All Channels
Popular
480°

How Phil Spencer Changed Xbox

Joey Marrazzo: Xbox has undergone a large overhaul since Phil Spencer took over in 2014 and it has paid off very well for the video game juggernaut.

Read Full Story >>
gaminginstincts.com
Terry_B1858d ago

Umm..their Xbox One on place 3 long behind the PS4 and Switch + shrinking number of xbox exclusives paid off very well? rly?

Jin_Sakai1858d ago

Starfield and Elder Scrolls 6 are a few new major exclusives. Then there’s Ninja Theory and other developers the purchased working on first party games. On top of that Game Pass is killing it with 20 million subscribers.

Terry_B1858d ago

And when are Starfield and ES 6 getting released? 2023? 2024? 2025? And are they even exclusives or is that just a wild guess from you? Game Pass is killing it? Last time I checked over 40 Million people were subscribing ps+.

But more important are console sells ..and those did not actually do that well since Phil Spencer "took over" ..which he didnt.

Orchard1858d ago

“ But more important are console sells”

Are they? Dollars are dollars whether they come from a subscription or from console sales. And those dollars are more likely to come from subscriptions since hardware is typically sold at a loss.

Michiel19891858d ago

@terry what does it have to do if its an exclusive or not? it doesnt make the game better or worse only for the fact of being on 1 or more than 1 platform. So now Days Gone and HZD are suddenly worth less cause they got pc releases? or somehow worse?
not sure what your obsession is with "do you even exlcusive bro?" but its dumb. Wouldn't it be awesome actually if ES6 and Starfield came out on both platforms?

mkis0071858d ago

$1 subs dont do much to the bottom line and that is what most people are paying in all likelihood. Unless there is proof that is wrong? MS wont give out those numbers though. I wonder why? They only failed to give out numbers in the past when they were not the leader. MS, like others, has a habit of adding people who have so much as touched one of their offerings into their stats releases.

RosweeSon1857d ago

They may be exclusive but are they coming any time soon, nope. 20 million subscribers is great but they all paid full price or got on it during a deal 🤔🤷🏻‍♂️ 🤣 more to the point until those tops exclusives start arriving game pass is great and all that but not that amazing, subscription service for a load of games you generally wouldn’t bother with 🤷🏻‍♂️🤣 getting better and it does have some great games but normally ones you’d have bought by now come back in a couple of year and see if all these big money deals have paid off. Currently they’ve gone no where

IamTylerDurden11857d ago (Edited 1857d ago )

Please just using speculation as fact. We don't actually know what games will be exclusive. Ppl need to stop getting manipulated over and over. It's the Phil Spencer special. Did XB1 not teach you anything?

@Orchard

"More important are dollars"

Have you looked at revenue for PlayStation and Xbox recently? PlayStation is dominating in that category.

SurgicalMenace1857d ago

So GP= 20 million x 15 = 300,000,000

Horizon = 15 million × 60 = 900,000,000
Spiderman = 20 million x 60 = 1,200,000,000
God of War = 20 million x 60 = 1,200,000,000

Doing the math, the 3 games above potentially generated up to 3.3 billion dollars which is 11 times more than a year of GP revenue. Now, just add in console, subscription, etc and you'll get a better picture of the scale if things.

CaptainHenry9161857d ago (Edited 1857d ago )

@SurgicalMenace

You just started another war. You know how sensitive they get on here. Everyone already know the revenue numbers

thebutcher091857d ago

@SurgicalMenace

You may want to "do the math" again because you just gave us GP monthly revenue (based on those numbers) which would actually equate to $3.6Billion for a year.

Orchard1857d ago

@SurgicalMenace How does that math work?

1. Your GP numbers are monthly. 300 million a month. Which would be 3.6 billion dollars a year.

2. 3.6 billion dollars is more than all of those games combined, and those games did not all launch in the same year, so you can effectively remove HZD from the annual numbers.

3. Those games are one time purchases, subscriptions are recurring so in year 2, Microsoft again makes >= 3.6 billion dollars while these games make substantially less than in year 1.

4. The revenue you've posted for those games doesn't all go to Sony. Shippers, manufacturers, stores etc. all take a big cut. You also have to offset all of the development costs (and those games aren't cheap) plus marketing, licensing etc.
MS likely has higher profit margins on subscriptions than Sony has on 1st party games.

