40°

Why console wars shouldn't matter

gameinvasion.wordpress.com writes "The console wars have been waging for a long time now and with both the PS3 and Xbox still in a heated Battle for sales I think it's safe to say that owners of either console can settle down and let the fat cats of the games industry settle this on their own."

Read Full Story >>
gameinvasion.wordpress.com
MasFlowKiller6303d ago (Edited 6303d ago )

NO as a gamer you go were the gaming is good

2007 the 360, 2008 the ps3 and 2009 as of now the ps3

I guess the gaming media forgot that the video game industry is the industry of video games.

Just look at the line up, all fanboy aside you go to the console that give you the best games, GAMES with and "S"

andyo136303d ago

half the time its the articles fighting with each other, if it wern't for horrible articles all the time im sure there wouldnt be such a strong disagreement between the 2 consumers.

Xbox Street Gang6303d ago (Edited 6303d ago )

2007- Sony, 2008- Sony, and 2009- Sony...

:)

Powertesties6303d ago

Competition is what makes gaming such a great hobby. I love games and imagine what it would be like if there wasn't more than one console. You need to have both sides always trying to out do each other.

It is a must. It brings out quality and innovation.

As for my thoughts on the last few years, here goes.

2007, year of the 360 (PS3 was new and games were limited)
2008, year of the 360(PS3 still had problems with ports)
2009, wow, this is going to be tough. The PS3 really has some bangers in the works. Starting with Killzone 2. It is still too early to count the games that are not out yet and may not even be released this year. MS hasn't even released their list of games yet. If Sony can update the PS3 firmware, add some features and bring out some killer apps (and better multi-platform games) Sony just may take this year. We shall only see.

HDgamer6303d ago

No number one you sound like a fanboy and not a gamer. You don't go where the gaming is good otherwise you will be flip flopping harder than John Kerry in 2004 election. As a gamer you play all that is available, getting all the consoles and playing most of the games ignoring reviews or rants.

KRUSSIDULL6303d ago

The Year of the Wiiiiiii LoLzzz

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 6303d ago
Wise_Man6303d ago

• Its Human nature to fight and/or defend what we believe is right, War will always Exist.

Serjikal_Strike6303d ago

I think its wise to say 2009 will be the year of the ps3!

Rhoic6303d ago

I think it's wise to say who cares who's year it is..

The Rock6303d ago

The Rock likes to buy every console. Because of this every year is The Rocks year. Then The Rock can sit back and watch Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo layeth the smacketh down while The Rock enjoys the fruits of their competition. If any fanboy disagrees then The Rock says this:

You can take your controller, shine it up, turn it sideways, and stick it straight up your Candy Ass.

If you smell what The Rock is cookin'

Graphics Whore6303d ago

It's always a double edged topic, competition ignites rivalry and competition accelerates productivity and the need for innovation. It's difficult to find the subtle balance however the fanaticism is almost totally independent because of the consumer body is dependent on the media medium, but the corporate entity usually has a very neutral voice (usually). It more or less just boils down to segregation: those who have one and not the other and those who have both.

The 'console war' matters, the pseudo stock broker internet feud however doesn't.

slave2Dcontroller6303d ago (Edited 6303d ago )

I completed my next gen trilogy yesterday by setting a new 360 Jasper along side my Wii and PS3. YES! The triliogy is complete :D

PSN; slave2Dcontroler(with "1" L due to character limitations)
360; s2Dc 176(due to the same thing LOLZ)

Rhoic6303d ago

Yup same here.. The epic next gen trilogy now sits together fighting off the forces of.. something. BUT I HAVE DEM ALLZ!

Why dis6303d ago

It dosn't matter only to the losing team.

Show all comments (15)
40°

15 Years Ago, Mortal Kombat (2011) Saved Gaming’s Biggest Fighting Franchise

A brutal reset, a smarter story, and a return to what made it great—Mortal Kombat (2011) revived the series.

Read Full Story >>
fortressofsolitude.co.za
italiangamer5d ago

"Gaming’s Biggest Fighting Franchise"

Press X to (seriously) doubt.

DarXyde3d ago

Underrated comment. I used to hate that game so much that any time my siblings asked me to play it, I just picked Hom and shut myself down mid-match.

Soy4d ago

And then MK1 killed it again.

DivineHand1253d ago (Edited 3d ago )

15 years went by so fast. I remember playing through the story mode at launch.

