670°

God Is a Geek Employees Resign After Owner Copies Elon Musk’s Nazi Salute

TNS: The owner of God Is a Geek copied Elon Musk's Nazi salute, which led to the staff's resignation and the creation of a new website.

Read Full Story >>
thenerdstash.com
thorstein350d ago

Hitler's party were certainly Christian so this comes as no surprise.

coolbeans350d ago

And the chief forces *against* Hitler's party were also certainly Christian, so I'm not sure what you're driving at here. r/atheism is just around the corner on your first left.

NXFather350d ago

You got realize alot of these humans are not really humans? I don't mean reptiles either.

NXFather350d ago

These days they are no longer open calling themselves Gods.

Cacabunga350d ago

Dumbest disrespectful website name..

coolbeans350d ago (Edited 350d ago )

I must make a critical correction here: the chief forces [that were consistently] against Hitler's party were also certainly Christian. My original comment is incorrect when considering that The Allies did include The Soviet Union, whose official ideology was atheism & communism (obviously). But that correction also unexpectedly reinforces my point, given Stalin's willingness to shake hands with Hitler and sign a non-aggression pact with him early on.

S2Killinit349d ago (Edited 349d ago )

He means they were christian as in christian ideals, imagery, propaganda, and sentiments were used by Nazi’s to justify or unite their base.

This is not new. And its not exclusive to Nazi’s or christianity.

Religion is and always has been used to justify the most heinous atrocities in human history, and continues to do so. In fact, religion and racism both live in the same space as both phenomena aim to create “out group-in group” worldview (according to professors of sociology). In other words, “I’m better than you because you will end up burning in hell, but my religion is correct so Im going to heaven”.

coolbeans349d ago

@S2Killint

"He means they were christian as in christian ideals, imagery, propaganda, and sentiments were used by Nazi’s to justify or unite their base."

But even that claim is warped the more you look into Hilter's own motivations. It's not really "christian" propaganda to harken back to Aryan bloodlines for example. Like, there's a wider mixture of ideals - some inherently contradictory to one another - that led to the rise of the Third Reich.

But even if that *were* the case, that still isn't a great excuse for thorstein's Reddit Atheism moment.

-Anglican priest decides to throw up a Roman salute (even being generous to his stated motivation) and is quickly defrocked over it.
-"Heh... not surprised to see from a Christian."

Like, to literally paint this broad brush over one guy who's literally being *punished* as we speak is simply asinine. That's why I was being smarmy in return.

thorstein349d ago (Edited 349d ago )

Since you keep calling me out with some pseudo historical claims.

The opposition were Christian?

The UK at the time was not a Christian as they once were. That decline started at the end of the 18th century.

The USA still firmly held a separation of church and state at the beginning of WWII and at no time did either country embrace Christianity as a driving force for opposing Hitler. And neither did France.

China was not Christian.

The Soviets were atheists. And yes, Stalin did awful horrible things. The USA had interment camps.

Hitler wrote Mein Kampf BEFORE his rise. He and his party had no doubt they were doing God's work.

That equivocacy doesn't change the simple fact that Hitler and his followers were Christian, no matter how much you want to embrace no true scotsman fallacy.

And then to dismiss the disgusting history of Christianity (and current disposition) with a broad stroke is "simply asinine."

To put it in gamer terms, this guy is not a bug, he's a feature.

coolbeans349d ago

@thorstein

-"The UK at the time was not a Christian as they once were."

"The USA still firmly held a separation of church and state at the beginning of WWII and at no time did either country embrace Christianity as a driving force for opposing Hitler. And neither did France."

So, none of these contentions directly challenge my initial statement. Let's just break these down first by historical statistics: Great Britain was ~60-70% Christian, USA was over 90% Christian, and majority of France was Christian (no collected census polls like the other two that I found). Britain's declining numbers does *not* defeat my overall point: the chief forces - with exception to the USSR - were Christian-majority nations. You can even broaden this out to Canada and other smaller European nation-states that fought the Nazis too; the result is the same.

As for *using* Christianity as a driving force, you're also wrong on several levels:

1.) You're moving the goalposts, as the initial focus was on the religious makeup *of* a nation.
2.) Your assertation is wildly incorrect depending on who you're talking about. FDR, Truman, and Churchill had no problem invoking Christian dynamics in rallying support and talking about driving back Hilter's evil. There's probably over a hundred books about the church's role with the US military in particular.

