490°

European Commission responds to perceived bias in Microsoft-Activision merger

European Commission Deputy Head draws ire for public comments regarding the Microsoft-Activision merger, but he is not involved in the merger unit.

Read Full Story >>
tweaktown.com
Orchard1160d ago

I don't think it matters if he is involved with the unit or not - he will likely have contact with said people.

He has single handedly just handed Microsoft their biggest legal defense against any decision by the EU commission that they are not happy with. They will just point towards this guy and say "Look, the case was already decided before they'd even reviewed any evidence".

Nacho_Z1160d ago

Microsoft can point to him all they want but it'd be pointed out to them, as it is multiple times in the article, that he has absolutely nothing to do with it.

sparky771160d ago

It doesn't matter he could still have influenced people who are part of the decision process.

Orchard1160d ago

That's now how courts work. He is an employee of the same organization, and has direct contact with members who are undertaking this review.

"My Playstation" shows bias, and he's already stated the outcome of a case before the investigation occurs by stating "working to ensure that you will still be able to play Call of Duty on other consoles".

He's just handed Microsoft a huge win. Wonder how much they paid him for that :P

Lifexline1159d ago

Lol clearly you are uneducated about the law. Orchard is right if the EU rejects it they can use this as one of their bullet points to appeal the decision. Why do you think usually organizations don’t make public comments when an investigation is happening. Which is why I said the EU commission clearly is wanting attention.

Christopher1159d ago

***That's now how courts work. He is an employee of the same organization, and has direct contact with members who are undertaking this review.****

Perhaps you don't understand. They made statements to ensure that doesn't happen by noting his detachment from the process entirely. With their public comments saying he isn't involved, Microsoft would now have to prove his involvement since it was addressed prior to arguments and decisions.

Lifexline1159d ago

@above that is not how it works in real life. If you work for an organization every single employee represents the company. That’s why companies have policies for all their employees. Because they know every single person they hire represents them. Which is why there is a vetting process to getting hired. Look at other cases in law.

Orchard is correct this could potentially help them if the outcome is unfavorable he is stating facts. People need to learn about the law and how it applies to companies and it’s employees. Anyone with a job knows this when you work for a company if you do something wrong you can put the company at risk for a lawsuit and getting yourself fired in the process. That’s why I’m surprised the EU employees are being so vocal. When other agencies around the world aren’t.

Christopher1158d ago

*** that is not how it works in real life. If you work for an organization every single employee represents the company. ***

I love the logic of this.

Random employee goes on Twitter to say something. Now, for all eternity, that employee comment is now going to allow others to question all things for that company.

That's not how that works. Companies respond to the validity of the comments of employees all the time and evidence must be presented to invalidate those responses. What you might be confusing here is public opinion, but legally that's not how it works.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1158d ago
sparky771160d ago

Yep I can't see it getting blocked after this, since the appeal process could make the entire commission look like a joke and could cause companies like Facebook to call their bias into question too.

Orchard1160d ago

Yeah, this could open a huge can of worms for all the other things they've ruled upon in the past.

Nacho_Z1160d ago

You're dreaming Orchard. Just because you desperately want it to be the case doesn't mean it is.

Orchard1160d ago (Edited 1160d ago )

Nothing to desperately want at all. I've been clear time and time again that I think this deal should (and will) go through - and COD should (and will) stay on PS.

darkrider1159d ago

Give it a rest. Is opinion is well know here. He will always defend Microsoft at any cost. Even in taking games that for decades were played by millions of sony gamers and still are. From a company that just can't compete in videogaming. Can't create amazing games, well let's buy they all. It's OK.

This deal shouldn't never go through if he was gamer. Never. No gamers wants to take games from other gamers. No matter if it was Sony or Nintendo. Buying huge publisher to force gamers in to trash services... What's next when this deal doesn't work? Well for a trillion dollar company the answer is easy. Another publisher and another.

sinspirit1159d ago

They really think that a potentially biased or influential person means the ruling would benefit MS.. not how it works. You don't get to point out someone's bias and the judge just goes, "yeah I guess, that must mean we should ignore facts and proper review and the damages to the market when this entity would be purchased".

