All Channels
Popular
840°

Cyberpunk Game Maker Faces Hostile Staff After Failed Launch

Rebellion is in the air at Polish video game publisher CD Projekt SA after the company’s highly anticipated, and thrice-delayed, latest title was released to scathing reviews about glitches.

Read Full Story >>
bloomberg.com
Destiny10801979d ago ShowReplies(3)
RaidenBlack1979d ago

"Many industry observers have wondered why Cyberpunk 2077, which was first announced in 2012 and was delayed three times in 2020, still appears to be unfinished. Several current and former staff who worked on Cyberpunk 2077 have all said the same thing: The game’s deadlines, set by the board of directors, were always unrealistic. It was clear to many of the developers that they needed more time."

badz1491979d ago

You will be surprised at how many out there that believes the last gen consoles are the ones at fault for all these mess, not CDPR. Many even go the extra mile by saying PS4 and xbone players should be thankful that they even got the game at all as this should be a "next gen only" game.

That's how disgusting these so called PCMR elitist which are now suddenly fine with the game running at 45-60fps on ultra setting even with the 3080.

thorstein1978d ago (Edited 1978d ago )

I would add that it isn't even "next gen" only. I play on PS5 and I still have major gamebreaking glitches and crashes that are unrelated to performance.

The game isn't finished whether you play on PS4, PS5, XBOSX, or an $8000 gaming PC.

Father__Merrin1978d ago

I know just check out pc gameplay footage it still runs poor. This is sign of a poor developer that has lead developed on wrong system and has now backfired badly.

I don't think this will be fixed your better off with another title. Sony nor Microsoft or even Nintendo as a lesser company would never release a AAA in such a torrid state the game is broken on all formats

bouzebbal1978d ago (Edited 1978d ago )

This game should have been pushed to 2077

I'm out

spektical1978d ago (Edited 1978d ago )

for the record i have a 3080 and the game struggling to play well with ultra is blasphemous. This game is an unpolished gem. Its rough all over the place. Glitches galore, random crashes, game breaking bugs (i've been stuck several times in the scan mode when exiting a camera), missing features you see in other open world games like gta (tires flattened, AI isnt only a hands up, etc.)

In short this game needed possible another half year to get to the point of good enough to release on PC. I have no idea how management thought they could let consoles slide without revolt.

I also bought the game on console to play on my ps5 since I scored a a8h from costco. But have returned it (thank god i never opened it).

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1978d ago
WelkinCole1978d ago (Edited 1978d ago )

I kinda got that from some of reds interviews. Overly ambitious and were dismissive of devs who couldnt hack it in their view when in fact they were being unresonable

franwex1978d ago

Eight years was an unrealistic expectation?

Rocketisleague1978d ago (Edited 1978d ago )

Probably has more.to.do.with individual.features and sprints causing shitty code.to.go.into.the 'final build again.and again causing a crappy dev cycle with a never ending shitstorm of broken half finished features

I've experienced this first hand

shuvam091978d ago

Witcher 3 released in 2015, so probably around 2016 is when development would've really begun

SinisterKieran1978d ago

Lol people seem to think companies only work on one game at a time. Probably worked on cyberpunk while making Witcher.

NotoriousWhiz1978d ago

It's probably time for developers to stop announcing games years early (or at a minimum to stop announcing release dates) until the product is done and then they can say: "hey guys, we got this great game coming out next month"

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1978d ago
Knightofelemia1979d ago (Edited 1979d ago )

If I put blood sweat and tears and long hours into a game I would also demand answers especially if I am thinking to myself I am making a game I think people are going to like and enjoy. Refunds left right and center, buggy game, Sony taking it down is like a massive kick to the balls for the developer who actually gave a shit when he/she built the game. The higher ups should have listened to the staff pushed the game back worked out the bugs skip the holiday sales and launch the game when it was ready. I hate higher ups who only see sales rush it out the door patch it as we go call it a game just to get those holiday sales.

monkey6021979d ago

Not to mention I'm sure that just like any other studio. Bonuses and rewards are paid based on reviews and sales data. Something I'm sure developers dont appreciate losing when they were forced to work nearly 2 months worth of 6 day weeks on mandatory overtime at last minute

RuloR_6661979d ago

In other cases you are right but CPR already stated that the developers will get full bonus despite the problems and trouiblesome launch

monkey6021979d ago

Oh I hadn't read that. That's a good thing at least.

