All Channels
Popular
720°

Cyberpunk 2077 — Our Commitment to Quality

CDPR: "Dear gamers, we are committed to fixing bugs and crashes and will continue to work and improve the game via future updates."

Read Full Story >>
cyberpunk.net
TGGJustin1949d ago (Edited 1949d ago )

Q: Didn’t you test old-gen consoles to keep tabs on the experience?

A: We did. As it turned out, our testing did not show many of the issues you experienced while playing the game. As we got closer to launch, we saw significant improvements each and every day, and we really believed we’d deliver in the final day zero update.

So new year same old lies from this pos company. Consoles aren't PCs. If they played this game on a base PS4 and base Xbox One then it is impossible they didn't see the problems that people have with them. We're not talking about some random bug we're talking about horrible framerate, textures that take forever to load, poor visuals, horrible bugs, and so much more. It's one lie after another with them. It's also ridiculous that they act like this game is perfect on PC when it's full of bugs, poor AI, a lifeless world, and so on on there too.

-Foxtrot1949d ago

I don't know how they can bullshit to our faces and pretend like they never saw anything wrong

They are really saying that despite all of their testing, all the Quality checks, the play testers and whatever else is in place, they hardly saw any of the issues on last gen consoles, even going far to say they saw improvements

That's so f******* bad man

SullysCigar1949d ago

They've learned nothing. They're making what they think are the right noises to slither back into the good books. Less talk, more action. Give us the results that should have been there for us at launch and then move on to more content for this game or go to the next one - and SHOW us you've changed.

Army_of_Darkness1948d ago

Wow! This guy literally thinks we're a bunch of F*#king idiots!?
How are some gamers cool with this? Sure some of y'all PC's can run it good but think outside the box people! We can't let them get away easy on this one otherwise they won't learn anything and just repeat the same thing next time around.

Bobertt1948d ago

From what i remember from leaks from the devs, they claim the execs knew the game was buggy but they didn't really pay attention or the people under them who are supposed to inform them downplayed it and they figured they would have them fixed by launch with the day 1 patch, but the devs knew it was not going to be ready. If that is true it's retarded none of the execs decided to play the game before launch.

Christopher1948d ago

What's worse is that he's throwing all the QA on the team (all 65+ of them) under the bus with statements like that.

NeoGamer2321948d ago

In the video the leadership team took full responsibility for the shipped product and said that their testing was inadequate, the older consoles were challenging to work with, and COVID also played a role.

I'm not sure what is wrong with what was said.

Did you expect them to say that are testers are losers, our team sucked, and we should just dig and hole, jump in and bury ourselves?

There is a delicate balance in a video like this. Comin out and saying we should've did better and not blaming the people working there as they put in huge hours probably to do the best they could do. You don't want to tell your team they aren't smart or valuable. But, at the same time you are trying to say we need to do better. I think that he did that well. They've promised three new patches, free dlc, and the nextgen updates in the second half of the year.

This situation just reminds me of why I don't buy games on day one anymore, Wait about 6 months on SP games and about a year on MP games, and other people go through the frustration and I just enjoy the game from end-to-end.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1948d ago
nickanasty2061949d ago

Could it be possible that they have way lower standards for what is actually acceptable? Not trying to make excuses at all for them because to me its unacceptable. Just wondering if the people they had doing QA testing really do honestly think it was in good shape?

JEECE1949d ago (Edited 1949d ago )

I think a big part of it is that they don't understand that a greater number of gamers are becoming aware of framerate and are also less willing to tolerate bugs.

If you go back and watch GTA V on PS3 and 360, you'll find drops into the low 20s. Bethesda titles from that era would be similar, and were also loaded with bugs (New Vegas on PS3, anyone?). I think they gambled that people playing on base consoles still were not the type to get worked up about or even notice performance issues. Ten years ago they might have gotten away with it.