So what you're saying is, if we look at raw dollars and ignore the above costs in #4 - in terms of revenue, Game Pass is effectively making a Horizon game every 3 months, or a Spiderman/GOW every 4 months. Without a 3-4 year dev cycle. Sounds like a pretty good, reliable revenue stream to me.

4Sh0w1857d ago (Edited 1857d ago )

Orchard great post, but of course fanboys still thinking like its the ps2 gen. Microsoft spreads themselves over a variety of platforms, making money in other ways more so than sony who's more focused on selling hardware.

That said I CANT get all aboard the Phil hype train yet because Xbox has had a severe drought of consistent AAA exclusives on his watch. Yeah alot is in the works & the Bethesda deal was a huge win but thats bird in the bush talk...until he delivers those games consistently I give him a C+ right now because yes Xbox is doing great in terms of hardware, BC, gamespass and their consumer friendly approach.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 1857d ago
darthv721858d ago

Guess you been smacked by Mai's boobs to remember the WiiU finished in 3rd in the 8th gen while the XBO is still selling and in 2nd place.

Switch was overlapping with 8th gen and is handily in the lead for 9th gen.

Terry_B1858d ago

Hey Hey Hey! I am not Andy!

Thing is, Switch sold like twice of consoles in its few years on the market than Microsoft sold Xboxes. I bet we see a new Nintendo console in less than 2 years already.

1858d ago
sactownlawyer9161858d ago

Switch will end up selling more than double Xbox 1 sold and if they make a switch pro it will definitely sell better than Xbox 1x/s.

1858d ago
IamTylerDurden11857d ago

For all the bullshit that Microsoft fed us about XB1 outpacing 360, it won't even break 60 million units. In fact, estimates have it at 50 million even. The 360 sold 85+ million. So, it's entirely possible that XB1 ends up more than 30 million consoles behind 360 when it's all said and done. XB1 has been phased out and numbers are paltry month to month. It won't do more than 5 million more, lifetime.

So for all the propaganda regarding what a grand success XB1 was despite getting trounced by competitors, and the saving grace that "it's outpacing 360"... it will likely fall at least 30 million short of its predecessor. More damning yet, PS4 has already sold over 115m units and Switch surpassed XB1 in less than half the time. Can the narrative finally end that XB1 was a massive success? It wasn't. It didn't flop, but it wasn't a huge success.

darthv721857d ago (Edited 1857d ago )

@Marvin, each company has their own time frame of when they release their next generation of hardware. there is no specific rule that says they must all release at the same time. nor is there any mandate that they all have to be at a certain level of technical prowess. nintendo has had generations last as little as 4 years to as much as 6. WiiU was 4.5 years, that falls in line with their schedule.

Sony has had 5-7 and MS has had 4-8. There is no re-invention anywhere. It's just the way things are. Only one generation where XB finished in 3rd and that is the 7th. Wii (102m) was 1st and PS3 (88m) was 2nd and 360 (86m) finished not far behind in 3rd. Before that (6th) the XB (25m) finished in 2nd but was way behind the PS2 (150m) while the Gamecube (22m) finished in 3rd not far behind XB.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1857d ago
Atom6661858d ago

There's some good reports and videos out there detailing some of the internal discussions and general standing of Xbox within MS back in 2014. It was bleak.

Even if you're not a fan of XB, MS, or Spencer, you can't deny the difference between 2014 Xbox and 2021 Xbox.

It's still a wait-and-see situation, but just look at their list of known upcoming games, if nothing else. Quality and final release dates are still huge question marks. But the sheer volume of 1st party, 2nd party, and 3rd on the way is staggering.

Terry_B1858d ago

The difference for me as someone who plays mainly on PC is that there are even more Microsoft game on Steam now. Like today Battletoads for 5 Bucks. But the thing is..before 2014, before the xbox one gen, I had a reason to get a XB360. Some games that were truly exclusives. Hell some of them are xb360 exclusive till today like Blue Dragon.

