All Channels
Popular
710°

Boycotters respond to Valve's reponse

Administrator of boycott group says: "While we are excited about the idea of new content, we are still in the dark about it..."

Read Full Story >>
allaboutthegames.co.uk
qface646197d ago

lol its probably 1 new gun that's it xD
no seriously i doubt its anything big though maybe something they came up with last minute to calm the angry fans down

6196d ago
Pixel_Addict6196d ago (Edited 6196d ago )

fermcr11, Left 4 Dead was released only a few months ago. That fact is made worse because the game's single player campaign (if you can call it that) is criminally short. It takes around a little more than 4 hours to beat. The only thing L4D fans have left is the multplayer and even that portion of the game isn't as robust as it should be.

What L4D fans are angry about is the notion that Valve would make such a content starved title, then promise to release DLC to make up for it then suddenly announce a brand new L4D game, and just to add insult to injury, L4D2 looks to be exactly the same... only it will cost 50 dollars and it will split up the L4D online community. Sounds like Valve has been studying the old Microsoft strategy of business. Release a product without proper support then suddenly release a slightly different version... at full price no less.

I really could care less and I don't feel one bit sorry for the fans, because all the while Gabe and company have been giving millions of PS3 owners the shaft for years.

That doesn't mean that don't have a legitimate gripe with Valve.
So to sum it up for you, you are not clever and Gabe and Valve are complete jerks.

cyberwaffles6196d ago (Edited 6196d ago )

good job sack boi. you are what most people would call a tool. valve most likely thinks, "hook line and sinker."

how can valve go from one of the most appreciated game developers of all time (still are in a lot of ways), to just lackadaisical ones?

valve honestly hasn't brought anything special lately, except maybe portal and the half life episodes. everything else has been extremely standard from them, no matter what you think. same FPS, different paint job. i was expecting valve to really separate themselves from the competition this generation since they did it extremely well last gen, but now (imo) they're just average developers pushing out titles for the sake of quick cash.

that's the bad thing about resting on your laurels i guess.

Pistolero6196d ago

I don't care about the boycotters. I'll be playing a great game while those crybabies are missing out. I'm sorry if that sounds harsh or insulting, but I absolutely despise people like that. They are the same kind of people that sue for the littlest things. In countries like Japan where people take personal responsibility and don't walk around thinking the world owes them something the number of lawsuits is a fraction of what it is in the U.S. and many other countries. And they are better off for it. This boycott is motivated by the same sense of entitlement that you see in those lawsuit-happy countries.

Lifendz6196d ago

With the new game coming out? Maybe Valve will prove me wrong but I don't see them releasing anything substantial for the old game. How could they? They want to sell copies of L4D2. I'm still shocked they're going to release the sequel a year later on the day from when the first came out. I wonder if EA will have Valve crank out L4Ds like EA does Madden.

Speak with your dollars gamers. I guarantee this won't happen again if you show EA and Valve that you're not going to buy the game.

IdleLeeSiuLung6196d ago (Edited 6196d ago )

Nobody b!tches about a rehashed differently numbered sports game, so why complain about L4D2?

There are plenty of games that get the same treatment just worse. See CoD series, Guiter Hero, Rock Band and most sports games. This is a case of spoiled customers. Heck they even got a FREE DLC not too long ago! Let me repeat that, FREE FREE FREE! There aren't too many games that get free stuff (especially on the 360).

Heck, they are even lucky Valve is willing and promised publicly to continue to support the first L4D considering most other companies just plainly ignore it. Other companies would probably respond to you with the equivalent of laughing at you for asking.

So don't give them a hard time, let them release more information as pertinent and vote with your wallet!!!

Finally, if you are going to b!tch about this game, don't be a hypocrite by NOT boycotting other games.

Blaze9296196d ago

this is becoming too funny

The Lazy One6196d ago

Doesn't anyone understand how game announcements work. They don't announce every feature at once. They announce it over time to build anticipation.

petitioners: "whaaaaaa you need to tell us more features now, or you guys suck..."

Valve: "you need to grow a pair of balls while we hit you with some truth..."

Grandizer6196d ago

I still want more L4D and I don't care if I have to pay every year.

The day Valve publishes a bad game my money will speak. I doubt L4D2 will be this bad game though.

_____________________________ _______________________________ ______-
Multiplayer base split on 2 SKUs ????

So what? you can't fit all the players on a single server anyway, I fail to see the point in that argument. And XBOX Live AND Steam can tell you which game your friends are playing, it's up to you to load the correct game.

I will whine when Valve stays years without releasing games, not when they do.

Leathersoup6196d ago

What gives? Valve does free DLC and if they say a new game is required, I believe them. Heck how many people buy a new freaking Madden game every year when all they do is update the teams. It's still football. Give me a break.

zagibu6196d ago (Edited 6196d ago )

Why are there still people comparing L4D with sports games? The first iteration of a sports game doesn't come only with half the teams. L4D is lacking content. PERIOD. They have to fix this first before they can demand money for a sequel.