DragonWarrior191979d ago

Yup, bonuses are typically based on Metacritic scores and when CP launched it was VERY clear the outlets that were going to give the game a 9/10 no matter what purely based on hype. Cyberpunk really exposed corruption all throughout the industry from board of directors and shareholders forcing deadlines, lazy developers who clearly bit off more than they could chew, Sony and MS certifying and allowing the game to be released on their platforms knowing full well the game's state, reviewers clearly being hype-biased and giving amazing scores. Now all of the people from news outlets are claiming they saw this trainwreck coming after years of hyping this game up saying it was going to be the best game of all time. Hopefully this sets a new standard for game development in the future, but we all know that won't happen.

1978d ago Replies(2)
BlackIceJoe1979d ago

With everything that is happening at CD Project Red I'm curious if there will be a mass walkout of developers and then go work at a different studio or create their own company.

It definitely will be interesting to see what comes next for all the workers.

Nerdmaster1979d ago

Why? They know every other company will have the same problems, if not even worse.

ocelot071979d ago

Not every company rushes games to release. Look at Sony. They delayed Last of us 2 twice I think and sure they had some crunch periods. But look at the game once it released has won GOTY and praised by reviews.

Look at Gran Turismo. They take years to come out because they take there time. You don't see Sony pushing polyphony digital to fart one out every year.

AuraAbjure1979d ago (Edited 1979d ago )

It doesn't have to be that way. If it is that way they start their own game development studio. I've said it before and I'll say it again. The technology that's out now is curtailed to the small team. Just look at No Man's Sky or Bright Memory: Infinite. A small team designed NMS ONLY on PC (which is arguably how 2077 should have been) and they put out a great game. BMI is literally made by one dude and was honored with gameplay reveal for the Series X.

1978d ago
Ninver1979d ago

Things must be in shambles at CD's studio right now. I anticipate several key employees walking out early to avoid any association with the studio. Dark times ahead.

Show all comments (81)
30°

Official PlayStation Podcast Episode 538: Marshes and Mollusks

This week the podcast crew discusses Darwin’s Paradox, South of Midnight, and games on the horizon.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
80°

Cyberpunk 2077 PS5 Pro Ray Tracing Impresses, but PC Still Holds Visual Edge

Cyberpunk 2077 on PS5 Pro delivers strong ray tracing upgrades, though PC maintains an advantage in global illumination and path tracing.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
PrinceOfAnger39d ago

PC with Path tracing all max looks way more impressive

eddieistheillest38d ago

PC max settings with path tracing will always be better but for a console that is super impressive.

BeHunted38d ago

How is PS5 Pro impressive? It's cheaper building your own PC

andy8538d ago

It isnt though is it? Beat its performance costing 900. Saying that, beat its performance costing 699 like it was when we all bought it. You likely won't get near.

S2Killinit38d ago

Except almost no one playing on PC has all the parts it takes to play it at that level. Not to mention the electricity bill that comes with running a PC like that(I should know).

UltimateOwnage37d ago

Agreed. Considering the only way you’ll best the $1,000 PS5 Pro visually is with a $2,000 PC with a 5080 series or higher GPU. I’d say it’s a bargain if you want stable high end performance.

