220°

IBM patents bullet dodging bionic armor

Your science fiction fantasy may be coming a reality, if IBM has anything to say about it. The company was recently granted a patent for bionic body armor, originally filed last March, that's intended to bestow the wearer the power to dodge bullets.

Full article after the jump.

Read Full Story >>
engadget.com
lsujester6229d ago

That armor is yelling out "Instant Death!:

donator6229d ago

So, what if you're standing at the edge of a cliff and someone shoots something at you. The body armor determines its a risk and stimulates your muscles and flings you off the cliff? =D

FarEastOrient6229d ago

I'm not sure I would want to wear something like this back to war. "Distort" my body to avoid a bullet, I'm deploying next month back to Iraq but this is kinda more than necessary.

Why not develop "armor" that repels bullets away from me instead of my body avoiding an incoming round.

gamesmaster6229d ago (Edited 6229d ago )

"Why not develop "armor" that repels bullets away from me instead of my body avoiding an incoming round."

it would seem more logical but the amount of force and momentum a bullet has when travelling at say 2000+ feet per second is immense, depending on caliber, it can be enough to put a hole in an iron plate, or concrete. meaning the size of the electro magnetic field and field strength would have to be immense aswell. its just not feasable.

according to the laws of physics you would need a masive energy source to produce such a field and on top of that it would manipulate any metallic objects in its vecinity, ie your own weapon could potentially shoot away from your body. :O

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6229d ago
Mcrmarcher6229d ago (Edited 6229d ago )

Lol, or if you were getting stuck into some nice Spaghetti Bolognese and a sniper fired at you =P. Pretty cool though

thereapersson6229d ago

The flying spaghetti monster would not allow that!

Mcrmarcher6229d ago

Flying spaghetti monster for teh win!!! XD

Awookie6229d ago

Jesus if you move that fast and instantly wont your bones break, muscles tear and pass out?

catastrophee6229d ago

a machine gun firing at you.....

gamesmaster6229d ago

well, the patent said its for long range fire so i guess they could minimise movement and speed by reacting earlier to the shot. but it has its flaws, like you say, a machine gun would still rape you.

Timesplitter146229d ago

Something tells me people will get their spines broken with that thing.

And what if bullets are flying everywhere around you? Will it make you implode or something?

Show all comments (17)
20°

Ghost of Yotei star: 'workers need more protections' in game dev

Ghost of Yotei actor Erika Ishii's journey from fan to performer shaped their views on developers' rights as workers.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
1d ago
90°

Pachter: "I Think The New Xbox Console Is Already Dead, They've Blown It by Embracing Game Pass"

Wedbush Securities analyst Michael Pachter believes the next Xbox console might be already dead due to Microsoft embracing Game Pass at $30.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
jznrpg4d ago

You know the world is f’d up when you can agree with Michael Pachter

VenomUK4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

You know the world is f’d up when Michael Pachter has given up cheerleading Xbox.

Eonjay4d ago

The crazy part is that this crazy fool was saying that Sony was doomed (or in his words 'going to be run over by Microsoft') because of GamePass after the Activision Deal. He was the one telling them to embrace GamePass and now that its killed them he is acting like he never said that.

Iceball20004d ago

I agree but that was before they doubled the price of game pass

peppeaccardo4d ago

this senile old f@rt is still in business ?

blacktiger4d ago

You know the world is f'd up when investors listen to Michael Patchtcher after the advice "Sony is doomed if Microsoft buys Activision and put it out on gamepass"and now he's saying "I Think The New Xbox Console Is Already Dead, They've Blown It by Embracing Game Pass"

I feel bad for investors.

1Victor3d ago

It’s true what they say “even a broken clock is wright twice a day”.
In this clock case is twice a game generation 🤣

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3d ago
dveio4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Wouldn't it be the case of Pachter finally agreeing with parts of us rather than we agreeing with him?

I remember vividly that back in the day when GP was introduced and shaped further, many of us were saying that it's a great service on one hand. But were also already skeptical, too, as to how Microsoft would be able to keep the service running financially in the future.

Or/and how it would affect studios and game development in general.

As of March 2026, I think we have the answers some of us anticipated back then, when it was still Pachter who had forecasted «100 million subscribers».

Outside_ofthe_Box4d ago

A lot of this is just basic logic and common sense.

How much does it cost to develop a game? How much does it cost to market a game? How much does it cost pay devs/publishers to release on GamePass?

How much do users pay per month/year on GamePass? How many users does Microsoft need to be subscribed at once for them to truly be profitable to where GamePass pays for ITSELF(i.e not including stuff like in app purchases that they would get regardless of GamePass' existence).

You would need a large amount of subscribers or increase it's price to a point where it's no longer a "bargain" for it to be profitable.... if you're asking me. For some reason Pachter didn't see it that way nor did MS' users.

bigfish4d ago

Likely the next Xbox will have a premium price tag so they have some profit margin on the low numbers they sell. We all know that the bulk of revenue will come from 3rd party sales on other devices and perhaps some from game pass.

Hypertension1404d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Not to mention the fact that if it does have steam, nobody is going to buy games off the windows store.

If they dont have free online, this thing is dead to me.

TheCaptainKuchiki4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

And even Gamepass flopped. The end goal of Gamepass was to be hegemonic, to kill game purcahses with subscriptions. But that never happened. Game sales are still thriving, Gamepass' subscriber count has stalled, it's costly for MS and studios and its price is increasing.
The purchase of Activision allows them to hide Gamepass' failure. Not suprising that gamepass was removed from Nadella yearly bonus, they knew they would never hit the targets.

Michiel19894d ago

the tinfoil hat is on!
You think they spend 75 billion to hide that gp isnt doing well? XD
They totally didnt buy activision because they got some of the biggest and most profitable ips on the planet, but instead they bought it so you can't say online that gamepass failed!! that's totally the reasoning fr fr

Outside_ofthe_Box4d ago

He never said any of that..

Said that it ALLOWED them to, not that it was THE reason for the purchase...

TheCaptainKuchiki2d ago

learn to read each word before hitting "reply"

Rainbowcookie4d ago

I am not a Pachter fan , but I have to agree...who would have though. It used to be to sell cheaper hardware that is subsidised by First party game sales in the first few years until you can reach millions owning the console and by that time you can cheapen your hardware because the tech have been revised. With gamepass on everything and developers losing sales that option is now limited. With the onset of more options for games and developers going for Gass gambling FOMO style games and dlc consumers have become rightfully picky. Add that to growing hardware prices and escalating ram and pandering to society... it kills a brand. Most og gamers are gonna find you out and stay away. Put on the pressure of companies demanding higher revenue for sales, the poor developer has no other option to put a new coat of paint on a copy of another successful game. Innovation , what we are looking for doesn't happen a lot because the danger of failing could lead to budget cuts and them letting you go...so you play it safe and make a copy of a copy. Yes we get genres and types but 80% is the same game we have had for ages. So then because you are scared you let them put it on gamepass and you know you know at least what you get.

Show all comments (48)
40°

Nintendo's partners are selling $2 billion in shares — here's what that actually means

Nintendo announced Friday that several of its long-time partners, including DeNA, will sell off some ¥300 billion in company shares.

Read Full Story >>
hanafuda.report