All Channels
Popular
1010°

Cyberpunk 2077 is "a different game" after console update, says CDPR dev

This should quell some of the concerns about Cyberpunk 2077 console performance.

waverider1986d ago

So, why no consoles review?????

Tedakin1986d ago

I"m thinking the day 1 update isnt out yet so they don't want the console versions reviewed until then.

UltraNova1985d ago

Yes, the game right now, the version burned on disc and headed to retail, must be unplayable.

I will not touch it for at least 3-6 more months, it will be a different game by then.

ArchangelMike1986d ago (Edited 1986d ago )

Probably because they didn't want to give the unpatched code to reviewers? Plus, I can't imagine this game running all that well on PS4 & X1, so it makes sense from a PR point of view to send codes of the PC version.

porkChop1986d ago

They gave the unpatched PC code to reviewers, so what difference does it make?

DaReapa1985d ago (Edited 1985d ago )

Comment deleted

1986d ago
Sirk7x1986d ago

Because there's a 45 GB difference between what's on disk and after the day 1 patch. Basically a completely different version of the game. Doesn't make much difference to me, but kinda sucks for anyone with slow internet, or who doesn't like to connect their consoles. The game was shipped unfinished and they ran out of time. This is CDPR though, so I expect they'll be patching it constantly and giving free DLC over the next months, like they did with Witcher 3. Just looked it up, I think they patched it 23 times.

CrimsonWing691985d ago

Because they won’t review well lowering that good ol’ meta score.

RazzerRedux1985d ago

Each platform has its own metacritic score.

Such as....
https://www.metacritic.com/...

CrimsonWing691985d ago

@Razz

Yea I don’t think they’ll want a 90 on PC and 70 on consoles

RazzerRedux1985d ago

I seriously doubt there will be that much of a spread. Maybe a couple of points.

MADGameR1985d ago

Because the console versions are a complete mess. So they are damage controlling by rushing out the patch. Trust me its BAD

CrimsonWing691985d ago

That's the thing, most of the 7's are in part due to how buggy the game is. I think if consoles ran worse you'd be seeing more 7's. Hell, some reviews were actually saying to wait until patches are out that fixes all the bugs.

shauzy1985d ago

I played 7 hours on the ps5, and its really average performance wise, its 1080p, with no performance or quality options, sure its 60fps mostly with occasional fps drops, i can see the textures load on cars, human models i think are less than 1080 when they're average distance far, the game also crashed 2 times, i was playing on patches 1.01 and 1.02, it still needs an update otherwise people will be furious about it

StoneyYoshi1985d ago (Edited 1985d ago )

Might wanna share PSN ID so people can see if you are telling the truth. Also considering you said there isn't a choice for quality or perfomance throws a red flag since its been shown to have that option.
player.one/cyberpunk-2077-wil l-include-quality-and-performa n ce-modes-138132

Edit: You keep your whole account private, even recently played games. 🤔

shauzy1985d ago

Oh sorry, shauzy5 is my psn id

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1985d ago
porkChop1986d ago

If the day one patch was significant enough that it makes that much difference, then it should have been ready for reviewers. CDPR pulled the same crap with TW3 at launch, after talking a bunch of smack about Bethesda. They should not get a free pass on this because they now have a track record of releasing games unfinished.

alextdarling1986d ago

I get where you're coming from but the whole reason the game was delayed (this time) was for this Day 1 patch.

They have every right to have an unfinished product before launch, because its not launched!

russo1211986d ago

@alex

"...They have every right to have an unfinished product before launch, because its not launched!"

I must correct you, IMO they don't have the right nor the ethics to sell an unfinished product, that's the shady practices everyone is doing to release something even if broken and then patch it up. Most of us don't expect to have Day 1 patch included in DB disks at retail. Day 1 patch means you'll need to download the patch to make a working product. So, they're selling a broken or different game at retail, at least for consoles.

I_am_Batman1985d ago

Going gold usually meant the game is finished. Patches should be a last resort to fix bugs that weren't found in QA. Day one patches that are almost the size of the full game are absurd and devalue the physical release of the game.