-"China was not Christian."

Right, but China was also not one of the chief forces against Hitler's party like I stated at the outset.

-"The Soviets were atheists. And yes, Stalin did awful horrible things. The USA had interment camps."

No, no. You're missing the point. What I'm highlighting there is of all the *chief forces* against Hitler's party, the one atheist-majority nation at one point in time had no qualms shaking Hitler's hand and signing a non-aggression pact.

-"And then to dismiss the disgusting history of Christianity (and current disposition) with a broad stroke is "simply asinine."

Bro, what are you even on about here? I'm literally commenting about the broad strokes you paint in your FIRST COMMENT about this priest who's been subsequently punished by his higher-ups for this stunt, which is what makes you look so asinine. How is it a feature if he's been immediately defrocked for this? lol

Like I said before, r/atheism is just around the corner on your first left.

VariantAEC346d ago

Yes, no Jews, Catholics, Buddhists, Muslims, and atheists fought against Hitler. NOT A SINGLE ONE... It's in the Bible!
/s ⬅️ Just in case it wasn't super duper obvious.

coolbeans345d ago (Edited 345d ago )

@Dishonest Random (VariantAEC)

I've followed this up by emphasizing all but one of the Allied Nations were "Christian-majority." ; Even then, anyone with a functioning brain can understand the context surrounding my 1st reply and its implications. Obviously people of other disparate faiths (or atheist belonging) fought against the Nazis too.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 345d ago
thorstein350d ago

Catholics are Christians. No take backs.

Seriously, No True Scotsman is the fallacy.

350d ago Replies(2)
Hedstrom350d ago

Well Hitler was a socialist and vegetarian to. And a pet friend.

thorstein350d ago

And he ruined a mustache and a symbol.

Hedstrom350d ago

He kinda ruined the name Adolf to, not many names it after.

A Furry Furer?

anast350d ago

It's not their religion that was the problem, it was their expedient pacifism. For the most part, the churches used convenient pacifism to justifiably neglect the people that they leeched off of in the time of need. To be clear, I'm not knocking them, I would have probably been an expedient leech too.

Rainbowcookie349d ago

If they were Christian they would have lived according to the Bible and Messiah. Who was in fact Jewish. They like many only lived "christian" by name no action.

S2Killinit349d ago

My good friend, while you are right in some respects, the fact is that christians have a report card filled to the brim with injustice, moral deprivation, extreme cruelty, heinous atrocities, etc. Yet they still claim to have some sort of moral superiority over everyone else.

And its not just christians, its all religious people. None of them have clean hands, yet they are always the victim, despite all facts pointing to them being the worst humanity has to offer. It is not a surprise that out of 10 racist people 7 are religious. It is not a surprise that the worst atrocities in human history have religious underpinnings. Only the religious allow themselves to commit extreme injustice because they walk around with a sense of being inherently better than others. It gives them more room for moral turpitude.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 345d ago
ZeekQuattro350d ago

He tried to own the libs and instead FAFO. So many careers pissed away doing as much. It's not even the first Church he's been kicked out of for pulling stupid stunts like this. 🤣

Eonjay350d ago

What is the actual point of doing this?

350d ago
350d ago
InUrFoxHole350d ago

Oner is big mad. It's ok my guy salute away. I see you... we see you 👀

Outside_ofthe_Box350d ago

Context is a one way street I see...

anast350d ago (Edited 350d ago )

Oner out there fighting for the master...

350d ago
Mmmkay349d ago (Edited 349d ago )

@Oner
Show me a video of Kamala doing the same. We all know these still pictures are taken by Nazis because of their agenda. Come on. I am waiting. You can find still pictures of anyone in the world waving their arms. Show me a video. You know like the Elon video. We both know you cant so prove me wrong. And just remember that Elon even had to manipulate and reverse the picture of Tailor Swift to try and prove that he is not a nazi. It took the internet less than a minute to prove him lying again.

S2Killinit349d ago (Edited 349d ago )

@Oner
ORRR its not the media that is ridiculous, its YOU who is ridiculous for not catching on to what Mr. Musk is doing. He is clearly doing it for a certain response. You can even tell that he is preparing to pull it off seconds before he does it.