Redemption-641160d ago

You and your ilk are so ill informed it's laughable.

Crows901160d ago

Cod won't stay on PlayStation. The only thing in writings states a certain amount of time

Orchard1159d ago

Minecraft is still on PS.
Destiny 2 is still on Xbox.

It’s not impossible that COD stays on PS - they’d also be giving up a lot of revenue if they remove it.

I expect it to stay on PS - but Xbox and/or GamePass players will get perks.

1Victor1160d ago

Let’s grab our pitch forks and torches a dude on a different department of the European Commission said "The Commission is working to ensure that you will still be able to play Call of Duty on other consoles (including my PlayStation)" let us all rage because HE POINTED OUT HE HAVE A PLAYSTATION 🤦🏿.
RAAAGEEEEEEEE AND INDIGNATION 😱

neutralgamer19921160d ago

Forget about all of that we just don't want any console maker to acquire these publishers. I don't think that's hard to understand. Ms got Bethesda and made their games exclusives now so they can say "games will be available on other platforms all they want but reality is once any deal goes through Ms has all the power"

What's amazing to me is how many Xbox gamers want this deal to go through and don't see the negatives or the long term ramifications of this deal. If you are a gamer and you support any console maker to acquire publishers than you aren't being a neutral gamer

Gamingsince19811160d ago

They don't see the negatives because they think this will help Xbox finally get second place instead of third I guess. Also they wouldn't care what games playstation gets because they only use xbox.

The3faces1159d ago

I agree with you to a certain extent but no matter how you do it the end result is the same., whether you buy a publisher or you make third party deals for exclusivity it keeps games off every platform and it's wrong. MS and Sony are guilty.

1160d ago
1160d ago
tay87011159d ago

nah he didnt hand him any ammo. If MS wants
this to cross the finish line, they will have to put it in writing that it will stay on PS permanently and release day and date. not some half ass vague statements. they havent put it in writing because they dont want that. they want to try and force new players into the xbox eco system.

Crows901159d ago

"Minecraft is still on PS.
Destiny 2 is still on Xbox.

It’s not impossible that COD stays on PS - they’d also be giving up a lot of revenue if they remove it."

Theyd be giving up a lot of attachment rate to gamepass if they dont remove it. Eventually it will be more lucrative for them. Especially once they get back the money they spent.

Minecraft is not a core experience for consoles. Ive never played it for one. Bungie only just got purchased by sony and there was clear communication that the game would stay multiplatform.

There hasnt been this clear communication at all regarding Call of Duty. We also know much more details about the ActiBlizzard deal than those others. We know they sent a letter agreeing to a certain period. We know they purposefully left out any language that it would continue to stay afterward. We also know that despite phil saying it will stay...nothing in writing has guaranteed that...why dont they want to do that? One possible answer.

Extermin8or3_1159d ago

There's no legal case there. You'd have to prove he had any involvement or influence which would be basically impossible. Plus remember the eu couets do as the commission wants- almost always.

zarbor1159d ago

Yup. You are correct. No matter how much he or they try to explain, he's tainted and open the possibilty of bias.

dumahim1159d ago

I work for a company. People here make decisions regarding the type of toilet paper they buy. Do you think, just because I work for the same company and can contact them, that I have any influence over the type of toilet paper they buy?
Spoiler...

I don't.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 1158d ago
XiNatsuDragnel1160d ago (Edited 1160d ago )

Hopefully European commission does block this, or on the condition that Activision sells Blizzard, Crash and Spyro, and most of IPs to other companies or form a side company to house these IP in as a consequence for this huge purchase but nah that ain't reality.

1160d ago Replies(2)
SPEAKxTHExTRUTH1160d ago (Edited 1160d ago )

It’s a bad look for the EU commission no matter how people try to spin it. This can definitely play into MS’s favor if this guy is legit.

