All Channels
Popular
320°

Is Sony Losing It?

Sony is a great company. No one can deny the force that they have become in the gaming industry. Anyone who thinks that Sony is on the brink of collapse is a fool.
As a brand the Sony PlayStation is here to stay. The Playstation 1&2 combined have sold 270 million units world wide. This by itself secures Sony a place in the industry for a long time yet to come. Yet if you take into account the estimated PSP Sales of 44 million world wide sales total of you come to the number 314 million PlayStation Brand units sold. (Keep in mind this number neglecting current sales of the PS3) So all Sony haters need to just let it go, Sony is not going anywhere anytime soon.

With all that aside, in Sony's third generation of life as a console manufacture life is not so great right now. The PS3's install base is estimated to be around 20 million. While this is a decent number it pales in comparison to the Wii. As for the battle for second place with the 360, Sony trails by around eight million units. On the surface these numbers don't seem to be too bad, however when you look at the bigger picture you can see that Sony is going through a very rough patch.

Read Full Story >>
gamingfront.net
oriol0036302d ago

I was a bit skeptical at first but after reading the article he proves some good points Sony has kinda screwed it up and they didn't even get the Super Bowl ad which was stupid, Microsoft spent around 10 million advertising Halo 3 which is not half as good as Killzone 2. Damn Sony.

PirateThom6302d ago

10?

Microsoft spent 30m advertising Halo 3, the same it cost to make the game.

I'm glad Sony don't do that, because I'd rather have another game rather than a load of ads.

ASSASSYN 36o6302d ago

Yeagh how dare MS promote a game that people will be playing on xbox-live years down the road.

PirateThom6302d ago

Don't you think the people who will be playing it years down the line will be the same people who would have bought it anyway regardless of advertising?

ASSASSYN 36o6302d ago

No I don't think people would have bought it regardless of advertising. You advertise for public promotion of some product or service. The business of drawing public attention to goods and services is the point.

Basics of marketing is advertising what people may want. WTF is the point if you don't advertise you would systematically eliminate potential buyers leaving you looking like a douche with a warehouse full of products.

GWAVE6301d ago (Edited 6301d ago )

If Sony "losing" it is simply an issue of sales, this is what I see:

PS3's first year: outsold the 360 worldwide even though "it has no gamez!" as the haters claimed...and at a $500-$600 price point.

PS3's second year: outsold/sold the same (depends on what source you cite) as the 360 at double the price; outsold the 360 for the entire year worldwide except in the last 3 months.

First two years of the PS3: 21 million units sold.

First two years of the 360 (with one year of no competition): 14 million sold.

Hmmmm.

Aside from that, who has more dev studios? Sony. Who has better-looking exclusives? Sony. Who has free online? Sony. Whose online is more stable? Sony (yes, it's true. P2P vs dedicated servers). Who has reliable hardware? Sony.

Journalists fail to look at cold, hard facts. They take a narrow snapshot of the current market and ignore the big picture. They say that the PS3 is selling horribly, yet the 360 sells less and it's selling just fine.

I understand that some people have a preference. That's fine. Some people preferred the Xbox, Dreamcast, or Gamecube instead of the more popular PS2 (I had the Xbox and Dreamcast). Yet, no journalists would fabricate facts to somehow "prove" that the Gamecube was doing better than the PS2 or to "prove" that the Dreamcast was doing better than the Xbox.

Yet today, it seems that so many journalists have an agenda. What is that agenda? It's to see Sony fail, even if Sony's "failure" is invented by half-truths and ignored facts.

La Chance6301d ago (Edited 6301d ago )

well , MSFT spent a whole lot of money for Halo 3 but the crazy amount of money Halo 3 brang in can get you more than ONE game more.

I think the whole team behind Halo 3 , from Bungie to the marketing team know more than you how to handle their products.I mean who are you ?
If they got the money to do that then let it be ! Considering Halo 3's out of this world sales I dont think they regret a single second

On topic : Sony simply underestimated the competition BIG TIME.
The Wii and the 360 are doing way better than anybody would have expected.I think thats the main reason.Sony built their strategy from a "we'll will anyway" perspective and they woke up to see that this gen is another story.

They can thank the power of the PS brand because I think if it were the 360 at the place they would be going the way of Sega with the dreamcast

La Chance6301d ago (Edited 6301d ago )

Geez , you go from controlling 80% of the gaming market to being in a position where you will probably never catch up with your direct rival ansd you think that Sony isnt "losing it" ?

