330°

Is the Console War Finally Over?

IGN - The battle between PlayStation and Xbox has waged for years, but a messy and unexpected conclusion to the console war may already have happened.

314d ago
VenomUK313d ago (Edited 313d ago )

Yes. PlayStation has beaten Xbox.

This time next year when the evidence of this is stronger, Halo on PS5 & Xbox console sales have cratered, no one will even be asking the question.

Some die-hard Xbox enthusiasts have shifted their loyalties from the great Xbox console to the company Microsoft - they are not the same thing. Of course Microsoft as a Big Tech company with 3 trillion dollar market cap has significantly more wealth than Sony will likely ever have, but some fans are incorrectly equating this with Xbox success - it isn’t. PlayStation beat Xbox but there will be other wars to come.

The recent Gamertag radio interview with Peter Moore bought back some fond memories of the original Xbox and the early years of the great Xbox 360 era. 🫡

S2Killinit313d ago (Edited 313d ago )

PlayStation won. But while the console war is done, the competition continues. MS has retreated into monthly subscription services and PC and is trying to scorch consoles.

Cacabunga313d ago

War is over with no winner for the first time ever

Flewid638313d ago

Consoles have beaten consoles before. That didn't end the console war. lol.

Lightning77313d ago

Xbox console sales are dead last with no hope of revival in sales but they are providing most to the industry right now.

StormSnooper313d ago

“Most” okay. He couldn’t even finish the sentence lest he be found out.

YodaCracker313d ago

The war ended with Microsoft as the biggest games publisher in the world, bringing in more revenue than Sony.

RedDevils313d ago

What I never knew there even a war, cause Xbox was never in it.

darthv72312d ago

@caca... the winners are those of us who never cared about petty wars and just bought the platforms because they just wanted to play the games.

I kept saying people should support all so they would never feel a moment of disappointment when one of them decides not to compete. During any platform downtime, I had others to keep me entertained.

The ones who argued... prob only had one, and it was the one they defended most.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 312d ago
Profchaos313d ago

Nah man don't do Sega dirty like that the Dreamcast 2 is right around the corner 9/9/29

Darkegg313d ago

Microsoft out, Sega in. If video game prices aren't controlled better with less competition, then I'm out. No way will I spent $100 for a partial game which is what they are working at.

Agent75313d ago

You look back at the history of Atari, can't really fault their consoles and computers, most of their games didn't exactly meet AAA standards.

Profchaos313d ago

I find it interesting that Atari was inches away from signing a deal that would have given them the right to distribute the NES or at that time the Famicom to all regions outside of Japan.

lukasmain314d ago

Of course it's over. And that Loser with thousands of Alt-Accounts is like some console war veteran who came home and can't function because of a severe case of Gaming Shell Shock. He can't sleep. He trembles at any pro-Sony news and when an Xbox game is rumored or confirmed to be going to Playstation he starts shaking uncontrollably. Flashbacks. Prone to wetting his pants.

-Foxtrot314d ago

It’s weird though because rather than being mad at Microsoft for “betraying him” he’s mad at Sony. If people like himself spoke up more 10 years ago rather than letting things slide then maybe the backlash from their own die hard fans would have kept Microsoft in line more. I just hope people learn from this incase Sony starts getting even more cocky, especially with the live service trash.

It’s even funnier because it’s just towards Sony aswell, with Nintendo it’s like their second champ, unless they see Nintendo as the whole General Hux thing “I don’t care if you win, I just want Sony to lose”

314d ago
pwnmaster3000314d ago (Edited 314d ago )

Idk why you guys even acknowledge him/her/them.
They obviously just want attention and excitement because they lack it irl.
Just ignore them and I promise you they will get bored lol

Gamingsince1981313d ago

Not much else for them to do as an xbox owner, so they might as well make infinite n4g accounts.

1Victor313d ago

@pwn: “ Idk why you guys even acknowledge him/her/them.”
I. My case is fun to read the blind ignorance and titanic stupidity mix with mental and emotional instability in each of the comments oh and as a bonus finding his alt accounts hard typing been banned after I call them out 🤣.
Now
The console war isn’t over yet as the Xbox is struggling and might release another console if and when they stop pushing consoles or came out officially and say they’re 3rd party then it will be officially over till then they got a microscopic chance to get back on 2nd again

S2Killinit313d ago (Edited 313d ago )

While I understand your sentiments guys, please don’t go overboard because you never know what people have going on in their personal life. Also, besides the alt-guy’s constant harassing PlayStation gamers w his comments over the years, he is actually otherwise a decent guy from what I’ve noticed in his comments about non-gaming issues.

So lets keep our comments non-personal as much as possible.

lukasmain313d ago

I've seen him tell Lies about people and tell people to STFU. I've seen him insult people. Let me ask you, why is it so hard to just make an account and lay off the BS comments? He just can't bring himself to show respect to anyone other than pro xbox fans. It's like he's incapable. His best effort is holding an account for about 3 days before getting banned again. He shows no respect. So I won't respect him in any way.

