
BeefJack writes: "It's been three months since the release of Street Fighter 4. Since that day, one of the characters, Ken, has become the laughing stock of the Street Fighter world. Unfortunately, I found that this distaste for Ken stretches all the way back to the original game."

The Street Fighter series has a long history, but which are the seven best games the franchise has yet offered to gamers?
After Street Fighter II released in in 1991, it caused a fighting game explosion, both in arcades and in home consoles. But, as the decade ended, and arcades were failing, so too were 2D Fighting games. This is how Street Fighter IV completely revitalized the genre.
I'd say Blazblue helped too. Didn't care for Street Fighter 4, but Blazblue was amazing during that time. Sad that the series kind of went downhill after the first 2 or 3 games though.
BlazBlue was the much better, more technical game..and a real 2D Fighting Game after all. But yes, since it was a big name..the characters were still popular and the game itself was good, SFIV indeed helped a lot. However, I am pretty sure the much better-selling Mortal Kombat 9 would have been done without SFIV as well..and that one truly helped to make the fighting game genre in general more popular again.
eyyy max xD
one of the very few streamers i can actually watch without it being cringe and awful ha.
The content of IV was severely lacking when it launched. It got better over time.

In the same interview at EGX 2019 recently, Capcom and Street Fighter producer Yoshinori Ono responded to a fan question asking if there were any plans to bring the fourth or fifth entries in the series to the Nintendo Switch.
they botched SFV so bad, just start over, make a new version with proper single player mode and fully fleshed out with support for all of the consoles this time.
Did you see how Ultra and the Collection sold? We don't need to convince Nintendo of anything. Just put it on the console.PHYSICALLY.
You’re not seeing Street Fighter V come to other platforms besides PC because Sony helped co-fund the game so it’s staying only on PS4 & PC
That doesn't makes sense. Is Nintendo saying that Capcom can't publish the game on the system because it's users don't want the game? if so, that's really stupid of them, because why should they care?
Nintendo isn't saying such things of course.
Capcom shouldn't pass the buck. If they don't want to make more SF games on the Switch, then just say so, and say why.
If they want Nintendo to fund the project, then they are the ones that need to convince Nintendo to give them money.
That flowchart is pretty funny. I'm a Sagat player and I wanna see one for Sagat, since there are a lot of people whining about Sagat being overpowered.
Ken got a bad rap from all the shoto scrubs who invaded the game and made him look totally lame. Don't blame the character though, blame the player. I admit though, I've fought SO MANY bad Kens that when I finally fight one who has an inkling on what the hell to do, I get beat down in the first round.
Then I think "oh yeah this guy isn't trying to fireball zone me continuously when it's not working and throwing fierce shoryus out FROM ACROSS THE SCREEN" and I adjust my tactics. It's all about the players man.
Almost all matches I've had online are against Ken it's like people don't see the other characters or something, pretty funny really.
Its like 3s all over again
That's what i hate about Street Fighter, the number of duplicate characters and techniques. Ryu, Ken, Saggat, Akuma, Sakura, always quart-circle front Punch, quart-circle back Kick, etc...
That's also why Street Fighter games will never be on top of my favorite fighting games. It's always about Ryu or Ken, hadôken or shôryuken. Of course there are people that choose other characters, but not enough, and when they see you've kicked their ass, they go back to Ryu / Ken.
I appreciate much more Guilty Gear and Tekken series, despite my lack of combo-knowledge with Tekken, because at least the character and technique list is eclectic and you really have choice.