All Channels
Popular
200°

Fallout 5: Which Studio Could Make It?

With work on Starfield wrapping up and work on Elder Scrolls 6 starting is there a chance another studio could work on Fallout 5?

Read Full Story >>
lordsofgaming.net
EmperorDalek745d ago

I would've thought they're too busy with Avowed and Outer Worlds 2

CUnit123123743d ago

You never know what can happen. I'm sure they are working hard tho

Jared2500745d ago

Not anymore. Most of the New Vegas devs are long gone

RaidenBlack745d ago

I'd rather have a Fallout 1st person (Starfield engine based) spin-off from another studio like Obsidian/Roundhouse/Arkane a la New Vegas style and Fallout 5 from Todd & co.
Also won't mind another isometric Fallout RPG spin-off on top of that as well ... from inXile or Obsidian

-Foxtrot745d ago

Either a New Vegas spiritual sequel with a new location (personally I’d use the spin off games to move around the world to Canada, UK, Europe etc to see their own versions of Vault Tech and the like).

Or

A remake of Fallout 1 in the same style as 3, 4 etc

RaidenBlack745d ago

Howard is more against Remakes ... he can be forced to handover the IP rights for a spin-off but he'll rebel if remakes are discussed. lol
Plus ... fallout 1 and 2 humor is pretty dark ... doubt MS will be able to keep 'em in remakes.

porkChop745d ago

I'd love an FPS spin-off from Obsidian and isometric spin-off from inXile. That would give us a steadier stream of Fallout while Bethesda can take their time with TES VI and Fallout 5.

CantThinkOfAUsername745d ago

And then people wonder why companies keep making sequels instead of taking risks on new IPs...

porkChop744d ago

1) Not every game can be a new IP. Some IP are just begging for sequels and spin-offs because the lore and world building are so good.

2) Both Obsidian and inXile have multiple teams, so this wouldn't stop either from also putting out new IP.

TheColbertinator745d ago

For sure Obsidian. Bethesda should go mobile at the rate of their quality drop. Inxile should make one too afterwards.

anast745d ago

I wouldn't let Bethesda touch it, unless you want an game that was dev'd by AI.

neutralgamer1992745d ago

Until we wait please remaster FO3/NV with all the dlc. Gameplay improvements, faster loading, better textures and performance. Make a physical version with both games on the disk and it’s a buy for millions

Because we have years of wait before we get FO5

BrockEmSockEm745d ago

Yeah, but they can't even do the FO4 next gen update correctly.

Show all comments (21)
120°

Fallout 5 Set to Begin Development and Starfield To Receive More DLC

Jez Corden has reported that Fallout 5 has been greenlit, and Starfield will be receiving new DLC in the near future.

Read Full Story >>
nettosgameroom.com
lockedongamer1303d ago

Ugh, enough Fallout. Focus on Elder Scrollls!

RaidenBlack303d ago

They ARE already focusing on ES6, bub.
FO5 comes after it ~2032+. (and the last mainline single-player i.e Fallout 4 was in 2015 i.e 10 years ago)
I am more interested in the rumored Fallout spinoff projects in development from other studios.

PrecursorOrb303d ago

Personally it would be cool to get a 3 remake but I mainly want new Vegas with the dlc’s

Ghostwood303d ago

Without Starfield we would probably have TESVI by now and Fallout 5 would be well into development.

*Sighs*

TheColbertinator303d ago

I speak on behalf of every human on this damn cursed planet to Bethesda : Focus on Elder Scrolls and Fallout only

Abear21302d ago

Fallout 5 should have been green lit 5 years ago, what are these fools doing?

90°

Bethesda Is Taking Playable Ghouls "Into Consideration" For Fallout 5

We all owe Fallout 76 an irradiated beer or two.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
-Foxtrot624d ago

Wouldn’t that change a lot gameplay wise

I mean it’s cool don’t get me wrong but what about Rad infested areas and the like, would Ghouls be able to walk through without a care in the world

Name Last Name624d ago

Basically starting with the rad perk. Just like Skyrim Lizards could breathe underwater.

Gameseeker_Frampt624d ago

I imagine it would be handled similar to the way vampirism is done in Skyrim. The downside of be able to walk through Rad infested areas without a care in the world would be the constant threat of becoming a feral ghoul.

anast624d ago

The games is going to be bad, like Starfield levels bad.

RaidenBlack623d ago

the game's not even in pre-production yet

anast623d ago

When I'm right, you can let me know.

Sciurus_vulgaris624d ago (Edited 624d ago )

I good see the following pros and cons of playing as a ghoul.
pros :
1. Regeneration
2. Radiation immunity

cons:
1. Low charisma and bartering
2. Some NPCs will shoot a ghoul on sight, thus altering guests.
3. Potentially become a glowing ghoul. You emit radiation that can harm your companions but you are empowered by radiation. NPCs that tolerant ghouls may now not tolerant you.

dmonee624d ago

Its about time. They let you choose different classes in elder scrolls, why not fallout?

70°

Fallout 5 -10 Ways It Should Improve on Fallout 4

It may be years away, but whenever it arrives, Fallout 5 needs to improve on its predecessor in several areas.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot737d ago

They really need to get rid of weapon mods and bring back more unique weapons that are hard to get / find

anast737d ago

They won't improve it other than a slight graphical upgrade. They have always been better at live action than making games.

MocBistro737d ago

Only way it could improve is taking it away from Bethesda and regroup Classic Fallout (1&2) devs with decent budget and time to make it.

736d ago