240°

Microsoft ‘hasn’t discussed’ Bobby Kotick’s post-acquisition employment status, it’s claimed

VGC: "Activision Blizzard claims its CEO Bobby Kotick hasn’t discussed with Microsoft whether he will remain at the company after the proposed acquisition deal.

According to a new line added to a filing by Activision Blizzard’s 8-K filing (as spotted by Axios’ Stephen Totilo), the company claims that Kotick and Microsoft didn’t discuss his plans before the acquisition announcement, and still hasn’t.

“No discussions or negotiations regarding post-closing employment arrangements with Microsoft occurred between Microsoft and Mr Kotick prior to the approval and the execution of the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, or have occurred subsequent to such approval and execution, through the date hereof,” it claims."

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
darthv721369d ago

There should be nothing to discuss... the guy's gotta go.

1369d ago Replies(4)
gamer78041369d ago

They can’t discuss it until the deal is final, so don’t expect to hear anything until then.

The_Hooligan1369d ago

Agreed! He's a complete scumbag.

Cackocacho1369d ago

He makes money. He will stay. Anyone who thinks Microsoft has moral high ground over any other cesspool of a company, is comically deluded.

Kotick is a slug, and you will see him get a new title to deflect from the fact that he'll be staying right where he is in the hierarchy, if not even higher.

1Victor1369d ago (Edited 1369d ago )

@ Cack
Do you think that maybe they’re planning for him to be phill 2nd in command, as you said the man know what to do to make money and Microsoft love to make money at all cost 🤷🏿
Edited for the Damn autocorrect

SullysCigar1369d ago

I think this could happen and I very much hope it doesn't.

fr0sty1369d ago

This should have been the first thing discussed, but as we see, Microsoft is rewarding his actions, not punishing them, by letting him stick around even this long. He's still on the payroll.

--Onilink--1369d ago

You do understand that the purchase hasnt even been approved? There is absolutely no scenario in which MS has any say to what happens to Kotick before the acquisition goes through.
And even more so, no scenario in which Kotick would leave willingly until he knows the acquisition is done. Its common sense

onisama1369d ago

Microsoft didn't own activision yet!
Thinkfrosty think

SullysCigar1369d ago

^ I think you guys are missing the point, I'm just not sure if you're doing it deliberately for an excuse to lash out.

They're referencing Kotick's POST-ACQUISITION employment status. The question is whether or not Microsoft have discussed this yet. The OFFICIAL/PUBLIC answer is no. The real answer is likely that they have, they just can't legally indicate that at this stage, as we are not POST-ACQUISITION yet.

So there's little point in referencing MS don't get a say "before the acquisition goes through" @Onilink, or that "Microsoft didn't own Activision yet!" @onisama, as that's bloody obvious and not even in question here.

isarai1369d ago

That's the only reason i would think it's not being talked about. Ignore the problem and hope it goes away

Godmars2901369d ago

Would think if Kotick stays, then MS ends up looking worse. Exploiting a bad situation only to fundamentally continue it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1369d ago
sourOG1369d ago

He’s gone. If him staying wasn’t even discussed as a part of the contract he’s gone. They wouldn’t pay him what he wants. Let’s just hope he doesn’t go to another pub we like because he will get another job quickly. Hopefully it’s something stupid like mobile games pub.

gamer78041369d ago

He’ll absolutely be gone you are right. They just can’t say anything until the deal has closed.

Knightofelemia1369d ago

He allowed Activision to be in this shit storm of a mess he has to go enjoy your job while you have it. Moment Microsoft takes control in 2023 there might be an article of Kotick is either being sacked or forced to retire from Activision.

Godmars2901368d ago

No. He didn't "allow" it, he contributed to the s**t storm. He illegally, immorally mistreated people working for him while exploiting the vast majority every way possible legally.

Vizigoth041369d ago

Probably need to make sure the deal goes through first right? All opinions aside anyway?

--Onilink--1369d ago

Of course, not only does MS legally has no say with anything happening in Activision right now, there is also no way Kotick would decide to leave until he knows the deal is approved and done

Show all comments (49)
60°

Rockstar launches official marketplace for mods

Rockstar has launched an official marketplace for "every server and every player" to buy mods: Cfx Marketplace.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Christopher2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I wonder how much of this isn't just taken work of others who have modded for free.

Edit: Also, great way for R* to take popular ideas and build them into GTAVI based on demand.

fr0sty10h ago

What I see happening here is, R* is going to ban mods in GTA6 UNLESS you buy them from the marketplace and R* then gets a cut of that sale.

ActualWhiteMan13h ago

Ah, perfect timing with them taking down the Bully online fan mod. Greedy a$$ company.

Christopher10h ago

It's okay as long as they get a cut of the money.

fr0sty10h ago

Expect R* to force it on you.

Snookies124h ago

Yep, right there with you. I'll happily donate to a mod creator if it looks really cool, or if I enjoy it. But expecting payment up front? Nope, not touching it.

IanTH9h ago(Edited 9h ago)

I'm not entirely sure how to read this, as it doesn't seem exactly like an exact parallel to Bethesda's paid mods shenanigans.

Rather than single player stuff, this appears to be aimed solely on Cfx Servers. From what I've gleaned, apparently Rockstar bought the Cfx mod team several years ago, coming a few years after weird contentions led them to ban a few of their members. Ultimately, the question is if they plan to keep this contained to only online/servers.

I have to guess to a degree yes. It'd be pretty hard to "force" paid mods for single player when modding files locally on your own machine, but much easier for servers they'll control. So perhaps this is their soft launch ahead of GTA6 online and they'll clamp down more tightly on non-official servers going forward? Ever since they've become a 1 or 2 property studio, I haven't really cared much for Rockstar stuff, so I'm not entirely up on everything surrounding this. Sounds like it has the potential to be problematic further down the line, but right now fairly easy to ignore...I think lol.

Show all comments (10)
50°

Kotick claims lawsuit objecting to MS-Activision deal was "tied to Embracer's desire to boost sales"

Former CEO describes lawsuit filed by Swedish pension fund as a "collateral attack" on Activision Blizzard.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
OpenGL1d 6h ago

Yeah, the Microsoft deal has DEFINITELY worked out for everyone.

galgor1d 3h ago

Can this mother fucker just get lost already

PRIMORDUS1d 2h ago

He belongs in here ⚰️, hopefully sooner than later.

MrDead11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

Kotick Made $155 million from MS in the buyout, the little b*tch needs to stop whining. Thanks to this Microslop deal and massive industry consolidation thousands upon thousands of devs and other workers lost their livelihoods. This greedy piggie pervert needs shut up and f-off.

40°

An Update to Our Shared Commitment to Safer Gaming

Discover how Sony Interactive Entertainment, Nintendo, and Microsoft continue to collaborate to improve player safety across our platforms.

Read Full Story >>
sonyinteractive.com