Im a student in business school in and trust me in NO WAY , no matter what is that a good thing.

No business man on planet earth would be happy to go from the domination the PS2 had to the situation the PS3 is in right now even if it isnt a flop.

How you manage to see the evolution of the Playstation from last gen to this gen a positive thing is beyond business , commercial and financial logic.

The ps3 isnt a failure but is very far from being the succes Sony was expecting.

PS "First two years of the PS3: 21 million units sold.

First two years of the 360 (with one year of no competition): 14 million sold."

Let me rectify that : PS3 lifetime sales = around about 20 million

360 lifetime sales = around about 28 million.

Why do you only pick the years that suit you ? Speak in "cold hard facts" and that means taking ACTUAL numbers and NOT setting up the numbers so that they suit you.

Mindboggle6301d ago

MS actually spent $40 million advertising Halo 3, but it was ultimately worth it, as the game has sold over 8 million. You do the math...

8 million x £30/$50 = !!!!!!!!!!!

They more than made their money back. If halo 3 was a flop, the 360 would of probably died in 2007.

xwabbit6301d ago

I want the same people who where talking about HHG to talk trash about this article too. Lets wait and see

Monkey5216301d ago

I'm sorry, but considering that the PS3 came after the 360 (1 year later), and the Wii magically having success, the PS3 isn't doing that bad at all. They are catching up at an extremely fast rate and are not stopping. They may not control 80% of the market, but that's because they had no real competition back then. The xbox came years after and the dreamcast died. We won't even talk about the gamecube. I'm not saying that the PS3 is doing amazing like the PS2 did, but they are in a decent position considering the circumstances.

CrazzyMan6301d ago (Edited 6301d ago )

they didn`t support 3rd party developers in first 2 years with help in development of multiplatform games, and because of that some multiplatform games had some problems with framerate.

All other thing Sony did right.
Of`course, it would be better, if in 2008 there were available more traditional jrpgs like Eternal Sonata or WKC, but that is just 1 year, which has ended already and we still had some great tactical jrpgs like Disgaea 3 and Valkyria Chronicles with a great traditional jrpg - Persona 4.
I hope in 2009, there will be not only WKC and TLR but also some new good jrpg games.

About losing 3rd party multiplatform exclusivity, well for now it`s not big deal, since to achieve true PS3 power for 3rd party alone would need a lot of time like atleast 3 years. The games are still coming to PS3.

About SALES, PS3 could cost 299$ in 2007, they would have sales like Wii, around 40-45 mln. today and lose maybe 1-2 bln. $.
BUT who would ignore 25-28 mln. x360 userbase vs 40-45 mln. PS3 userbase Today??? Sony would lose 2 bln. $ for what? For 2-3 exclusive games? Is this WISE???

p.s. And there are ~50 mln. PSP sold WW, don`t use VGC numbers as facts, they are just ESTIMATES.

cayal6301d ago

"Sony has kinda screwed it up and they didn't even get the Super Bowl ad which was stupid"

$3 million on one damn ad is ludicrous. That isn't good spending and I am glad Sony wouldn't waste their money when the same amount can get you multiple ads shown multiple times.

ultimolu6301d ago

Okaaaaay...

Press agree if you think Sony's doing a good job so far in terms of software and hardware, considering the PS3 has been on the market for only two years. Press disagree if you think they're out of their f*cking minds.

And be honest.

green6301d ago

I don't think it's as easy as that.I believe that Sony is not advertising the PS3 enough and in "enough" i mean advertising the value of the system over it's rivals.

A consumer goes into a shop and all they see is the price and especially since Microsoft and Nintendo are very good at advertising the lower price points of their consoles .Sony's adverts should highlight the inclusion of wi-fi,web browser, blue-ray, free online gaming etc, things that it has over it's rivals that will help consumers justify spending the higher price over the 360.

As of now i don't see that and it's a shame because i believe that when taking all those things into account it makes the PS3 a valuable system.

demonddel6301d ago

@ORIOL003 How the f@$k you know you never even play the game yet..........y'all need to quit sucking sony's d!@k and just play some games.

Godmars2906301d ago

But they didn't do the quality control on the 360 causing RRoD, backtracked on HDMI and still use DVDs while penalizing devs who make games that need more than 2 discs.

There really needs to be articles questioning if MS knows what they're doing, if they even have "it" rather than all of these "Sony is Doomed" pieces.

