
Gamecell: As a single-player experience, there's little to recommend Resistance 2 over the glut of quality shooters available right now. The rare glimpses of graphical and level design brilliance are horribly over-shadowed by the garish, uninspired locations and complete lack of originality. As a multiplayer game it really comes into its own offering up to 60 player battles and a sublime co-op experience that redefines the way you'll look at the mode in other shooters.
The gaming industry moves at such a pace that it’s not surprising we’ve seen countless franchises fall into obscurity over the years.
There is a rumour that Driver 1 & 2 remasters will be released for Switch and presumably for other systems as well.
https://www.gamingbible.com...
Not sure however whether this results into new games in the near future.
Ninja Gaiden? Splinter Cell? Tenchu? Virtua Fighter? Killer Instinct? Killzone?

While it's been on ice for as long as it was around, the Resistance franchise has no shortage of quality.
My take:
Single player
3, 2, 1
Multiplayer
3, 1, 2
Overall
3, 2, 1
I beat the lengthy single player in 1 multiple times and spent hours in the online too. Plus 1 featured my home town! Special mention to the audio design in 1: playing that with surround headphones blew me away.
Note: I have the platinum for Resistance 2.
I only played the 3 main Resistance titles. My ranking would be;
1. Resistance 3
2. Resistance: Fall of Man
3. Resistance 2
Man I loved 3's campaign. Another gem stuck on the ps3 and who knows if insomniac will go back to the franchise.

While the studio is best known for Spyro the Dragon, Ratchet, and Clank, and Spider-Man back on the PS3 the studio broke from creating platformers and made one of the highest regarded science-fiction first-person shooters of all time. This was Resistance and it remains one of Sony's most acclaimed and dormant franchises.
Resistance 3's campaign was gorgeous for the time - and an awesome game to boot.
I've said in the past I'd like to see this series return and have it take place years later, like in the present.
I'll give you an example if I'm not mistaken the last game ended in the 50s, so if it was to take place some time in the 2020s you'd have an opportunity to see how the world changed after the fall of Chimera and all the new technology that came out of that war.
Just like in our universe we all know WW2 happened, but we never experienced it, so if the next Resistance game takes place years later so too would people in that universe know a war look place against the Chimera, they just wouldn't know what it really was like.
So getting to see how that universe would respond to the Chimera reemerging would be interesting.
Imagine a little kid talking with his grandfather about the war and the kid just thinks it was just a made up bed time horror story and what was said was worse than what really took place, but now that the Chimera come back the kid will find out why years later the old timer adults were still waiting for the Chimera to return.
I think there is great potential for this series still and I really believe the best way forward for Resistance is make it have a time jump too.
So hopefully this series will return.
I was blown away when i played for the first time Resistance on the PS3. Great Game. Also liked very much an played for hundred of hours the Co-op of R2. The SP campaign of R3 is also excelent. I really hope that Sony and Insomniac annouced the Remaster of the Series and a new chapter. They got story to do that.
Resistance 2 was one of the first few games i played on ps3 and I loved it, would definitely finish that again :D
I just finished the ressitance2 campaign and it was boring. not even one vehicle level. just shooting at aliens all the time. i like the co-op online do, but will sell it for skate2.
game is intence, gets my heart pounding every time i play it.
i give it a 9.2/10 just for having an awesome online with 60 players, plus coop is really fun.
graphics n art style is good (should play all games in HD)
cool weapons, sick intence gameplay, story is good SO FAR.
well off to play some socom, HoO RaH!!!!
game is a solid 9 to me...it delivers for a FPS
Am I the only person who is tired of seeing every FPS being judged only by its contribution to the genre in regards to innovation? Who cares if there are other games where you do similar stuff, ITS RIDICULOUSLY FUN. Seriously, I have played SO many FPS games, and I think R2's single player campaign is one of my favorites. Yes, I love HL 1 and 2, they are amazing and original, but originality DOES NOT NECESSARILY EQUAL AMAZINGNESS. (Note: in the case of HL 1 and 2 it does equal amazingness but that is not the sole reason).
If a game takes a genre and polishes it to near perfection, I am not really that worried about how much it innovates. It is important, but its not ALL THAT MATTERS. For example, I think Far Cry 2 is a good game, I own it, but I got bored with that game SO much faster than I did with R2 or COD: WAW. Neither of the latter two is original in regards to innovating the FPS genre, but they are both fun as hell and super intense. Am I wrong for thinking that makes them better games than Far Cry 2?
Basically, innovation is great, and we need it to push games forward. But just because a game doesn't have you doing something thats never been done before doesn't mean it can't be incredibly fun and an excellent gaming experience. Game reviewers feel like they have to judge games based on some scale that doesn't even exist, instead of comparing games to similar games in the genre. I'm tired of this, R2 is amazing, the single player is straight baller, and anyone who says the words "derivative shooter" in the same sentence needs to be smacked in the face with the butt of a bullseye.
I don't mean to get on this dude too hard, but It's 2009, This review is just hitting N4G?
Wow.
Everyone is moving to Killzone 2, b.k.a. the next big thing.
I guess they'll review that spunky new game Mirror's Edge next month.
Thanks for playing, gamecell.co.uk.
Wow.