All Channels
Popular
190°

Media Molecule's praise for PS3

The team behind LittleBigPlanet, Media Molecule, has been discussing the background to its eye-catching game in an exclusive Develop interview - and has plenty of good things to say about host format PS3...

Read Full Story >>
developmag.com
Bigmac5736961d ago

I hope they can live up to the hype with this one.

TheExecutive6960d ago

How much hype is there? It isn't an impossible game to make. It is, however, new. Sony will make it thei poster child for HOME, developers will love it, gamers will love it, and we will love it.

However, the hype for it isnt that unrealistic...

SmokeyMcBear6961d ago

very interesting, I can't wait for this game. Its a good view of a developer that had come to develop for the ps3 with no legacy code. They seem to enjoy coding for the ps3. Yes it is a change in development, it could be a good thing, getting people to think outside the box rather than just repeat the code they have always used. This can only be good for the industry.

J@D6960d ago

Excellent, I can't wait to play LBP.

StrboyM6960d ago

start from sratch on any of the new consoles it will be more rewarding than expecting to bring last gen tools and engines. only the unreal engine is overuses... and i think that will fade away when edge is widely distributed

JOLLY16960d ago (Edited 6960d ago )

I watched the littlebigplanet videos and I din't get it. What is so exciting about this game? Honestly, I'm not trying to bag it. I just seriously don't get what even looks fun.

BIadestarX6960d ago

We don't know, but who cares! It's Sony so are used to it! Hype Machine! We don't much about the game or it's game play but those freaken PR agents are just too good to ignore.

SmokeyMcBear6960d ago

the physics man, the pure physics of gameplay. The user created content. Make your own levels, load them up for other ps3 users to play. All you really gotta know to understand is... the DEVELOPERS at the DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE, went absolutely nuts when this game was presented. I would think DEVELOPERS would be the harshest critics, not fanboys that don't even own the console.

JOLLY16960d ago (Edited 6960d ago )

doesn't every game have physics? The physics in forza are awesome! Okay, there are physics. There is user created content, Okay. How are you going to create it? Do you have to own a dev kit? All I know is little muchkin people were playing around with big stuff. If I wanted a non-game I would just make some lame 3d environment, where I could "user create" my own furniture and apartment, where all my friends could visit. Of course they could only visit while my machine was turned on. that's fine though, I would make another non-game that made people want to keep their system on all day. I'll tell them that they are going to solve world hunger....or cancer...something of that nature. Once again...I ask...what looks so fun about this little big planet?

SmokeyMcBear6960d ago

dude what the hell are you talking about?? I think you are getting like 4 seperate things confused into one. LBP is a game, and no you do not need a dev kit. It has tools withing the game itself, to create a level. It is a platform game with the most amazing physics that are offered in that type of game. I'm not sure what you mean by the physics in forza.. you mean the way you turn a corner? I think you are seriously misguided in the programing of physics in a gaming world. Also you are confusing HOME with LBP, two totally separate things, one is a game, the other is an online service.. wow, why am i even bothering, do some research before you spout some asinine question.

JOLLY16960d ago (Edited 6960d ago )

little big planet isn't a game. It's a tech demo. The physics weren't spectacular. stuff moved and fell. Congrats on the wonderful physics. If you want to talk about a game with great physics, you'd talk about Forza. (that's why I referenced the game). What was the spectacular gameplay? people walking (and skateboarding) in a world (you can do that in home). It looked like they were playing around (just like playing some frames of bowling in home). So the "user created content" (I think home has that) is cookie cutter. You don't actually make anything! You just use assets that the developers give you. Excitebike did that in the 80's. So, everyone can make the same levels out of the same assets and they can share them with the rest of the world. Then everyone can compare whose world looks like the others.....fun!

TheExecutive6960d ago

Yes. ^^^^ all of the above. What is so spectacular about this game? Physics? No. Gameplay? No. Hype? No. the main point of this game is user shared content.

Jolly... I know you are talking about physics, but what the hell does forza have to do with LBP? ( Plus what does forza offer thta GT doesnt?) IT IS ABOUT USER CONTENT. Not about physics... if someone says it is about physics, well.. that is just wrong.

TheExecutive6960d ago

i read your post again... just to make sure the forza part made sense. What is so great about forza's physics engine that you need to speak of it?? I am sorry to stick to this point.. but what about forza?

Babylonian6960d ago

Go play Excitebike, cause I know I will be playing LBP.

fenderputty6960d ago

"Excitebike did that in the 80's. So, everyone can make the same levels out of the same assets and they can share them with the rest of the world. Then everyone can compare whose world looks like the others.....fun!"