Giriath6301d ago

He isn't really "looking at the bigger picture". If he were, he'd see that the Playstation 3 was released a year after the Xbox 360, even a few more months in Europe where it has sold the most. When talking sales, that really does count. And I don't think he actually believes Microsoft aren't equally as disappointed as Sony. Neither expected Nintendo's under dog to become the wonder dog.

If Sony has so few exclusives on the Playstation 3 as he says, wouldn't Microsoft be even more disappointed and confused when the PS3 is selling just as much as the Xbox 360 despite being more expensive? Fact is that the PS3 now has at least as many good exclusives as the Xbox 360 does.

Now that Sony has started promoting their console in much the same way Microsoft does, most of the gaming press ridicule them, when they are the ones who told Sony to start doing so in the first place. Claiming that the Playstation 3 has more longetivity isn't very bold when it has new and superior tech in the CELL processor and Blu-ray drive, and Sony will support it for at least 8 years, if not the promised 10.

xTruthx6301d ago

Sony isn't losing it.... end of discussion <8-D

ultimolu6301d ago

I do agree with you on that green. I remembered the days where you couldn't even watch T.V without seeing some PS2/PS1 advertisement. Sony needs to move their asses in marketing the PS3 correctly.

iHEARTboobs6301d ago

Sony would be in trouble if they were under MS's business model. The PS3 will stay on the market longer than the 360 and if anything, that's when they'll catch and surpass the 360 in sales if it isn't done by the time the next XBOX hits. But if Sony doesn't outsell the 360 by at least a million this year then they wont catch up until the next XBOX. But as a gamer as long as they keep pumping out great games i'm happy. It's a great system.

+ Show (18) more repliesLast reply 6301d ago
tnkGODimATHEIST6302d ago

Sony LOST A LONG TIME AGO WITH THEIR garbage ass console.

PirateThom6302d ago

So many tears... what's wrong? Killzowned?

dukadork26302d ago

yeah he sounds like he just got gang raped by a squad of angry helghasts

6302d ago
PR3DAT0R6301d ago

Yeah lots of people agree with you right?
seriously stop trolling you are really starting to annoy me, since when has the ps3 been considered garbage?

ps3's not the console you have to take out to fix on a weekly basis unlike a certain console i know that will not be mentioned.

ultimolu6301d ago (Edited 6301d ago )

Wow...who spit in your food today? o_0

And if the PS3 was a garbage console, it wouldn't exist today.

Shane Kim6301d ago

Sony made the 20 million mark faster than 360.

Gue16301d ago (Edited 6301d ago )

Can't do any other thing than laugh when a bot says that the PS3 is garbage when their console is getting massive failure rates around the planet... It doesn't even has any good games for 2009.

Zool 086301d ago (Edited 6301d ago )

With KZ2, Heavy Rain, GOW3 & FF13(Japan) this year I think not

Dimitri6301d ago

ahhh you see what jealousy does to people ??

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 6301d ago
StoneySweatLeafs6302d ago

Killzone 2 is going to change everything. Developers are going to see the results that were produced from the PS3 and flock to it. Plus with all the great games coming down the pike. It's tax seasons people. Watch the Feb. numbers rise!!

tnkGODimATHEIST6302d ago

Its just that simply Sony's marketing fails in comparison to Microsoft Game Publisher. Sony does a bad Publishing job.

Why dis6302d ago

The 2nd coming? hahahahahaha

ape0076301d ago

and you want n4g to ban hhg?

be happy with these articales,that'a all you want,you deserve this

ENJOY

edhe6301d ago

4 years & Sony's financial & technical backing all games do not have.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6301d ago
ASSASSYN 36o6302d ago (Edited 6302d ago )

Why do they say sony won't win against the 360 this gen. And why microsoft says they wouldn't want to trade position with sony this gen.
360 - 28m units - 39 months = 717948 units / month
PS3 - 20m units - 27 months = 740740 units / month

717948 per month*336months = 241230528 million xbox 360's sold
740740 per month*336months = 248888640 million ps3's sold

28 million xbox 360's today. + sold in 336 months =269230528
20 million ps3's today. + sold in 336 months =268888640

Even factoring a margin of error, plus or minus the numbers work in MS favor for holding 2nd. No sony will not die from this but they deffinitely loss their shine.
Even if the ps3 consistently outsells the xbox 360 world wide sony will still be in 3rd place in the console war in 336 months thats 28 years!

PirateThom6302d ago

Assuming nothing ever changes...

But, as you know, things rarely stay the same.