Today I see not one reason anymore to get a xbox instead of a PS5 since it simply has no exclusives anymore that are not also available on PC. How is that a good thing for Microsoft or the Xbox changed by Phil Spencer? IF he is responsible even..which i doubt.

purple1011858d ago (Edited 1858d ago )

Too little.. too late. They lost all their customers.

And I'm willing to bet, some of those gamepass subscribers, are PC gamers only. Making their console sales even less than we currently know them to be.

It's been a disaster zone for last few years. America still holding on, but most people in europe, asia. Middle east and africa have all moved onto PlayStation.

Atom6661858d ago (Edited 1858d ago )

@ Terry

Remember, Spencer was elevated to VP of Gaming in 2017. I think it's awesome that we're seeing their games on Steam. It's been a long time coming, but they finally started to 1. Support PC again and 2. Wised up that working with Valve/Steam is smarter than forcing Win Store on people.

Not being forced to buy a console is a good thing. Having such a strong PC presence already with Windows makes PC gaming a no-brainer for MS. Why not leverage your strengths to go after different gamers?

@purple

That type of thinking is odd to me. Someone is buying their very first console today. We aren't given life-time citizenship cards for consoles.

I've been a Nintendo guy, a Sega guy, a PS guy, an Xbox guy, PC guy, etc. etc. throughout my life. So it's never "too late" for anything.

The vast, vast majority of gamers don't care about brand loyalties.

And if the billions spent in the last few years by MS are "too little," I really can't imagine what would happen if they REALLY tried...

Orchard1858d ago

@Terry_B

“ it simply has no exclusives anymore that are not also available on PC. How is that a good thing for Microsoft”

Because MS games are not free on PC. You’re paying money to Microsoft.

Dollars spent on console aren’t more valuable than dollars spent on a PC.

Revenue is revenue. Source is irrelevant.

IamTylerDurden11857d ago (Edited 1857d ago )

I look at the 360 generation and the XB1 generation. Phil took over very early on during XB1 and by comparison 360 dominated XB1 and had some huge new IP that set Xbox up.

The 360 was the golden age of Xbox, but XB1 and even the new generation have Xbox trailing their competitors by a wide margin and there is a distinct lack of quality exclusives. The entire Spencer administration has seen fans wait embarrassingly long for meaningful games and it's only continued through the new gen. SX had one of the worst launch lineups ever and six months in there still isn't much. Xbox also trails their competitors in total revenue. I just don't see how this guy is the Messiah.

anast1857d ago

Anything is better than noting, but anything shouldn't be praised solely because it's better than nothing.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1857d ago
ABizzel11858d ago (Edited 1858d ago )

I mean he didn't really. This is Microsoft's initiative, they want more service-based subscriptions, and that's where XBL, Windows 365, GamePass, etc... came from. People prefer financing things outside of their budget.

If Xbox was $1,500 with 600 games inlcuded, last-gen, current-gen, and pre-ordered for release, it would be sitting on shelves. But make it $500, and spread that remaining $1,000 into a $15/mo. service that gets you 300 games instantly, and adds the other 300 over 5 years and it's an easy buy for Xbox fans.

It's the same thing with smartphones, cars, and almost everything else we use. People would rather finance, so they can have things now, instead of paying one lump sum and being done with it, because of all the other expenses in life.

Phil didn't come up with this, this is what the entire company at MS had decided on moving forward. Phil is just the person in charge of Xbox and thus implementing this. Now whoever came up with the concept of GmaePass and started making contracts with publishers on what games will be coming to the service, they are the ones who changed Xbox and helped Xbox.

rlow11857d ago

I agree partially, your right that it wasn't his idea alone. MS had already been doing this for year's with Office. Also, behind any successful leader theirs a great team. Heck, Steve jobs didn't create the iPhone, he had a very general idea about what it would be and their were already full screen phones that existed prior to the iphone. But it was his team that came up with the form factor and software to make a device that changed everything in that field. Do we credit his team? Or does everyone say Steve was a genius? Did Edison invent the lightbulb? Or was it his team? Everyone plays an important part. A leader is rarely the person that came up with the idea, but they are the ones with the vision and the drive to implement it. Xbox was in a bad place before Phil took over, with top investors calling for it to be spun off. Phil turned his team and the brand around by digging in and evangelizing Xbox. If it had been anyone else leading Xbox, it wouldn't be anywhere close to where it is today. Give the guy and his team some credit.