TGGJustin1949d ago

@Jeece A big thing you are missing though is that all of those games you mentioned were shown before hand to at least give gamers an idea of what they were getting into. CDPR showed nothing but PC footage leading up to release and misled people into thinking that the console versions would be a similar experience. Heck reviewers weren't even allowed to use their own footage which isn't something you ever really see.

calderra1948d ago

They explicitly disallowed reviewers from posting PS4 footage.
If YongYea or Laymen or whomever had said PS4 was crap, they'd be blackballed from reviewing for CDPR.
Still think CDPR didn't know?

moomoo3191949d ago

Game looks great but where tf is all the traffic? If you are not in the city literally no cars on the road. Cops also spawn out of thin air. The wanted system is straight up non-existent. Im playing on PC but its clear the open world needed another 6 months EASILY.

-Foxtrot1949d ago

And games journalists are the ones who, when giving us the final preview of Cyberpunk, were praising Night City for how big, alive and captivating it was.

enkiduxiv1949d ago

@Foxtrot I can't help but think that some of the rage directed at the company should go towards all of those day one reviewers and the gamers that fall for their nonsense. Don't get me wrong. CDPR needs to be held accountable for its misleading marketing. However, at the end of the day this manipulative launch would never have happened if the Day One reviews hadn't put the game at a 93 on Metacritic.

I ultimately played it on PC and, while I enjoyed it, it was definitely buggy and immersion breaking in places. I don't see how having a PC copy of the game to review really could have effected the review scores all that significantly.

This launch highlights something we all know about and largely ignore. Game criticism is almost entirely under the control of the publishers. If they want their game to launch with perfect scores or even win game of the year they can just make it happen. I know the gaming community often blames this on casuals, but casuals by definition don't consume that much gaming media. When was the last time that friend we all have that just plays FIFA and GTAV went online to look for a game review or watched an award show. It's the hardcore gaming community that fell for CDPR and believed it could do no wrong. They are the ones who pre-ordered the game in droves a year before it released. The problem starts there.

calderra1948d ago

CDPR edited the game page so 2077 is officially "action-adventure" genre, not an RPG.

People still think the RPG mechanics and open world are going to get "fixed".

Wake up Samurai, you just got burned.

neutralgamer19921949d ago (Edited 1949d ago )

TGG

Even on pc this game is a mess with all the bugs and glitches. From broken police system , to poor NPC who disappear right when you turn the camera away. How about npc walking in circles something they Skyrim got right on very old hardware.

The amount of excuses from gamers depending this is not surprising since gamers are the biggest Hippocrates because they will defend one game if it's coming from their favorite company but then they'll bash another game if it's not coming from their favorite company for the same issues

Here's a case in point electronic arts puts micro transactions in Star wars battlefront 2 in the internet blew up yet Ubisoft has been adding XP boosters to single player games and gamers are okay with it and they make excuses like well you don't have to buy them

until we as gamers decide enough is enough and everybody is going to be getting equal treatment nothing is going to change. What's really stinks is when I saw a common saying well when Witcher 3 launched it it was also very buggy so cyberpunk 2077 will be fixed over time, then why are the developers charging full price for something that will be fixed over time

Stop with excuses this game was the most hyped game in past 10 to 15 years and it did not meet expectations it launched when it was not ready whether we were talking about consoles or PC this game is a buggy mess with a lot of glitches everywhere

Father__Merrin1949d ago

The only things Ng a high end of does is brute force a higher frame rate and even then it's not smooth or stable. All the bugs and glitches remain.

They should have released in the summer on pc then console during fall '21

Elda1949d ago

CDPR refusing to let reviews & footage of the console versions when the embargo was lifted told it all that they were hiding.

neutralgamer19921948d ago

Exactly they knew what shape this game was in and even on pc it's a mess so it's not like pc gamers got the compete version. As a gamer what's really sad is this game had so much hype and potential and we as gamers felt like CDPR will do is right because they are pro consumers than they didn't even show gameplay for all platforms

philm871948d ago

How many of you have actually played it on the base consoles?

calderra1948d ago

CDPR explicitly demanded in their review embargo that you could NOT show your own footage of the console versions, and you could NOT talk about the console versions. You had to use their (pre-rendered, PC) footage to show the game in the best light on consoles.

