@Shiore

They don’t say they use a 5060TI anywhere but the comparison with other cards. Fake frames are not as good as real ones. So for a 5060TI this would likely run at well under the native FPS used by the ps5 pro. Why would you choose to accept that hit in latency?They most likely compared the 5090 in each comparison that wasn’t labeled otherwise.

@Babadook7 In the video you can see the performance with the configuration listing, which showcases the 5060 Ti. So yes they used it. Doesn't matter if it's throughout. The game is being maxed out on the 5060 Ti, at those settings there is no visual difference between it and 5090 as both are at the "setting ceiling".

Saying “fake frames are not as good as real ones” misses the point of what frame generation is actually doing. The GPU still renders the core frames like normal, but frame generation intelligently adds inbetween frames using motion data, which makes everything look much smoother, especially at high framerates, The 5060 Ti; a middle card in the 50 series line up handles above 150 frames in this game, so it's utilized well in part with it's native optimization. You can check what the recommended requirements are for this game for 1440p 60, we're talking hardware from almost ten years ago.

You can make an argument for competitive games where latency and Nvidia Reflex can only do so much currently, but not for slower paced single-player, cinematic stuff where frame gen legitimately improves the experience past a performance threshold, such as shown in the benchmark.

Forget about it dude it's impossible to convince these guys a PS5 Pro is equivalent to an entry-to-mid level new PC and not some $2000 machine. They don't want to hear it. Still stuck in covid/crypto boom price mentality or something.

@Shiore

You didn't contradict any of my points. This is most likely using the 5090, not the 5070TI. No evidence to the contrary exists and so you couldn't produce any. Settings aren't the problem, activating is. As for the 5070TI it would be running at about 37.5 FPS and that makes a game like this worse than on the Pro due to poor latency.

@Babadook7 You don't have any points, your "most likely" is based on nothing. You're the one with no evidence to the contrary. I however have what's in front of me that's already comparable to other existing benchmarks, and so there's no reasonable doubt on their part to have to lie. You can quite literally go on youtube and search "Stellar Blade 5060 Ti" and pick your poison. This isn't hidden information.

Great. You can run it at max settings on a GTX 5060TI at 37.5 FPS. Or smooth out the frames but not the latency and introduce extra artifacts. Well played.

It's wild what you'll go to to cope here. Taking that "beyond 150FPS" number and dividing it by 4 to get your magic 37.5FPS number kind of shows how little you know about any of this, and your dishonesty to try and reach a figure that supports your bias. The PS5 Pro game looks fine, you don't need warp reality to defend it, but the fact is a 5060ti in pure performance metrics is about 40% faster than the PS5 Pro's GPU. PC's going to have some overhead but not that much.

@Babadook7 Lmao. There is no such things as "GTX 5060TI " The GTX line hasn't been a thing since the 20 series introduced RTX. There is no artifacting with a game like this at these settings, nor at that framerate.

https://youtu.be/z98CCoFe30...
Here, you can kindly stop regurgitating nonense now. You really need to educate yourself on what you think you know what you're talking about. Even if it's to troll, improve your ability at it. You're not even being entertaining.

NAH, it’s the usual PC elitists who are reaching on this one. I’m far closer to reality by my math than you guys trying to claim that 150 FPS is an accurate comparison to native FPS. Totally ignoring the documented latency it creates. Oh and $2000 was accurate sorry guys.

Regarding RTX vs GTX I stand corrected.

Your video however is of terrible quality and isn’t proof of anything. Actual analysis shows there is plenty of artifacts for current frame gen.

Here for example.
https://www.techradar.com/c...

“Once again, I found that Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Remastered is another game that the Nvidia RTX 5090 can play at 8K – but with a lot of help from DLSS and Multi Frame Generation.

However, maybe because of underlying technology or the fact that the game hasn't been out (in remastered form) long enough for major patches or drivers, the visual artefacts that are introduced using these features were particularly obvious – and distracting.”

Also the 4x frame gen will indeed be significantly worse in terms of latency than the 60 fps version on PS5 (and pro).

*facepalm*. I think you need to do some actual research dude. I'd try and educate you a little more but it's pretty clear you "don't want to hear it"

LLM is a subcategory of AI....all LLM is AI but not all AI is LLM.

AI does exist, wtf are you even talking about. Then explain me how OpenAi created an AI that taught itself how to play Dota 2? what you meant by AI in the old days already had a name: bots. You're just throwing some terms around that you're absolutely clueless about.

@michiel

AI did not autonomously teach itself how to play DOTA2.

"throwing some terms around that you're absolutely clueless about."

Oh boy.

Sorry bud, artificial intelligence only exists in science fiction.

@Crimson

Fair points all around. We will just have to wait and see how this plays out. I guess I always saw A.I as a gun. It doesn't matter who wields it, because the intent behind having it is pretty straightforward. Some people will only use the gun as a last resort, primarily to help small businesses and or solo peeps have at least some competitive advantage while they wear many, many hats. Some people will use the gun as a first resort because they see the inherent advantages of A.I. and immediately think "cost savings", while others will know a gun exists, but don't know how to use it. A.I has all the ability to become weaponized, and I agree with you that bad actors cannot be blamed for all of A.I, but I just don't trust big companies like E.A. (for example) to use it in ethical fashion.

and again, you are correct about major technologies being developed with enterprise in mind.
We are entering just such a weird time in history. Unlike older technology, A.I is here to stay forever. And it's only going to get better. And the attempts to reign it in have been awful. Some commercials I've seen on TV have embraced it fully as long as they state "made with A.I" text on the bottom as it's shown, while others are absent.

What makes A.I so frusturating and compelling is that no one really knows what the end game actually looks like. We see a million different paths, and so it's like we are designing the rules for a whole new sport. The thing that makes this so unique is the iterative process that has made the technology exponentially better with each passing year. This is all moving so fast and at times, I wish we pumped the brakes to ask how this will fundamentally change our lives, because it will in a matter of time, for better or worse.