Joystiq: Right about now you're probably thinking, "Cool, a compilation of the first four PixelJunk games!" followed by, "Wait a second ... there have only been three PixelJunk games." This is true. As you can no doubt tell from the above screenshot, PixelJunk 1-4 is an entirely new downloadable PS3 title from Kyoto-based Q-Games. It just doesn't have a final name yet.
We can think of some adjectives to describe this summer release based on our first hands-on. "Fun" comes to mind, as does "simple." Two staples of the PixelJunk franchise, when you think about it. Oh, and "really cool fluid dynamics." Wassat? Let us explain after the break.
Don’t expect future PixelJunk titles to force you to go out of your way in order to get 100% trophy completion.
Good? This is bad news. Trophies should require some sort or challenge otherwise its a stupid system.
they never said they wouldnt be a challenge. if you read the article, it says the trophys will be made to be aquired more naturally while playing. i have %100 in pixeljunk monsters, i cant recall one trophy that i got just from playing naturally. i had to play intentionally to unlock them. for example, Deep Impact- Destroy 15 enemies at once with the mortar tower, or Wishing Well- Drop 100 coins into the water and clear the specified stage are not trophys that are aquired naturally
psn games will never get plats unless they got enough content to be comparable to disc games.
Every gamer should have a quality shooter in their repertoire, but quite often the feel of the game can translate straight to frustration, instead of fun. If the control scheme is too touchy or slow to respond, all other factors become irrelevant. No matter how gorgeous the graphics...
TheSixthAxis: 'Zuler's been at it again, this time bringing us some trophies for Pixeljunk Shooter, a good couple of weeks before it might release here and a month before it will release in Japan. He's away right now, though, so it falls down on my considerably manly shoulders to post them. Please, thank our dear Zuler in the comments.'