1Victor1160d ago

Next we will see a comment from the janitor and be all rage and indignation because he can influence the decision by cleaning their office 🤣

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH1160d ago

What a dumb comment. You’re comparing a janitor to someone who works in the EU commission in some degree? His comment comes off bias simple because of his position and he could potentially sway people who DO work on the commission. It’s just a bad look and a comment he should have kept to himself.

Gamingsince19811160d ago

I hope he does sway people, no one but fanboys want this deal going through, no one can think it's a good idea for MS to own pretty much everything.

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH1160d ago

And only a fanboy would care if this deal goes through or not. I personally couldn’t careless

Gamingsince19811159d ago

@speak

Nope, only a fan of gaming wouldn't want it going through, nothing good can come from MS owning everything, it just seems you're an xbox fanboy pretending not to be. I know im neutral in the console wars because I don't even own a playstation 5 or xbox, I only have a pc, but I still see the big picture like a lot of others do.

Even stevie wonder can see MS is bad for gaming and MS having a monopoly in gaming is about as bad as a scenario as you can get.

1159d ago Replies(1)
1Victor1159d ago (Edited 1159d ago )

How is my comment any dumbe compared to both your above and bellow my 🤷🏿 at least the janitor got a better chance than someone who is not even close to the people ……… you know what the point is that this is the epitome of grasping at straws for people like you trying to find a excuse and cry out IT WAS BIASED if the merger don’t get approved 😩

1159d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1159d ago
ActualEngineer1160d ago

The gaming community's response on this case is a prime example of how childlike, immature and immoral most gamers are; how out of touch, unknowledgable and two-sided they can be and how entitled they can feel.

Activision Blizzard is a company facing an internal collapse, bleeding talent and facing legal trouble from it's employees. With a board of directors that can not assess the situation properly and fix the company's internal problems and their game quality (especially blizzard) has been on a sharp decline compared to what they could have been.

Most franchises, on the other hand, are being bled to death and communities like WOW are starting to die.

Yet, despite microsoft being able to fix the internal problems and aliviate the stress between management and employes, gamers choose to attack the acquisition that could actually save the company. The acquisition that could possibly save and bring back the life to World of Watctaft, diablo, overwatch 2, Tony Hawk etc etc.

It is beyond me, as such, to think that someone can be so small as to ignore the actual death that is lurking around Activision's ip's corner, so that he can still play call of duty in that single console of his.

rippermcrip1160d ago

First of all you're being dramatic about the state of their games.

Secondly, name a single franchise that Microsoft has ever taken over and saved? The truth is the opposite. Games they've taken over generally go down hill.

Gamingsince19811160d ago

What a wall of text for nothing, take a look at all the things MS has done with the companies they acquire, none turn out fine, I would rather EA bought Activeblizzard than MS.

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH1159d ago

How is MS in the position that they are in today if everything they do is wrong? Lol clearly people at MS know more about how to run’s business than you do.

SurgicalMenace1159d ago

They're good at making Operating Systems, but their gaming division has never turned a profit since its inception. That should explain things clearly enough. To be fair, they don't have the best track record when asked to create anything outside of systems and controllers. All these big acquisitions only help to illustrate their deseration in the industry that you're so convince they know so much about. Owning an XB every generation has given me 1st hand experience of their lack of effort and I wouldn't trust them with any company at this point.

sinspirit1159d ago

@SurgicalMenace

Well I wouldn't say good. They simply came into a booming market at the exact right moment. Windows has notoriously had terrible OS's with anfew good ones in there. But, they just keep having strange issues and updates mess up features and drivers all the time. Their console OS has been more heavy weight than others in the past, not sure how bloated it is this gen. They're really not as talented as their revenue will tell.

