110°

Bitmob.com: MAG PS3 Concerns

As if creating a massively multiplayer online shooter boasting 256 character battles wasn't enough, The devs that brought us the super successful SOCOM series are now promising to deliver a robust combat experience with no slow down and intuitive tactical battle.

Gun_Senshi6162d ago

Please check it.

Just like BF2 Clan. We always played together in square, rerolling leader to respawn (until nerf) and working together (Balanced classes in squad ETC)

Just Like Socom Clan too.

Also I noticed in SOCOM Confrotation, the comunity is mature. Everyone has mic and talks for tactics and alerting others example saying "Sniper north building" which saves a team from wipeout.

50CALheadshot6162d ago (Edited 6162d ago )

true, this game emphasizes STRATEGY. looking at the vids you can clearly see the potential to kick some major ass.

dragunrising6162d ago

I'm really looking forward to the game as I'm confident it will get team combat right. I agree, Socom and Warhawk fans will be at home in MAG. The chain of command aspect is simple but intuitive- players with more experience will get leadership. I hope the game gives players incentive to "follow orders" outside of punishment and/or booting the player. The developers never spoke about medals or other rewards for winning. I'm sure there is plenty more to discover.

Lifendz6161d ago

which is cool...but I don't think most online players can work together effectively. Heck, I can't even get medics in KZ2 to heal. People with the repair badge simply don't fix anything. Now I'm going to expect these same people to listen to me if I'm squad leader?

Trebius6161d ago

Well Lifeendz...I agree with you on the fact that many online experiences include the 1 or 2 people that are recluses or just deviate from the plan and do their own thing. Supposedly this game is meant to make team effort a MUST as opposed to an option. The people that purchase this game and are thinking right now "I'm gonna be an awesome leader! I cant wait!" are the ones that you want to play with. And who WOULDNT want to be a top ranking leader?

All I'm saying is, I'm happy there's a system which makes it very motivating to play "NICE" and follow orders...im pretty souped about this game.

Lifendz6161d ago

"The people that purchase this game and are thinking right now "I'm gonna be an awesome leader! I cant wait!" are the ones that you want to play with. And who WOULDNT want to be a top ranking leader?"

I agree. Those people that buy thinking that are going to be awesome to play with. But c'mon man, you've played the team orientated games online. Rarely do you get a team that works together. Don't get me wrong; when it happens it's friggin awesome. But after dealing with so many jerks I just can't see this game working on a massive scale unless I get in a good clan.

I hope I'm wrong though. Mag seems to have a ton of potential.

BattleAxe6161d ago

This game will truely revolutionize the FPS genre.

cyberwaffles6161d ago

even though quake wars enemy territories ended up having average reviews for consoles, the teamwork made the game immensely fun. you actually had to communicate with your teammates to get the job done. if someone was a medic but needed an assault person to destroy a vault, your teammate yells, "i need assault!" and you reply "i'm on the way." after you destroy the vault, you need a covert ops to hack the computer so you ask for a covert ops and while he's hacking, he yells back "watch my back, i almost have it hacked." some enemies run into the base you're hacking; you yell "enemies are coming in from the back!" everyone preemptively awaits to attack them. one of your teammates gets heavily injured so you call for a medic to restore your health and they reply "ok i got ya."

and this is a game where you weren't forced to do things to accomplish objectives. MAG, on the other hand, requires you to obey your objectives and when you actually go along with the rules of the game, its a hell of a lot more fun. games generally give you the option to complete missions such as killzone 2, where as MAG mandates you to follow your squad leader's commands, and where the squad leaders have to obey their platoon's orders, and where platoon leaders have to listen to their other companies for direction.

if a game is built on the ground up for teamwork and it's a necessity to work together, they generally end up being more tactical and fun. games like call of duty or halo will never be that way because everyone just run n' gun and do lone wolf tactics and sadly because of the simplicity of those games, they tend to garner more attention from the little 10 year old prepubescent kids who cuss and talk sh!t constantly.

MAG is most likely going to do 1 out of 2 possible things for gamers.

