150°

EA will be a very different company under private ownership

Analysts see trouble for studios like BioWare, potential for Saudi meddling.

Read Full Story >>
arstechnica.com
NovusTerminus107d ago

I see trouble for Bioware coming from their last two games being giant financial disasters, with horrible writing and mid gameplay.

Nitrowolf2106d ago

I mean, it's trouble for the franchise. Not in a sense of closing down like Bioware could face, but anyone thinking that things won't be driven purely for profits because "investors" are "out" probably haven't been paying attention to other recent events.

Not that they have been smart decisions for profits, but look at City of Wolves shoehorning in a DJ and Cristiano Ronaldo.

If people think the Battlefield series and other EA-owned properties aren't going to be affected, and in fact improve, yeah, I would start rethinking.

Armaggedon106d ago (Edited 106d ago )

Dragon age Veilguard was fine. Had some cringe moments sure, but I have rolled my eyes at alot of games people say does have good writing.

Rebel_Scum106d ago

Nah I reckon they’ll be alright. They’ve had some failures that should give them some lessons to learn from. As long as the publisher keeps their beak out of it they can always bounce back.

Relientk77106d ago

I knew EA loved money, but I didn't know they loved blood money.

Alos88105d ago

Really? The idea EA doesn't care about ethics surprises you?

Christopher106d ago

Look, this sucks, but imagine BioWare IPs being picked up by one of the good RPG studios out there? CDPR with Mass Effect and Dragon Age perhaps? It won't have the same DNA, but at least the potential to continue the legacy of those games in a fashion that's better than what EA will likely do with them is out there?

crazyCoconuts106d ago

It sucks that they'll have to fail before ditching the IPs which will probably be years from now.

blacktiger106d ago

I see trouble when I see Saudi Arabia

Dexterio106d ago (Edited 106d ago )

Ikr? The problem is everyone loves their money.

Elit3Nick105d ago

It's not just Saudi Arabia, it's also Jared Kushner.

Show all comments (26)
30°

PlayStation Store Holiday Sale Refresh Adds and Removes Titles

Sony has refreshed the Holiday Sale, as new titles are added and a lot have been removed.

40°

The Epic Games Store Has a Free Double Dose of Styx

The Epic Games Store is giving away two Styx games this week.

Read Full Story >>
terminalgamer.com
60°

Rockstar launches official marketplace for mods

Rockstar has launched an official marketplace for "every server and every player" to buy mods: Cfx Marketplace.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Christopher2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I wonder how much of this isn't just taken work of others who have modded for free.

Edit: Also, great way for R* to take popular ideas and build them into GTAVI based on demand.

fr0sty12h ago

What I see happening here is, R* is going to ban mods in GTA6 UNLESS you buy them from the marketplace and R* then gets a cut of that sale.

ActualWhiteMan14h ago

Ah, perfect timing with them taking down the Bully online fan mod. Greedy a$$ company.

Christopher12h ago

It's okay as long as they get a cut of the money.

fr0sty12h ago

Expect R* to force it on you.

Snookies126h ago

Yep, right there with you. I'll happily donate to a mod creator if it looks really cool, or if I enjoy it. But expecting payment up front? Nope, not touching it.

IanTH11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

I'm not entirely sure how to read this, as it doesn't seem exactly like an exact parallel to Bethesda's paid mods shenanigans.

Rather than single player stuff, this appears to be aimed solely on Cfx Servers. From what I've gleaned, apparently Rockstar bought the Cfx mod team several years ago, coming a few years after weird contentions led them to ban a few of their members. Ultimately, the question is if they plan to keep this contained to only online/servers.

I have to guess to a degree yes. It'd be pretty hard to "force" paid mods for single player when modding files locally on your own machine, but much easier for servers they'll control. So perhaps this is their soft launch ahead of GTA6 online and they'll clamp down more tightly on non-official servers going forward? Ever since they've become a 1 or 2 property studio, I haven't really cared much for Rockstar stuff, so I'm not entirely up on everything surrounding this. Sounds like it has the potential to be problematic further down the line, but right now fairly easy to ignore...I think lol.

Show all comments (10)