Consider for a moment that Mr. Musk and others like him have intentionally triggered people and certain segments of society because they have figured out that if you want to get away with things, you need an army of dedicated, vocal, individuals who will defend you no matter what you do. So while they rile our society up to blame and hate each other, they are running away with the keys to the safe.

Its classic divide and conquer tactics. Men vs. women, liberal vs. conservative, whites vs. latinos, native vs immigrant, etc… meanwhile Mr. Musk is getting richer and we are closer and closer to an oligarchy.

So no, its not the media who is ridiculous Oner, its YOU.

349d ago
ZeekQuattro348d ago

He wanted to play stupid games so he got his reward.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 348d ago
Lexreborn2350d ago

When I said it feels like a lot of people on the internet lately been overtly racist and doing the most. Especially with the anti DEI articles and anti-woke propaganda I just knew some people in charge were without a doubt apart of this ignorance.

And lo and behold the owner of a site showed his ass feeling entitled. Looking forward to more FAFOs revealing how evil they really are because I’m tired of the masks and separation tactics from the enemies within

348d ago
Lexreborn2348d ago

lol okay @alfred I’m the pussy but people like you hide behind screens, masks and tiki torches in a basement because the outside world is scary!

Popsicle350d ago (Edited 350d ago )

@Oner I agree that it was his intent, because i do not believe Elon is an antisemitic Nazi sympathizer. Elon has admitted to having a form of Autism known as Aspergers which leads to odd social behavior such as the “Elon” salute, and the media jumped on it because they will take any opportunity to label conservatives as Nazis. Elon is good at many things, but public speaking does not seem to be one of them.

That said, what this priest did was in poor taste, demonstrated poor judgment, and in my view is indefensible. I don’t want to see other idiots copying this salute and thinking that it’s funny. It is rooted in pure evil and associated with the attempted genocide of an entire people. I understand the context and the intent, but it isn’t funny and needs to die.

Killer2020UK350d ago

Here's the thing, I have autism, I've never unintentionally performed what incredibly closely resembles a Nazi salute and if I did, I would:
1. Acknowledge how close the resemblance was
2. Apologise and make very clear what my intentions were.
3. Distance myself from the Nazi fucks who both recognise and are celebrating what they believe to be endorsement of their white supremacist beliefs.

Whereas so far all I've heard from him is criticism of "legacy media" and people desperately doing cartwheels to excuse what is very clearly a Nazi salute in appearance by renaming it "Roman salute" or "straight arm gesture".

Popsicle350d ago (Edited 350d ago )

@killer I am sincerely glad that replied instead of only hitting the downvote button because the button tells me little about other’s thoughts. I can’t tell which part the disagreement comes from without explanation. Is the disagreement in defense of the priest, or is it because of my assessment of Elon. I expect my post to be unpopular because I am not picking a team. Things are not always as black and white as people make them to be. There are often shades of grey. Point being, I appreciate the response.

That said, My opinion is that Elon is not an antisemite or Nazi sympathizer, and I do think his “heart to the world” gesture was truly intended to be what he said it was when he did it on stage. The man is a genius, but as with any genius it is common to see glaring flaws and deficiencies. Often in the form of social skills and communication. Do I think his gesture was tone deaf and irresponsible? Absolutely I do, because you get more impressionable people like this priest imitating it and somehow thinking it is funny when it is clearly isn’t. Even so, I do not think he owes anyone an apology for what he believes is a misrepresentation of his “heart” gesture.

I could be wrong because I do not truly know Elon’s heart, but I have watched his behavior over the years and he is clearly socially awkward which forms some of the bases for my opinion that he is not a Nazi sympathizer.

At least we have one thing in common Killer. It seems neither of us are going around performing a salute linked to the most vial of crimes against humanity. Genocide against and group should never be tolerated.

Sonyslave3350d ago (Edited 350d ago )

Elon musk grew in South Africa in the Apaerthied lol, he just call out Germany for feeling sorry about their past history Nazi.

🤪 The guys follow the right wing group in Germany(not the only country) and this happens.

anast350d ago

This sounds like a mother hen protecting her chicks...

thorstein350d ago

@popsicle

You're not "on either side?"

Look, there are people here that don't see eye to eye with me about dei and woke games and we poke at each other. Sometimes maliciously. Sometimes in jest.

