Reports suggest Battlefield 6 campaign lacks polish, with early impressions calling it the weakest part of the game.
The Battlefield 6 roadmap for 2026 has been revealed, and it confirms a server browser is on the way alongside naval warfare and more.
Until they add bigger maps to modes other that their garbage br, im not reinstalling that, they just blatantly misled a lot of people leading up to release. And still refuse just add bigger maps which people have asked for since the beta fk EA!
Why would you assume that? Nowhere in there does it mention bigger maps, it mentions reimagined old maps, says nothing about their size
TBF - the developer does say that next month they are releasing the largest map they have released in a Battlefield yet in Golmud. (4x the size of Mirak Valley)
And then in July comes Tsuru Reef (even larger) which I actually think looks really sick
I couldn't agree less with you actually.
EA hav3 listened to the people before releasing this B6 game.
It plays much better and more battlefield like than the past 3 installments.
Personally, it's not bigger maps this game needs. They've dropped the player count which is a great compromise imo.
Bigger maps with only 32 v 32 means more running around doing nothing.
Keep the new maps coming & aiming for old style battlefield games and it's a win win for me.
Server browser should've been in there at launch, when will devs learn this? It's a feature seemingly always neglected but then added in a future update...
I remember in BF Hardline the server browser didn’t have any dedicated DLC maps, and the entire player base fell off accordingly. When people pay good money for DLC maps, they want to be able to actually play them, and that means dedicated DLC ONLY servers must be programmed into the server browser by the devs.
EA should do what Bungie did for Halo 2 in 2005. When Bungie basically invented DLC maps for online matchmaking they were smart enough to realize it could split the community. DLC maps had DEDICATED PLAYLISTS so players who spent good money on the DLC could hop right into matches. Later, the DLC maps became free and also became a MANDATORY DOWNLOAD for everyone so that the DLC maps could be integrated into all standard playlists. This prevented the game from dying and the community from being fractured.
"Battlefield 6 Dev Director Anna Norrevik has been announced as a headline speaker at Europe’s premier B2B games conference, Nordic Game Spring 2026 (NG26), which returns on 26–29 May to Malmö’s iconic Slagthuset venue." - Nordic Game.
Four industry veterans inducted into UK Games Industry Hall of Fame, including Debbie Bestwick and Jon Ingold
Not surprised at all.
In other news, the sun rises in the East! #eafail #failup
Still believe they should have ditched campaign and put those ressources in more mp content (Not Like in 2042 where they cut the campaign and still managed to offer Lackluster mp content).
Nowadays i have a hard time motivating myself to play through FPS campaigns in general.
Should've focused on a co-op mode instead. BF3's campaign was pretty bad, but it's co-op mode showed a lot of potential despite its short length.
"Take the game from what wpuld otherwise be a high 80s/90s score on metacritic to mid 70's" given we all know everyone is playing it for the MP, unless the campaign is like broken or truly terrible- both of which I doubt it will be, should it really have a major impact on the score given the multiplayer seems to be aolid and has lots of content. It seems strange to me to mark it down signifciantly for what is ultimately additional content and gameplay being similar to mp- should still feel good to play. The storyline may be abit meh - but I dont think that's a good reason to mark it down significsntly.