All Channels
Popular
320°

Ubisoft - The Safest and Most Boring Developer

With the recent Ubisoft releases of Watch Dogs Legion and Assassin's Creed Valhalla, I should be excited. But really, I don't care.

Read Full Story >>
fictiontalk.com
RickRoland2015d ago

Agreed. Their games do nothing for me.

NeoGamer2322015d ago

I don't know why safe and boring is bad though. At least when I buy a Ubisoft game, I know what I am getting. The biggest complaint I have in the Ubisoft games is that the story telling is weak. If you were to improve that part of their games it would at emotion and personal connection to their games which would change a lot of the thought around safe and boring. To me, most Ubisoft games ship mechanically sound and well tested.

bouzebbal2015d ago

Last game I bought was Rayman Origins, before that AC2.. I don't like what they do, and I can see I'm not the only one

NeoGamer2322015d ago

@bouzebval
I don't disagree that the games "do nothing for most gamers". But, in art and entertainment worlds there is art and entertainment that "play it safe" and "don't do anything new" but do it well enough that they people buy their products and it fills gaps while people wait for the big innovations and new great stuff.

Not every game developer is an innovator. They work to differentiate themselves and sell their products. Ubisoft does this by doing nothing really new and playing it safe. Others take more chances, yet others are even more boring and safe. At least when I buy a Ubisoft game, it feels like it was well tested and I know what to expect.

RaiderNation2015d ago

"I don't know why safe and boring is bad though. At least when I buy a Ubisoft game, I know what I am getting. "

Wow. Because thats what I buy games for...predictability.

TheOptimist2015d ago

Why would you pay for something that doesn't surprise you in the least.

I would never pay for a rehashed product no matter how "polished it is"

ABizzel12015d ago

I don't think safe is bad or boring, but Ubisoft has a severe lack of newness and diversity. They have been making the same games for 2 going on 3 generations now, with multiple iterations per generation, with the same rinse and repeat mechanics.

For some people having the same routine in life is brings them comfort and keeps things nice and even. Whereas, other people have a broader range of diversity in their life bringing them higher highs for the better, and lower lows for the worse. It's a give and take.

Ubisoft is that same routine person (and to be honest EA and Activision fit this as well), where there's nothing really new to expect. Whereas, developers who take risk are the ones who produce either new AAA IP's, games that make you think and feel, or revolutionize what we think about games, genres, or mechanics.

We all love new exciting AAA IP's, but safe also has it's place as obviously millions of gamers buy COD, Assassin's Creed, Sports, every year / every other year, even if most of those safe games are not for me.

neutralgamer19922015d ago (Edited 2015d ago )

there biggest is they think quantity equals to quality. Some of their games could be great if they were actually shorter and required less grinding. On top of that they thought it was a great idea to add micro transactions to single player games especially the kind that affect the actually gameplay/enjoyability as in XP BOOSTERS

once UBI has made a open world game they will use same/similar gameplay features for most of their upcoming open world games. It was very recently that they went away from gameplay feature of climbing towers to reveal map locations. They do the same thing again and again and have become boring/repetitive

on top of all that they downgrade their games and launch with bunch of bugs/glitches

UBI can't keep this up they are the next publisher to go under or sell. I don't think people realize how UBI isn't doing well financially

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

this guy explains everything going on at UBI and this guy also predicted Bethesda will be sold

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

RosweeSon2015d ago

Because it could be exciting and exceptional. I like some Ubisoft games but each and every year no. Every other year wouldn’t be so bad but they literally churn the games out and it shows hence they always score 7-8 rather than 9-10s

Profchaos2015d ago

Agree it was my main issue with WD legion the standard open world was good enough but not forming a connection with its cast just made it boring. Wd2 on the flip side was a real highlight for me as the conversations between characters was excellent among the standard open world gameplay wrench and Marcus really brought some ice into it

Dragonscale2014d ago

So boring isn't bad? And thats why these games keep getting churned out because people keep buying this crap. Every game is pretty much a reskin of the last, with the same old combat, quests, progression and loot boxes. No thanks ubisoft.

NeoGamer2322014d ago

@Dragonscale
If every game has to do something new and exciting we would see about 5 games a year.

Doing an existing formula well is perfectly fine. Some may think it is boring, but that is not true. 95% of the world is boring if you take that approach because almost everything has been done before and is being done the same way.