Elda313d ago

Nope. That mess deserves all the ridicule & shade thrown at them for their immense amount of trolling because of their overkill of love for MS/XB.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 313d ago
314d ago
Terry_B313d ago (Edited 313d ago )

The console war was over 10 years ago already. Microsoft fumbled since the xbox one worldwide.

scorpio_2049313d ago

I still remember listening to that on my way to eat lunch with my wife. They kept talking about TV and I was just asking what about games. Before that I owned Microsoft consoles. After that I’ve always bought Sony.

Popsicle313d ago

Same. Xbox was my primary console before that presentation. I remember watching it and hoping they would give me a reason to purchase an XOne. They never did and I only purchased a PS4 that gen.

Profchaos312d ago

That was such a nightmare of a reveal I was thinking ok this is the intro still they have to show something a sizzle reel anything but nothing really came I remember feeling like I just wasted my time watching that

Show all comments (74)
40°

An Update to Our Shared Commitment to Safer Gaming

Discover how Sony Interactive Entertainment, Nintendo, and Microsoft continue to collaborate to improve player safety across our platforms.

Read Full Story >>
sonyinteractive.com
110°

There's an Underrepresented Majority That Wants Entertainment Without Agendas, Says Ex Tripwire CEO

Ex-Tripwire CEO John Gibson shares his 'Entertainment First' vision to capture the agenda-free magic of classics like Star Wars, Zelda, and Metroid.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
Goodguy012d ago

Yes. Just make a good game instead of worrying it should make some kind of stupid social/political differences in the world... we've got enough of that in the real world. Games are places we can escape to and just have fun.

z2g2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

How about you make a game that’s important to you and the people who are interested in that buy it and the ones that don’t like it don’t have to buy it. Just because something bugs some people doesn’t mean there aren’t other people who it doesn’t bug. Someone’s hangups shouldn’t be other people’s problems.

Don’t want a game that features a political or cultural statement or an underrepresented group of people? Don’t buy it.

Not all of us just want vapid, mindless fantasy all the time. Sometimes we want something that represents us or means something. There’s nothing wrong with that. Look how many movies in the world have covered so many types of stories, people or historical controversies to huge successes. Games are no different.

Eonjay2d ago

The plot to remove representation or ideas and content that you dont approve of is an agenda within itself. Its also censorship. People need are trapped in this main- character syndrome where they believe that the world and all of its happens are fashioned for them alone.

crazyCoconuts2d ago

"Don't buy it"
Exactly what people do.
And then big companies are reminded why if you want to make money you may not want to do things like villainize half your market. If you want to preach one side of an argument you're gonna lose people. At least do the Deus Ex/GTA thing and show the warts on both sides so everyone has something to agree with

senorfartcushion2d ago

We’re still waiting on that Splinter Cell remake…

raWfodog2d ago

On the flip side of that, good games can have characters of different ethnic and social backgrounds without thinking that some agendas are trying to be pushed. I've played many, many great games throughout my life with many different characters (male, female, white, people of color, even some animal characters) and loved them all simply for the story and entertainment they provided me while I escaped into those worlds.

senorfartcushion2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

That’s not possible.

Being a child doesn’t remove the political points of OLD GAMES, we were just kids. In fact, older media was decidedly more political than some of the cowardly, childish efforts we have today.

This is precisely why we are still to get that Splinter Cell remake. We can’t have a fun Splinter Cell game with AAA graphics because a few virgins don’t want “politics in their games.”

neutralgamer19922d ago

Keep gaming free of nonsense. Agenda pushing in social media age has gotten worst

senorfartcushion1d 7h ago

Name a game and I’ll tell you what the agenda was

Notellin1d 21h ago

"While our first game is faith-based"

Yeah you guys want to get rid of all the politics and play a nice Southern Baptist game. We get it.

Christopher1d 19h ago

He should follow his own words, then.

*** That changed around two years ago, when he started consulting for Bible X, the studio behind the Christian-based game project Gate Zero. Last month, Gibson, through his recently established publisher Templar Media, acquired the developer.***

Not sure there's anything more political in history than religion.

S2Killinit1d 17h ago

But his statement is also an agenda. Hope people are intelligent enough to know that.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 1d 7h ago
z2g2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I fail to see how representing actual underrepresented or making them feel included is an “agenda”. This is an extremely self centered selfish viewpoint. Those actual underrepresented people just want to be recognized as valid. The privileged majority who are always represented take that for granted and can’t deal with the fact that “other” types of people or views exist. Inclusion or awareness isn’t an agenda. It’s representing reality and making those “other” people or stories be seen and align with actual reality.

There are literally thousands and thousands of games to choose from, and if you are annoyed that some have cultural or topical relevance, that’s your problem and you don’t have to buy them. Meanwhile other people who want that actually have games that speak to them. So sick of this “my way or the highway” attitude.

