount going on and the size of the game is almost assuredly not able to be replicated on any console (although MAG looks like it will have just as much going on, but probably not as big of maps or effects), however, if your comment was directed at me, I clearly stated I was referring to graphics, and ArmA 2 is not a graphical powerhouse by any means. Not to take anything away technically from it, but just because it has 5000 things going on at once doesn't mean it's more visually appealing than other games with far more detailed graphics. You can't compare a game like this that trades graphical detail for size and scope to something like KZ2, which is far more linear, but far more detailed.

Part of it was directed at you thats true but mainly for console gamers that really do not know that games like this exist (warhawk for example is a pc battlefield clone but not many console gamers know about the legendary franchise that is battlefied). Arma 2 is not a visually unappealing game like your making it out to be. Not many people are able to visually max out Arma 2 (If we're talking view distance slider).

One reason being the game is poorly optimized. It fails to take full advantage of 4gb of ram and quad core. Even on my quad core it only seems to peak at around 50% cpu power used while putting out sub-par (35ish) frame rates.

Saying that UC2 graphics is better then any PC graphics is purely opinion base. While the other way around has facts involved. (because of resolution, texture, AA etc.....)

@raztad

i usualy expect this kind of mindset from a 360 fanboy, a pc nowadays would only cost the same as a ps3 or elite (for a decent one) and it will totally cream both in terms of graphics and game play.

And ARMA 2 actually looks really nice on my rig, even with the sheer size of the map.

playing at those kind of resolution you wont need any AA, i've seen games in 1080p and 720p...just dosent look as impressive as the res i play as on my computer.

Madis, you sir are a failure and a fanboy.