what a terrible interview. One response and the first stupid thing the author writes after it is, "Well there you have it folks. The Wii just couldn't handle it."

In this logic the ps3 can't handle it either in it's "best looking title". It's looking like a great game and it's sad that biased d-bags are already doing their damndest to try and put it down.

I want to see if the "Journalist" who wrote this garbage even got more then one question out to begin with before the guy from high voltage realized he was talking to an idiot. Guess we'll never know.

go figure the fanboy morons would have to drag in sony into this one.

just be happy that high voltage is giving you what looks like to be a really great 3rd party fps.

isnt to show that the ps3 or the wii cant do splitscreen on graphic extensive games, but rather the fact that the wii's graphical peak still isnt as good as our ps3/360 graphically substandard games that actually do have splitscreen such as halo 3, cod, resistance, etc. all those games look better and features splitscreen. sorry, but the conduit's strong points arent its graphics; its all going to boil down to its uniqueness and how good the gameplay is. atleast its a good looking game for the wii.

How can you claim that this is the fps everybody has been waiting for on the wii, and then reveal it has no split screen multiplayer mode. Would i be correct to assume that means no offline multiplayer mode? (with human players.) That in my estimation lowers the games appeal, as i have no access to the net. (i'm using my phone as a modem: dial up.)

We had this debate yesterday about the games artwork, and how the artwork is 'oldskool,' they don't even offer a split screen multi player mode (oldskool), further evidence that this game is turning out to be a mess.

I think this game should be called Identity Crisis.

nobody expects the same level of graphical detail in split screen. everybody who has ever played a split screen game will know it comes at a cost of something, even if it is sound.

it's just an excuse for being lazy and not giving us what we want/expect.

I'm as upset about this as the next guy but you have to give them credit their main motto or rule was if anything felt added on, half assed or just wasn't great! then it wouldn't be in the game and reducing the quality in split screen doesn't satisfy them seeing as they are perfectionists who believe if it isn't amazing then its not going to be in the game

Every great split screen multiplayer game i have played has had its quality reduced- goldeneye, mario kart, halo etc. It would be unreasonable to expect no loss of graphical quality in split screen for any system, so i think it is a shame they have completely left the feature out.

I doubt it would have been terrible or unbearable to look at or play. If they are bragging about the engine being able to produce '360 level graphics' then surely split screen would be a doodle for the engine? I smell something that is not right. Maybe they have simply ran out of time.