1985d ago
DragonWarrior191985d ago

If the game is in that bad shape then they should have delayed it again and work the patch in. It's inexcusable to release a completely broken game and saying "it fixed with a patch" is not justification. CPR only allowing their footage instead of review captured footage and no console version reviews is extremely sketchy. The game was clearly not ready for release.

RaiderNation1985d ago

@I_am_Batman

Incorrect! Going gold does not mean the game is finished. Going gold means that all of the data that is going onto the actual disc is done. However that doesn't mean the game itself if finished.

I_am_Batman1985d ago (Edited 1985d ago )

@RaiderNation:
The Gold master isn't an arbitrary step that can be done anywhere in the dev cycle. It is the end goal and it should come after all known bugs are fixed and the game hits the intended performance target. Otherwise teams could go gold right after reaching alpha.

The ability to patch games after launch should not be used as an excuse to sell sell a subpar product with the promise of fixing it later. In the worst cases this could relegate the physical release of a game to a glorified early access version.

PrinterMan1985d ago

Bull crap. That's a LAME ASS excuse.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1985d ago
xTonyMontana1985d ago

Their games are so massive in scale though, it is always going to have bugs. Talking smack about Bethesda is unacceptable though, both are the same type of games in terms of scale.

Mrxboxman1985d ago

Endless complaining humans. Don't you people get tired of yourselves. The game is very ambitious. This team has a great track record. Either buy it or don't, but as a consumer, we have 2 options.. Advocate for a delay or accept a patch day 1. I choose the latter.... Especially over whining like children.

pingthing1986d ago

Because you only get one first impression?

DaCajun1986d ago

Yes, that's what a FIRST impression is for us in this reality. You can have a second, third, or fourth impressions but you technically can only have one "first impression" of someone or something.

Unless somehow you can bend space and time or maybe you have alzheimers then sure you can have first impressions over and over all day everyday if you please.

RebelWAC1985d ago

I’ll be playing on pc at first but no console review and not being able to show your own review footage doesn’t sit well with me but it still, bugs can be fixed, the core experience cannot.

I’ve coped and managed through games like skyrim, fallout 3 through 4, gta 5 online, rdr 2, Witcher 3, battlefield games and many more that ended up being revolutionary staples in said genre so this doesn’t worry me too much but “that’s just one mans take on the situation..” *Yong voice

ClayRules20121985d ago

I hear you. I hope you’ll get a great and wonderful gaming experience when you play on PC!

For myself, I can honestly say, games like TW3 (regardless of it’s day 1 patch) and months of patches later, the overall experience I had with the game on release date to when I finished it wasn’t honestly a buggy buggy mess. I remember one issue I did have was whistling for Roach to come near me, only to hop on him and than he’d disappear and Geralt would be sitting (what looked like) on air lol. This happened 5 different times, and was rather funny than game breaking or anything.

There were little issues with transitions between cutscenes to gameplay in moments, but overall it didn’t hinder my experience and wasn’t as bad as what some other people had reported on their ends.

I’m curious to see how it’ll perform on the older consoles.

RazzerRedux1985d ago

"Cyberpunk 2077 got updated last night, fixing many of the engine quirks I had. Also NVIDIA released drivers specifically for it. "

https://twitter.com/JezCord...

phoenixwing1985d ago

Hopefully those drivers also are for the 2070 super and not just the 3000 series cards

RazzerRedux1985d ago

Jez is running a 2070 so I'd say so.

AnnaDea1985d ago (Edited 1985d ago )

20 fps~ at 1080p Ray Tracing ultra settings on a 2070 laptop gpu without DLSS2.

This game seems like it's so optimized like hell.

RazzerRedux1985d ago (Edited 1985d ago )

He is a GPU generation behind to be running this game on RT Ultra. Obviously he just wanted to take a screen shot of the ray tracing.

AnnaDea1985d ago

"He is a GPU generation behind to be running this game on RT Ultra. Obviously he just wanted to take a screen shot of the ray tracing."

Of course.

If he had DLSS2 on he would be in the 40fps area or so. If he goes down one step or two to high or medium setting he would be able to play the game with a high framerate.

