All Channels
Popular
880°

BioWare 'really pumped' to work on PS3

Speaking to VideoGamer.com, vice president of entertainment and miscellaneous at BioWare, and vice president of Electronic Arts, Greg Zeschuk, said that the team's found developing on the PS3 "exciting", and even has its advantages.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
frayer6165d ago

Once exclusive developers are jumping ship and loving the PS3

poor bots

TheDeadMetalhead6164d ago (Edited 6164d ago )

Even Valve are looking for PS3 programmers. ;o

Just wait. The MDF will be on here within an hour saying "B-B-B-B-But you still don't have Mass Effect!!1"

El Botto6164d ago

Google to launch operating system
By Maggie Shiels
Technology reporter, BBC News, Silicon Valley

Chrome logo

Google is developing an operating system (OS) for personal computers, in a direct challenge to market leader Microsoft and its Windows system.

Google Chrome OS will be aimed initially at small, low-cost netbooks, but will eventually be used on PCs as well.

Google said netbooks with Chrome OS could be on sale by the middle of 2010.

"Speed, simplicity and security are the key aspects of Google Chrome OS," the firm said in its official blog.

The operating system, which will run on an open source license, was a "natural extension" of its Chrome browser, the firm said.

For Microsoft the news comes just months before it launches the latest version of its operating system, called Windows 7.

'Back to basics'

"We're designing the OS to be fast and lightweight, to start up and get you onto the web in a few seconds," said the blog post written by Sundar Pichai, vice president of product management, and Google's engineering director Linus Upson.

Both men said that "the operating systems that browsers run on were designed in an era where there was no web" and that this OS is "our attempt to re-think what operating systems should be".

To that end, the search giant said the new OS would go back to basics.

"We are completely redesigning the underlying security architecture of the OS so that users don't have to deal with viruses, malware and security updates.

"It should just work," said Google.

Google already has an operating system for mobile phones called Android which can also be used to run on netbooks. Google Chrome OS will be aimed not just at laptops but also at desktops for those who spend a lot of time on the web.

"Truly competitive"

The announcement could dramatically change the market for operating systems, especially for Microsoft, the biggest player with around 90% share.

"This announcement is huge," said Rob Enderle, industry watcher and president of the Enderle Group.

"This is the first time we have had a truly competitive OS on the market in years. This is potentially disruptive and is the first real attempt by anyone to go after Microsoft.

"Google is coming at this fresh and, because it is based on a set of services that reside on the web, it is the first really post web operating system, designed from the ground up, and reconceived for a web world," Mr Enderle told the BBC.

Last year Google launched the Chrome browser, which it said was designed for "people who live on the web - searching for information, checking email, catching up on the news, shopping or just staying in touch with friends."

Stephen Shankland at CNET said the move had widespread implications.

"One is that it shows just how serious Google is about making the web into a foundation not just for static pages but for active applications, notably its own such as Google Docs and G-mail.

"Another: it opens new competition with Microsoft and, potentially, a new reason for anti-trust regulators to pay close attention to Google's moves."

Some commentators said Google's motivation in all this was pretty clear.

"One of Google's major goals is to take Microsoft out, to systematically destroy their hold on the market," said Mr Enderle.

"Google wants to eliminate Microsoft and it's a unique battle. The strategy is good. The big question is, will it work?"

At the popular blog, TechCrunch, MG Siegler said "Let's be clear on what this really is. This is Google dropping the mother of all bombs on its rival, Microsoft."

Microsoft releases Windows 7 later this year to replace Windows Vista and Windows XP which is eight years old.

The Redmond based company claims that 96% of netbooks run Windows to date.

Out of beta

In a separate announcement Google also revealed that many of its most popular applications had finally moved out of trial, or beta, phase.

Gmail, for example, has worn the beta tag for five years.

"We realise this situation puzzles some people, particularly those who subscribe to the traditional definition of beta software as being not yet ready for prime time," wrote Matthew Glotzbach, the director of product management in the official Google blog.

The decision to ditch the beta tag was taken because the apps had finally reached the "high bar" mark, he wrote.

More than 1.75 million companies use Google apps, according to the firm.

-MD-6164d ago

You've yet to receive one of their games while we're already enjoying them and you're bragging? LOL

TheDeadMetalhead6164d ago

I was right! =D

"Just wait. The MDF will be on here within an hour saying "B-B-B-B-But you still don't have Mass Effect!!1""

Then 5 minutes later...

"You've yet to receive one of their games while we're already enjoying them and you're bragging? LOL"

I must be psychic or something. ;o

-MD-6164d ago

What I said had nothing to do with what you said.