Loktai37d ago

@BeHunted You have NOT checked pricing lately. Please excuse my Wall of text here., The PS5 Pro, youre going to want essentially a 4060/5060 to get in the ballpark, and the ps5 pro has a 2tb 5g/sec SSD. So you go buy a cheap 50 dollar case, a 75 dollar power supply, a controller to play with maybe? so we dont have any electronics and we are at ... 150-175 bucks. The 2tb SSD is going to be 150 bucks MINIMUM by itself, for a cheap brand, lets assume youre happy with that. SO now we are at ... 300? We dont have anything that actually runs games yet. Lets get a system board , Ultra budget... 125 bucks? I dont know if you can find one with Wifi for that money but.... You MAY find one that cheap or open box, again we dont care about quality lets just go balls to the wall cheap. 425 bucks and now we have a system board and storage. Lets fine the cheapest CPU that makes any sense and will be ok playing games + overhead. ... I assume you dont mean used equipment here. Lets cheat. Lets use a bundle off newegg. Cheapest CPU a 7600x- this is fine for games../.. other PC guys may snicker but it is going to work. We are already deep into compromise. On sale bundle discounted board at 149 plus 20 dollar coupon, has wifi. Great. Now legs buy the bare min memory keeping in mind we have to run the OS/ STEAM or whatever other stuff in the background. 16 probably will run HORRIBLE but we could try and lets go with the cheapest, slowest memory you can get, DDR5 5200 . 16gb of it, this after overhead will give you something like what youd have on a PS5 pro, just dont leave a bunch of stuff open in the background and hope the devs optiomized. Ok so here we are.. That combo with the cheapest PSU I could find on newegg, and a cheap case ,and all the discounts ....So thats a Case, PSU motherboard CPU and slow ram and a cheap 2tb SSD (I didnt take the ones I saw.. I cant beleive they are that much I chose a 1tb SSD which will be half as much as the PS5 pro has... for 250 bucks but you can probably get a cheap and slower one for the same price and have 2tb) is 900 dollars. I didnt buy a CPU cooler I am just hoping it would come with one, and I didnt include the cost of a keyboard and mouse here. And most computers dont use optical drives, and dont have physical games so really....so we are good there. However we have a problem. at 900 bucks we dont have a GPU yet. Or an OS. So if you get your OS somehow super cheap maybe you score a 30 dollar key somewhere, ok, lets call this 950- I am being generous. Now we need a video card. So tell me, because we could make arguments all day about WHICH video card will give you PS5 pro performance. we have exceeded the cost of a PS5 pro in spite of going as cheap as we could- we have no covered the cost of shipping all these because lets hope its all on free shipping.. .we have not talked about the higher initial cost means more sales tax , or the fact that now you need to assemble all this from different makers and assume NOTHING will go wrong with any of it or youll be RMAing shit for weeks So we can ignore video card and its already more expensive. The cheapest video card to get you playing will be 350 bucks plus,. which is half the cost of the PS5 pro basically by itself. I know its CRAZY to rant like this but. what you need to know is after you dump these 1300 dollars , assemble it and get it running, the 1300 dollar pC is not the PC thats going to run full path tracing and look so much better than PS5 pro... its the PC to match it....at best

fr0sty37d ago

"and the ps5 pro has a 2tb 5g/sec SSD"

*with hardware compression that speeds this up to as much as 9.4gbps, keeping pace with some Gen5 SSDs, for far cheaper. A comparable SSD for PC alone will set you back over $200.

CrimsonIdol37d ago

fr0sty, even if we're to keep believing that a compression algorithm on a 5gbps drive were to make up the difference to faster gen4/gen5 drives, I can tell you as it stands now, the SSD is not the main loading bottleneck, it's usually the CPU (you have to DO something with all that data after all). Generally cross platform games will load faster on a PC than PS5 irrespective of the SSD (so long as it's at least gen3 nvme speeds) with very few exceptions. I've not seen a game loading situation on PC where having gen3 speeds is notably worse than gen5 speeds. We're talking at best with a ripper CPU a difference of a second or so to load into a game, from 4 seconds to 5 or something. If you want to point to something that PS5 doesn't have to worry about it's the shader compilation step that always takes ages the first time or when you get new drivers.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 37d ago
KyRo38d ago

No shit but it's only the 1 percent that can make it look "way more impressive".

andy8538d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Naturally it is, that's why it says PC has the edge. But then you're paying 3 times as much. Both have their benefits.

derek38d ago

But with everything "maxed" out (path tracing etc) 99% of pcs struggle to maintain a solid frame rate. Face it with the heavy use of ai going forward alot of the visual differences pcs players have enjoyed will continue to diminish going forward.

KwietStorm_BLM37d ago

Ya don't say? Also a ferrari is a fast car.

CrimsonIdol37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Path tracing CP2077 looks unbelievably good IMO. It's one of the few games I accept a big resolution trade-off to play with it turned on with decent framerates (down to 1440p with DLSS and above 50fps to get into g-sync territory). I'm playing on an RTX 3080, which will set you back about $400 secondhand these days.

andy8537d ago

Isn't really fair to compare new Pro costs with second hand PC parts. With that comparison PS5 Pro used is 500 ish

CrimsonIdol36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

Sure, fair enough. When the pro first came out secondhand wasn't really an option but looks like there's a few about already. you'll get path tracing with a used 3080 or 4070 and they're definitely around. You don't HAVE to be some rich guy to play PC gaming like is constantly expressed on this site (that the barrier to entry to PC gaming is 2000 or 3000 USD or some nonsense like that). There are affordable ways in.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 36d ago
The_Hooligan38d ago

I wish when anyone does performance comparison videos of consoles vs PCs, they would include the cost of that said PC they are testing it on. As a non-tech person, I know how much a PS5 (Pro), Xbox Series and Switch 2 cost but no idea on the PC side. It doesn't make sense to do a comparison between two products where one is $450-$700 range ($900 now with the new price increase for the pro) vs PC that cost who know how much.

