Sci-fi horror puts this at the top of my most anticipated list and for that Housemarque fun/addicting gameplay

*chef's kiss*

This game won’t be that good. Look at the developer.

Uh huh.

Why was 70$ your limit?

Could it be the artificially priced special editions last gen?

Those same special editions will likely be 80$ this time around. Will your limit go up to 80$?

I'm not buying anything at 70$
I'll just have to wait for the deals to roll in.

$60 was my limit. Bought two games last year at full price, everything else was on sale. Won't buy any games at full price this gen, I think. No reason to, really.

@RgR I never bought special editions I always just get the standard copy

Yea man, I hear you. It’s tough to hold out but I can’t support the new standard of $70 a pop. It’s times like these that I miss Best Buy’s Gamer Club discounts.

Yeah. I'm definitely getting this game because it looks great in my opinion, but even something like $10 cheaper could go a long way in securing more sales. I really want this to succeed.

Yeah although I understand that this is a bigger project than their earlier games, they still haven't shown me anything that tells me it's a full AAA game. While I wouldn't expect a $20-30 price, I figured it would be in the $40-50 range. I'm going to get it, particularly because there is so little out right now that is actually made for PS5 rather than PS4, but I unfortunately don't see this being a big seller.

Or perhaps they are confident the game is worth that price, and will let the reviews speak to its value

That GoW live service game was the dumbest idea ever. I thought they were remaking Bloodbourne or a Demons souls expansion (covering that broken arch stone). Sony was really panicked after that abk/Microsoft news hit. I hope it was a side project for Bluepoint and that there's another one in the pipeline. That GoW game apparently never got off the ground.

Blaming Sony for pursuing Live Service when the top 5 games every month by spend and engagement are live service games is illogical. Gamers are telling Sony where to invest so there is a real disconnect between what is said online and what people actually play. Who should Sony listen to? Clearly the logical decision is to listen to people actually playing games and whether we like it or not Sony would be in vioulation of it duty to its investors if it didn't try to pursue LS. People taking out their fustrations on Live Service games by attacking Sony and using it as the industry whipping boy does not fix the industry. You are just telling the rest of the industry that they can keep doing what they are doing because they aren't called Sony. All I hear people say is that they hate live service but every single month the top games are live service. You are all either lying or you don't know what you are talking about. Sony should pursue both SP and live service games.

If you’re sure you want one get it before the price rise.

Yeah, thanks.

I'd like one but can't justify it right now.

better get it fast

And it looks like Sam got over his haphephobia. It's going to be good.

It's also still the only new first party IP released this generation on PS5. Everything else has either been sequels or remakes/remasters.

^

Concord

To those who disagree, please let me know what other new IP Sony has released this generation besides Returnal. Go ahead, I'll wait. And Concord doesn't count because Sony recalled it.

I want to try out the patch, I want to complete the game - but I can't because I can't get past the first world. And before you jump to tell me to 'get good' I tried and I couldn't!

Venom

Did you get as far as the first boss?

@Venom Do you play on PS5? I would play co-op with you. Or a friend could play co-op with you. I have beaten the game a few times (been a while) and have played a lot of the Tower dlc. A friend could help you complete it.