Why do you have a bad game as your avatar?

Mo0eY6164d ago

Murderdolls pooped his panties.

MGOelite6164d ago

murderdolls why do you have a bad developer as your avatar?

-MD-6164d ago

"murderdolls why do you have a bad developer as your avatar? "

Yeah like I didn't see that coming.

sorry you're too young to remember Donkey Kong, Battletoads, Perfect Dark or Goldeneye. Son.

Sez 6164d ago (Edited 6164d ago )

and konami,squarenix,capcom,namco, (tekken series)ect. would like to say hello. all use to make games exclusively for the ps brand. now jumps ship. POOR DROIDS. see what i did there. ;)

@TheDeadMetalhead

and droids are still saying. bu bu bu but you still don't have Movie gear solid 4. then when a once exclusive game now goes mutli-plat. droids stop crying. bu bu bu bu that game/dev was never exclusive to the PS brand. LOL

iDystopia6164d ago

lol look forward to seeing those Bioware Exclusives on PS3.

The few multiplatform they decide to put on PS3 will looks better on 360, just like Dragon Age.

TheDeadMetalhead6164d ago (Edited 6164d ago )

@ vega75 - "konami"

So they bring one game to the 360 and suddenly that means they "jumped ship"?

"squarenix"

Oh really? Last time I checked, FFVersusXIII and FFXIV were PS3 exclusive, and FFXIII is still exclusive in Japan. Again, they brought ONE game to 360, and that means they "jumped ship"?

"capcom"

Please explain this one to me. Street Fighter IV, Resident Evil 5, Mega Man 9, they were all multiplat. Where exactly did Capcom change anything? They've always supported all of the current consoles, even back in the 90s (Street Fighter II on Genesis, Resident Evil on Saturn, etc.).

"namco"

Again, how did they "jumps ship"? Just because Tekken 6 is now multiplat? What does that change? I'm still going to be playing the game on my PS3. It's not like it went 360 exclusive. =/

@Aaron Greentard below - Your name implies that you like PS3, yet your comment bashes both the 360 and PS3. I must admit, I am thoroughly stumped. Nicely done.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 6164d ago
lloyd_wonder6165d ago (Edited 6165d ago )

I've been a Bioware fan since Kotor on PC. Never owned an xbox console.

Good to know they'll be supporting the PS3 in the future. Hopefully, DA is a great game.

leila016164d ago (Edited 6164d ago )

That's what the Ghost Busters developers said...

I hope it's not just all talk though.

thereapersson6164d ago

Unlike Terminal Reality, Bioware is a trusted developer with an extremely high development pedigree. I'm sure that if they were to make such claims, they would also have something to show for it.

clintos596164d ago

I bet they would be able to generate killzone 2/uncharted 2 like graphics if they ever made an exclusive ps3 game. I can only imagine, but good to see them supporting the ps3, u can bet they will be as happy as EA with the revenue the ps3 will be bringing in for them.

Imagine them putting mass effect 1 & 2 on one bluray & selling it for $99.99 I would definately buy it. :]

JoySticksFTW6164d ago

“It's new. Because we already had experience on 360, that kind of got ahead a little bit, but now we pretty much caught up. Actually it was very exciting. People on the team were really pumped to work on it. They were like, wow. We have a lot of people that like doing new stuff and trying new things, and they were like, wow another platform, can't wait! It's been good.”

We need more dev teams like this. Excited to learn something new and step out of their comfort zone.

FarEastOrient6164d ago

You can add me to he list that would pay $100 to get both Mass Effect 1 and 2 on the same disc. I actually liked Mass Effect better on the PC than on my Xbox 360, probably because most of the problems were ironed out by the time the PC came out.

Christopher6164d ago (Edited 6164d ago )

BioWare to the PS3 is the biggest win PS3 will ever get for me other than exclusives. I bought a 360 just for Mass Effect and will continue to buy BioWare's games wherever I have to in order to play them. This is the only third-party developer where I can make such a statement. They have never let me down and based on what they showed at E3 it's going to be a very long time until they will.

The best part about this is if BioWare can put out good PS3 games, then EA will likely take what they've learned and a few of their guys to lead other PS3 developments to ensure the same level of quality on the console. It's a win-win situation, honestly.

edhe6164d ago

They didn't even take advantage of the 360 - they had a mediocre instance of the unreal engine3 on ME1. They'll never wring out ps3 power with that kind of attitude.

Will be interesting to see what me2's doing in the engine.

