100°

Atari Reveals Google Chrome Browser Is Built Into Atari VCS

This is interesting news. Today, iconic entertainment brand Atari announced that Google’s Chrome browser is built into and powers various online services on the upcoming Atari VCS PC/console hybrid.

Darkborn1954d ago

How is this scam of a console still not released yet?

Matology1954d ago

How do you know it's a scam?

Garethvk1954d ago

It has been promised for years and is supposedly only now coming out.

Darkborn1954d ago

There were multiple red flags that happened. For the longest time no one, not even the engineers knew what the specs were. They showed "footage" of games being played on it but it was actually on a pc and there were caught because one of the games devs came out and said they were never putting that game on this console and requested it be taken down, it's been delayed multiple times over years and they keep asking for more money and increasing the price. There's more things too but I stopped watching after a bit.

Garethvk1954d ago

There was a debate if their hotel would arrive before the console.

Vits1954d ago

I mean it's a Linux based computer.... Chrome should be there as well as Firefox.

Garethvk1954d ago

They have promised it for so long I am just curious if it does anything more than play retro games.

Vits1954d ago

Unless you really only heard of it when it was first announced and them didn't followed anything after that. You shouldn't really be curious about of what is going to be capable of. Because that is more or less public information.

It's OS is based on Linux and the system is not locked. Meaning that you can run any other distro that you like or even Windows. While it's CPU+GPU is a Ryzen Embedded R1000. And while we dont know the especific model we do now that is either a 2 Core 4 Thread or a 2 Core 2 Thread model either with a Vega 3 Graphics. Meaning that performance should be comparable to something like a Athlon 200G.

What in terms of real world performance means that emulation until the Wii will be great. Indies will likely run as well as eSports titles. But as far as AAA goes... Well older stuff like until 2014 should run somewhat playable, but newer games will really struggle.

But honestly. I think this device is fantastic as far a concept. Because it's just a very sleek looking mini-PC. The $300 for the base model is really not that bad because for that price you normally can only find Intel Graphics based mini-PCs and they are pretty bad.

The issue though is it being sold as a game machine. Sure it can game, but it's going to be much more usable as a HTPC. The lack of a larger storage is also annoying. But it does have a M.2 slot so at least we can expand it.

40°

The Epic Games Store's Weekly Free Game is Doomed

The Epic Games Store's weekly free game is dark and drear, and definitely doomed.

Read Full Story >>
terminalgamer.com
40°

Hello Kitty Creator Sanrio to Self-publish Games, ‘Sanrio Party Land’ Coming Fall 2026

Sanrio announced the launch of iSanrio Games, with inaugural title Sanrio Party Land slated for a fall 2026 release and 10 more games to come in the next three years.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
160°

Xbox Game Pass Ultimate Price Update

Starting today, Game Pass Ultimate drops from $29.99 to $22.99 a month. PC Game Pass will also drop from $16.49 to $13.99 a month. Prices may vary by region.

Beginning this year, future Call of Duty titles won’t join Game Pass Ultimate or PC Game Pass at launch. New Call of Duty games will be added to Game Pass Ultimate and PC Game Pass during the following holiday season (about a year later), while existing Call of Duty titles already in the library will continue to be available.

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
Neonridr3d ago

can't wait to hear how this is spun negatively.

darthv723d ago

Its nice there is some kind of drop... but is that all they really value CoD to be, a lousy $7 a month?

I was hoping it would drop by $10.

MisterBoots3d ago

That $7 equates to $84 per year - which is more than COD new ($69.99 + tax).

So - you can get the exact same thing - and save a few bucks - or you can skip COD and pocket the savings or use toward another game - or games if on sale.

That’s how I’m taking it - and is enough for me to sign back up after canceling the day it went to $29.99.

fr0sty2d ago

It's unlikely that COD is going to be the only title they stop offering day one, but we'll see how they play their hand.

VenomUK2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Including Call of Duty in Game Pass is just leaving money on the table. When the Elder Scrolls VI releases hopefully Microsoft doesn’t launch it into Game Pass. Then it can make more profits and use it give more value to Xbox console owners!

