190°

Does Every Game Need Online Multiplayer?

Andrew Weymes of The Nightly Gamer writes: "This generation of gaming has certainly seen some incredible single player only games such as Uncharted: Drake's Fortune, Bioshock and Mass Effect, but it's quite clear that developers don't want to deal with the criticism that they will receive from both critics and gamers for not offering a multiplayer mode in 2009 and onward. Both Bioshock 2 and Uncharted 2 are going to have a multiplayer mode and multiplayer in the next instalment of the Mass Effect series hasn't been ruled out by the developers. The original Mass Effect was quite long because it was an RPG so critics didn't bash it too much for not having a multiplayer mode, but Uncharted: Drake's Fortune and Bioshock weren't as lucky. Both games offer great single player experiences but they are both relatively short games that can easily be completed in under twenty hours and that's being generous. Both games probably clock in at a little under fourteen hours. It's obvious that the developers of both games listened to the criticism that they received, but multiplayer modes aren't always necessary. If anything, hastily adding multiplayer to a game that really doesn't need it usually takes away from the game as a whole. Gamers are left with unsatisfying campaigns and decent multiplayer that they have played thousands of times over."

Read Full Story >>
thenightlygamer.com
PirateThom6140d ago

If I get 14 hours out of a game and it offers the replay value of Uncharted (which I've played through quite a few times), then multiplayer is a moot point for me.

InfectedDK6140d ago

Agreed.
But "Does Every Game Need Online Multiplayer?" - No.
Next.

PinkUni6140d ago

games are meant to be interactive with other people

when you play games where you're only interacting with what the developers created there's no quality there

might as well be living in a world with only 3 people

online make games infinitely more random and interesting compared to a closed off world with only singleplayer

why do u think the internet is so popular?

MrWeymes6140d ago

I understand what you're saying, but I disagree. That's like saying going to the movie theatre with a bunch of other people all around you is better than watching a movie on DVD or Blu Ray in the comfort of your home alone. It's a matter of preference. Single player only games draw you into the universe of that game if done right whereas multiplayer always lets you know that you are just playing a video game. Don't get me wrong, I love multiplayer at times but I love a good single player experience as well and I don't think that a game should get a lower rating for not having a multiplayer component.

PinkUni6140d ago

@MrWeymes

But games aren't movies, movies are almost like a 1 on 1 conversation, where there is only one person talking, and they're completely oblivious to you

games are far more complex, instead of just telling you something, they're asking you to do something. its not a 1 on 1 conversation, its a cooperative/competitive conversation.
you actually have a chance to manipulate that world.

i mean just look at the first videogame ever made.

it had multiplayer

when you take it so far as to say that single player games should never have an online mode, even if it was just one other person who can guide you from online, you're just watching a show, you aren't really playing anything anymore

rockleex6140d ago

Lets say games are an interactive book/movie.

You could read the book all by yourself. Or watch the movie with friends and family. Vice versa.

Anyways, I mention books and movies because that's the main purpose of a singleplayer game. To take you on a wonderful journey through its beautiful storytelling and set pieces.

Why do people read books or watch movies? Same reasons why people enjoy singleplayer experiences.

Why do people go bowling with their friends? Why do people play sports with their friends? Same reasons why people like multiplayer.

Sure, you prefer multiplayer over singleplayer. But the same does not apply to everyone.

MrWeymes6140d ago (Edited 6140d ago )

You share the same thoughts as many gamers. They don't see the purpose of multiplayer. However, like the guy below you said, a good single player game will immerse you in the world of that game. It's similar to the feeling you get from a great book or film. You're drawn into that world. You feel for the characters and such. I love JRPGs for the reason that you usually care about the characters and their stories by the end of the game and they have a lot of depth to the gameplay. Of course, you are entitled to your opinion as everyone should be. :)

PinkUni6140d ago

the whole reason why people enjoy movies or books is because the stories in them are so good that you're convinced that you're part of that world, right?

you see it as beautiful story telling
i see it as a delusion

story telling is literally as if someone was lying to you.

you wouldn't be reading or watching anything if you didn't believe in it to some degree right?

which is why fake looking sets or poor dialogue is seen as cheap in any sort of story telling.

and you know if that's not true why are most media driven shows have human beings as the main character and not a some triangle or or scribble

edgeofblade6140d ago

Multiplayer is only needed when it is done well. So, every game could POTENTIALLY have multiplayer.

This really is a loaded quesetion and everyone knows it.

Mikerra176140d ago

Look at games like Oblivion, Fallout 3, God of war series, Uncharted

None of those games need multiplayer because they are so good by themselves. I know many people who don't like to play with other people online so playing a game like oblivion is awesome to them.

It all comes down to personal Preference, I am going to purchase God Of War 3, and Uncharted 2 for the single player experience even though there may be multiplayer on both of them (confirmed for Uncharted 2)

The way I look at it is, did it bother us in the past when we couldent play GTA online with friends? or even the first shooters

II Necroplasm II6140d ago

Anyone played Condemned 2 bloodshot? well there is your answer.

NO.

Some games is just not meant for a multiplayer, gamers would rather the makers focus on the whole game experience than spend time making a lackluster multiplayer for a game that is not in need for it at all.

MrWeymes6140d ago

I agree about Condemned 2. It was a great game in my opinion, but the multiplayer was absolute nonsense compared to other games. I maybe played the multiplayer for an hour or two. It was just dull and uneseccary.

gaminoz6140d ago

Totally agree with OP....half the time people move on from online multi unless it is a COD or Halo or Killzone. Waste of time and effort that could be used polishing the single player game in most cases.

