O yeah sure MS and Sony aren't doing such thing?

Not all games need motion plus, so its NOT a MUST perse.
At least its here now.

microsoft and sony do the same thing, but not the extent of the Wii,

the wii is more expensive the the 360 right now.. thats not right,

and you have to pay a 100$ dollars if you want to add another controller,

thats the point i am making, not sure how people disagree with that.

The raking in money from add-ons goes like this:
1. Nintendo
2. Microsoft
3. Sony

Nintendo is a money eater. Up front, you would pay US $40 for wiimote, $20 for nunchuck, and now $20 just for a gyro meter?

Microsoft add-ons are expensive, especially the wifi addon. I can't have a 50ft cable running through my house.

Sony has most things ready right out of the box. The only thing i don't like is $55 for dualshock 3.

" This is what the nunchuck was meant to do since the begining"
Eh no, the Wii-mote works as it should, They never promised full 1:1 motion enabled games. The Accelerometer alone couldn't provide that.

" .i mean, its very bad that they only introduce it now to make a quick buck AFTER they've made loads of quick bucks....
"

O no a company wants to make money....the horror..
Seriously =/ get real.

I respectfully but vehemently disagree here .
Many of us (myself included) bought the wii and it's hype based on the actually made promised of real movement reproduction , without stuff like wii motion plus .

People expected (and rightfully so) stuff like real time and accurate lightsaber fights , or like that scenes in sony's e3 demo , with the buckler and sword .

We didnt really or at all get that .I aknowledged that red steel was just a first effort that could and is already being improved with the sequel ...

I didnt dwell on zelda not featuring advanced recognition and fighting mecanics , because it was a launch title and a gamecube port to boot ... but i was surprised to see most action games that followed didnt do much more .

It doesnt prevent great games to still exist on the console , but so far out of the list i've tried or bought of games , and not counting what i count as "shovelware" , i can only remember resident evil 4 (and following remakes i guess) , Metroid , PES 09 (cause it's actually a quite revolution for soccer games) , maybe tiger woods 09 , Fragile , that actually utilise fully and accurately use the wiimote . I probably forgot one or two game , but imo that list is very short

Again , not fully using the potential of the wiimote or using even the pad didnt prevents great games , but i'm just saying , it's far from what was promised , and now only start with motion plus

" We didnt really or at all get that .I aknowledged that red steel was just a first effort that could and is already being improved with the sequel ... "

This is the thing, Ubi said its not 1:1 in full(Keyword: FULL - rotation included) motion controls.
It was pointed out by many developers.

People want to hear or see what they want to hear or see.

" it's far from what was promised"
What was promised exactly? Nintendo even said its pretty much the point to use your imagination. Yeah lots of games have simple waggle controls, but it was up to the player to interpret the motion.

Seriously they promised no such thing as full 1:1 motion controls.
If they did i would like to have a source of some sort.

maybe you're right , i dunno . But so far an eyetoy cost 29$ or less and doesnt use alkaline batteries .

Will depends on the cost of the wand .

hell i dont think sony even knows clearly what they want , between claims it might work with even the ps3 pad and a wand , or two wands , or one ...

How did Sony get into this conversation/article again? And Sony never touted Sixaxis to be the emphasis of their games, or even gave the impression that they were trying to offer 1:1 motion tracking. Yes, it was a shoe-in gimmick to their controllers that I found unnecessary, but do any of their games (minus PSN titles) really focused on needing it to be accurate? No.

Sony's only real efforts were to try to enhance the games' experience with them. You can't say the same about the Wii, as its library is almost solely based around such controls. So the add-on is in fact more important to the system than Sixaxis. But to bash the MotionPlus wouldn't be right given that Nintendo wasn't sure about the technology in the first place, let alone the impact and popularity it would now have. And as the pioneer of this whole motion-gaming rage that's going on with all three companies, of course the tech might not be up to expectations at the start.

But hey, if you want to try to bash Sony whenever you find the chance (I've seen your other posts) go ahead...

I would understand the bashing if Sony's new motion controllers were not 1:1 or did not act like the demo shown, or if all that was released was gimmicky shovelware for it but until any of that happens, you can't bash it preemptively.

"How did Sony get into this conversation/article again?"
Sony isn't it the article at all, but comparisons are bound to happen since Sony's motion controller looks similar

Tiger Woods 10 is a great deal. You get the motion plus for $10 instead of $25.