however it's said , i mean they are no fans of the wii lol

Would they say the same about MGS4 or Gears of War? Of course not.

What they're basically saying is "Nintendo don't deserve this game, the harcore gamers on the 360 and PS3 are the ones who should be playing this, plus it'd get more money for Sega."

Utter tosh, mate :)

Nothing in that article suggests Kikizo is prejudiced against Nintendo. It's the logic of confining the game to one platform that they're questioning, not whether MadWorld is an appropriate game for the Wii.

"Surely a game of this ilk, with its gruelling boss fights and double-digits combos, would suit hardcore Xbox 360 and PS3 audiences down to the ground?"

"but isn't Inaba concerned that PlatinumGames has shut itself off from all those high definition gamers who dig the gore factor but refuse to shell out for a Wii?"

It's obvious that they think it should be on the other consoles because so called "hardcore" gamers want the game but won't get a Wii.

They also don't say Bayonetta should be on the Wii because the fans of Madworld will miss it. It doesn't blatantly say it but it's implied heavily.

And as I said would they argue that for MGS4 and Gears? or any of the third party casual games for the 360 and PS3?

Love this game (played on Vita) and i think i got pretty far, but never finished because i refused to look up a guide 😎