But, we're all united against nazis. There's only one side.

OptimusDK349d ago

So openly supporting a extreme right party in Germany is not some sort of hint⁉️

OldDuffer349d ago

You are being downvoted because Elon is clearly an antisemetic nazi and has proved himself so with many tweets and his seeking out of the most extreme right wing party's around the world. People trying to excuse the bigots behaviour are seen for who they are , no matter how much they try and deflect. You, are a huge part of the problem and will therefore be down voted by any reasonable sane person with free will.
Posting wandering why you are being down voted is pathetic, you must know.....

FunAndGun346d ago

Blaming the "media" for something Musk did. You people are such delusional drones.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 346d ago
Inverno350d ago

He smiled… you can literally hear people laughing in the background too. That's hilarious, totally worth it.

Palitera350d ago

It was an "anti-abortion summit". Suits them well.

VariantAEC346d ago

Are you claiming that Nazis were pro-natalist?

FTLmaster350d ago

So nazi salutes are funny now? Must’ve missed the memo ‘cause that ain’t funny. Like. At. All.

Inverno350d ago

Context matters or so I've read and been told. If something is done as a joke or said or done in some informative way then it's justified. Now if you don't find it funny then that's you. Personally I find it hilarious, just like I find 9/11 memes funny, or seeing kids get hurt. If people can't understand that then I can't say I care. We're not obligated to think alike.

FTLmaster350d ago

@Inverno I understand that humor is very subjective and context does matter; I agree with you on that. I also think comedy is sometimes about the shock factor as well. Personally, though, I think this specific joke is incredibly tasteless. We don't all have to like and laugh at the same things. But a nazi salute? Really? That's what you consider funny these days? I find it utterly abhorrent, but you do you.

Inverno350d ago

Bruh there's a whole comedy movie where Hitler is an imaginary friend to a kid. We make fun of literally everything, nothing's sacred. The worst moments of history get turnt into movies for entertainment purposes. All sorts of series topics have been the butts of many jokes. Tasteless? Absolutely. Will I still laugh at em if I find it funny? Yes. Not just these days, I've found these things funny all my life. I choose not to get offended by em, while also understanding the history behind em.

ApocalypseShadow350d ago

If you think it's funny, try telling that joke at work or in other places where crowds are. Let us know how funny they thought it was.

I know you think it's somehow similar to things like Dave Chappelle doing the klan thing for comedy. We all understand that. But that salute this guy did and Elon weren't funny. If you were on the receiving end of something you find distasteful, I'd bet you wouldn't find it funny.

MrBaskerville350d ago

These days you get cancelled just because you heil in public. What has the world come to, can't even support Hitler anymore.

Inverno350d ago

I've said plenty weird shit at work, and fooled around with coworkers too. I'm sorry to inform ya that no one actually gives any F's. Maybe it's cause it's Florida. Y'all really underestimate just how many people don't get offended by stuff or just how many people have really twisted sense of humour. People's moral compass points in all sorts of directions dood. Just the other day some gay dood walked out talking bout how he eats huge green bananas and how he don't like the bruised ones. We all laughed.

FunAndGun346d ago

Clearly your parents failed you.

Inverno346d ago

And clearly you fail to understand that people develop on their own outside of what influence their parents may have had on them as they were being raised. It's hilarious to see the amount of people here being so taken back over me finding an ironic Nazi salute funny. All of you pretending to not have aspects that make y'all much more unpleasant than me finding the humour in obvious irony. Speaks volumes on all of you.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 346d ago
mastershredder350d ago (Edited 350d ago )

How do you even play Wolfenstein Calvin Robinson? Does it hit too close to home?

Now take that money and Buy Sniper Resistance and make a statement by dispatching Nazis (while not attacking real people like Calvin with stupid, STUPID business leadership decisions).

His priesthood lasted about as long as his salute. Enjoy exile Chut.

Show all comments (160)
40°

An Update to Our Shared Commitment to Safer Gaming

Discover how Sony Interactive Entertainment, Nintendo, and Microsoft continue to collaborate to improve player safety across our platforms.