Still want to pretend CDPR didn't know?

stloony1948d ago (Edited 1948d ago )

As a QA lead in a software company...."infuriating&q uot; would be the word.

100% the QA testers knew what was up.

If I was one of them at that company, I would be speaking out against every lie these guys are stating. Yes, they would get fired for doing that, but the public would easily back them up and help them with any financial downfall that might have caused.

These obvious lies are not helping anything.

yeahokwhatever1948d ago

i think one of two things when i heard this from him:
1) their QA team is non-existent, insufficient or just bad.
OR
2) they've created a work environment where QA engineers are afraid to speak up or be too "negative" because they're always met with hostility.

I've seen both of these things IRL.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 1948d ago
RaidenBlack1949d ago

2nd half of 2021 is a long way off.
Lets see in 10 days, what they've able to improve.

JeffGUNZ1948d ago

Yeah, this game is going to fade off quick I think. PC players have beaten it and now it doesn't look like any content at least till the summer by gauging that timeline. What a let down. This game had so much potential and now it's just a joke.

RaidenBlack1948d ago

Actually many PC players waited it out coz they wanted to upgrade to newer GPUs and then play the game (Since both launches coincided). So becoz there was shortage of GPUs in 2020, they'll instead pick it up in 2021.
For console players ... many also waited for the console version reviews and ultimately refrained from buying. And are waiting for either performance stability patch for previous gen or current-gen upgrade patch.

Christopher1949d ago

And people thought I was joking when I said 2021 Holiday for next-gen upgrades on console.

The-Matrix-has-you1949d ago

I certainly wasn’t expecting it to be so late in the year. I hope I am still interested in the game by then.

Christopher1949d ago (Edited 1949d ago )

I'm assuming, combined with the tons of updates they'll have to do over the next 3-4 months just to get the game stable, they have a requirement to maintain focus on the DLC per shareholder agreements to their schedule. Those take precedence over the free next-gen upgrades.

neutralgamer19921949d ago

Yes I think this game will be better come late next year and we might even be looking at 2022 just for them to keep patching/updating

Not sure even if CDPR have the guts to announce any dlc/expansions until this game becomes very stable on all platforms. Making this game stable and playable is what the priority has to be right now. They have lost estimatedly close to 1 billion dollars since the launch of this game via stock market/refunds

Christopher1949d ago

They showed in the video that DLC would start to release about 3 months.

SullysCigar1949d ago

Haha, well it is a joke - the whole damn situation!

I_am_Batman1948d ago

I'm not even sure that's gonna happen. Roadmaps from CD Projekt are about as useful as a one-legged man at an ass-kicking contest.

ArchangelMike1948d ago

At this rate it might be best if they just relaunch the game when the next gen updates are ready, along with the DLC etc. They've been burned by shareholder expectations, I hope they don't repeat the same mistake by allowing shareholders to dictate their schedules, instead of the QA and dev teams - who are the ones who know when the content is ready for market.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1948d ago
niseek1949d ago

For me the biggest problem is the difference in what they presented in gameplay videos to what we actually received. I know stuff changes in development but the game is not the deep RPG they were advertising.

StoneyYoshi1949d ago (Edited 1949d ago )

Like the first 40 minute gameplay where they said "everything you see is potentially subject to change"?

And boy did they warn us! lol

enkiduxiv1948d ago

Strat-edgy on youtube talks about this in his review of the game. The problem is that they had all of the hardcore rpg fans thinking it would be more like a CRPG with branching narratives and player agency. Instead they made it like a modern Bioware rpg. The story is decent, but it was very misleading. I liked the story telling in this game, but I can certainly see why people were disappointed.

JeffGUNZ1948d ago

This. I am lucky enough to play this on a high end PC. I beat everything I can in this game. This is absolutely nothing like the game they advertised and showed off over the years. That's the real crime.

isarai1949d ago

Just shut up and fix it...ffs🤦‍♂️

Christopher1949d ago

They can do both, just FYI. It's literally his job to do this while the people who can fix the game are doing just that.

wwinterj1948d ago (Edited 1948d ago )

It is indeed his job to lie in order to try and appease fans and investors.