And there are plenty of games out there, if that privileged majority have an issue or don’t want a game based on cultural relevance. Pick up a Switch. Most games are g-rated, noncontroversial cartoons with stories fit for tweens. No reality to get mad at.

2d ago Replies(2)
KyRo2d ago

It's always me me me me me with you lot. There's a difference between representation and forcing it for the sake of forcing something to a very very loud but very small minority.

Christopher2d ago

You really are only proving their point with this sort of response to the idea of people feeling included in some games versus the plethora of games without it.

Outside_ofthe_Box2d ago

We need to define what "forcing" is because I've seen people say things like Aloy being female in Horizon is pushing an agenda or catering to a "very very loud but very small minority" before.

dveio2d ago

@z2g

I personally think you've nailed it here.

For decades, wether in film or music, there had been ONE primary target group.

And if you're looking further, even in economy, laws, courts or any other area there had been only one target group.

While others, let's be real, were surpressed.

It's "funny" though - why do we all think personalities like David Bowie, Mick Jagger, Freddy Mercury, etc., have had such a huuuge impact on cultures and society? Because they were 1:1 depicts of the Demon Slayer or the Duke?

No, because they were different. Because we all are different.

The only people time and time again that are complaining, whining and moaning about everything (while highly likely even been a fan of Queen or something) are prejudiced people.

Are people that "But it's never been any different, and I want it to stay that way!".

There's nothing highly hidden here. It's always been the same. After decades, even centuries of rules written by and for the "one primary target group", they are now the loudest that complain & moan.

Inverno2d ago

Y'all could also, ya know, just not buy games you feel have an agenda? This constant bitching coming from all these whiney men every time they see a game that isn't catering to them specifically is tiring. They latch themselves onto these games and throw endless amounts of harassment as if there aren't another thousand games releasing before/around/after. I'm usually outspoken when it comes to forced diversity in games, but the issue here is you're all bigoted as hell and need to learn to be a little less offended. Y'all become the snowflakes you mocked so much lol.

MrDead2d ago

This guy is one of the biggest most delicate snowflakes out there, I'm sure he'll be crying on Tucker Carlson or Fox "News" again soon.

Michiel19891d 21h ago

@christopher cater to and include are two very different things. Played most of the games you mentioned and had no issue with any of em because they just include it. I have no issue with inclusion of that, but if in the next god of war, Kratos would all of a sudden hyperfocus on being a strong independent man or a hypermasculine one, I would give them shit for it as well. It has nothing to do with the inclusion of x or y group, but about the integrity of the game.

@inverno stop putting words in my mouth . It's actually the opposite of what you say, I said there can be no conversation because as soon as you criticize them, a whole angry mob comes at you and tries to cancel you. Thankfully it's become less and less over time and people actually realize now they can voice their opinion without having the fear of losing their job.
You really can't see that a lot of companies are now backpeddalling about the woke bs? They finally realize making your product worse to cater to a group who doesn't buy your product anyway is terrible.

Michiel19892d ago ShowReplies(4)
PitbullMonster1d 15h ago

Who was crying about kingdom come deliverance, Stellar Blade and the first descendant? White Hetero men Or leftards?

Inverno1d 4h ago

Leftards but those games still went on to release and become financially and critically successful. This dood, who was a CEO, went on social media to voice an opinion that at the time was controversial. Just cause you have freedom of speech and expression doesn't mean you hafto always voice your opinions publicly. He had to step down because it was more about the company than just him. Now he's back talking bout "unrepresented majority", as if there aren't different audiences to cater to. Since people from both sides can't seem to escape getting fired for voicing opinions then I guess everyone's got to equally face the consequences of their inability to shut up.

MrBaskerville2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Star wars, anti agenda? Lol. I don't think Lucas would agree.

Inverno2d ago

One of the most politically charged movies in existence. They can pretend it's all about space wizards with swords but the space nazis are still in the movies and they're still the bad guys. It's ironic as hell.

JEECE2d ago

More evidence that if the agenda feels legitimate within the story's world, people don't even notice that it is an agenda and they don't complain.

Elit3Nick2d ago

This one gave me a chuckle, too.

JEECE2d ago

As ever, this is a misguided expression of the speaker's issue. While of course there are some games (pure puzzle games, etc) that have no agenda, any game with a narrative is conveying some type of message. What people who say they don't like "woke" or "politics in games" actually mean is that they don't like hamfisted, poorly written narratives/characters that are thin veneers for modern political messages that feel out of place in the game's universe. It's why all these people complain about the Veilguard and not Baldur's Gate 3. They both have "woke" characters but in BG3 they feel like they belong in the universe, while in the Veilguard they just feel like generic fantasy skins for modern American 20-somethings.

Show all comments (61)
40°

Interview: Groovin’ On a New Donkey Kong Country Tribute Album

Mega Mixtape has some good grooves coming in, and Gamerhub UK talks more with them.

Read Full Story >>
gamerhub.co.uk
14h ago