1) if players are assholes and insubordinate, they will never win, rank up, or get to experience the full package of MAG and will most likely turn away from ever playing the game again which would help the MAG community filter out the dingbats from true teammates.

or

2) the nature of the game will actually force players to play together, obey chain of command, communicated, play tactically, and most importantly, have a more immersed style of gameplay.

i had doubts about MAG, but after seeing gameplay of this and knowing Zipper's track record for their past SOCOM online games, i fully trust them that they know how to weed out the gamers who would otherwise ruin the online experience.

rockleex6161d ago

This is the perfect game for FPS clans. ^_^

Imagine a clan of 128 players going against another clan of 128 players. O_O

Tactics and strategy will either make or break you. >:D

evrfighter6161d ago

clan of 128 players?...in what gaming utopia do you live in. I noticed a lot of predicting of having to use actual teamwork in this game. While I won't bash you for it, I'll just say welcome to pc gaming circa 2005. This was an idea that many games around that time period promised to bring but failed to deliver. Bf2's Project Reality mod is the only thing that came remotely close in delivering a realistic but really fun shooter.

As for MAG the only term that comes to mind when I think about the numbers its going to bring in pubs is "zerg rush".

ThanatosDMC6161d ago

I'm so gonna shoot my team leader then... how dare he tell me what to do! I'm a lone wolf sniper whore in games like BF2 and the like.

Tony999Montana6161d ago

The devs stated that you receive extra xp points or whatever if you complete your leaders orders. So the player would have to be stupid not to do what he's told. People blindly follow the missions which games sets them in single player games so what problem should there be following another person's missions?

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 6161d ago
DA_SHREDDER6162d ago

bitmob.com. Arent these the same dudes who ripped off thebitbag.com's name? LOL!

TheIneffableBob6161d ago

I don't see the resemblance other than the word 'bit'.

DA_SHREDDER6161d ago

Hmm sure, whatever you say. Hsu. LOL!

fuckoffodion6161d ago

Don't take that douche seriously.

Allowen6162d ago (Edited 6162d ago )

Probably got to join a guild in MAG to be worth the fun .

I mean, without a guild is a so strategic game is madness, was ok to be alone in a 30 VS 30 team death match in a game such Resistance 2 but I can't see that happening in MAG.

Not sure if this FPS is for me since I like to act like RAMBO some times and I normaly play after 22:00 and so I evade using a mic to not make much noise in my building.

cyberwaffles6161d ago

10:00PM isn't late to be loud, i yell all the way past 5:00AM.

table6162d ago (Edited 6162d ago )

This game could well be the new haven for ps3 clans but because most people arn't serious gamers MW2 will get more love.

Beast_Master6162d ago

I know people that only buy Madden and COD every year, so your right I don't see this game grabbing up that crowd, but I do think all of the old Socom fans are drooling over this title. I hope they pick up the PS3 and join the party.

dogmeat eater6161d ago

The perks and everything where fun for a long time. But now the COD series is just gotten old. Theres so many better online shooters out there. Such as MGO. COD games just don't take any skills. I remember getting at least a 15 kill streak every match in COD4.

gokuss1220026162d ago (Edited 6162d ago )

sad but true.

The fact that everything in the game is executed by live players is just amazing. During the E3 demo, when the commander sent the signal that the area was clear, and the choppers came uniformly flying in (allowing for new spawn points); should have sold everybody.

(I keep bringing this up but...) If Someone (possibly the army i.e. A.A.) sponsors M.A.G and it is made available for free (just like rag-doll Kung-Fu) there would/should be absolutely no reason for anyone to have anything bad to say about it.

free sponsored game trend ftw!!!!!

**edit**
if someone disagrees, please don't just click 'disagree'. Reply to the comment specifically stating what you are disagreeing with and/or why you are disagreeing. Otherwise it would just be assumed that you are a troll.

callahan096161d ago

I didn't disagree. I think sponsorship would be cool, but I doubt it would happen.

