All Channels
Popular
320°

Assassin's Creed Valhalla: PS5 vs PC Graphics Analysis + Optimized PC Settings

DigitalFoundry writes, "Just how much PC horsepower are you going to need to match or exceed PS5 performance? In this video, Alex Battaglia breaks down the visual make-up of Assassin's Creed Valhalla on a per settings basis then stacks up a range of PC GPUs against the PS5's fidelity and performance level. Oh, and if you're looking for optimised performance settings for the PC game, look no further."

Read Full Story >>
digitalfoundry.net
RazzerRedux1973d ago

Summary
Dynamic rez for PC is set with anti-aliasing

PC lowest dynamic rez 1836p
PS5 lowest is 1440p
XSX lowest is 1188p

PS5 Quality Settings Equivalence to PC:

Shadows Ultra High
World details Very High
Cloud settings between High and Ultra High
Environmental textures High
Water High
Clutter setting is above PCs High setting
PS5 cloth moves at 30fps and 60fps on PC, medium setting
PS5 alpha effects at lower resolution than PC

PS5 lower resolution allows for higher settings
RTX 2060 Super spends most of its time sub-60 fps with same quality settings as PS5. As much as 20% slower.
PS5 performance is similar to RTX 2080 in the selected test area
RX 5700 outperforms RTX 2060 Super in this game

1973d ago Replies(4)
Outside_ofthe_Box1973d ago

Well done chap.
Your summaries are very sophisticated.

SmokinAces1973d ago

Clutter setting on PS5 is above PC's VERY high setting.

RazzerRedux1973d ago (Edited 1973d ago )

Clutter setting are above PCs Highest setting

Happy?

phoenixwing1973d ago

looks like my 2070 super got edged out by the ps5 but I mean it's a ubisoft game and they're never really optimized much so I'm still confident in my 2070 super in a game like cyberpunk 2077. Although since I play at 2k I'm able to choose higher graphics settings which is what i bought a pc and a 2k monitor for in the first place. I applaud the ps5 though, it's definitely worth it's price.

phoenixwing1972d ago

@brett
2k is 1440p x 2560p

8831972d ago (Edited 1972d ago )

This game is not "optimized" for anything - it is *definitely* NOT optimized to leverage the unique architecture of either major next gen console. It is not optimized to show off how effective NVIDIA's RTX core tech is (no raytracing). It is not optimized to utilize PS5s insane IO potential for 17.3GB/s (or possibly more) texture bandwidth etc. It is just running an ***OLD*** engine and while it looks nice, it is nothing close to demonstrating what the consoles or newer NVIDIA GPUs are capable of when software is coded to utilize their very different architectural/design/compressi on-decompression approaches. If future software *is* designed to utilize the consoles' designs properly, many PC/console comparisons will likely be less valid than they are now due to very different approaches to fully utilize the hardware -- but then, multiplatform titles seldom do this so it is not too likely to be a major factor either.

BrettAwesome1969d ago

@phoenixwing
No, dummy. 1440p is 2.5k
1920 = close to 2000 = 2k
2560 = close to 2500 = 2.5k
3840 = close to 4000 = 4k
Get it??

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1969d ago
BehindTheRows1973d ago

Razzer very detailed as usual!

TheColbertinator1973d ago

@Razzer

Good work on the analysis.

SmokinAces1972d ago

You dont need to be rude and sarcastic I was simply pointing out the verbiage used, he said "very" high. I wasn't putting down your summary I was simply adding to it and clarifying, I dont know why some people have to be so defensive and triggered all the time.

RazzerRedux1972d ago

Your correction was accurate. I had no reason to be snarky. I apologize.

SmokinAces1972d ago

Apology accepted and appreciated.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 1969d ago
waverider1973d ago

To think a console that cost 399 can achieve this! Cerny and is team are really amazing!

FlyingFoxy1973d ago (Edited 1973d ago )

3060Ti needed to match/exceed PS5. Looks like a 3080 is needed to get numbers in the high 70's @ 1440p according to other benchmarks

ProjectVulcan1973d ago (Edited 1973d ago )

3060Ti is faster than a 2080 Super and thus PS5. The game heavily leans towards AMD GPUs as preference, meaning a 5700XT is enough to actually match like to like.

The reality here though is that 3060Ti is much more powerful for ray tracing than any console.

It's all very well using a last gen game with no ray tracing for comparisons when most games going forward will use ray tracing of some form.

If you compare the games with heavy ray tracing which is a much more realistic scenario even an Xbox Series X can't beat a mere RTX2060 Super.

This test literally stacks everything in favour of console- no ray tracing on an old game engine favouring AMD graphics. Change any of those factors and the result skews quite significantly.

Tapani1973d ago (Edited 1973d ago )

You are absolutely correct. This is one title, and 5700xt matches the PS5 performance here, especially in OC. Interestingly the teraflops match as well, as PS5 won't be constantly at 10flops and 5700xt hits that 9.75flops all the time, or more if OC'd.