@SPEAKxTHExTRUTH

It's not because their console itself got them there. Any other business would have bailed from how long it took XBox to finally profit. You don't need to have business skills to point out their mismanagement of developers, games, and consoles. We see developers go downhill, shutdown, restricted, forced to work on projects they don't want, and we have the most notorious hardware failure rate ever under their management. Don't bring up tired arguments like that. It's just a petty way to try and end an argument when you have nothing to argue your side.

staticall1159d ago

Sorry, but a lot of what you've said can be applied to Microsoft as well, especially this part: «With a board of directors that can not assess the situation properly and fix the company's internal problems and their game quality».
343 Industries wasting $500 million dollars on Halo Infinite (and releasing awful 4 and 5 beforehand) and all we got is infinite problems and delays. What's the excuse? It's a studio created by Microsoft, isn't it?
The Coalition and Perfect Dark hiatus, so they had to hire another studio to develop the game together. Doesn't that scream "internal problems"?
And for that Microsoft turned Rare into, they should have a special cauldron in hell.

The only studio i can think of that's doing it's job great is Forza developers. And i wouldn't say this has anything to do with Microsoft or their "help".

Microsoft has 23 game development studios (according to their own official Xbox website) and what they got to show for it? And before you say, Sony has 19 game development studios and they release hit after hit. So Sony has less quantity and more quality. Microsoft has no excuses. So please, stop acting like they're some sort of savior.

darkrider1159d ago

Microsoft can't even fix their own studios, much less tons more of studios...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1159d ago
Show all comments (69)
60°

Rockstar launches official marketplace for mods

Rockstar has launched an official marketplace for "every server and every player" to buy mods: Cfx Marketplace.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Christopher2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I wonder how much of this isn't just taken work of others who have modded for free.

Edit: Also, great way for R* to take popular ideas and build them into GTAVI based on demand.

fr0sty7h ago

What I see happening here is, R* is going to ban mods in GTA6 UNLESS you buy them from the marketplace and R* then gets a cut of that sale.

ActualWhiteMan10h ago

Ah, perfect timing with them taking down the Bully online fan mod. Greedy a$$ company.

Christopher7h ago

It's okay as long as they get a cut of the money.

fr0sty7h ago

Expect R* to force it on you.

Snookies121h ago

Yep, right there with you. I'll happily donate to a mod creator if it looks really cool, or if I enjoy it. But expecting payment up front? Nope, not touching it.

IanTH7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

I'm not entirely sure how to read this, as it doesn't seem exactly like an exact parallel to Bethesda's paid mods shenanigans.

Rather than single player stuff, this appears to be aimed solely on Cfx Servers. From what I've gleaned, apparently Rockstar bought the Cfx mod team several years ago, coming a few years after weird contentions led them to ban a few of their members. Ultimately, the question is if they plan to keep this contained to only online/servers.

I have to guess to a degree yes. It'd be pretty hard to "force" paid mods for single player when modding files locally on your own machine, but much easier for servers they'll control. So perhaps this is their soft launch ahead of GTA6 online and they'll clamp down more tightly on non-official servers going forward? Ever since they've become a 1 or 2 property studio, I haven't really cared much for Rockstar stuff, so I'm not entirely up on everything surrounding this. Sounds like it has the potential to be problematic further down the line, but right now fairly easy to ignore...I think lol.

50°

Kotick claims lawsuit objecting to MS-Activision deal was "tied to Embracer's desire to boost sales"

Former CEO describes lawsuit filed by Swedish pension fund as a "collateral attack" on Activision Blizzard.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
OpenGL1d 4h ago

Yeah, the Microsoft deal has DEFINITELY worked out for everyone.

galgor1d 1h ago

Can this mother fucker just get lost already

PRIMORDUS1d ago

He belongs in here ⚰️, hopefully sooner than later.

MrDead8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

Kotick Made $155 million from MS in the buyout, the little b*tch needs to stop whining. Thanks to this Microslop deal and massive industry consolidation thousands upon thousands of devs and other workers lost their livelihoods. This greedy piggie pervert needs shut up and f-off.

40°

An Update to Our Shared Commitment to Safer Gaming

Discover how Sony Interactive Entertainment, Nintendo, and Microsoft continue to collaborate to improve player safety across our platforms.

Read Full Story >>
sonyinteractive.com