Show all comments (39)
470°

MAG was one of the most ambitious shooters ever and deserves a PS5 sequel

Zipper Interactive were once one of Sony's most important studios and became a household name due to their work on the SOCOM U.S. Navy SEALs series during the PlayStation 2's heyday. Their most ambitious title was MAG. Could it make a comeback?

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
yellowgerbil2278d ago

Best game ever. I had put over 1700hrs into that game before it deteriorated too far with cheaters getting out of the map and sadly decided it was time to let it die (Zipper had already been closed down by that time).

_SilverHawk_2278d ago

Amazing game. Hopefully sony makes a sequel

XisThatKid2277d ago

This is the game in modern gaming that even got me into shooters i spent literally days with this game Raven All the way. War against the the mighty D ride oh so edgy S.V.E.R.

NecrumOddBoy2277d ago

Original Battle Royale. No microtransactions. Definitely ahead of time.

XBox4eva692277d ago

It's almost as far from battle royale as you can get. o_O

frostypants2277d ago

It didn't have a BR mode.

Da12RespectA2277d ago

That wasn't a battle royale game at all.

rdgneoz32277d ago

3 teams of 32 fighting it out would be considered Battle Royaleish. If you're gonna saying teams are OK when you start doing teams of 2 or 3 or 4, then 32v32v32 should work. And on besides that, it had 128 v 128 which was insanely fun.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2277d ago
Muzikguy2277d ago (Edited 2277d ago )

I personally hadn't played much of it. I did spend a lot of time in PlanetSide 2 though (somewhat like MAG). Games like these tend to get overrun by cheaters and then ruined too often.

Teflon022277d ago

MAG didn't have that issue as far as I remember. I use to love the 256 matches. That game had an amazing community. Everyone actually communicated and played together. No one B****ed at the team. Everyone understood there was so much going on that if things are going wrong. Everyone had to think of new strategies.
Fav moment was when all 3 other squads 32 took their objectives but we were struggling with ours and had one more to blow up. The other leaders were communicating asking if the 2 nearest squads should send ppl. Our leader was like Naw I got a idea. So he told us all to die and set ourselves at the nearest hills prone without being seen. So we all did and surrounded the areas.
He said everyone on his count throw your grenades. Then snipers go all out and everyone else run in. They won't be able to get everyone and if needed the snipers go in about 10 seconds after.

Everyone did that and I got to the objective and set it off. 9 of us survived and got it. felt amazing to say I got the objective, cover me in that moment. Wish it was PS4 so I could have saved that moment
It was literally the coolest moment I had in a online shooter, closest since was BF4.

Muzikguy2277d ago

@Teflon

That does indeed sound like an awesome moment. One that makes games like these memorable for sure. It does seem like MAG had a lot more cooperation than most any online shooter

Teflon022277d ago

It did because you absolutely can't get no where in it without teamwork. It also didn't have an extremely big base of players. Everyone who played really wanted to play. I really hope they bring it back and do the same thing to only have serious players get into the big matches again

UltraNova2277d ago

Wow, what a run! This game looks better than PUBG!

Muzikguy2277d ago

Watching that video you wouldn't think the game was on PS3.

Spenok2277d ago

I adored this game too. Some of my best FPS online memories on it. So freaking good.

I'd love to see another game like this come out at some point. And NOT like Planetside... M.A.G. was something special.

yellowgerbil2277d ago

Yeah problem is if it existed now adays, it would likely be riddled with xp boosts and dance moves and all that other pay garbage...
MAG and Warhawk are the only 2 online games I ever got into, and both need a PROPER sequel on PS5.
Remember the first time I got 100 kills in a match, was in a turret with a repair kit and just mowed down wave after wave on Valors map.

2276d ago Replies(1)
2276d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2276d ago
PrinceOfAnger2278d ago

I had so much fun with this game

TGGJustin2278d ago

This is a game that was ahead of its time. Had it came out on PS4 it would've done much better. I put hundreds of hours into this despite the problems it had on PS3.

UnholyLight2277d ago

Really interesting as an Xbox owner at the time. This game had captured my interest as a kid but I never got a chance to play it. Being on PS4 and soon possibly PS5, I would love to see this franchise brought back to life. I imagine with the power of next gen it would be really quite fun.

