140°

Destiny 2 Has a PVP Problem

Sean writes, "The list of issues includes lack of incentive (which is the biggie), lack of new maps, maps being taken away, lack of modes and options, and the overall structure. The most recent bone of contention in the community is the presence of Stasis. I would also propose that the very nature of what Destiny 2 is means that PvP will always be contentious."

Read Full Story >>
gamingnexus.com
lukasmain1867d ago

I don't play Destiny anymore, but what about the fact that PS5 and Series X can play the multiplayer at 120 FPS and last gen consoles can only do 30 FPS and they all play together in multiplayer? Is that a factor people are worried about?

kryteris1866d ago

not really a big deal, though m/k vs controller in other games have been a real !@#$.

Rude-ro1866d ago

Please tell me how 120fps vs 30fps on a p2p network mathematically makes it a “not really a big deal”?

Because there is not one iota of facts behind that statement that can be presented.

YOU may not care and or find it to be a big deal... but that is just an opinion solely from you.

Vegamyster1866d ago

It's a pretty big deal especially as high refresh TV panels are becoming the norm, 30 fps feels sluggish in comparison 60 fps let alone 120.

1866d ago
waverider1866d ago

Its not only PVP, where im so tired of the combo handgun, shotgun, stasis, no skill whatsoever, Is the huge lack of content. HUGE. Iron Banner they dont make nothing new. For me, they could bring back all the strikes from Destiny 1. And make more weapons and armors. Make new ones!!! i really dont understand why the lack of content. Even cool PVE modes from other season should be on. The 6 team Vex mode was cool. How hard is to make modes like that. The game looks great on the PS5, but....

KyRo1866d ago

Lack of content is why I gave up on D2. The expansions are expensive for the very little content they provide. Adding old missions/planets, boss types, weapons from the first game under a expansion was the end of the line for me.

Great game but I feel its ruined by the greed of Bungie that was disguised as Activations greed for years.

waverider1866d ago

i agree with you. I cant understand why bungie got so much problems with content. They could never kill the first Destiny like they did. Now, they are forcing us to use the weapons that they want, because we cant increase the ligt on old ones! Why? They took content that we already had payed! Worlds? in terms of story. We are light and now must be darkness? wtf? Why?

Parasyte1866d ago

I think the only way Destiny will truly evolve and advance as a franchise is under new leadership. Luke Smith and Mark Noseworthy have done good things for this franchise, but their screw ups like sunsetting, keep holding everything back.
It’s beyond time that they should be replaced.

gorebago1865d ago

this season and expansion were terrible..

we paid $50 for less content than Warmind which cost $20

victorMaje1866d ago

I’ll never forget Destiny 1. Despite the unfortunate story mess-up it had that grounded feeling & a kind of serious tone that I loved.

OMNlPOTENT1866d ago

I understand the vaulting of the planets and content.. Kinda? The thing I don't get is why they would vault the pvp maps along with it. There simply isn't enough content in destiny right now to keep it afloat. I feel like if they are going to vault things, the content they add better add up to the content we lost.

gorebago1865d ago (Edited 1865d ago )

especially when maps from vaulted planets are still in the game too

Show all comments (16)
100°

PlayStation Scales Back Expectations for Bungie as Live-Service Risks Come Into Focus

PlayStation has scaled back expectations for Bungie after reassessing Destiny 2 development costs, highlighting the risks tied to live-service games.

Read Full Story >>
4scarrsgaming.com
isarai_lee21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Honestly Thank Goodness!! Yet another good sign of a possibility of returning to what made them great and undoing Jim Tyans trend chasing love service gamble. Still gotta wait and see just what direction they're going but this is a good sign in my book that they're not betting it all on live service anymore

S2Killinit18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

Not sure what you lot are talking about anymore. They need to cover all range of games. Im primarily a single player gamer, but even I cannot be daft enough to ignore the fact that we need all manner of games including live service games. Everyone here seems to be a market expert.

isarai_lee18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

Yes "all manner" not just exclusively live service like Jim was doing, but you also shouldn't be forcing devs to make games they not only have no experience making, but also flatout dont want to do.

S2Killinit18d ago

Assuming that anything like that is actually the case and not just a perception of n4g commenters of course.

Redemption-6418d ago

@isarai_lee
Yes "all manner" not just exclusively live service like Jim was doing.

I don't understand why you people have to keep making up lies. You can say you don't like some or most of their focus being on live service games, but to say they were exclusively focusing on live service games is pure copium. At most half of their games were live service and the rest were single player games. Seriously why lie about something so obvious?

isarai_lee18d ago

@Redemption-64

You say that as if we don't have word directly from Jim Ryan and PlayStation stating they wanted at least 12 live service games released within a year. Followed by tons of official word of those Live Service games being cancelled after he was pushed out. All studios combined at the time PS had 15 studios, 12 is a hell of a lot more than half of 15, and it was definitely their primary focus evident by the fact that a huge portion of their studios have taken uncharacteristically long to release or announce anything since, hell some studios have yet to release anything this gen almost 6 YEARS LATER! The only one making stuff up is you.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 18d ago
21d ago
Relientk7720d ago

It may take a while but maybe they are finally learning. Good! Now stop with the live service crap.

ABizzel119d ago

I don’t think there’s anything wrong with a live service here or there, but to have many of your studios start focusing on it when there has been little to no experience among them was wild.

Christopher19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

They say this and then immediately release news of the Horizons co-op game that will definitely be a Live Service game.

isarai_lee18d ago

I feel like they knew that given the fact that the very furst thing they say in the trailer is to reassure they still make so games 😆

isarai_lee18d ago

I feel like they knew that given the fact that the very first furst thing they say in the trailer is to reassure they still make so games 😆

vTuro2419d ago

Bet they're regrettings spending those billions pretty hard right now.

S2Killinit18d ago

Destiny has been a huge success.

Redemption-6418d ago

They will not. Destiny has been popular for over 10 years, something most games can never hope to achieve. Most people, including myself those Bungie was going to make a D3 after the final shape DLC. Marathon looks to be a hit and a D3 announcement could break records.

Show all comments (45)
30°

Destiny 2 Update 9.5.0.5

Patch notes for Update 9.5.0.5, the one about Equilibrium fixes and more, are now available.

60°

Destiny 2 is considering adding Sparrow Racing League, unvaulted campaigns, more, new survey reveals

A new survey shows Destiny 2 is considering adding Sparrow Racing League, unvaulted campaigns, NPC sidekicks, new PvP and Gambit modes, and much more.

Read Full Story >>
thegamepost.com