You see, there's this little thing called and eye toy now.

Seriously though, you act like we have a minimal set of things that can be done. I'm pretty sure the # of different combinations one can conceive is much greater in this game than in excite bike. And like another poster has said, the internet adds a lot to the game.

m000b16960d ago

Nothing is spectacular to biased hyprocritical idiots, like jolly and bladestar. If the 360 does not have it they disagree.

anh_duong6960d ago (Edited 6960d ago )

appear in every single post about ps3?? i don't mean to be rude but why is bladestar obsessed about the ps3 even when he doesn't own one - infact he hates it.. hmm. this can't be normal nor healthy behaviour..

techie6960d ago

"What was the spectacular gameplay? people walking (and skateboarding) in a world (you can do that in home). It looked like they were playing around (just like playing some frames of bowling in home)."

DUde you did not watch littlebigplanet! You watched HOME. You were watching HOME my friend.

Little big planet has some of the best graphics I have ever seen in a video. Please search out the HD video and find the amazing textures it has. Everything is physics based in this game...everything has the weight you give to it. You create it as you go along. Look watch this video Jolly and everybody else stop jumping on the Jolly train when he hasnt seen the relevant demonstration of the game.

Here's the demonstration... http://www.gametrailers.com...

Here's the HD video. Enjoy http://www.gametrailers.com...

BIadestarX6960d ago

Why I'm I here? Cause I can... then again I am willing to make a deal. I will not comment on PS3 articles if you and all Sony fanboys don't comment on 360 articles... yeah.. that's going to happen. (though I didn't say anything that's not logical. Take what I said about this game for example... I never say it will not be great game... but it's hyped. We don't know much about this game, what will users be able to do or how extensive it will be. The game play, etc. Sony display a few minutes of a tech demo and pull the PR hat and started to talk about how great the game will be.. That's it. That's all you got. Not hyped?
You Sony fanboys are always acusing xbox 360 games or being hyped yet the most anticipated game on the PS3 is a tech demo where not even a story line or objective is defined. right....

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 6960d ago
Show all comments (38)
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel722d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga720d ago (Edited 720d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow721d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo182720d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie720d ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow720d ago (Edited 720d ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

720d ago
Hereandthere720d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 720d ago
Notellin720d ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

720d ago
Hereandthere720d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow719d ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere720d ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow719d ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX720d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney719d ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody720d ago (Edited 720d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno720d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Sheppard2720d ago

How did Sony kill the series?

Inverno720d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

720d ago
fsfsxii720d ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno720d ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)
320°

Most Offensive Video Games That Would Never Cut It Today

Times are changing, and these games would have never been made in today's climate.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
thorstein774d ago (Edited 774d ago )

Every single time someone uses this phrase whether it's music, movies, books, comics, video games, etc it's always the same claim.

The ubiquitous "they" won't allow it to be made. And every decade these claims are made the claimant completely ignores all the "offensive" material that is published when the claim is made.

In ten years, you can write a new article about how you can't make games like Helldivers 2, Resident Evil VIII, Mortal Kombat I, Dragon's Dogma 2, Alan Wake 2 etc etc etc any more.

MrBaskerville773d ago

Yeah, people wouldn't be constantly outraged if there weren't games that people found enraging. The whole SBI discourse shit wouldn't be a thing if all games were inoffensive. A game like Starfield can make a guy froth at his mouth, so there will always be room for a list like this.

0hMyGandhi772d ago

Normally, I'd be inclined to agree with you, but there are massive caveats.
TV shows like Venture Bros, Ren and Stimpy, and Aqua Team wouldn't/couldn't be made today. Hell, Ren and Stimpy was a *children's* show, same thing with Rocko's Modern Life.

It's not for some arbitrary reason, either. It's branding and IP alignment. Companies are far more risk-averse than they were when I was kid in the 90's. Of course, you have companies coming out of the woodwork to hell spur on similar content, but remember: Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon and some incredibly provocative material.

And for movies? it's pretty obvious. American Pie/Wedding Crashers/Eurotrip among many other "raunch coms" have fallen out of style, and are absolutely outside what the modern day film industry is willing to stand by.
Ace Ventura 1 and 2, Dumb and Dumber, Freddy Got Fingered, Rat Race, Harold and Kumar, and Van Wilder follow suit.