Show all comments (107)
30°

Official PlayStation Podcast Episode 538: Marshes and Mollusks

This week the podcast crew discusses Darwin’s Paradox, South of Midnight, and games on the horizon.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
80°

Cyberpunk 2077 PS5 Pro Ray Tracing Impresses, but PC Still Holds Visual Edge

Cyberpunk 2077 on PS5 Pro delivers strong ray tracing upgrades, though PC maintains an advantage in global illumination and path tracing.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
PrinceOfAnger34d ago

PC with Path tracing all max looks way more impressive

eddieistheillest33d ago

PC max settings with path tracing will always be better but for a console that is super impressive.

BeHunted33d ago

How is PS5 Pro impressive? It's cheaper building your own PC

andy8533d ago

It isnt though is it? Beat its performance costing 900. Saying that, beat its performance costing 699 like it was when we all bought it. You likely won't get near.

S2Killinit33d ago

Except almost no one playing on PC has all the parts it takes to play it at that level. Not to mention the electricity bill that comes with running a PC like that(I should know).

UltimateOwnage33d ago

Agreed. Considering the only way you’ll best the $1,000 PS5 Pro visually is with a $2,000 PC with a 5080 series or higher GPU. I’d say it’s a bargain if you want stable high end performance.

Loktai33d ago

@BeHunted You have NOT checked pricing lately. Please excuse my Wall of text here., The PS5 Pro, youre going to want essentially a 4060/5060 to get in the ballpark, and the ps5 pro has a 2tb 5g/sec SSD. So you go buy a cheap 50 dollar case, a 75 dollar power supply, a controller to play with maybe? so we dont have any electronics and we are at ... 150-175 bucks. The 2tb SSD is going to be 150 bucks MINIMUM by itself, for a cheap brand, lets assume youre happy with that. SO now we are at ... 300? We dont have anything that actually runs games yet. Lets get a system board , Ultra budget... 125 bucks? I dont know if you can find one with Wifi for that money but.... You MAY find one that cheap or open box, again we dont care about quality lets just go balls to the wall cheap. 425 bucks and now we have a system board and storage. Lets fine the cheapest CPU that makes any sense and will be ok playing games + overhead. ... I assume you dont mean used equipment here. Lets cheat. Lets use a bundle off newegg. Cheapest CPU a 7600x- this is fine for games../.. other PC guys may snicker but it is going to work. We are already deep into compromise. On sale bundle discounted board at 149 plus 20 dollar coupon, has wifi. Great. Now legs buy the bare min memory keeping in mind we have to run the OS/ STEAM or whatever other stuff in the background. 16 probably will run HORRIBLE but we could try and lets go with the cheapest, slowest memory you can get, DDR5 5200 . 16gb of it, this after overhead will give you something like what youd have on a PS5 pro, just dont leave a bunch of stuff open in the background and hope the devs optiomized. Ok so here we are.. That combo with the cheapest PSU I could find on newegg, and a cheap case ,and all the discounts ....So thats a Case, PSU motherboard CPU and slow ram and a cheap 2tb SSD (I didnt take the ones I saw.. I cant beleive they are that much I chose a 1tb SSD which will be half as much as the PS5 pro has... for 250 bucks but you can probably get a cheap and slower one for the same price and have 2tb) is 900 dollars. I didnt buy a CPU cooler I am just hoping it would come with one, and I didnt include the cost of a keyboard and mouse here. And most computers dont use optical drives, and dont have physical games so really....so we are good there. However we have a problem. at 900 bucks we dont have a GPU yet. Or an OS. So if you get your OS somehow super cheap maybe you score a 30 dollar key somewhere, ok, lets call this 950- I am being generous. Now we need a video card. So tell me, because we could make arguments all day about WHICH video card will give you PS5 pro performance. we have exceeded the cost of a PS5 pro in spite of going as cheap as we could- we have no covered the cost of shipping all these because lets hope its all on free shipping.. .we have not talked about the higher initial cost means more sales tax , or the fact that now you need to assemble all this from different makers and assume NOTHING will go wrong with any of it or youll be RMAing shit for weeks So we can ignore video card and its already more expensive. The cheapest video card to get you playing will be 350 bucks plus,. which is half the cost of the PS5 pro basically by itself. I know its CRAZY to rant like this but. what you need to know is after you dump these 1300 dollars , assemble it and get it running, the 1300 dollar pC is not the PC thats going to run full path tracing and look so much better than PS5 pro... its the PC to match it....at best

fr0sty33d ago

"and the ps5 pro has a 2tb 5g/sec SSD"