Babadook71973d ago (Edited 1973d ago )

Ps5 is well ahead of the 2080TI in places and therefore a 3060TI as well. Face it the ps5 does mighty impressive here.

RaidenBlack1972d ago

@Babadook7

2080Ti? Are you nuts?
I urge you to do little bit of googling regarding that card. And the Differences between 2070, 2070 Super, 2080, 2080 Super and finally the 2080Ti.

King_Noctis1972d ago (Edited 1972d ago )

3060Ti does not only match the PS5, it will exceed it. Based on the result it seem an RTX 2070 will be enough to match the PS5.

“ Ps5 is well ahead of the 2080TI in places and therefore a 3060TI as well. Face it the ps5 does mighty impressive here.”

You can’t be serious right? TFLOPs alone the 2080ti is higher than the PS5, and we still haven’t even talked about things like Ray tracing cores yet. At this point why not go all the way and say the PS5 is as powerful as the RTX 3070?

Father__Merrin1973d ago

Wow a console that costs £359 performs better? Of course if you buy an i9 and a 3090 you will brute force your way through but is it worth it any more if you want to play a game.

And to think going forward all the new IP and existing franchises like God of war etc I can confidently say God of war Ragnarok will have best visuals on any platform

RazzerRedux1973d ago (Edited 1973d ago )

" Of course if you buy an i9 and a 3090 you will brute force your way through but is it worth it any more if you want to play a game."

DF says PS5 runs equivalent to an RTX 2080 in this game. A RTX 3060ti would more than suffice.

Babadook71973d ago

I don’t think a 3060TI would suffice. Would need a 3070.

RazzerRedux1973d ago (Edited 1973d ago )

DF says a 3060ti is superior to RTX 2080 Super. DF says this game runs similar to a RTX 2080.

Pretty sure 3060ti will do fine.

Ju1972d ago

Why would you get a 3060 if you can get the whole thing for $400 which does the same? Sure if you already have a PC. But even then, the reason to upgrade would be go beyond a PS5. Otherwise, what's the point? Just get a PS5. Really PS5 for those games, and something at a >3070/6800 for a PC makes sense. Also a 3060 most likely would hardly go beyond 4k@60Hz, one reason to game on a PC is going beyond those 60fps.

Destiny10801973d ago

performing like a 2080 right out the gate, and that terrain quality

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Show all comments (73)
40°

Humble Choice Bundle April 2026 Lineup Includes Assassin's Creed Valhalla

The lineup of games in Humble Choice Bundle for April, 2026, have been revealed, and one of the featured title is Assassin's Creed Valhalla.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
90°

Assassin’s Creeds' Cutscenes And Voicelines Have Digressed Over Time

Assassin’s Creed has always been a staple for good cutscenes that engage the audience. However, it's grown lacking of the latter now.

Chocoburger646d ago

The story was at its most interesting early in the series, but has eventually ended up spinning its wheels going nowhere. The games don't feel linked together anymore. This is to make it easier to constantly churn out endless sequels.

gold_drake644d ago

absolutely agree.

it was so interesting and then ..

montebristo644d ago

The smaller more intimate maps and historic references are lost. The setting used to be a character in AC. Now it’s just a massive empty shell of its former self.

180°

Almost every Assassin's Creed game is $12 or less — get them cheap

There's never been a better time to get into Assassin's Creed thanks to these deals.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
CobraKai653d ago

Im so behind on AC. I gotta start up Brotherhood 😄

anast653d ago

I got Odyssey and Mirage to play still.

CobraKai653d ago (Edited 653d ago )

Ha. At least youre in the more current side of AC.

The_Hooligan652d ago

Last one i played was origin. I am also behind on AC games.

anast652d ago

@Cobra

The older ones are kind of a chore. I did enjoy Syndicate and Unity, though.

@Hoologan

I had a good time with Origins for the most part.

anast653d ago (Edited 653d ago )

If they are all Gold versions, it's definitely worth it.

Chocoburger653d ago (Edited 653d ago )

Waste of money, after the Desmond story arch, but even worse is that its a waste of time. The franchise is just spinning its wheels going nowhere. The further you progress through the series, the more 'corporate' it begins to feel, until its nothing but an empty husk, begging for you to spend money on its micro-trash-action store. There are loading screens in Origins informing you that if you spend money on "fun costumes" you'll feel better! Despicable.

Save your time for something better. Modern day Ubisoft is garbage.

MeatyUrologist652d ago

To each their own I guess? I really enjoyed them up until odyssey and valhalla was decent. I still really enjoy exploring the massive detailed worlds and the characters, stories, gear, and combat.

I have never once been swayed by a loading screen trying to get me to buy DLC as these games have 10x more content than you would ever see anyway. I do agree the series seems to be going the wrong direction at the moment, but would still highly recommend origins, odyssey, and to a lesser extent, valhalla if you enjoy adventure and exploration games.

gold_drake652d ago

not every AC game is worth playing tho ha.

i feel like it stopped being good after 3. and 3 was even a stretch.

1 and 2 tho? amazing.