Ubisoft uses an existing formula for many of their games. They do it well. But, as I have stated they could do better if their stories were more engaging and personal. Currently they really don't have stories in their games. Or the stories are more like guides then actual stories.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 2014d ago
NecrumOddBoy2015d ago (Edited 2015d ago )

Ubisoft has their other studios that make smaller games like Rayman, Valiant Hearts and, Child of Light. Those are not boring at all. Their openworld titles have just fallen into a formula that’s over saturated which causes the Ubi-fatigue.

monkey6022015d ago

Those studios and projects are gone. UbiArts are dead. Child of Light and Valiant Hearts were made at the beginning of the ps4/x1 gen and nothing in that range has come since

Muzikguy2015d ago

I haven't cared about Ubisoft since the days of the original Watch Dogs. That game did it for me right there.

Rebel_Scum2015d ago

I still like a good far cry game. AC Origins was good but too long and massive.

I agree with the headline though.

Psychotica2015d ago

How can a game be too long or massive? I mean it's not like you have a time limit to finish it.

LabRat2014d ago (Edited 2014d ago )

@psychotica - as people get older they tend to have less time to game. And with how many games get churned out every year...yes people do want their games to be able to be finished in a reasonable time so they can enjoy more

roadkillers2015d ago

It is funny. They create a very innovative game (Assassins Creed, Far Cry, Raymon, Prince of Persia, Watch Dogs) and they kinda do incremental improvements

Gameseeker_Frampt2015d ago (Edited 2015d ago )

We can thank gamers for that. Want to see some truly original Ubisoft games? Check out 2007 Assassin's Creed and 2008 Far Cry 2 which are pure gameplay experiences instead of safe, mindless collectathons. Want to guess which games of their franchises are crapped the most upon by gamers? Same 2 games. We spoke and Ubisoft listened.

GreatSako20202015d ago

Those two games are when I realized Ubisoft games are boring. Ubisoft was boring since forever.

agent45322015d ago

Agreed, those two games are not as popular not praised as their other games...

PersonX2015d ago

I like their open world games, much better than boring linear games.

ClayRules20122015d ago

I respectfully disagree. I’d rather play a linear game such as the first 3 Uncharted games (4th being wide linear/my personal favorite) over any and all of Ubisofts open world games. hey look nice, and beautiful at times. However, they fail to have real personality/life and attention to detail to the likes of what Rockstar with GTA 5/RDR2 & CDPR delivered with the masterpiece TW3, not just the worlds, but gameplay design, and if that’s not impressive, just the quality/writing/performances in the main story’s and than on top of that, the side quests in the Witcher and Dynamic world events in RDR2. Ubisoft just doesn’t seem to care enough to bring their own unique flavor and polished quality that a studio of their size and resources should be able to produce.

I’ll add HZD in there with RDR2 and TW3. One of the best games this gen for me personally, in general, but in terms of open world, easily bested any of Ubisoft’s open world games I’ve played, and I’ve played most of them. Horizons a masterpiece.

Having said that, I am genuinely happy that you yourself do find enjoyment in Ubisofts open world games. I’m glad you get your moneys worth!

LucasRuinedChildhood2015d ago

I know I'd rather play Starfield, the next Elder Scrolls, Fallout, etc over just about any Ubisoft game these days. Definitely not buying Legion or Valhalla when my PS5 arrives.

GreatSako20202015d ago

Not even close. I would play any Fallout game over Ubishit games

Show all comments (61)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio23d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing23d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9223d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit23d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing23d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9222d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
50°

Spiders Studio, Developers of GreedFall: The Dying World, Announce Liquidation of the Company

Spiders: "We're going to cut straight to the chase so you're not left wondering: After a long period without clear answers, we have received confirmation that Spiders is being liquidated.

What does it mean? This means the company as a whole no longer exists. We'll cease our functions immediately. The planned DLC will release via Nacon, and then-- well, that's it.

We're sorry that it's come to this and would like to thank each and every one of you for your support over the years.

If you have any questions or run into issues with your games, please contact Nacon directly as we'll no longer be able to reply."

40°

Koei Tecmo Announces Record Financial Results After Releasing Many Big Games

Today, Koei Tecmo announced its financial results for the full fiscal year 2025, related to the period between April 2025 and March 2026.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com