*with hardware compression that speeds this up to as much as 9.4gbps, keeping pace with some Gen5 SSDs, for far cheaper. A comparable SSD for PC alone will set you back over $200.

CrimsonIdol33d ago

fr0sty, even if we're to keep believing that a compression algorithm on a 5gbps drive were to make up the difference to faster gen4/gen5 drives, I can tell you as it stands now, the SSD is not the main loading bottleneck, it's usually the CPU (you have to DO something with all that data after all). Generally cross platform games will load faster on a PC than PS5 irrespective of the SSD (so long as it's at least gen3 nvme speeds) with very few exceptions. I've not seen a game loading situation on PC where having gen3 speeds is notably worse than gen5 speeds. We're talking at best with a ripper CPU a difference of a second or so to load into a game, from 4 seconds to 5 or something. If you want to point to something that PS5 doesn't have to worry about it's the shader compilation step that always takes ages the first time or when you get new drivers.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 33d ago
KyRo33d ago

No shit but it's only the 1 percent that can make it look "way more impressive".

andy8533d ago (Edited 33d ago )

Naturally it is, that's why it says PC has the edge. But then you're paying 3 times as much. Both have their benefits.

derek33d ago

But with everything "maxed" out (path tracing etc) 99% of pcs struggle to maintain a solid frame rate. Face it with the heavy use of ai going forward alot of the visual differences pcs players have enjoyed will continue to diminish going forward.

KwietStorm_BLM33d ago

Ya don't say? Also a ferrari is a fast car.

CrimsonIdol33d ago (Edited 33d ago )

Path tracing CP2077 looks unbelievably good IMO. It's one of the few games I accept a big resolution trade-off to play with it turned on with decent framerates (down to 1440p with DLSS and above 50fps to get into g-sync territory). I'm playing on an RTX 3080, which will set you back about $400 secondhand these days.

andy8532d ago

Isn't really fair to compare new Pro costs with second hand PC parts. With that comparison PS5 Pro used is 500 ish

CrimsonIdol32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

Sure, fair enough. When the pro first came out secondhand wasn't really an option but looks like there's a few about already. you'll get path tracing with a used 3080 or 4070 and they're definitely around. You don't HAVE to be some rich guy to play PC gaming like is constantly expressed on this site (that the barrier to entry to PC gaming is 2000 or 3000 USD or some nonsense like that). There are affordable ways in.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 32d ago
The_Hooligan33d ago

I wish when anyone does performance comparison videos of consoles vs PCs, they would include the cost of that said PC they are testing it on. As a non-tech person, I know how much a PS5 (Pro), Xbox Series and Switch 2 cost but no idea on the PC side. It doesn't make sense to do a comparison between two products where one is $450-$700 range ($900 now with the new price increase for the pro) vs PC that cost who know how much.

Loktai33d ago

I did the math to get into the ballpark to Match a PS5 pro, not including anything fancy, and not trying to match its storage size because SSDs are so expensive right now... 1300-1500 if you take advantage of bundle pricing. It will still consume a lot more power, and be bigger and louder than the PS5, but it is , arguably more versatile. The PCs that stomp a ps5 pro are over 2000, perhaps more like 2500 depending on non-game oriented components like the size of the storage as an example because M.2 ssds are crazy right now, 5x+ their previous price even for the same models in some case.