BTW: Even if the situation was the same with sports games (which it isn't), weighing bad up with bad doesn't make good.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 6196d ago
jessehaysfl6197d ago (Edited 6197d ago )

Yeah fans respond...

Valve is full of $hit. L4D is an awesome game but come on guys. It's been a year. Half life.

StanLee6196d ago

You know what, detractors need to shut the hell up about Left 4 Dead 2. They're a very, very small minority and no one cares. These video game sites and blogs need to stop giving their opinions credence. They're less that 1 percent of the Left 4 Dead fanbase.

mastiffchild6196d ago

So if you think you're(and everyone else) is being conned you're a crybaby? And should let Valve(or whoever) get on with it , shut up, fall in line and take it? Is that why we like our democratic freedoms so much?

Fact is most games that are basically online only reflect that in the price. Fact is the SP in L4D is just a very weak, tacked on training for the MP so why was it full retail price? If L4D2 contained a real SP as well as the other content(though improvement in such a short time is very doubtful, imo)they promise then noone would have much of an issue-esp if the mod support for 360 and other promises from the first light package are upheld-or even if they just price the second game as an online only offering.

Socom and Warhawk were priced correctly for what they are(Socoms faults notwithstanding!)and Valve were happy, on the PC, to reduce the L4D price for weekends in order to make the slack up with extra sales(and were rightly lauded for this move)but they haven't done this for the 360 version yet. Why not? It clearly shouldn't be the full price of games that offer a full package both on and offline and the sequel so soon makes them look greedy-which for Valve is very damn sad as they usually really look after their PC gamers.

nnotdead6196d ago

i think most people are just use to this kind of business model. they being console gamers never fully understand the support PC gamers are use to. i do think people have a right to complain, but but with more and more games going multiplat this is going to happen more. on the plus side, this might mean Valve will take less time in between Half-Life episodes. okay maybe not :)

Brock Danger6196d ago

with all the things going on in the actual world, this is the rallying cry that gets you all heated up? We've got a failing global economy, a burgeoning flesh trade, flagrant missile tests in N Korea, a spreading HIV epidemic in africa, countless other critical issues, and THIS IS WHAT GETS YOU RILED UP? VALVE IS MAKING ANOTHER GAME?

GO OUTSIDE.

zagibu6196d ago

You are on a gamer's website, idiot. You go outside and complain about whatever.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 6196d ago
RememberThe3576197d ago

But this is blatant. I mean, Dynasty Warriors doesn't even come out once a year. lol

I personally wasn't impressed by L4D and I didn't think it had much content to begin with. I'm sure this game will have just as much content. And I still wont see what the big deal is.

Syronicus6196d ago

This boycott is justified. TO be told that there will be much DLC released for the game and then see next to nothing prior to the announcement of the next release is tough to take. Also, seeing as how the game engine is only being mildly improved for the second release is tough to take as well. When you see or hear of no graphical upgrade you wonder why it did not just get released like Wars did for Crysis, an inexpensive expansion pack rather than a full retail title.

I played the first L4D and was unimpressed as well and won't bother buying the second. Perhaps a rental for me but I can feel for those on the boycott. I just hope that they stick to their guns no matter the outcome. There is nothing worse than a boycott that goes south and the signing members give up and buy the game.

Erdrick6196d ago

seriously, what a rip-off. when i buy a valve game i expect it to last, not become obsolete in a year.

Nelson M6197d ago

And here is my Response !
Stick it up yer Ass Gabe !!
You Barny Gumbal Looking Freak !!!

danielle0076196d ago

Why though?
Because it's going to KNOCK YOUR SOCKS OFF with ahmaaaaaazingness and you just can't handle it?

Fine, keep your socks on, kid, I'm sure noone will miss you. :D

Ace Killa 086196d ago

how the hell are you going to boycott

nelson i do see your comments on the open zone you seem to be a troll for xbo360 news and always bash on them now i do hope u have a pc and you play l4d if not then your fanboyism is showing please prove me wrong

xGrunty6196d ago

Valve cares about 16,000 ppl not buying the game.

You guys better rethink your thoughts.

Show all comments (87)
70°

OG Left 4 Dead Creator Announces He's Working On A New Multiplayer Shooter

Following Left 4 Dead's undying legacy, the developer of the game shares that a new likewise project is in the works.

ZycoFox272d ago

L4D had potential to be so much more. The issue was that the release of the second game just one year after the first added a decent amount of content which was much needed, then there was nothing except for a few small content updates spread far between.

This is one of the only games I can think of that benefits from a yearly release, or at least a yearly DLC so it doesn't split the player base.

The games just got too samey and lack content.. it's a shame they didn't keep up the pace, I know you can download new maps but it doesn't change the overall game or add new enemies etc.

-Foxtrot271d ago

Regardless of what Valve officially said they didn’t need to do a sequel that fast, things could have easily been added to the original overtime and the sad thing is the characters and atmosphere of the original was better than the sequel. I mean we went from the dark, grim city streets to the sunny south where we are hitting massive menacing tanks with frying pans.