From what I hear and what I remember, this game was FAR ahead of it's time. A real shame it never truly took off from my understanding.

grifter0242277d ago

I'm an xbox boy since mech warrior but got a ps3 slim for mag. If you liked halo or cod you'd have had a blast in mag. Was one of the first games you could actually do something other than shooting and still make a difference in game.

spicelicka2277d ago

PS4 needs something like it. In the multiplayer space it's far behind the Xbox, there are no quality multiplayer games on it that aren't on other consoles.

Dirtnapstor2277d ago

Yes, yes, and yes. Way ahead of it's time. Would love to see a PS5 variant of this game.

Show all comments (100)
120°

Modern Warfare Ground War mode has MAG vibes

Erina Rose, Sausage Roll writes, "Call of Duty: Modern War introduced a new, improved, Ground War game mode this weekend that reminds us of the old PlayStation 3 classic, MAG."

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
ilikestuff2402d ago (Edited 2402d ago )

I never played mag, I did play this beta however, and if mag was like this beta then (fart noises) for mag.

2402d ago
TheGamez1002402d ago

Man do I miss mag and zipper.

TheSinsibleOne2402d ago

Seriously though. Nowadays this and next gen are practically begging for a new MAG.

zodiac9092402d ago

How did we go from having games like resistance 1, 2, warhawk with 30 vs 30 player battles, and M.A.G. with 128 vs 128 players, ON LAST GEN to now having 20 vs 20...such a step back.

JEECE2402d ago

Because Sony hadn't figured out how to market their exclusives yet. Plus at that time COD craze was at its peak. So "generic high school bro #7," who was the primary purchaser of FPSs at that time (or at least represented a crowd necessary to sustain a playerbase), if he even had a PS3, would have just seen a game like MAG as a "copycat of Black Ops, man."

Not to mention MAG was pretty terribly uninviting for new people after awhile, because it was more skill-based. This was great for veterans, but if you weren't willing to put in the time getting destroyed for awhile, you would never appreciate the game. The Battlefield: Bad Company and BF:3 games out during that gen were far more accessible to lower level players.

Vegamyster2402d ago

Battlefield 4 was at the start of the generation and had 64 players, to me it depends more on how the map/gameplay is utilized, i enjoyed the 20vs20 modes more in the MW Beta than the 64 player ground war mode.

2402d ago
moomoo3192402d ago

It feels absolutely nothing like MAG lol. Way more battlefield vibes

xX-oldboy-Xx2402d ago

And even those are very small vibes, it still feels like COD at the end of the day.

390°

MAG: The Greatest Game You Never Played

Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out and most of you probably never heard of it, never got to play it and never will.

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
FiLTHY ESKiMO2522d ago

Who would the next gen version nor that Zippers gone?

_SilverHawk_2521d ago

I remember this game and it was amazing. I would like it if Sony would make another one because this game was ahead of it's time.

RememberThe3572521d ago

It was an amazing concept and it was a cool game, it was just ahead of it's time. I played the sh!t outta MAG, but the game itself played just okay. I'd love to have seen a sequel, even just a spiritual successor, especially with the next gen coming and the way cloud computing has advanced a game like that nowadays would be awesome.

Elwenil2520d ago

It may have been amazing if you played for SVER, but if you played for Raven or Valor, it was an unbalanced mess. I had some fun with it, but the player count was an illusion at best and false advertising at it's worst. The map and faction balance was so ridiculously skewed you knew who was going to win as soon as you saw what team you were against. It definitely had some interesting ideas, but was far from an amazing experience in my opinion. I would have much rather Zipper have made another SOCOM game rather than MAG.

darthv722521d ago

that game would make for a great battle royale release. So many players all at once... it was ahead of its time for a console shooter.

TheGamez1002522d ago

Was such an underrated game. One of my most favorite fps of last gen. So unfortunate zipper was closed down. Imagine if it was a success and thered be a 2nd game by now.....