That's really good that older card can get so much out of this game.

RazzerRedux1985d ago

Yeah, I'm impressed. Hopefully I'll be able to bump up the resolution a bit on my 2080 Super. I'll turn on RT for some screen shots like Jez, but I need that 60fps.

Show all comments (63)
30°

Official PlayStation Podcast Episode 538: Marshes and Mollusks

This week the podcast crew discusses Darwin’s Paradox, South of Midnight, and games on the horizon.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
80°

Cyberpunk 2077 PS5 Pro Ray Tracing Impresses, but PC Still Holds Visual Edge

Cyberpunk 2077 on PS5 Pro delivers strong ray tracing upgrades, though PC maintains an advantage in global illumination and path tracing.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
PrinceOfAnger35d ago

PC with Path tracing all max looks way more impressive

eddieistheillest33d ago

PC max settings with path tracing will always be better but for a console that is super impressive.

BeHunted33d ago

How is PS5 Pro impressive? It's cheaper building your own PC

andy8533d ago

It isnt though is it? Beat its performance costing 900. Saying that, beat its performance costing 699 like it was when we all bought it. You likely won't get near.

S2Killinit33d ago

Except almost no one playing on PC has all the parts it takes to play it at that level. Not to mention the electricity bill that comes with running a PC like that(I should know).

UltimateOwnage33d ago

Agreed. Considering the only way you’ll best the $1,000 PS5 Pro visually is with a $2,000 PC with a 5080 series or higher GPU. I’d say it’s a bargain if you want stable high end performance.

Loktai33d ago

@BeHunted You have NOT checked pricing lately. Please excuse my Wall of text here., The PS5 Pro, youre going to want essentially a 4060/5060 to get in the ballpark, and the ps5 pro has a 2tb 5g/sec SSD. So you go buy a cheap 50 dollar case, a 75 dollar power supply, a controller to play with maybe? so we dont have any electronics and we are at ... 150-175 bucks. The 2tb SSD is going to be 150 bucks MINIMUM by itself, for a cheap brand, lets assume youre happy with that. SO now we are at ... 300? We dont have anything that actually runs games yet. Lets get a system board , Ultra budget... 125 bucks? I dont know if you can find one with Wifi for that money but.... You MAY find one that cheap or open box, again we dont care about quality lets just go balls to the wall cheap. 425 bucks and now we have a system board and storage. Lets fine the cheapest CPU that makes any sense and will be ok playing games + overhead. ... I assume you dont mean used equipment here. Lets cheat. Lets use a bundle off newegg. Cheapest CPU a 7600x- this is fine for games../.. other PC guys may snicker but it is going to work. We are already deep into compromise. On sale bundle discounted board at 149 plus 20 dollar coupon, has wifi. Great. Now legs buy the bare min memory keeping in mind we have to run the OS/ STEAM or whatever other stuff in the background. 16 probably will run HORRIBLE but we could try and lets go with the cheapest, slowest memory you can get, DDR5 5200 . 16gb of it, this after overhead will give you something like what youd have on a PS5 pro, just dont leave a bunch of stuff open in the background and hope the devs optiomized. Ok so here we are.. That combo with the cheapest PSU I could find on newegg, and a cheap case ,and all the discounts ....So thats a Case, PSU motherboard CPU and slow ram and a cheap 2tb SSD (I didnt take the ones I saw.. I cant beleive they are that much I chose a 1tb SSD which will be half as much as the PS5 pro has... for 250 bucks but you can probably get a cheap and slower one for the same price and have 2tb) is 900 dollars. I didnt buy a CPU cooler I am just hoping it would come with one, and I didnt include the cost of a keyboard and mouse here. And most computers dont use optical drives, and dont have physical games so really....so we are good there. However we have a problem. at 900 bucks we dont have a GPU yet. Or an OS. So if you get your OS somehow super cheap maybe you score a 30 dollar key somewhere, ok, lets call this 950- I am being generous. Now we need a video card. So tell me, because we could make arguments all day about WHICH video card will give you PS5 pro performance. we have exceeded the cost of a PS5 pro in spite of going as cheap as we could- we have no covered the cost of shipping all these because lets hope its all on free shipping.. .we have not talked about the higher initial cost means more sales tax , or the fact that now you need to assemble all this from different makers and assume NOTHING will go wrong with any of it or youll be RMAing shit for weeks So we can ignore video card and its already more expensive. The cheapest video card to get you playing will be 350 bucks plus,. which is half the cost of the PS5 pro basically by itself. I know its CRAZY to rant like this but. what you need to know is after you dump these 1300 dollars , assemble it and get it running, the 1300 dollar pC is not the PC thats going to run full path tracing and look so much better than PS5 pro... its the PC to match it....at best