I honestly believe Valve killed it because it was a Turtle Rock game at its core and Valve wanted it to be known as an Valve only IP moving forward

They even brought back the original survivors just to kill one of them off (even though in the original they were heading North to Canada)

JEECE271d ago

Lol L4D2 came out in 2009, and you are saying it should have been a 2020s type live service game. It's just a great game, it doesn't need battle passes and skins.

This attitude is why devs are afraid to make any multiplayer game that isn't a live service.

Jingsing270d ago (Edited 270d ago )

Also in these current economic times live services is just a no go when people are being more frugal with their purchasing power. I don't do any subscription services anymore which means I can't do multiplayer on a console even if I wanted too. Something the console manufacturers should think about if they want to get players to even try their online stuff.

70°

Top Horde Shooters Your Squad Should Play

The Guide Hall explores the top horde shooters that co-op fans should be playing this year before the upcoming launch of Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2!

Read Full Story >>
theguidehall.com
130°

Looking Back At 2008, An Unbelievably Incredible Year Of Video Game Releases

Huzaifa from eXputer: "2008 was home to the likes of Call of Duty: World at War, Dead Space, GTA 4, Far Cry 2, Left 4 Dead, and many other hits, which is outright remarkable."

ChasterMies764d ago

Some of these low paid video game “news” writers weren’t born before 2007.

just_looken764d ago

Here here

Those that were around before 2000's i am sure are like me that think we entered a world of non readers or those that follow without question.

I can not wait to see fallout 3 a goty game even though it was about water with non content until you add the dlc/updates then you got the performance/crashing

CrimsonWing69764d ago

I don’t think anything can compare to 2023

lucasnooker764d ago

1998 - the best year in gaming! Metal gear solid, crash bandicoot 3, medievil, half life, ocarina of time, thief, tenchu, resident evil 2, Spyro, tomb raider 3, oddworld abes exodus, banjo kazooie.

It was a different breed of a gaming era. You’ll never understand what it was like back then. The aura of gaming, it was different!

KyRo764d ago (Edited 764d ago )

I second this. Gaming was a lot more varied and fun than it is today. I'm 35 so getting on compared to some here but I got to see all the changes from NES up to now but I've never felt so disappointed in any generation than I have this current gen. I was expecting more from this generation rather than prettier versions of games that came before it. Game mechanics have become so refined that alot of games feel the same and has done for a while now.

Maybe it's time to have a break for a while. I love gaming but I don't feel I get much fun in the traditional sense out of it anymore.

CrimsonWing69764d ago (Edited 764d ago )

Metal Gear Solid, Resident Evil 2, Abe’s Exodus, and Ocarina of Time are the only things from that list that I liked.

Here’s the 2023 game releases that I personally liked… and big releases that I didn’t care for:

- Dead Space Remake
- Wo Long Dynatsy
- Resident Evil 4 Remake
- Diablo 4
- Fire Emblem Engage
- Hogwarts Legcay
- Street Fighter 6
- Hi-Fi Rush
- Like a Dragon: Ishin
- Octopath Traveler 2
- Final Fantasy Pixel Remasters
- Final Fanatsy XVI (actually ended up not liking this, but it was still a big deal release)
- Baldur’s Gate 3
- Armored Core VI: Fires of Rubicon
- Lies of P
- Mortal Kombat 1
- Marvel’s Spider-Man 2
- Starfield (Ended up hating this one, but big release)
- Super Mario Bros. Wonder
- Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom (I’m an old-school Zelda fan, but didn’t really enjoy this game)
- Alan Wake 2

I mean, honestly I’ve never seen a year of major IP releases like that, ever.

Profchaos764d ago (Edited 764d ago )

Isn't it just a generational thing realistically.

I've been gaming since way back and I some of my favourite games go as far back as the late 80s for me each generation has a year or two of game changing releases one after another before an inevitable dry spell.

I kind of agree gaming had a different feel games hit different because we didn't have the internet nothing got spoiled and you really had to put in the effort to beat a puzzle which could set entire groups of people looking for a solution. But most importantly games were experimental and not as cookie cutter as today even basics like controls were not universal today r2 is shoot l2 is ads garunteed you can't deviate from that in a shooter back then it could of been square, R1 or R1 and circle nothing was standard.

But as time moves on a new generation picks up their controller they are going to be interested in different things that PS1 demo disc with the t Rex blew our primitive 16 bit brains back on launch but to kids today it's laughable.
The new gen of kids coming into to hobby seem to value different things to us there seems to be a huge focus on online play, streamers, gaming personalities, and social experiences, convience of digital downloads. To me I value none of that but that's ok like my parents not liking the band's I would listen to its just the natural cycle.

Gameseeker_Frampt764d ago

Just about every year in the 7th generation was great and something we most likely won't experience again.

2009 for example had Assassin's Creed 2, Batman: Arkham Asylum, Dragon Age: Origins, Uncharted 2, Halo 3: ODST, Killzone 2, Borderlands, Bayonetta, and Demon's Souls to name a few.

just_looken764d ago

It still amazes me we got over 7 rockstar games ps2/ps3 but 3 for the ps3/ps4/ps5

Dragon age 1-3 and mass effect 1-3 in 7ish years what a generation.