Chubear6164d ago

You don't have to imagine it cause that's going to be happening next year when EA brings ME to the PS3 and it won't be $99 either but more like $79.99 for the ME1&2 edition while ME2 will be regular price - BOOK IT! XD

La Chance6164d ago

Cant wait to get the 360 version of Dragons Age.

spongeboob6164d ago

How many times have we heard this from developers only to be let down time and time again. I will hold my excitement for when i see the proof, thank you.

meepmoopmeep6164d ago

Greg Zeschuk, said that the team's found developing on the PS3 "exciting"

:)

Marquis_de_Sade6164d ago

leila, please don't mention Terminal Reality in the same sentence as Bioware, unless of course you're talking of how much better Bioware are. KotOR and Mass Effect are two of the greatest games I have played, gripping story lines and sublime gameplay, you could call me a Bioware fanboy I suppose.

Anyway, to the topic in question, it's nice to see a developer with such a good attitude towards learning something new, kudos Bioware!

evrfighter6164d ago (Edited 6164d ago )

Come on people. Most of you are stuck on graphics more than anything else. With Bioware expect to play great games with them. Just don't expect any technological killers from them. You'll only disappoint yourselves.

Bioware makes great games not tech demos. IMO they are the saving grace of rpg's this gen. This is why Star Wars: The Old Republic is going to be an mmo unlike any other.

beeeffess6164d ago

@1.13

I enjoy Bioware games as much as the next guy. Loved KoTOR.

But I still think making the next game an MMO is a bad decision. It could be the best MMO ever. But with one obvious competitor (although the Old Republic is a new MMO rather than a copy cat) I don't see it doing well.

That's not to say I want it to be a failure. I want it to do well. I'm sick of chore-like MMO grindfests.

aaron58296164d ago

Bioware is not known for graphics... they are known for the gameplay.

So, to me, graphics arent important... even on multiplats, i can live with the usual "washed out" or "blur" graphics, just as long as it performs smoothly.

I cant stand frame rate drops.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 6164d ago
TheDeadMetalhead6164d ago (Edited 6164d ago )

Bioware FTW.

I'm definitely going to get Dragon Age: Origins. =D

6164d ago Replies(5)
6164d ago Replies(4)
Show all comments (172)
220°

EA Turned Down BioWare's Pitch For A Dragon Age Origins Remake Or A Remastered Trilogy

EA turned down BioWare's pitch to work on a remake of Dragon Age Origins or a remastered Dragon Age Trilogy, according to a new report.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Terry_B287d ago

Thats a pity. A remaster Trilogy would sell a lot better than the game they released last year.

TheEroica286d ago

Speak for yourself... Some of us are tired of remastered/remakes. Maybe this industry could show a little originality or progress a thought forward. Pass on dragon age remastered. Make a competent dragon age game or fold up shop.

FullmetalRoyale286d ago

They did speak for themselves.

jambola286d ago

At what point did they indicate they were speaking for anyone else?

Lionsguard285d ago

No, they would have just ruined it by retconning things with their agenda.

Ristul285d ago

Exactly, while I love the orginal game (origins) they would have censured the hell out of it and replaced it with wokeness.

-Foxtrot287d ago

I would have rather seen a remake of Origins which added onto it with more content than Dragon Age 4

If successful they could have continued on from it ignoring the other DA games.

Christopher287d ago

Lore dump in Veilguard was very good and I enjoyed the game for that.

I would not at all be opposed to more of a 'remake' of the first game, though. Not sure a 'remaster' with better graphics and whatnot would really pull me in if it didn't include more updated controls and gameplay.

Armaggedon286d ago

Yeah, your right about the lore, and thats the reason I like dragon age in the first place. I think thats why theres such a divide with veilguard. Those that fell in love with dragon age for the rpg mechanics were gravely disappointed.

pwnmaster3000287d ago (Edited 287d ago )

Honestly I tried getting into dragon age 4 but just couldn’t man and it wasn’t that political BS, annoying yes, but not game killing. It just wasn’t it for me.
I would rather they just remake the original and stay true to the original

anast286d ago

It's not a good game. But if a few trans and gay people upset you, then you have some issues with stuff beyond politics.

pwnmaster3000286d ago

Didn’t care for it.
Annoying yes, because it’s dragon age.
That whole trans and binary just didnt fit in and felt force.