Obscure_Observer1858d ago (Edited 1858d ago )

"Umm..their Xbox One on place 3 long behind the PS4 and Switch + shrinking number of xbox exclusives paid off very well? rly?"

Xbox One had the WiiU destroyed, and SX is just stretching it's legs. So expect more studios acquisitions, more first party games and more exclusive second party games.

This time there's no Mattrick BS or weak hardware, Kinect, or network/SO problems to fix.

This new gen will be all about the GAMES for Xbox.

I honestly hope competition to keep up.

sinspirit1858d ago

Comparing it to a failed console. Maybe play devils advocate on your statements before thinking it's a good argument. Wii U destroyed itself by no 3rd party support, a restrictive gimmick, market confusion, and not many console selling games.

So awkward every time people think Mattrick made all those decisions. He was pushing Microsoft's agenda. That's it. Looking at those interviews in hindsight it actually seemed like his blunt responses of the new anti-consumer policies was to piss off MS.

It's extra awkward because Phil Spencer is actually behind the Kinect fiasco. 2008-2010 he transitioned from being in charge of European XBox studios general manager to being overall in charge of all XBox studios. The same era that MS decided to fully focus on Kinect, using European studios he was familiar with(Lionhead; Rare) to develop Kinect content and then pushed tech demonstrations that were staged and faked altogether. Then core gamers were entirely ditched for the last years of 360 because of Phil's decisions. Then we have the entire XBox launch fiasco, and the entire XBox One generation of games where Phil has one of the worst release schedules and poor excuses of AAA first party titles. Have you ever had a boss that does just about nothing, has others do the real work and idea making, and then takes too much credit over other peoples achievements because they know that they have nothing of their own merit to brag about? Basically, Phil. He's only there because everyone else had publically voiced XBox's new policies and grew insane public backlash.

1Victor1858d ago

I think of Phil spencer as the security guard at the restaurant door checking temperature he’s just doing what’s been told by the boss behind the office doors way in the back, he can’t do anything he want just what been told and you been piss off at him or be happy with him means NOTHING as long as you spend money inside

1857d ago
Ddog451857d ago

Read the article, as whole yes things are better. Exclusives aren't the only thing, game pass is making them tons of money and is the best deal in gaming. The access to so many games is incredible, I cant keep up. Latest being outriders going to game pass day 1, awesome! So ya like the article says how Phil changed xbox has been a big win!

GrmpyolGamer 1857d ago

You are thinking more n terms of console sales. That's the old and outdated way of thinking. Get with the times of services. Sony and Nintendo are lagging

343_Guilty_Spark1857d ago

Does your version of Third place means they are getting out the console space and making no money??

frostypants1857d ago

Hey now, don't get in the way of their obvious 2021 astroturfing campaign.

neutralgamer19921857d ago

I don't know why I have to say this to begin with but I am a PlayStation gamer why do we hate each other. We are gamers xbox and playstation are doing well. As a new xbox x owner I am enjoying gamepass only thing that surprised me was file size and getting notifications from cable service that I have used 75% of data lol

Chill guys it's weekend play games enjoy relax. Whether Playstation finishers first or Xbox last it really doesn't make a difference because we will get to enjoy some excellent games hopefully. I think this generation will be a lot closer especially when some big-time bathesda titles are released only on xbox and day one on gamepass

To be honest with you when I look at game pass I want Sony to do something similar. Having games ready to play day one especially games like outriders and MLB The show. And I know my opinion won't be popular but let's get out of this fanboy cycle and enjoy the games

King_Noctis1857d ago

“And when are Starfield and ES 6 getting released? 2023? 2024? 2025?”

Forgive me if I miss anything, but does the PS5 have any concrete release date for their upcoming first party exclusive games beside Rachet and Clank?

Agent751857d ago

@sactownlawyer916 But the Switch is a handheld. Home consoles versus handheld consoles is a dead in the water debate.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 1857d ago
1858d ago Replies(1)
AngelicIceDiamond1858d ago

"Changing" is the correct term here still. The fact that MS is playing a different strategy with its services by offering newer AAA's for 10 to 15$ is smart and very consumer friendly on their end. For me I wanna see those AAA first party from MS. I think that'll be the turning point for MS officially. AAA games that need to have a high critic rating.