Read Full Story >>
sonyinteractive.com
110°

There's an Underrepresented Majority That Wants Entertainment Without Agendas, Says Ex Tripwire CEO

Ex-Tripwire CEO John Gibson shares his 'Entertainment First' vision to capture the agenda-free magic of classics like Star Wars, Zelda, and Metroid.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
Goodguy012d ago

Yes. Just make a good game instead of worrying it should make some kind of stupid social/political differences in the world... we've got enough of that in the real world. Games are places we can escape to and just have fun.

z2g2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

How about you make a game that’s important to you and the people who are interested in that buy it and the ones that don’t like it don’t have to buy it. Just because something bugs some people doesn’t mean there aren’t other people who it doesn’t bug. Someone’s hangups shouldn’t be other people’s problems.

Don’t want a game that features a political or cultural statement or an underrepresented group of people? Don’t buy it.

Not all of us just want vapid, mindless fantasy all the time. Sometimes we want something that represents us or means something. There’s nothing wrong with that. Look how many movies in the world have covered so many types of stories, people or historical controversies to huge successes. Games are no different.

Eonjay2d ago

The plot to remove representation or ideas and content that you dont approve of is an agenda within itself. Its also censorship. People need are trapped in this main- character syndrome where they believe that the world and all of its happens are fashioned for them alone.

crazyCoconuts2d ago

"Don't buy it"
Exactly what people do.
And then big companies are reminded why if you want to make money you may not want to do things like villainize half your market. If you want to preach one side of an argument you're gonna lose people. At least do the Deus Ex/GTA thing and show the warts on both sides so everyone has something to agree with

senorfartcushion2d ago

We’re still waiting on that Splinter Cell remake…

raWfodog2d ago

On the flip side of that, good games can have characters of different ethnic and social backgrounds without thinking that some agendas are trying to be pushed. I've played many, many great games throughout my life with many different characters (male, female, white, people of color, even some animal characters) and loved them all simply for the story and entertainment they provided me while I escaped into those worlds.

senorfartcushion2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

That’s not possible.

Being a child doesn’t remove the political points of OLD GAMES, we were just kids. In fact, older media was decidedly more political than some of the cowardly, childish efforts we have today.

This is precisely why we are still to get that Splinter Cell remake. We can’t have a fun Splinter Cell game with AAA graphics because a few virgins don’t want “politics in their games.”

neutralgamer19922d ago

Keep gaming free of nonsense. Agenda pushing in social media age has gotten worst

senorfartcushion1d 8h ago

Name a game and I’ll tell you what the agenda was

Notellin1d 22h ago

"While our first game is faith-based"

Yeah you guys want to get rid of all the politics and play a nice Southern Baptist game. We get it.

Christopher1d 21h ago

He should follow his own words, then.

*** That changed around two years ago, when he started consulting for Bible X, the studio behind the Christian-based game project Gate Zero. Last month, Gibson, through his recently established publisher Templar Media, acquired the developer.***

Not sure there's anything more political in history than religion.

S2Killinit1d 18h ago

But his statement is also an agenda. Hope people are intelligent enough to know that.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 1d 8h ago
z2g2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I fail to see how representing actual underrepresented or making them feel included is an “agenda”. This is an extremely self centered selfish viewpoint. Those actual underrepresented people just want to be recognized as valid. The privileged majority who are always represented take that for granted and can’t deal with the fact that “other” types of people or views exist. Inclusion or awareness isn’t an agenda. It’s representing reality and making those “other” people or stories be seen and align with actual reality.

There are literally thousands and thousands of games to choose from, and if you are annoyed that some have cultural or topical relevance, that’s your problem and you don’t have to buy them. Meanwhile other people who want that actually have games that speak to them. So sick of this “my way or the highway” attitude.

And there are plenty of games out there, if that privileged majority have an issue or don’t want a game based on cultural relevance. Pick up a Switch. Most games are g-rated, noncontroversial cartoons with stories fit for tweens. No reality to get mad at.

2d ago Replies(2)
KyRo2d ago

It's always me me me me me with you lot. There's a difference between representation and forcing it for the sake of forcing something to a very very loud but very small minority.

Christopher2d ago

You really are only proving their point with this sort of response to the idea of people feeling included in some games versus the plethora of games without it.

Outside_ofthe_Box2d ago

We need to define what "forcing" is because I've seen people say things like Aloy being female in Horizon is pushing an agenda or catering to a "very very loud but very small minority" before.

dveio2d ago

@z2g

I personally think you've nailed it here.