90°

PlayStation legend Shuhei Yoshida says Jim Ryan fired him because he didn't listen to him

Why did Sony push Shuhei Yoshida out of his role leading PlayStation's first-party games? He'd overseen some huge successes. Well, apparently, he didn't listen.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Relientk775d ago

Yeah I can see that for sure. Shuhei Yoshida should have been in charge not Jim Ryan.

Cacabunga5d ago

It should be free highway for him now.. but Sony are too stupid to see this, especially that moron Hulst

S2Killinit5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

Wtf why all that anger. PlayStation is dominating on every level. Besides I think there is a little more to hiring a CEO than just who is available. Its not like its a athlete your team wants to buy.

neutralgamer19924d ago

S2Killinit

live service failures, chasing trends, closing studios. yes dominating

Cacabunga4d ago

Sony is Dominating because competition is not existing. Compared to previous gens this is the poorest in terms of software offerings.

Last gen we got Uncharted 4 Lost Legacy and TLOU2 from ND alone.

This is so far a remasters gen, with no competition to lift up the quality

1nsomniac4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

..."PlayStation is dominating on every level"....

...Really???

PlayStation are soon heading into a new generation in the not to distant future. They currently have the worst customer satisfaction they've ever sustained as a company. The company is heading for a huge crash while at the same time they'll need to be planning how they are going to try and win back that favour and the build up to their new releases.

Yes financially they're winning but they're going to have to ride out this complete public corporate disaster. No one has faith in the company or the product anymore. They've damaged their public image so much this generation. Greed can kill anyone.

medman4d ago

Hulst is a disaster......

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4d ago
blacktiger4d ago

He would've done the same thing and fire Jim Ryan and Shuhei would be the villain. Why?
Because Elite creates the narrative and distraction for gamers, users and citizens.

Outside_ofthe_Box5d ago

More confirmation that Jim Ryan is the culprit for what has happened to Sony. Hulst needs to go too. What sucks is that a lot of the good top heads at Sony are no longer there. I wish that guys that were forced out prematurely by Dumbo Jimbo like Shuhei and Layden came back.

robtion4d ago

Yep. Yoshida was responsible for bringing one of the best games of this generation to playstation (Stellar Blade). He is an actual gamer and is in touch with what gamers want (creative, fun games, not GaaS and agenda pushing). He also seems like a genuinely nice guy if you watch some interviews. Of course they got rid of him.

darthv725d ago

Makes you wonder if MS even thought about hiring him after Phil and Sarah were leaving. He certainly couldn't make their situation any worse.

Agent755d ago

Microflop. After Windows XP and Xbox 360, it all went floppy.

S2Killinit5d ago

Floppy 😆
No pun intended

badz1495d ago

Yoshida for President! Jim Ryan was and always be a hack! Sony should get Shu back

Lightning775d ago

All the gamer/consumer lead heads are gone across PS and Xbox. shuhei gone phil's gone (questionable) but gone. The future of gaming is somewhat uncertain across the board.

Show all comments (30)
50°

Ex-Naughty Dog Dev: Big Studios Are 'Forced' to Hire Like Factories

Former Naughty Dog artist Gabriel Betancourt explains why the "sweet spot" for game teams is under 200 people and how AAA "factories" kill creativity.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
5d ago
phongtro123_com5d ago

There’s definitely some truth to this. When teams get too large, coordination starts to outweigh creativity—layers of approval, risk aversion, and tight deadlines can turn bold ideas into “safe” ones. Keeping a team under ~200 people sounds ideal for maintaining clear communication and a shared vision. That said, massive AAA projects also come with huge technical demands and expectations, so scaling up isn’t always avoidable. The real challenge is figuring out how to keep that small-team creativity alive inside big studio structures.

DarXyde5d ago

More than that, it's logistically untenable. Inevitably, when teams get too large, how do you keep tabs on accountability? I suspect this massive team size is a consequence of the perfectionism streak Naughty Dog has.

I wish we could have so many people working on something and it turns out great because I'm all for collaboration in spirit - the problem is too many people as part of the larger team and smaller units. Suppose for example that you have too many people in the art department; you will very often come up against fiercely competing visions for how things should look. That competitive vision will cause friction between team members, team doesn't work as a unit, the back and forth can further delay parts that the other departments are waiting for, etc etc.

A 200-person team says, to me, that we need to scale back game development. Even if it means we go back to PS2 era costs and scale, why not? Those games are still great fun, the budgets were in check, and you could literally break the 200-man team into like 10 20-man teams working on different projects.