GameZone writes: "Now we should all remember that the Story mode is only one small component and should never make or break a fighting game's success. Unfortunately, the other modes are just as shallow. Mission mode is a predictable set of "do this, do that" objectives. Gallery offers a look at some of Evolution artwork (again, predictable). Survival mode is just as it sounds. And then there's…what, exactly? After playing through the story, Arcade mode wasn't too exciting. Ad hoc play lets a friend jump in, but without any skill required to perform each move, and with every character playing the same, it's very difficult to keep the competition going. Basically, it amounts to a game of who can mash the square button more effectively".
It has been years ever since the first MMORPG announced. Every year countless MMORPGs comes out. However, not all MMORPGs could meet the public successfully in the end. Many of them aborted in development phase or died from bad publishing. Today, I would love to look back at those transitory MMORPGs.
GamersBliss.com writes: "Metacritic has been around for quite a while now allowing the site to ‘keep score of entertainment’. So we decided to round-up some of the worst scores for each system. The platforms on this list will include: PS3, Xbox 360, Wii U, PC, Wii, 3DS, PSP, and the PS Vita. What qualifies the game to be on the list is that it must have the worst metascore on metacritic and it must be a retail box game. Lastly the list will be in descending order of the worst metascore to see what platform holds the worst game on metacritic. So let’s take a look at what is the unanimous worst of the worst in gaming, just don’t expect to see user scores on the list."
Only lame fanboys and mindless people care about metacritic and review score....
So why do you always make comments about the same thing? Seriously for someone who says "only mindless people care about review scores and Meticritic" you sure comment enough about it. Checking your comment history, you go absolutely bonkers when a Sony games don't score well. Go back to when PS All Srars came out and you are all over the place.
The same developer of Big Rigs made The War Z in 2012 and it also got a very low metascore (20%). He should just quit.
No, I hope he doesn't. We need really bad games to help us appreciate the better ones. Also, it's just so much fun to watch.
Why would he quit when there are endless droves of complete fucking morons who are simply much too stupid to do their own research before they readily fork over their money for utter trash? As big of a piece of worthless shit Sirgay Titov is, I say to him, carry on scamming those half-witted mouth-breathers with open wallets and little to no consumer restraint.
Black Ops Declassified got a 33 and that was supposed to be the Vita killer app! I remember the legions of sony fans defending it and claiming its a standard CoD title and bla bla bla!
Yeah but I bet you don't remember the legions of Kinect defenders saying that Steel Battalion would be then killer app for the Kinect and bring the hardcore to it and blah blah blah but instead scored bad and sold badly. Nope. People only have memories for what Sony fanboys say.Everything else blanks out the moment it doesn't pan out.
There aren't legions of Kinect defenders, lol, there's literally me and about five other people who could play Steel Battalion. It was immense.
smashcrashbash...
Legions of Kinect defenders?
https://www.google.co.uk/se...
I don't see a legion here son.
Because sometimes you just look at a game and have to ask yourself, “How did this get made? Who thought this was a good idea?”
it wasn't even DB - DBZ, the only thing it had was dragonballs and same names.
Was sickening.
But it was so accurate to the show. Like how piccolo in the one that kills his grandpa and how roshi uses the kamehameha to revive a dead goku rather than blow a hole in his chest. And lets not forget how awesomely authentic piccolo seemed.
Ok... I am guilty of playing 2 of these games.
Shadow the Hedgehog and Pokemon Channel.
Shadow the Hedgehog was actually pretty fun.
Pokemon Channel? I bought a game in which I watch TV with a Pikachu... that was the whole game. Man I was a stupid 10 year old.
Hell the only reason I think I bought that game is because it came with a demo for Pokemon Colosseum. And then I got XD gale of darkness
Now those were awesome games... even though I am 20 now... that game needs a sequel.
I don't really count Channel as a game, more as a Tamagotchi. I only really bought it for a Jirachi, and I'm ashamed to say I traded in my PS1 for it. Worst decision in my life. EVER.
I was a big fan of Pokémon at the time and my foolish child mentality got in the way of common sense. I just want my PS1 back...
But plenty of americans still watched it. *cough*gears,me,gow,cod,killzo ne,gta,halo*cough*
Don't know why people disagree with you, that was one of my favourite gaming moments.
The first time I played it I didn't know I was in control of what was happening. When I realized, I got goosebumps of how awesome it was. For me the entire las chapter of MGS4 was epic.
MGS4 was a mess at every turn. Trying to tie up every single loose end, does not a good story make.
MGS3 however, had the greatest ending in the history of everything.
Well, that's your opinion and your entitled to that, but you are in the MINUTE minority there. That ending was VERY epic. All the battle themes from the various MGSs (well, I'm counting the third one as one because...you know, it plays during THAT fight in MGS3), the way it's just your fists and feet doing the fighting instead of guns, and it's the fight that you've been waiting 4 games to finally have. Yeah, not sure what you saw as a flaw that none of us did.
But you are right about MGS3. That WAS epic, as well, especially when it's YOU, with the actual button, that has to do the ending action. Very good breaking of the fourth wall there.
I won't go as far as ignoring you, though. Some people just take opinions too damn seriously.
So is it conventional wisdom that MGS4 is better than MGS3??? I mean I love ALL the MGS games, and MGS1 is still my All-Time favorite.
But I always thought MGS3 was more well received than MGS4, in terms of story specifically.
I know everyone has their own opinions, but is the assumption (MGS3 > MGS4) not the case???
The only Metal Gears I liked were MGS1 and MGS3. Their stories were more movie like. As bizarre as the lore is in the Metal Gear universe, at least 1 & 3 were more believable.
4 was like a soap opera (Raiden and Rosemary during MGS2 was like that too). People coming back from the dead, corny romance wrap ups; everything was without substance. The whole game was about tying up every loose end, disregarding anything that makes logical sense (even for Metal Gear's standards) and being too over the top with the drama. Besides Snake's monolog at the beginning, there was nothing about the MGS4's story that I liked, nor did anything make sense, especially the ending. And I'm usually open minded about how Metal Gear stories go.
The fist fight was fine, it's the time placement. MGS1 and MGS3 had their final fist battles at the perfect time. MGS4 threw it into a part, that eventually became out-shined and forgotten once you board the battleship.
"spoiler" (as if its really needed)
But the thing is its not really Liquid at all its Ocelot, its been Ocelot since MGS2. I may be in the minority but I wanted the real Liquid Snake to have "residence". so to speak. in Ocelot's mind.
The idea of a reattached arm transferring consciousness to another sounds far fetched but I still thought it was interesting when it was introduced in MGS2. Sadly, to me at least, it was just Ocelot just acting to be Liquid to trick the "La-le-lo-li-lo" (forget exact phrase).
