is this your first Diablo game? Killing bosses aren't a big deal. The end game is where the game actually starts. Rifts, bounties, etc. I don't know how Immortal works but that's where the kerfuffle is, getting legendary gems from end game runs or something. No one actually gives two shits about beating the final boss.

@Lionsguard

"No one actually gives two shits about beating the final boss."

Maybe read the article and the comments here before posting something as stupid as that. You're in a comment section for an article specifically about just that lmao. There's a whole article about it and the comments here are saying yeah, just like a normal game but but but it's so hard to do it in Immortals without spending money! So obviously people do give two shits. My point, if you bothered to crack the rock hard code I wrote it in (/s because you probably need that confirmed) is that you don't need to spend a penny to accomplish what the article is blowing up. Christ, can't believe I needed to explain that.

It's a F2P game. If it's not your thing, don't play it. I don't plan on touching it at all. I like most of Nintendo's games but I haven't touched a single one of their mobile titles and have no intention of doing so. No need to drag them through the mud for trying something different. (There are other reasons to drag them through the mud, but this ain't it)

Activision: "How is it possible to beat this game without MTs? This is preposterous. We need to work on an update immediately to course correct so that there is no way people can beat the final boss without grinding for 1000s of hours."

I agree with you and Foxtrot. It is really sad that we are actually celebrating a person beating the game without spending any money.

Sure it is free to play but it ends up being pay to win or pay to beat. And I blame players as much as the company because those who pay to win are the ones driving these kind of practices in the game industry. I am all for free to play games as long as it is also free to win where spending money does not give anyone ANY kind of advantage in the game.

I have been playing Overwatch with my friends since the beginning and I have not spent a dime on loot boxes because if I pay a full price for the game, I am not spending anything on cosmetics because everything should be unlockable by just playing the game and making in-game currency not feel like a chore. Now Overwatch 2 is free to play and from what I can see the only thing you can spend money on are cosmetics. That being said, I will support any developer by buying something in game if I think they have done a great job with a free to play game and the core gameplay is fair where no one has an advantage because they bought something. Again this is what I do and not saying it is right or wrong but you should always vote with your wallet.

^ no, you're right @NotoriousWhiz, we should just be quiet and hope they don't take our silence as acceptance. Then they totally won't bring this crap to future games. / s

Clearly I'm skipping this. I have no intention of supporting this kind of thing, especially if it's at the expense of an IP I've enjoyed in the past.

But it won't be fun tho

Battle pass exclusives.

i played only during launch and i found the ones in that battlepass to be absolute dogwater, the only ones that looked somewhat cool were the paid ones in the store and i wont bother with either. The game itself was just so hollow, there were no cool builds cause every synergy was just "x or y skills does more dmg or has this extra effect" almost no experimentation needed, couldnt give a rats ass about armor if the core of the game is boring af.