1Victor3d ago

Can’t wait to hear how this will be spun extremely positive. 🤣
I wonder why knowing Microsoft thick head something must has happened in the background in the levels of Xbox one and Kinect 🤷🏿

fr0sty2d ago

Any price cut is a good thing in this day and age, but it also reveals a flaw in GamePass' design that we've all been calling out for years... it's unsustainable, especially with day and date releases on new games. COD won't be the only game they exclude, they're setting a precedent with it that they'll likely expand upon in the future.

At least they're being realistic about it now. I bet in the future we're going to start seeing them try to subsidize the high price of new consoles by making you buy 2-3 years of gamepass with it to get the console cheaper. I'm still not sure that'll be enough to save either the hardware or gamepass, but we'll see.

Neonridr2d ago

price cuts are good, the removal of Call of Duty is clearly something they are planning to leverage. But considering everyone around N4G claims Call of Duty sucks, it's not a big loss now is it?

LucasRuinedChildhood3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Well, they're removing their biggest game from being Day 1 on the service so GamePass users can buy it instead. That's the intention.

They increased the price to $30, then removed COD and dropped it to still be above the old price.

It's an understandable compromise but the consumer Ultimately is getting less.

Think the calculation is that *most* COD users don't play that many games and aren't interested in GamePass. The GamePass users who do like COD would just buy it anyway. MS reportedly lost out a lot of money last year putting COD on GamePass.

Bathyj3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Well Call of duty could just be the beginning. What other games can they trim from the service to get the price down? How long before it's just the Xbox core first party studio games and not the one to everquired?

Create an interesting scenario with Call of duty as well. Will people wait a year to play it? Does that split the fan base? Will it hurt to Call of duty more than a benefits Game pass? These are all legitimate questions which we will find the answers to in the coming years

And I don't consider my post negative spin just realistic observation. At the very least this backtracking can be seen as an admittance that the previous strategy of gamepass was not sustainable as most of us said.

darthv723d ago

I'd get rid of the EA and Ubisoft+ too. That should bring the price down more. The only game from either of those parts of the service i played was jedi Fallen order / survivor. both of which i also bought on disc so it was more of a convenience i didnt have to put the disc in to play when i was playing them via remote play. And really that is why i still use GPU and PS+. its the convenience of having the games ready to play from a remote location. I havent picked up my consoles controllers in at least a few years. I guess that makes me a bad gamer, but so what. i'm still playing the games, just not physically on the machines themselves. GCloud and Portal are my go to now.

GhostScholar3d ago

They’ll say no one is buying game pass so they had to drop the price , even though it’s been extremely profitable.

Outside_ofthe_Box2d ago

Why remove CoD if it's *extremely* profitable then? Why even increase it to begin with?

Outside_ofthe_Box2d ago

Always funny seeing those that defended the price hike go "how you gonna spin this now!" after the price drops.

You should be thanking those that called it out. Obviously this is a good thing especially with everything increasing nowadays.

Also, what happened to the reason why that the Activision acquisition was good for gaming was that CoD would be day one on GamePass? Another backtrack on that I guess...

What removing CoD on GamePass shows, is that it's not sustainable for for the more popular and/or bigger budget games because of the sales you lose out on like people have been saying since inception. It never made sense to put CoD on there unless you thought it's popularity would draw in a lot of subscribers which it obviously didn't. And if it was as sustainable as people claim they wouldn't have increased the price while putting it on there in the first place.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2d ago
3d ago
KicksnSnares3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

New Xbox Boss the 🐐?

3d ago
Vits3d ago

In my region, it’s still more expensive than it was before the last price hike, but it’s a far more viable price point.

Losing Call of Duty from the service, honestly, has zero effect on me, and given they chose to make it so, it’s probably not the big seller they originally thought. Overall, it’s really good news, but I still think they have work to do on the tier structure, having Premium and PC at the same price point with different features feels odd.

Lightning773d ago

Yep take COD out. Them waiting a year is interesting but it make sense. They don't want certain ppl waiting 4 to 6 months they want fomo and maximum sales. Wait a year while the new one releases.

Ok so far so good.

Show all comments (46)