Phil has changed console and services for the better, I agree but the games still remain.

purple1011858d ago

Hate to rain on your parade but I asked to make you going to give them at least $180 before you see any good games come to fruition.

AngelicIceDiamond1858d ago

Not sure what you mean. You're known to have a strong fanboy nature so I assume what you're saying is negative.

1857d ago
purple1011857d ago (Edited 1857d ago )

@ANGEL , sorry i ment uk prices, which are 14.99 a month, times 12 is 180, so i expect gamepass subscribers to give over 180 before any good games come out, as it will take a while for their purchases to come to fruition.

my spelling / grammr mistakes.- is sometimes not the best. should have stayed in school instead of playing games.

concerning my fanboy natutre, thats for good reason, playstation is clearly better than anything else - i say jokingly, but its kinda true, dont you think|>?

in my life of over 20 years gaming (im 35 currently)

ive owned, a

megadrive (genesis)
pc
gamegear
gameboy
n64
ps1
dreamcast
ps2
xbox (original)
ps3 slim
xbox 360
xbox one (project scorpio launch day edition)
ps4 pro
ps5.

don't you think I have the right to know what I like, and/or, support who I want.?

derek1858d ago

Xbox has successfully taught their mindless subscribers to not support the industry by paying for games and that actual ownership is no longer important.

chiefJohn1171857d ago

Says who? I'm subbed and still buy games hell many gamepass games actually had higher sells after going to gamepass. If anyone is mindless it's people like you that fail to see the true picture or just in denial

RauLeCreuset1857d ago

Contrary to what they may have been led to believe, the industry will be supported. Right now it's MS footing the bill to attract subscribers. Neither publishers nor Xbox are running a charity. Let's hope it isn't until "actual ownership" is a thing of the past for people to realize that.

NeoGamer2321857d ago (Edited 1857d ago )

So what how is "actual ownership" really important? I used to buy CDs, DVDs, blu-rays, and games. I valued ownership. Had literally 6 x Ikea full height Billy bookcases of media.

Then, came iPods... Then, came streaming video services..... Then, came PSNow and GamePass...

Now, I subscribe and purchase. I can afford to buy, rent, lease, subscribe, and purchase. These are just tools to acquire things, they are nothing more. Each person needs to decide on a given item which purchase model suites them for that item. For example, if you like replacing your car every two years is purchasing better then leasing? Probably not. But, if you keep your vehicle for 10 years or more purchasing probably makes sense.

All that is happening here is that consumers are being given more options on how to purchase games. You may feel ownership is important. But, many people analyze their purchasing and "own" where it makes sense to them, and use another purchase model where it makes sense for them.

I both purchase and subscribe for movies and games. I only subscribe for music. I play games and watch movies on subscriptions. If I really like them, I value them in my mind and then wait and purchase them when they get to the valuation I have assigned them. I now own over 2,500 games digitally and over 5,000 movies/TV digitally.

Also, supporting the industry.... How much money does Gamestop and the consumer give developers and publishers when they buy used games? NOTHING. At least, with subscribing I know that the developer has negotiated with Microsoft or Sony and agreed to an amount for their game which is supporting the industry.

Used game purchasing was out of control and provided no cash to the developers and publishers. Now with subscriptions effectively killing the used game market the significant money is going directly to developers and publishers. That makes the industry healthier not less healthy. It does kill retailers like GameStop, but outside of the sadness I feel for people losing their jobs, the money was not going to the right place to begin with.

343_Guilty_Spark1857d ago

If the industry is not supported why do they keep coming to GamePass?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1857d ago
Saaleh1858d ago (Edited 1858d ago )

Compared to xbox one, yes game pass is a better option. PC gamers are in for an extra treat. AAA MS/Bethesda "exclusives" are still far from launch.

Compared to early xbox 360. Game pass is a huge letdown and a downgrade.

Compared to sony. There is no competition anymore. Which is pretty sad..

