
The videogame industry has seen its share of controversy, almost all of which center around sex and violence. It's a rare thing for a game to be labeled as potentially racist. But that's what it's come to for Capcom's Resident Evil 5. The potty mouth of the main character Chris Redfield isn't an issue nor is the excessive blood and routine decapitations. What's drawing the ire of many outside the industry (and raising the eyebrows of some within it) is who you kill in RE5.

Circana data shows Resident Evil 5 as the best selling Resident Evil game in the US, ahead of Resident Evil 4 remake and Village.
So the most successful RE is the one where a white man is killing Africans.
This can't be real.

New leaks from Dusk Golem detail cancelled Resident Evil projects, including a Rebecca focused Revelations game, while stating no Resident Evil 5 remake is in development.
Capcom's willingness to invest in experiments and scrap them sets them apart form many other developers (Nintendo have a similar methodology). Far too often companies push a game setting or game mechanic that is just not that good and the final product is middling or poor.

Dusk Golem claims a Resident Evil 5 remake is not coming this year, with a Code Veronica remake expected instead.
Hopefully if and when they do a RE5 remake, they give it the RE3 remake treatment, because this is certainly one title that I don't want a faithful remake of.
Does this mean a game can never take place in an area with an extremely dominant race? If a game took place in BFE Idaho where there are only white people (oh excuse me... "cucasian"), would this even show up as news?
It's set in freakin Africa. Same way in CoD4 where it was set mostly in arab and russian countries and there was...surprise! Arabs and Russians as enemies.
No one b!tched then and no one should b!tch now because that's where the game is set...simple as that.
.
oh boy. not this again
No its not Racist? Racism has better controls