For decades, wether in film or music, there had been ONE primary target group.

And if you're looking further, even in economy, laws, courts or any other area there had been only one target group.

While others, let's be real, were surpressed.

It's "funny" though - why do we all think personalities like David Bowie, Mick Jagger, Freddy Mercury, etc., have had such a huuuge impact on cultures and society? Because they were 1:1 depicts of the Demon Slayer or the Duke?

No, because they were different. Because we all are different.

The only people time and time again that are complaining, whining and moaning about everything (while highly likely even been a fan of Queen or something) are prejudiced people.

Are people that "But it's never been any different, and I want it to stay that way!".

There's nothing highly hidden here. It's always been the same. After decades, even centuries of rules written by and for the "one primary target group", they are now the loudest that complain & moan.

Inverno2d ago

Y'all could also, ya know, just not buy games you feel have an agenda? This constant bitching coming from all these whiney men every time they see a game that isn't catering to them specifically is tiring. They latch themselves onto these games and throw endless amounts of harassment as if there aren't another thousand games releasing before/around/after. I'm usually outspoken when it comes to forced diversity in games, but the issue here is you're all bigoted as hell and need to learn to be a little less offended. Y'all become the snowflakes you mocked so much lol.

MrDead2d ago

This guy is one of the biggest most delicate snowflakes out there, I'm sure he'll be crying on Tucker Carlson or Fox "News" again soon.

Michiel19891d 22h ago

@christopher cater to and include are two very different things. Played most of the games you mentioned and had no issue with any of em because they just include it. I have no issue with inclusion of that, but if in the next god of war, Kratos would all of a sudden hyperfocus on being a strong independent man or a hypermasculine one, I would give them shit for it as well. It has nothing to do with the inclusion of x or y group, but about the integrity of the game.

@inverno stop putting words in my mouth . It's actually the opposite of what you say, I said there can be no conversation because as soon as you criticize them, a whole angry mob comes at you and tries to cancel you. Thankfully it's become less and less over time and people actually realize now they can voice their opinion without having the fear of losing their job.
You really can't see that a lot of companies are now backpeddalling about the woke bs? They finally realize making your product worse to cater to a group who doesn't buy your product anyway is terrible.

Michiel19892d ago ShowReplies(4)
PitbullMonster1d 16h ago

Who was crying about kingdom come deliverance, Stellar Blade and the first descendant? White Hetero men Or leftards?

Inverno1d 5h ago

Leftards but those games still went on to release and become financially and critically successful. This dood, who was a CEO, went on social media to voice an opinion that at the time was controversial. Just cause you have freedom of speech and expression doesn't mean you hafto always voice your opinions publicly. He had to step down because it was more about the company than just him. Now he's back talking bout "unrepresented majority", as if there aren't different audiences to cater to. Since people from both sides can't seem to escape getting fired for voicing opinions then I guess everyone's got to equally face the consequences of their inability to shut up.

MrBaskerville2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Star wars, anti agenda? Lol. I don't think Lucas would agree.

Inverno2d ago

One of the most politically charged movies in existence. They can pretend it's all about space wizards with swords but the space nazis are still in the movies and they're still the bad guys. It's ironic as hell.

JEECE2d ago

More evidence that if the agenda feels legitimate within the story's world, people don't even notice that it is an agenda and they don't complain.

Elit3Nick2d ago

This one gave me a chuckle, too.

JEECE2d ago

As ever, this is a misguided expression of the speaker's issue. While of course there are some games (pure puzzle games, etc) that have no agenda, any game with a narrative is conveying some type of message. What people who say they don't like "woke" or "politics in games" actually mean is that they don't like hamfisted, poorly written narratives/characters that are thin veneers for modern political messages that feel out of place in the game's universe. It's why all these people complain about the Veilguard and not Baldur's Gate 3. They both have "woke" characters but in BG3 they feel like they belong in the universe, while in the Veilguard they just feel like generic fantasy skins for modern American 20-somethings.

Show all comments (61)
40°

Interview: Groovin’ On a New Donkey Kong Country Tribute Album

Mega Mixtape has some good grooves coming in, and Gamerhub UK talks more with them.

Read Full Story >>
gamerhub.co.uk
15h ago