People here and neogaf just dynamic in their emotions. All it matter is new games and wow factor.

got_dam1857d ago

Now, we can't forget that MS being consumer friendly probably wasn't their first plan. I mean, im all for it. Just saying.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1857d ago
Knightofelemia1858d ago (Edited 1858d ago )

I would have thought out the design on the Series S better and made it the same specs as the Series X minus the disc drive. Xbox as a whole just lacks the titles to drawn me in as a customer and buying a Series X you can ramble off all the titles you want but with out a solid release date they're nothing to hold my breath for. XB1 really lacked the titles where as the PS4 had titles dropping left right and center like flies. Only time will tell how Microsoft will handle the Zenimax purchase right now no one knows wtf is going on. All we get with the Zenimax purchase it little tidbits here and there as of right now PS5 first if I can find one. Then I will buy a Series X once I start to see titles that pique my interest with the Xbox hell I might not even buy a new Xbox I was not impressed with XB1 and it's lack of games.

RazzerRedux1858d ago

Still need some kick ass first party games from Microsoft. That's been their issue for years. Thankfully their new studios will help in that regard. And no, I'm not talking about Bethesda. Bethesda games were coming whether MS owned them or not.

Obscure_Observer1858d ago

"And no, I'm not talking about Bethesda. Bethesda games were coming whether MS owned them or not."

Yeah, but with MS money and resources, you can expect TES VI and Starfield to be even better! Just like Wastland 3.

sactownlawyer9161858d ago

Just like Crackdown 3 right? Money doesn’t automatically equal success Xbox has proven that.

RazzerRedux1858d ago

Bethesda was making better games than Microsoft without Microsoft's money. And Phil Spencer knows this. That is why he said he is going to let Bethesda continue to operate as they have, which is smart.

Studios like inXile and Compulsion who were not already making AAA games are the ones who will truly benefit from MS funding. I'm also looking forward to Perfect Dark and the new Fable.

Darkborn1857d ago

Actually I expect a huge budget decrease with game pass. I think they will force them to throw games out the door faster and use less money.

Obscure_Observer1857d ago (Edited 1857d ago )

"Bethesda was making better games than Microsoft without Microsoft's money. And Phil Spencer knows this. That is why he said he is going to let Bethesda continue to operate as they have, which is smart."

False. Phil Spencer has allowed freedom for all of the Xbox first party studios to do what they want from the very beginning. That´s why Ninja Theory allowed themselves to be acquired in the first place. That´s why the Initiative has Perfect Dark, Iron Galaxy has Killer Instinct, Dlala Studios has Battletoads, Playground has Fable and so on...

"Studios like inXile and Compulsion who were not already making AAA games are the ones who will truly benefit from MS funding."

I agree. But in Bethesda´s case, there´s always room to improve. You got things mixed up. I was talking about money and resources, not influence. Bethesda has an infamous reputation for it´s buggy games (Bugthesda), so, now under MS I´m expecting their games to be more polished, refined, 90% less buggy while having more updates, patches, modes and content. They´re also free to work in collaboration with any other first party studios they want, sharing knowledge, technology and manpower.

In resume, I´m expecting their game output and overall quality to increase dramatically now their under MS.

@sactownlawyer916

"Just like Crackdown 3 right?"

Yeah. Just like Forza Horizon, Ori and Flight Simulator, right? Right?

"Darkborn"

"Actually I expect a huge budget decrease with game pass. I think they will force them to throw games out the door faster and use less money."

Total BS! Like they´re forcing 343i, Playground and Turn 10 to release Halo Infinite, Forza Motorsport 8 and Forza Horizon 5 faster, right?

You don´t even know what you´re talking about. Smh.

RazzerRedux1857d ago

"False."

No, it isn't false. Phil Spencer said he is leaving Bethesda alone. They are going to continue to publish their own games and operate as they have. If you have information where MS said they are going to inject money into Bethesda's QA department then please share it. As it is, open world games are notoriously buggy regardless of budget size and I doubt that is going to change even at Microsoft so might want to temper those expectations.

Obscure_Observer1857d ago (Edited 1857d ago )

@Obscure_Observer

"No, it isn't false. Phil Spencer said he is leaving Bethesda alone. They are going to continue to publish their own games and operate as they have."