Remember: I am not explicitly talking about films put onto streamers. I am talking wide-releases in actual theaters. Same thing goes for games: Carmageddon, Duke Nukem, Manhunt, Six Days In Fallujah (with their original concept), Hatred, and so on and so forth. Of course, I'd be inclined to mention most tactical shooters like Rainbow Six and Joint Ops as well, due to cultural sensitivity regarding *who* you are shooting and why.

And not all of it is bad (obviously). Tastes change, and perspectives change to fit the demographic.
I should add that I'm a lefty, living in L.A. Working in film.

thorstein772d ago

The Boys, Invincible, Jojo Rabbit, Deadpool, Gen V, Last of Us, Banshee... There are plenty of media being made today that people will claim "can't be made today".

Profchaos772d ago

Yeah but if you consider manhunt which was basically a snuff film could you seriously make that game with high than PS2 era graphics.

thorstein772d ago

The Outlast Trials just came out.

But the storyline of Manhunt was that you were executed. But then lived. And if you didn't do as you were told, you'd die. And the people you killed were not innocents.

It was all filmed by a psychopath.

As we speak GTA VI is being finished up for a release. You get to play a Bonnie and Clyde type of protagonist who run up against the law.

Bodycam looks so real.

People are making those games. Articles like this will always exist no matter how incorrect they are, no matter how many times they blame "them" for whatever it is "they" do to prevent "those" games from being made.

ZycoFox773d ago

The UK is the biggest junk country pandering to that nonsense as well, with laws against free speech and expression to match. It got so bad even Rowan Atkinson made a video on free speech about it.

Now the UK raises the age rating on harmless films like Mary Poppins, it's just a load of pansy weak ass nonsense.

MrDead773d ago (Edited 773d ago )

The right wing Tories have been in power in the UK for the 14 years you know the ones that are "anti-woke", blame them for your perceptions.

Killer2020UK773d ago (Edited 773d ago )

Are these snowflakes in the room with us now?

This is more faux outrage designed to get hits. The consequences are unfortunately creating hysteria amongst those willing to buy into it and blame "them" or "the left" or "liberals" meanwhile the left are kicking off about genocide, actual real world abhorrent acts. Nobody is campaigning to censor this shit.

Huey_My_D_Long772d ago

Not too mention the fact that some of these game are controversial for you know, underage porn and encouraging rape.

So either the guy just came in to comment snowflakes without reading anything, or he is calling people snowflakes for having a problem with said titles. Crazy how much brain rot someone can have.

banger88773d ago

Dead Island: "The early PC version of the zombie game swapped the playable character Purna’s Gender Wars skill with a prototype name, which shouldn’t be mentioned directly. The skill name made fun of both Purna as a character and feminists."

"Feminist Whore" lmao

gold_drake773d ago

ill add one more to the list.
drakengard 1.

its ridiculous tho, especially since they'd still be able to find their place in alot of places in the world. except america of course ha. and maybe Australia.

ppl are so sensitive these days. ha. but it is what it is.

Barlos773d ago (Edited 773d ago )

They're not offensive.

And we need another Fat Princess. Fantastic little game!

Some people just have no sense of humour if this sort of thing offends them. They need to lighten up and stop taking themselves so seriously.

Deeeeznuuuts773d ago

Would love a new fat princess game 🤟

CantThinkOfAUsername773d ago

Games literally about sexual assault, mass genocide, bombing civilians, and school shooting. None of which is satirical.

isarai773d ago

Actually it's about fat princesses

Huey_My_D_Long772d ago (Edited 772d ago )

Its crazy that people are fixated on Fat princess when clearly the list is going over controversies, and not all of them are equal. Like way worse examples but pretend the entire list is like that.

Show all comments (37)
70°

Top 20 Best PlayStation 3 Games (20-11)

Alex DS. from Link Cable Gaming writes: "Is the PlayStation 3 retro? This is a surprisingly hard question to answer as the system definitely has the age to be considered retro, having launched in 2006, over 15 years ago now. But with it being home to so many massive games, many of which still hold up today and in fact were released for the PlayStation 4 when that console was released, make the PS3 a retro console that doesn’t feel retro."

Read Full Story >>
linkcablegaming.com
shinoff21831459d ago

No ps3 is not retro. I dont even consider ps2 era retro. All imo.

shinoff21831459d ago

Typically, the term retro is given to items which are at least 20 years old (but not yet 40 years old).

Quick google search

badz1491459d ago

No the PS3 is not yet a retro console. But if you're gonna put 1 game from a series in this list, then LBP2 should be there instead of the original, Motorstorm PR is also an overall better game than the 1st game and to put Tools of Destruction over A Crack in Time is a blasphemy when ACiT is the best game in the series.