fr0sty33d ago

"and the ps5 pro has a 2tb 5g/sec SSD"

*with hardware compression that speeds this up to as much as 9.4gbps, keeping pace with some Gen5 SSDs, for far cheaper. A comparable SSD for PC alone will set you back over $200.

CrimsonIdol33d ago

fr0sty, even if we're to keep believing that a compression algorithm on a 5gbps drive were to make up the difference to faster gen4/gen5 drives, I can tell you as it stands now, the SSD is not the main loading bottleneck, it's usually the CPU (you have to DO something with all that data after all). Generally cross platform games will load faster on a PC than PS5 irrespective of the SSD (so long as it's at least gen3 nvme speeds) with very few exceptions. I've not seen a game loading situation on PC where having gen3 speeds is notably worse than gen5 speeds. We're talking at best with a ripper CPU a difference of a second or so to load into a game, from 4 seconds to 5 or something. If you want to point to something that PS5 doesn't have to worry about it's the shader compilation step that always takes ages the first time or when you get new drivers.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 33d ago
KyRo33d ago

No shit but it's only the 1 percent that can make it look "way more impressive".

andy8533d ago (Edited 33d ago )

Naturally it is, that's why it says PC has the edge. But then you're paying 3 times as much. Both have their benefits.

derek33d ago

But with everything "maxed" out (path tracing etc) 99% of pcs struggle to maintain a solid frame rate. Face it with the heavy use of ai going forward alot of the visual differences pcs players have enjoyed will continue to diminish going forward.

KwietStorm_BLM33d ago

Ya don't say? Also a ferrari is a fast car.

CrimsonIdol33d ago (Edited 33d ago )

Path tracing CP2077 looks unbelievably good IMO. It's one of the few games I accept a big resolution trade-off to play with it turned on with decent framerates (down to 1440p with DLSS and above 50fps to get into g-sync territory). I'm playing on an RTX 3080, which will set you back about $400 secondhand these days.

andy8533d ago

Isn't really fair to compare new Pro costs with second hand PC parts. With that comparison PS5 Pro used is 500 ish

CrimsonIdol32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

Sure, fair enough. When the pro first came out secondhand wasn't really an option but looks like there's a few about already. you'll get path tracing with a used 3080 or 4070 and they're definitely around. You don't HAVE to be some rich guy to play PC gaming like is constantly expressed on this site (that the barrier to entry to PC gaming is 2000 or 3000 USD or some nonsense like that). There are affordable ways in.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 32d ago
The_Hooligan33d ago

I wish when anyone does performance comparison videos of consoles vs PCs, they would include the cost of that said PC they are testing it on. As a non-tech person, I know how much a PS5 (Pro), Xbox Series and Switch 2 cost but no idea on the PC side. It doesn't make sense to do a comparison between two products where one is $450-$700 range ($900 now with the new price increase for the pro) vs PC that cost who know how much.

Loktai33d ago

I did the math to get into the ballpark to Match a PS5 pro, not including anything fancy, and not trying to match its storage size because SSDs are so expensive right now... 1300-1500 if you take advantage of bundle pricing. It will still consume a lot more power, and be bigger and louder than the PS5, but it is , arguably more versatile. The PCs that stomp a ps5 pro are over 2000, perhaps more like 2500 depending on non-game oriented components like the size of the storage as an example because M.2 ssds are crazy right now, 5x+ their previous price even for the same models in some case.