But like I said it wasn’t game killing. I just found it boring.

andy85286d ago

Ill always have the argument you only see it if you go looking for it. Im not gay or trans, it was a 2 minute scene you can literally skip and then you dont see any more of it in the game. Didn't bother me at all.

pwnmaster3000286d ago (Edited 286d ago )

@andy
It really wasn’t 2 min and it was pretty much one characters identity lol.
Like I said it wasn’t game killing.

But to pretend it wasn’t stupid the way they went about it.
Sounded like something from our world would say.
Like wtf, i want fantasy to run away from our world.
I think it’s dumb asf to use real world terminology for real world problems in a game that isn’t set in ours world/altworld

Armaggedon286d ago

Understandable, it is a very different game in many ways.

@anast
I think it was a good game. Who is actually right here?

anast285d ago

It's not a good game. People people liking something is not always a good metric. People like sh%& games, I even like a few sh&% games myself.

Armaggedon284d ago (Edited 284d ago )

Thats the understanding people lack.

People set standards of what is “good”. Interestingly, it is a strange form of confirmation bias, in which people look for evidence to support what they deem “good or bad” about a title. That is why we have so many people that say that starfield does nothing new…when that is literally what it does..something new…for Bethesda at least.

I have had people call me trash before, moments before I obliterate them in whatever it is we are playing. Broaden your awareness, and you will know of what I speak.

isarai287d ago

That's ok, they probably would've sullied it somehow anyways

LucasRuinedChildhood287d ago

What was wrong with Mass Effect Legendary Edition?

Terry_B286d ago

Miranda Lawson..and a bit more.

franwex286d ago

Right? I’m actually glad they left it alone.

Show all comments (42)
100°

Next Year, I Promise I Will Play A Different Character In Dragon Age: Origins

I've played the exact same Warden in Dragon Age: Origins for years. In 2025, I will finally make a different one. Maybe.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
CoNn3rB509d ago

Tried it before, doesn't work. I tried to to play a Dalish archer but ended up being a Dwarf Noble warrior again, must be a bug

OtterX509d ago

Next year is tomorrow, so you'll start a new character tomorrow, right? 🤔

OtterX509d ago

It's not now, at least where I live. It's 2025 as of 2 hours ago. :P

Bercilak509d ago

Seriously? I play every playable character there is: a male human noble.

TheColbertinator509d ago

My preferred origin is Dalish Elf Archer that recruits the Templars, Baelen's Dwarves with Golems and Dalish Elves. Took me 3 playthroughs to lock down a "true" file for me. What a game.

508d ago
130°

Does Dragon Age: The Veilguard Top Dragon Age: Origins?

How does BioWare's latest stack up against its best offerings?

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
LordoftheCritics566d ago

LOL

DAO pioneered a new era for cinematic rpgs while Vainguard pioneered well shampood hair.

VenomUK565d ago (Edited 565d ago )

I bought Dragon Age: Origins at launch and I enjoyed it. It didn't pioneer diddly squat. What did it do that Mass Effect hadn't done already?

Armaggedon565d ago

People miss variables easily.lol

TheNamelessOne565d ago

Long story - no
Short story - no

Armaggedon565d ago

Depends who you ask. For me it did, and dragon age origins is still to this day my most replayed single player game.

MeatyUrologist565d ago

Wow, so sounds like you would put Veilguard up there as an all time favorite? Just curious what you love about it. I'm about 10 hours in and nothing has really grabbed me other than the gorgeous environments and animations

Armaggedon565d ago (Edited 565d ago )

What I liked about dragon age has always been the lore. Origins introduced concepts, but they didn’t really start toying with it until dragon age 2. Veilguard still has the lore and sense of mystery for me, but it also has the combat. I am more of martial arts kind of player. Games like Devil may cry, wo long fallen dyansty sekiro, or fighting games are what Im usually playing if I am not playing an rpg. I usually like role playing a super strong warrior, which this game lets you do, and it lets me concentrate on my specific character. One of the things keeping me from playing Baldurs Gate 3 offline is the fact that I have no choice but to control all of my team members. For me, that takes me out of the role playing experience when I am a gallant knight that has to always use a mage or rogue in combat. It was alot better playing with friends though.

For a game to be “good” for a player, it has to have a hook, and veilguard has several things that hook me in from combat, loot, to lore, and even the characters. Some games just dont have a popular hook that rakes in alot of people, so I always understand if someone doesnt like a specific experience. But when people start saying things are trash, thats when I say it gets borderline disrespectful.

SoloZelot90565d ago

In what way is the combat and build diversity good?

Devil may cry has the style meter that encourages good combat. It also has enemy variety...veilgaurd doesn't. Veilgaurds builds are pretty much non-existent. The itemization is boring due to its extreme linearity.