Now if they really want their multi to be played for long term, they need a offline split screen multi too...that way when it dies off online it can still be played at home, even if it isn't as intense.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 6140d ago
Mindboggle6140d ago

No, but I got some idiot freinds who refuse to buy a game if it doesnt have online multiplayer, which is just stupid.

MrWeymes6140d ago

I know a lot of people like that as well. I find it kind of silly because not every game needs a tacked on online mode to be fun. Like the guy above said, Uncharted: Drake's Fortune didn't have an online mode, but I played through its 8-15 hour story mode several times, so I felt that I got my moneys worth.

Honestly, I don't even play online in most games for longer than I have to for the reviews. Games like Killzone 2, Halo 3 and Left 4 Dead are great games that focus on multiplayer but most other games just have the standard "deathmatch" and such just so they can advertise the online modes on the box so that people don't whine.

table6140d ago

I'm guessing you are quite young since its normally the young teens these days who only would buy a game for multiplayer. The older gamers who have grown up with video games since the NES, SEGA and PS1 days(like myself) will always appreciate a good single-player only game.

MrWeymes6140d ago

Hell yes, Stewgart. I'm a young man myself being 20 years old, but I have the same mentality. I will always appreciate a good single player game. Even if it's 14 hours for $60, it really doesn't bother me. Like I said before, if you trade your games in frequently, you're usually only paying $30 for new games. That's not that much even for people with the tightest budget.

peeps6140d ago

It depends on the type of game. a game like fallout is a great single player game because theres so much to do. Due to how much games are starting to cost however, and the ammount of work needed to be put in, i think we're seeing shorter and shorter games...

If Call of Duty only included the single player game would it still be worth the $60 price tag? It's a great single player experience but it's very short. Multi-player offers a lot of reply value to a game and some games (such as dead space), have looked really good, but i've been put off by the fact that once you've completed it, theres only so many times you'd really wanna play through again.

Problem is, some games are great single player game but really wouldn't work as multi-player. I guess it's about getting the balance right. A single player only game needs to have the same reply value as a game that includes multi.

MrWeymes6140d ago

I'm not a rich man by any means, but I rarely feel like I've been ripped off by a single player only game. I just trade them in at Future Shop and get half of what I paid for them usually. So, I end up spending maybe $30 on a great game. It's worth it in my opinion to help support developers.

Dead Space probably would have been a contender for last years Game of the Year if I had my site up at the time. I played through it three times and got every trophy. It doesn't need some online mode where you are killing necromorphs with some random guy online. It would have killed the atmosphere in my opinion. For the sequel, I hope the developers don't feel pressured to include some random online play at the expense of making the single player portion even better.

patterson6140d ago

If the single player experience is going to suffer at the hands of online multiplayer (OM), leave out the OM.

beavis4play6140d ago

i still play uncharted and ratchet and clank: ToD. and i don't regret either one not having multiplayer.
and anyways.......other than the different maps that each game provides, MP is very similar in mechanics, gameplay as well as goals no matter which game you play. MP boils down to players running around killing each other.
but games like UC, ratchet, mass effect, bioshock......you get different stories, experiences.(and in the case of the afore mentioned games.......great scenery) and that's what makes high-quality SP games so good.

Show all comments (43)
40°

Blizzard Sends Legal Notice to bbno$ Over Diablo-Themed Website

bbno$ has temporarily shut down his website after receiving a legal notice from Blizzard Entertainment related to Diablo-themed content.

Read Full Story >>
cgmagonline.com
Mulletino2d ago

More and more it seems like these gaming companies are at war with their fans.

40°

Video Game Stocks Plunge on Fears Google's Genie 3 Will Replace Game Engines

When Google unveiled Genie 3, an AI that generates explorable 3D worlds from simple text prompts, investors responded by dumping video game stocks en masse—wiping out billions in market value in mere hours. But in their rush to flee, Wall Street confused "playable environments" with actual video games, ignoring the technology's hard limits while threatening the human creativity that makes games worth playing. As the industry faces a future of automated mediocrity driven by shareholder demands, the panic reveals a deeper truth: investors aren't betting on better games, just cheaper ones.

Read Full Story >>
rushdownradio.net
peppeaccardo19d ago

same level of fear that gen ai will replace art ... it is a tool that will help to prototipize open world games, but to completelly substitute game engines ... we are still a long way from it

z2g19d ago

Duplicate story. Or does Christopher just remove xbox stories that are similar?

Commentby19d ago

Humans have been developing things to simplify jobs since the beginning.
AI is going to remove the human factor from the job, but it can never replace all jobs that need a human factor.
I wish I could see the end of the story. What is the end, end goal, final piece, etc.
Is it a world run by machines, do humans live in a free world, does a dictator finally have an robot army, do humans finally free of working forever, does ChatGPT create an army to defeat Gemini., so many possibilities …

30°

Next Life is Strange game to be announced on January 20

Square Enix will announce a new title in the Life is Strange series on January 20 at 10:00 a.m. PT / 1:0 p.m. ET, the company teased.

Yui_Suzumiya35d ago

Life is Strange: Reunion is the title that was recently leaked and it's supposed to have Max and Chloe back together. So they finally doing what should have been done nearly a decade ago.