The_Zeitgeist6302d ago (Edited 6302d ago )

Ah yes a very nice burn indeed PirateThom.

The Fungus6301d ago

IDK wtf you're smoking, but 336 months is 28 years :/

I dont even care about the rest of your post, I just want to know why you chose 336 months lol.

Concerning the article, PirateThom is right. Things change.

gametheory6301d ago

Assassyn "360"?

SNES was losing against Sega Genesis until Street Fighter and Zelda were released, and Sega started releasing many useless add-ons.

PS1 started slow.

Dreamcast started great.

Not saying things *will* change, saying things *can* change and that nothing is certain. After all, 360 started from horrible in Japan to below average.

Are you one of those losers that believes trends are never broken? Just asking.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6301d ago
Show all comments (88)
130°

Why Guerrilla Games Shouldn't Abandon the Killzone Series

Hugely disappointingly, it seems that Guerrilla Games, developers of the Killzone and Horizon series, may be done with Killzone for good.

Read Full Story >>
thenerdstash.com
IAMRealHooman566d ago

1 was fine, overhyped as a " halo" killer
2 was a graphical beast at the time, and felt heavy
3 was good a refinement of 2 but not much else. weird audio issues environment were to quiet
shadow fall was pretty but bland

OtterX565d ago (Edited 565d ago )

Shadowfall had great Multiplayer though. Too bad the campaign was meh at best. It did have the occasional great moment sprinkled in.

TheNamelessOne565d ago (Edited 565d ago )

I played through 2/3 multiple times. I played through the original once, but it felt pretty lukewarm for me. I couldn't be bothered to beat Shadow Fall. I got a couple hours in and just went "I'm done". Never touched it again. It was awesome on the tech side, being a launch title, but it didn't even match up to the first game when it came to actually having fun playing it.

Rude-ro565d ago

3 in 3d was an amazing experience to be had.
Although not many experienced it as intended for good reasons.

just_looken565d ago

You forgot the ai advancements on the playstation 2 killzone one you could have a full team of bots doing everything even playing the objective that was a big thing.

In killzone 2 they always flanked you and when available used the high ground.

Playing killzone 2 no hud 5.1 audio was/is awesome

MDTunkown565d ago

They should finish Horizon story first

darthv72565d ago

I dont mind if someone else takes up the mantle for the KZ franchise. We are several years removed from the first game. It certainly could use a remake to gauge interest in the rest of the series. I know it has its fans... Im thinking of how a proper reboot can rekindle that old dormant flame and bring in a new generation of fans in the process.

just_looken565d ago

You forgot killzone mercenaries on the ps vita but it was the worst selling sony game for awhile there.

Yui_Suzumiya565d ago

Yeah, a remake would be pretty awesome

anast565d ago

They should let it go or sell it. No use spending millions on this project.

LucasRuinedChildhood565d ago

Would like a new IP before Horizon 3. Just because games take so long to make these days.

Show all comments (21)
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel732d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga731d ago (Edited 731d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow732d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo182731d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie731d ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow731d ago (Edited 731d ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

731d ago
Hereandthere730d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 730d ago
Notellin731d ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

731d ago
Hereandthere730d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow730d ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere730d ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow730d ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX731d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney730d ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody731d ago (Edited 731d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno731d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Sheppard2731d ago

How did Sony kill the series?

Inverno731d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

731d ago
fsfsxii731d ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno731d ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)
320°

Most Offensive Video Games That Would Never Cut It Today

Times are changing, and these games would have never been made in today's climate.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
thorstein784d ago (Edited 784d ago )

Every single time someone uses this phrase whether it's music, movies, books, comics, video games, etc it's always the same claim.

The ubiquitous "they" won't allow it to be made. And every decade these claims are made the claimant completely ignores all the "offensive" material that is published when the claim is made.

In ten years, you can write a new article about how you can't make games like Helldivers 2, Resident Evil VIII, Mortal Kombat I, Dragon's Dogma 2, Alan Wake 2 etc etc etc any more.

MrBaskerville784d ago

Yeah, people wouldn't be constantly outraged if there weren't games that people found enraging. The whole SBI discourse shit wouldn't be a thing if all games were inoffensive. A game like Starfield can make a guy froth at his mouth, so there will always be room for a list like this.

0hMyGandhi783d ago

Normally, I'd be inclined to agree with you, but there are massive caveats.
TV shows like Venture Bros, Ren and Stimpy, and Aqua Team wouldn't/couldn't be made today. Hell, Ren and Stimpy was a *children's* show, same thing with Rocko's Modern Life.