TekoIie2522d ago (Edited 2522d ago )

I can think of many better games that I've yet to play...

"Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out"

HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better. I'm afraid that MAG is basically your standard FPS but uses scale as it's selling point. The vast majority of shooters that focus on smaller scale matches have gameplay leaps and bounds better than MAG so it is definitely not the greatest FPS.

I know many people are going to try and refute this by telling me to look at the three factions but MAG has literally no character. The game is call 'Massive. Action. Game' for gods sake which is a contender for 'The Worst Title a Game Could Have' award. I've never been a fan of Zipper but I hear great things about them from their PS2 days. However, with MP gaining popularity in the generation that followed I think it says a lot that they couldn't keep up with the competition.

Knushwood Butt2521d ago

'HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better.'.

It was released years later.

Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?

TekoIie2521d ago

"Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?"

Yes, Planetside 1.

Knushwood Butt2521d ago

Fair enough.

Can't say I've played it, but I enjoyed MAG for a while.

FantasticBoss2520d ago

MAG was one of the very few games trying to do scale like it did, but I think it missed the mark. Wish it could have had a sequel though as they may have been able to iterate on it to create something pretty neat.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2520d ago
Profchaos2520d ago

Sony had a awesome approach to online in the PS2 days with SOCOM co op that had games working together to achieve a tactical goal they pioneered voice chat on the PS2 for SOCOM but as they steamrolled ahead it was clear team Deathmatch would take over in popularity which shifted zippers approach so all their experience amounted for not much when designing online in the PS3 era.
It still was a decent game but couldn't stand out compared to cod which had millions of players consistently

yellowgerbil2521d ago

Loved mag had over 1700hrs into it across many accounts, remember my first 100 kill sabotage game, was insane

BLow2520d ago

Yes, so do I and not that game they released on PS3. I'm talking the one Zipper did and not Slant Six. At least Slant Six tried to do the series justice once they fixed the issues.

The one Zipper did didn't feel like Socom to me. It felt more like Ghost Recon to be honest. I absolutely loved the voice commands and I figured they would be even better on next gen hardware. They didn't even bother doing anything.

Maybe, I just wanted it more grounded and not so techy if that makes sense. I just wanted to go into jungles or missions just using my wits and patience and not have to use a bunch of gadgets. I wanted to be able to give orders with my voice to squad members. Yeah, they can at least have earpieces lol.

It's hard to explain but I know the old school Socom players know what I'm saying. Socom just had a certain feeling and the new game didn't feel that way. Slant Six yes. Zipper no...

We can only hope but if they bring it back they have to do it right. If not don't bother and just make something new. I rather have the memories I had with Socom be mostly positive than negative. Unless you pull a God of War, don't bother lol.

I've already said too much but that goes to show how much I loved Socom. Especially 1 and 2.....

Deathdeliverer2521d ago (Edited 2521d ago )

Game was simply ahead of its time. If mag came out now with improved graphics people would be blown away. Back then people whined about the graphics even though it had players literally everywhere. It was several great games in one. Battlefield, Ghost Recon, and Call of duty.

Hungryalpaca2520d ago

What exactly was it ahead of its time in? Player count? Planetside released in 2003 and and played count per match was over 300.

xkvcq2520d ago (Edited 2520d ago )

The BETA for MAG was one of my fondest gaming moments. I was highly anticipating the start of the beta servers but I had school that day. I had started downloading it that morning as soon as it was available and just when it finished downloading I found out school was cancelled, last minute, because of weather. BEST. SNOW DAY. EVER. I played the beta all day, continuing to put off my homework :P

TekoIie2520d ago (Edited 2520d ago )

Well have I got news for you pal! Planetside 2 has been available for nearly 4 years on the PS4 and longer on PC and people still aren't blown away. Maybe the novelty of scale is actually overrated and people don't care as much about it which is why MAG failed when multiplayer shooters were at peak popularity during it's lifetime?

If you were blown away by 256 players in 2010 why would you not have been blown away by 1000 roughly 2-3 years later?

Show all comments (84)