One of the leaders is not credible don't about other one, it be like the ps4 pro wish I happy with

The answer is that the test data that the leaker has or viewed doesn't reflect a chip running a full clocks. Thats all. this happened in the past. Remember when the PS5 chip was discovered but it was running at something like 9TFs BECAUSE it was a test bench and not running at full clocks.

Really all you have to do is listen to RED. It is explained in a lot of detailed on their channel. Actually chip should be between 2.5 and 2.8 Ghz.

Those running around here claiming 14TFs are clearly wrong. There are 60CUs. The very floor of possible performance has to be near 2x the PS5 without taking anything else into account. It is AT LEAST 19TFs without the rumored clock boosts or Dual Issue 32 bit instructions.

With the rumored extras thats how you are getting close to the 30TFs area. But you shouldn't expect that. You should only expect 19TFs according to information we already have.

I think he's right about how challenging it would be to make pro patches for upcoming games, The clock rate cannot be lower than base spec.

Edit: I think both leaks called for a lower clock rate. So both should be considered baseless at this point.

PS5 is plenty powerful enough as is. It is still delivering mid upper level scale graphics when compared to PC GPUs. You will get much more optimization of of a PS5 for many more years. The PS4 got optimization and support for performance that completely blows its contemporary PC equivalents out of the water.

I'm surprised it's still the old site. I thought he said starting today?

Insert the Ferris Bueller end scene... "You're still here? It's over.."

Never say die