Yes, it IS false. The way you described Bethesda´s "freedom" under MS, can lead people to misinformation. The way you said it, Bethesda is free to continue to operate the way they have, which also means that future games like Starfield and TES VI are coming to Playstation and that´s not the case at all! Do not confuse Bethesda´s creative freedom with freedom to do what they want.

From Phil Spencer:

"This is the next step in building an industry-leading first party studios team, a commitment we have to our Xbox community. With the addition of the Bethesda creative teams, gamers should know that Xbox consoles, PC, and Game Pass will be the best place to experience new Bethesda games, *including some new titles in the future that will be exclusive to Xbox and PC players.*"

https://news.xbox.com/en-us...

"If you have information where MS said they are going to inject money into Bethesda's QA department then please share it."

My pleasure! From Bethesda´s VP Pete Hines himself:

"First, let me say that we’re not making any landmark announcements or changes right now. As we’ve all shared, the expectation is that Bethesda Softworks and our studios will continue as we have in the past, just with more support and resources than we’ve ever had before"

https://bethesda.net/en/art...

"As it is, open world games are notoriously buggy regardless of budget size and I doubt that is going to change even at Microsoft so might want to temper those expectations."

You got a point. You´re right about open world games, and yes, I might be fooling myself having such optimistic expectations that could turn unrealistic and ultimately turn into disappointment. Specially in the short term. Thanks for the heads up.

RazzerRedux1857d ago

"Yes, it IS false. The way you described Bethesda´s "freedom" under MS, can lead people to misinformation. The way you said it, Bethesda is free to continue to operate the way they have, which also means that future games like Starfield and TES VI are coming to Playstation and that´s not the case at all! "

Nope. Bad assumption on your part or anyone who read it that way. I didn't even imply anything regarding PlayStation. Why would I when that was already settled? I fully acknowledged that after the Bethesda-Microsoft round table discussion.

"Clears it up enough for me. My take on all of this has been speculative, but also completely wrong. Bethesda games will be exclusive to "platforms where Game Pass exist". Spencer makes caveats for existing games or contractual obligations, but he might as well said "Elder Scrolls, Starfield, Doom, Prey, etc. will no longer be on PlayStation".

That's that in my mind."
https://n4g.com/news/240630...

"First, let me say that we’re not making any landmark announcements or changes right now. As we’ve all shared, the expectation is that Bethesda Softworks and our studios will continue as we have in the past, just with more support and resources than we’ve ever had before"

Thanks for that. Good to know.

Obscure_Observer1857d ago

@RazzerRedux

"Nope. Bad assumption on your part or anyone who read it that way. I didn't even imply anything regarding PlayStation. Why would I when that was already settled? I fully acknowledged that after the Bethesda-Microsoft round table discussion."

Fair enough. I apologize for reading too much into the lines of your comment.

kopp3rbug1857d ago

Lol! Maybe now that Microsoft owns them they can finally update their horribly outdated game engine.....

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 1857d ago
derek1858d ago

Microsoft has contributed nothing to the creation of great new ip, they simply have bought the work of others .

Obscure_Observer1857d ago

Lol. Quantum Break. Ori. Sea of Thieves. Gears Tactics. Forza Horizon, State of Decay. Avowed. Everwild... just to name a few.

From the top of my head, there´s at least 3 new IPs to be announced from Ninja Theory, Compulsion and Inxile.

Now, tell more about competition´s new IPs. I´ll wait. :)

Show all comments (173)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio11d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing11d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9211d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit11d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing11d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9211d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
50°

Report: Injustice 3 in Development at NetherRealm Studios

Thanks to the slip-up of an artist working on the title, we now have more evidence that a new Injustice game is in the works.

50°

Spiders Studio, Developers of GreedFall: The Dying World, Announce Liquidation of the Company

Spiders: "We're going to cut straight to the chase so you're not left wondering: After a long period without clear answers, we have received confirmation that Spiders is being liquidated.

What does it mean? This means the company as a whole no longer exists. We'll cease our functions immediately. The planned DLC will release via Nacon, and then-- well, that's it.

We're sorry that it's come to this and would like to thank each and every one of you for your support over the years.

If you have any questions or run into issues with your games, please contact Nacon directly as we'll no longer be able to reply."