As far as lore goes...I guess you're fine with them butchering the qunari.

Armaggedon565d ago

. If people can have fun with souls game combat, they should be okay with the combat in veilguard? Learn to view a games attributes in respect to the entire game instead of viewing everything in isolation. Devil may cry, all you do 98 percent of the time is beat the crap out of stuff….. of course its going to have more enemy variety and deeper combat. Thats the whole game😂
I dont too much care for what they did with the qunari, but Im not going to get caught up on it. Only an empty cup can be filled.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 565d ago
Armaggedon565d ago

In terms of traditional rpg aspects, origins wins. In terms of scale, presentation, and refined simplicity, Veilguard wins. Its not as simple as game A is better than game B, we have to set parameters

For example: Are there people that think origins is better? Yes, alot of them. Is it though? That is debatable.

SoloZelot90565d ago (Edited 565d ago )

Huh?

Okay in terms of story and choices as well as outcomes and character progression and writing...origins does it better.

In terms of combat decisions, diversity in encounters and strategies as well as meaningful power progression and itemization...origins does it better

In terms tone...that's more a preference...I'm not a fan of the change in direction....prefer dark fantasy and gore that origins brought.

I will give you the simplicity and eye candy vistas though the graphics have less to do with the game and more to do with videogames graphic progression. As far as simplicity...yes 100% veilgaurd wins there. The combat is so simple and mundane it is made for the casuals too busy on their phones to care too much about complex systems.

And before you tell me that the writing being bad is my opinion ..first maybe go check what actual writers have to say about it. People go for degrees about this type of thing.

Armaggedon565d ago (Edited 565d ago )

They follow a certain set of rules that is decided upon by the supposedly fallible, as to how things are supposed to be done. Does not make them untouchable because they have a degree. What they say is of interest, but it should not be considered gospel by anyone with awareness of how things work in this existence. I have bested opponents that are considered professional level, and Im not one myself. I have likewise learned from those not considered to be at my level in a specific area. Alot of that is subjective. In terms of character progression, Im seeing more in veilguard. In terms of story, it was simply gather treaties to fight darkspawn. This game is very similar: collect people to help stop the evanuris. Im more invested in this. The evanuris debit, is akin to Madara Uchihas build up and subsequent appearance in Naruto. They have been building towards this for three games. For me, what I am experiencing is hooking me in far more than origins.

And what is meaningful power progression? I never get to make the Sage of Strength true to form in these rpgs because warriors are always so normal, never possessing the herculean strength to role play the way I want. This game is one of the only rpgs I have played where the warrior feels superhuman. Whos to say that causing an earthquake with a stomp is not more meaningful to me than what origins has? Origins is more tactical, but more meaningful? Debatable
When setting these parameters, it is of paramount importance to detach oneself from personal bias, otherwise it will defeat the purpose.

SoloZelot90565d ago

Only for those with tremendously low standards and/or who are trying to push an agenda into gaming.

I'm thinking it's really just the former...that's what I hope anyways.

In no way, shape or form does this game come even remotely close to the nearest galaxy far away from dragon age origins or dragon age 2 for that matter.

Armaggedon565d ago

Lets not get hyperbolic now.

jznrpg564d ago (Edited 564d ago )

I really disliked 2 so I doubt it’s worse than that one but I am haven’t played Veilguard yet so I can’t say until I do

SoloZelot90564d ago (Edited 564d ago )

2 is my favourite for 2 reasons. Companions were all incredible...it's where we got varric after all.

And the events after each act actually have meaning. Sure the end state doesn't vary much but the storytelling surrounding each act ending as well as the possible outcomes is magnificent. I won't get into spoilers but loved that about the 2nd. I'm willing to have my mind changed but I've yet to encounter anyone able to tell me specifically what was so horrible and detrimental to the second that you don't also get in something like inquisition.

Inquisition is up there with it for me. I can recall all companions or most from both games and remember them fondly. Same for Kotor. But with inquisition I can't recall a single character outside of solas and the woman templar but only slightly to be honest.

jznrpg564d ago

I’d guess it doesn’t top it for me as I really enjoyed the first game but I can’t say for sure without playing both of them

Armaggedon564d ago

Depends on what you liked about origins. If it was the story and lore buildup, then you will probably be fine. If its the roleplaying aspects, veilguard is probably a hard pass because the rpg aspects seem extremely light, especially compared to dragon age origins. Choices and consequences do exist, but they seem to be small scale so far.

Show all comments (25)