It's not for some arbitrary reason, either. It's branding and IP alignment. Companies are far more risk-averse than they were when I was kid in the 90's. Of course, you have companies coming out of the woodwork to hell spur on similar content, but remember: Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon and some incredibly provocative material.

And for movies? it's pretty obvious. American Pie/Wedding Crashers/Eurotrip among many other "raunch coms" have fallen out of style, and are absolutely outside what the modern day film industry is willing to stand by.
Ace Ventura 1 and 2, Dumb and Dumber, Freddy Got Fingered, Rat Race, Harold and Kumar, and Van Wilder follow suit.

Remember: I am not explicitly talking about films put onto streamers. I am talking wide-releases in actual theaters. Same thing goes for games: Carmageddon, Duke Nukem, Manhunt, Six Days In Fallujah (with their original concept), Hatred, and so on and so forth. Of course, I'd be inclined to mention most tactical shooters like Rainbow Six and Joint Ops as well, due to cultural sensitivity regarding *who* you are shooting and why.

And not all of it is bad (obviously). Tastes change, and perspectives change to fit the demographic.
I should add that I'm a lefty, living in L.A. Working in film.

thorstein783d ago

The Boys, Invincible, Jojo Rabbit, Deadpool, Gen V, Last of Us, Banshee... There are plenty of media being made today that people will claim "can't be made today".

Profchaos783d ago

Yeah but if you consider manhunt which was basically a snuff film could you seriously make that game with high than PS2 era graphics.

thorstein783d ago

The Outlast Trials just came out.

But the storyline of Manhunt was that you were executed. But then lived. And if you didn't do as you were told, you'd die. And the people you killed were not innocents.

It was all filmed by a psychopath.

As we speak GTA VI is being finished up for a release. You get to play a Bonnie and Clyde type of protagonist who run up against the law.

Bodycam looks so real.

People are making those games. Articles like this will always exist no matter how incorrect they are, no matter how many times they blame "them" for whatever it is "they" do to prevent "those" games from being made.

ZycoFox783d ago

The UK is the biggest junk country pandering to that nonsense as well, with laws against free speech and expression to match. It got so bad even Rowan Atkinson made a video on free speech about it.

Now the UK raises the age rating on harmless films like Mary Poppins, it's just a load of pansy weak ass nonsense.

MrDead783d ago (Edited 783d ago )

The right wing Tories have been in power in the UK for the 14 years you know the ones that are "anti-woke", blame them for your perceptions.

Killer2020UK783d ago (Edited 783d ago )

Are these snowflakes in the room with us now?

This is more faux outrage designed to get hits. The consequences are unfortunately creating hysteria amongst those willing to buy into it and blame "them" or "the left" or "liberals" meanwhile the left are kicking off about genocide, actual real world abhorrent acts. Nobody is campaigning to censor this shit.

Huey_My_D_Long783d ago

Not too mention the fact that some of these game are controversial for you know, underage porn and encouraging rape.

So either the guy just came in to comment snowflakes without reading anything, or he is calling people snowflakes for having a problem with said titles. Crazy how much brain rot someone can have.

banger88784d ago

Dead Island: "The early PC version of the zombie game swapped the playable character Purna’s Gender Wars skill with a prototype name, which shouldn’t be mentioned directly. The skill name made fun of both Purna as a character and feminists."

"Feminist Whore" lmao

gold_drake784d ago

ill add one more to the list.
drakengard 1.

its ridiculous tho, especially since they'd still be able to find their place in alot of places in the world. except america of course ha. and maybe Australia.

ppl are so sensitive these days. ha. but it is what it is.

Barlos784d ago (Edited 784d ago )

They're not offensive.

And we need another Fat Princess. Fantastic little game!

Some people just have no sense of humour if this sort of thing offends them. They need to lighten up and stop taking themselves so seriously.

Deeeeznuuuts784d ago

Would love a new fat princess game 🤟

CantThinkOfAUsername784d ago

Games literally about sexual assault, mass genocide, bombing civilians, and school shooting. None of which is satirical.

isarai783d ago

Actually it's about fat princesses

Huey_My_D_Long783d ago (Edited 783d ago )

Its crazy that people are fixated on Fat princess when clearly the list is going over controversies, and not all of them are equal. Like way worse examples but pretend the entire list is like that.

Show all comments (37)