CrimsonIdol33d ago (Edited 33d ago )

Your calculations are seriously wrong. I did one the other day, in Australia a PC that would stomp a ps5 pro is about $2000aud which is about $1400usd, and that was with a 9070xt which has roughly 3 times the raw performance of the PS5 Pro GPU. And that price is only because of the expensive RAM and SSD. And you can still make a PC that beats a PS5 pro for the price of a ps5 pro. You have to make sacrifices, you probably won't put in a 2tb ssd at the moment, stick with 1 until the prices return to sanity then add another. but it can be done.

CrimsonIdol33d ago (Edited 33d ago )

It's the RAM that's the real killer at the moment. I bought 16gb of 6000mt DDR5 for 89AUD 6 months ago. Today it's 389AUD for the same. And there's no real getting around it you need at least that much RAM. To make a PS5 Pro beater for the same price I had to go back to AM4/DDR4 to get RAM that at least was only 2x the old price instead of 4x. Hopefully the recent news of OpenAI falling through on their gobbling up of memory stock will translate into a return to normalcy soon enough. That and the new open sourced AI compression google came out with lowering memory requirements.

andy8533d ago

I'd really be interested in seeing the PC that beats the Pro at 900 with new parts. Tbh I'm using 900 sparingly, no ones buying it at that when its been 600 odd for over a year. Making a PC to beat it at that price is impossible. I'd actually like to see the 9070xt build too tbh given that card is over 4 figures alone then you need the rest of the build at like 900 aus

CrimsonIdol32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

Sure. You can get a 9070xt for 890AUD currently. They've come down heaps. So yes you're correct with the rest of the build costing $1000aud or so gets you to the about 2000aud I mentioned. The PS5 Pro has had a price bump to $1399AUD. Definitely doable to put in a better CPU and GPU than a PS5 Pro for that, doesn't take much considering how weak the Pro is.
Here's the spreadsheet
https://limewire.com/d/4njJ...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 32d ago
NotoriousWhiz33d ago

In other news, that new Honda civic has impressive performance but falls short of the Lamborghini.

Loktai33d ago

Yeah... now imagine the civic was not only better on gas, and cheaper to insure (power consumption, ease of setup and warranty) but at 1/4 the price got you 70% of the outcome .... obviously you arent going to get laid in the civic- however in this case the reverse is true, probably hunched over a PC in a corner in a bedroom your girlfriend is not going to be that happy about the 3000 dollar RGB monstrosity youre obsessed with.

Iceball200033d ago

$2500 vs $800 for what, a 5% improvement.

Show all comments (32)
80°

Cyberpunk 2077 Is Now Utterly Essential on PS5 Pro

Push Square: "Cyberpunk 2077 is effectively a must-play on PS5 Pro. The ray-traced modes have left us thoroughly impressed, bringing an entirely new sense of visual depth to an already outstanding open world."

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
37d ago Replies(6)
Lexreborn237d ago

PS5 Pro showing its well worth the investment, it’s nice to have a capable console option and I really wouldn’t have minded is series X had gotten a soft refresh too. I was actually hoping it would but it only got the 2 TB upgrade.

37d ago Replies(7)
Storm2337d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Since I will not be getting a PS5 Pro, I have started a list of games that I will play on PS6, that will run the PS5 Pro version (or native PS6 if updated) at the best possible resolution and frame rates. This is one of them.

Smellsforfree37d ago

Still love how I picked up a physical PS4 disc of this at Best Buy for $10 a few weeks after launch because of how bad it was on PS4. The physical disc came with a ton of stuff too, like a map of night city and postcards.

AuraAbjure37d ago

Does it run at a stable 30 FPS now?

Smellsforfree36d ago

I've only played it on PS5 where it has been 60fps since launch.

AuraAbjure36d ago

but U said U bought it for PS4 🫤 ?

PRIMORDUS37d ago

Why? 😂 I tired it 3x on PC, couldn't get into it, uninstalled.

jznrpg36d ago

No game is for everyone. It doesn’t matter what it is. But that doesn’t make it a bad game. Just not your taste. GTA is super popular but I’ve never played one for more than 5 minutes. That doesn’t make it a bad game just not my taste.

Show all comments (35)