170°

Embracer CEO: PC "One of the Best Growth Drivers," Consoles Will Have "a More Muted Year"

During Embracer financial conference call, CEO Lars Wingefors talked about the outlook of the gaming market broken down by platforms.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Gamerscore2077519d ago

It’s pretty hard to believe anything this particular CEO has to say.

crazyCoconuts518d ago

In terms of running a successful business, yeah, he's wrong. Embracer is a sh** show. Is PC really gonna grow more than consoles? Don't know but I wouldn't trust this guy as a visionary.

"The company’s sales and profits have dropped sharply year-on-year, even if its executives painted a somewhat optimistic picture mentioning “significantly improved” cash flow and lower net debt."

Jingsing518d ago

Yes he is wrong. Steam numbers are always a good indicator. The mistake is conflating every PC in world as some high end gaming rig. Steam survey often shows the number of "high end" gamers meaning the same games you get on console is easily dwarfed each generation by consoles. In fact it's never even close in terms of player count. Sony and Microsoft know that hence the reason they put games on Steam. If Steam or PC became a threat they would stop. Why give up being a platform holder when platform holder is king.

Abriael518d ago

@crazyCoconuts we're not talking aboiut how successful his business is here. That's irrelevant.

@Jingsing: No one's talking about "high end." Sounds like insecurity. The PC market is expanding and the console market is not. That's all there's to it.

badz149518d ago

This is like a forecast. But the way he has been forecasting his company's growth has left projects and studios got shut down and people laid off. So can't help but feeling skeptical about what he says here

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 518d ago
BeHunted518d ago (Edited 518d ago )

It’s pretty hard to believe anything this particular @Gamerscore2077 has to say.

Hofstaderman518d ago

Been hearing PC is going extinct consoles since 1996.
Pffft

Fishy Fingers518d ago

Never heard anyone say that, nor is this guy.

anast518d ago

They have an audience that they can drip feed old product and the old product will be received with the same hype as a day 1 release.

Giblet_Head518d ago (Edited 518d ago )

Well, yeah, we're getting the definitive and most preservable version of a game that will always be playable at the highest optional quality available, no matter the hardware going forward. No having to periodically purchase pseudo-"upgrades", or repurchase port after port to play what we already bought once before on limited shelf life hardware restricted decimal. Any sane person would be thrilled by that pro-consumer convenience.

anast518d ago

cope

Most people won't be able to game on the highest quality.

If you buy it on Steam, you are renting.

Giblet_Head517d ago (Edited 517d ago )

@anast

Most people inevitably will, hardware improves with each iteration and the price only goes down. What you consider demanding today will be budget capable within a decade if not less due to new technology, and that version, on PC, will always be the best due to that. You don't need to rebuy it just to play it on new hardware.

As for "renting", I can download a game, copy the files to another drive, crack the purposefully thin steam DRM and it's mine forever no matter what licensing dictates. Either way even if a game is removed from the steam store, I have access to it no matter what, that includes redownloads. Meanwhile if you bought games digitally on a console but didn't download them in time before the inevitable store shutdown due to routine obsolescence you're SOL. Even then if something were to happen to your download you can't redownload it. You have no recourse. You're the only one coping.

S2Killinit518d ago (Edited 518d ago )

Well it makes sense because MS releases all its games on PC. That is one of three consoles. Sony releases some of its games about a year or two after they are released. So yeah PC will probably increase its importance.

I wonder of the type of games this developer releases (or wants to release) affects his opinion on the relative performance of each sector, or if this is some sort of objective data he is reporting based off of.

AndrenNguyen1471992518d ago

How can they retain a CEO like this
Embracer Group is gonna bankrupt

Show all comments (23)
60°

Rockstar launches official marketplace for mods

Rockstar has launched an official marketplace for "every server and every player" to buy mods: Cfx Marketplace.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Christopher2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I wonder how much of this isn't just taken work of others who have modded for free.

Edit: Also, great way for R* to take popular ideas and build them into GTAVI based on demand.

fr0sty6h ago

What I see happening here is, R* is going to ban mods in GTA6 UNLESS you buy them from the marketplace and R* then gets a cut of that sale.

ActualWhiteMan9h ago

Ah, perfect timing with them taking down the Bully online fan mod. Greedy a$$ company.

Christopher6h ago

It's okay as long as they get a cut of the money.

fr0sty6h ago

Expect R* to force it on you.

Snookies1226m ago

Yep, right there with you. I'll happily donate to a mod creator if it looks really cool, or if I enjoy it. But expecting payment up front? Nope, not touching it.

IanTH5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

I'm not entirely sure how to read this, as it doesn't seem exactly like an exact parallel to Bethesda's paid mods shenanigans.

Rather than single player stuff, this appears to be aimed solely on Cfx Servers. From what I've gleaned, apparently Rockstar bought the Cfx mod team several years ago, coming a few years after weird contentions led them to ban a few of their members. Ultimately, the question is if they plan to keep this contained to only online/servers.

I have to guess to a degree yes. It'd be pretty hard to "force" paid mods for single player when modding files locally on your own machine, but much easier for servers they'll control. So perhaps this is their soft launch ahead of GTA6 online and they'll clamp down more tightly on non-official servers going forward? Ever since they've become a 1 or 2 property studio, I haven't really cared much for Rockstar stuff, so I'm not entirely up on everything surrounding this. Sounds like it has the potential to be problematic further down the line, but right now fairly easy to ignore...I think lol.

50°

Kotick claims lawsuit objecting to MS-Activision deal was "tied to Embracer's desire to boost sales"

Former CEO describes lawsuit filed by Swedish pension fund as a "collateral attack" on Activision Blizzard.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
OpenGL1d 2h ago

Yeah, the Microsoft deal has DEFINITELY worked out for everyone.

galgor23h ago

Can this mother fucker just get lost already

PRIMORDUS22h ago

He belongs in here ⚰️, hopefully sooner than later.

MrDead7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

Kotick Made $155 million from MS in the buyout, the little b*tch needs to stop whining. Thanks to this Microslop deal and massive industry consolidation thousands upon thousands of devs and other workers lost their livelihoods. This greedy piggie pervert needs shut up and f-off.

40°

An Update to Our Shared Commitment to Safer Gaming

Discover how Sony Interactive Entertainment, Nintendo, and Microsoft continue to collaborate to improve player safety across our platforms.

Read Full Story >>
sonyinteractive.com