CrimsonIdol33d ago (Edited 33d ago )

Your calculations are seriously wrong. I did one the other day, in Australia a PC that would stomp a ps5 pro is about $2000aud which is about $1400usd, and that was with a 9070xt which has roughly 3 times the raw performance of the PS5 Pro GPU. And that price is only because of the expensive RAM and SSD. And you can still make a PC that beats a PS5 pro for the price of a ps5 pro. You have to make sacrifices, you probably won't put in a 2tb ssd at the moment, stick with 1 until the prices return to sanity then add another. but it can be done.

CrimsonIdol33d ago (Edited 33d ago )

It's the RAM that's the real killer at the moment. I bought 16gb of 6000mt DDR5 for 89AUD 6 months ago. Today it's 389AUD for the same. And there's no real getting around it you need at least that much RAM. To make a PS5 Pro beater for the same price I had to go back to AM4/DDR4 to get RAM that at least was only 2x the old price instead of 4x. Hopefully the recent news of OpenAI falling through on their gobbling up of memory stock will translate into a return to normalcy soon enough. That and the new open sourced AI compression google came out with lowering memory requirements.

andy8532d ago

I'd really be interested in seeing the PC that beats the Pro at 900 with new parts. Tbh I'm using 900 sparingly, no ones buying it at that when its been 600 odd for over a year. Making a PC to beat it at that price is impossible. I'd actually like to see the 9070xt build too tbh given that card is over 4 figures alone then you need the rest of the build at like 900 aus

CrimsonIdol32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

Sure. You can get a 9070xt for 890AUD currently. They've come down heaps. So yes you're correct with the rest of the build costing $1000aud or so gets you to the about 2000aud I mentioned. The PS5 Pro has had a price bump to $1399AUD. Definitely doable to put in a better CPU and GPU than a PS5 Pro for that, doesn't take much considering how weak the Pro is.
Here's the spreadsheet
https://limewire.com/d/4njJ...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 32d ago
NotoriousWhiz33d ago

In other news, that new Honda civic has impressive performance but falls short of the Lamborghini.

Loktai33d ago

Yeah... now imagine the civic was not only better on gas, and cheaper to insure (power consumption, ease of setup and warranty) but at 1/4 the price got you 70% of the outcome .... obviously you arent going to get laid in the civic- however in this case the reverse is true, probably hunched over a PC in a corner in a bedroom your girlfriend is not going to be that happy about the 3000 dollar RGB monstrosity youre obsessed with.

Iceball200033d ago

$2500 vs $800 for what, a 5% improvement.

Show all comments (32)
80°

Cyberpunk 2077 Is Now Utterly Essential on PS5 Pro

Push Square: "Cyberpunk 2077 is effectively a must-play on PS5 Pro. The ray-traced modes have left us thoroughly impressed, bringing an entirely new sense of visual depth to an already outstanding open world."

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
37d ago Replies(6)
Lexreborn237d ago

PS5 Pro showing its well worth the investment, it’s nice to have a capable console option and I really wouldn’t have minded is series X had gotten a soft refresh too. I was actually hoping it would but it only got the 2 TB upgrade.

37d ago Replies(7)
Storm2337d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Since I will not be getting a PS5 Pro, I have started a list of games that I will play on PS6, that will run the PS5 Pro version (or native PS6 if updated) at the best possible resolution and frame rates. This is one of them.

Smellsforfree37d ago

Still love how I picked up a physical PS4 disc of this at Best Buy for $10 a few weeks after launch because of how bad it was on PS4. The physical disc came with a ton of stuff too, like a map of night city and postcards.

AuraAbjure37d ago

Does it run at a stable 30 FPS now?

Smellsforfree36d ago

I've only played it on PS5 where it has been 60fps since launch.

AuraAbjure35d ago

but U said U bought it for PS4 🫤 ?

PRIMORDUS37d ago

Why? 😂 I tired it 3x on PC, couldn't get into it, uninstalled.

jznrpg36d ago

No game is for everyone. It doesn’t matter what it is. But that doesn’t make it a bad game. Just not your taste. GTA is super popular but I’ve never played one for more than 5 minutes. That doesn’t make it a bad game just not my taste.

Show all comments (35)