Loktai37d ago

I did the math to get into the ballpark to Match a PS5 pro, not including anything fancy, and not trying to match its storage size because SSDs are so expensive right now... 1300-1500 if you take advantage of bundle pricing. It will still consume a lot more power, and be bigger and louder than the PS5, but it is , arguably more versatile. The PCs that stomp a ps5 pro are over 2000, perhaps more like 2500 depending on non-game oriented components like the size of the storage as an example because M.2 ssds are crazy right now, 5x+ their previous price even for the same models in some case.

CrimsonIdol37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Your calculations are seriously wrong. I did one the other day, in Australia a PC that would stomp a ps5 pro is about $2000aud which is about $1400usd, and that was with a 9070xt which has roughly 3 times the raw performance of the PS5 Pro GPU. And that price is only because of the expensive RAM and SSD. And you can still make a PC that beats a PS5 pro for the price of a ps5 pro. You have to make sacrifices, you probably won't put in a 2tb ssd at the moment, stick with 1 until the prices return to sanity then add another. but it can be done.

CrimsonIdol37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

It's the RAM that's the real killer at the moment. I bought 16gb of 6000mt DDR5 for 89AUD 6 months ago. Today it's 389AUD for the same. And there's no real getting around it you need at least that much RAM. To make a PS5 Pro beater for the same price I had to go back to AM4/DDR4 to get RAM that at least was only 2x the old price instead of 4x. Hopefully the recent news of OpenAI falling through on their gobbling up of memory stock will translate into a return to normalcy soon enough. That and the new open sourced AI compression google came out with lowering memory requirements.

andy8537d ago

I'd really be interested in seeing the PC that beats the Pro at 900 with new parts. Tbh I'm using 900 sparingly, no ones buying it at that when its been 600 odd for over a year. Making a PC to beat it at that price is impossible. I'd actually like to see the 9070xt build too tbh given that card is over 4 figures alone then you need the rest of the build at like 900 aus

CrimsonIdol36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

Sure. You can get a 9070xt for 890AUD currently. They've come down heaps. So yes you're correct with the rest of the build costing $1000aud or so gets you to the about 2000aud I mentioned. The PS5 Pro has had a price bump to $1399AUD. Definitely doable to put in a better CPU and GPU than a PS5 Pro for that, doesn't take much considering how weak the Pro is.
Here's the spreadsheet
https://limewire.com/d/4njJ...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 36d ago
NotoriousWhiz37d ago

In other news, that new Honda civic has impressive performance but falls short of the Lamborghini.

Loktai37d ago

Yeah... now imagine the civic was not only better on gas, and cheaper to insure (power consumption, ease of setup and warranty) but at 1/4 the price got you 70% of the outcome .... obviously you arent going to get laid in the civic- however in this case the reverse is true, probably hunched over a PC in a corner in a bedroom your girlfriend is not going to be that happy about the 3000 dollar RGB monstrosity youre obsessed with.

Iceball200037d ago

$2500 vs $800 for what, a 5% improvement.

Show all comments (32)
80°

Cyberpunk 2077 Is Now Utterly Essential on PS5 Pro

Push Square: "Cyberpunk 2077 is effectively a must-play on PS5 Pro. The ray-traced modes have left us thoroughly impressed, bringing an entirely new sense of visual depth to an already outstanding open world."

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
41d ago Replies(6)
Lexreborn241d ago

PS5 Pro showing its well worth the investment, it’s nice to have a capable console option and I really wouldn’t have minded is series X had gotten a soft refresh too. I was actually hoping it would but it only got the 2 TB upgrade.

41d ago Replies(7)
Storm2341d ago (Edited 41d ago )

Since I will not be getting a PS5 Pro, I have started a list of games that I will play on PS6, that will run the PS5 Pro version (or native PS6 if updated) at the best possible resolution and frame rates. This is one of them.

Smellsforfree41d ago

Still love how I picked up a physical PS4 disc of this at Best Buy for $10 a few weeks after launch because of how bad it was on PS4. The physical disc came with a ton of stuff too, like a map of night city and postcards.

AuraAbjure41d ago

Does it run at a stable 30 FPS now?

Smellsforfree40d ago

I've only played it on PS5 where it has been 60fps since launch.

AuraAbjure40d ago

but U said U bought it for PS4 🫤 ?

PRIMORDUS41d ago

Why? 😂 I tired it 3x on PC, couldn't get into it, uninstalled.

jznrpg41d ago

No game is for everyone. It doesn’t matter what it is. But that doesn’t make it a bad game. Just not your taste. GTA is super popular but I’ve never played one for more than 5 minutes. That doesn’t make it a bad game just not my taste.

Show all comments (35)