All Channels
Popular
930°

The $70 Lie

VGChartz's Taneli Palola: "Sony and 2K Games have both already made the first steps towards $70 base price for games, with titles like Demon's Souls, Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War, and NBA 2K21 all costing that much. While other game companies have mostly remained silent on the topic, you can bet they're watching very closely at how those games perform on the market at that price point. If they prove successful, expect other companies to follow suit, increasing pricing to supposedly offset the rising costs of game development. There are just three problems with that basic premise to begin with."

Read Full Story >>
vgchartz.com
Blastoise2011d ago

Good article. Game prices never needed to increase, the money isn't going towards development or developers and it isn't going to get rid of microtransactions or other scummy business practices. It was purely about game companies seeing an opportunity to test the waters with next gen, and the sad thing is it'll probably work.

Geronosaur2011d ago ShowReplies(24)
alb18992010d ago

So much true in this article.

Dir_en_grey2010d ago (Edited 2010d ago )

You know there is something that happens in every economy of every country, it is called inflation.
So over time cost of living goes up, wages needs to go up, cost of game development, shipping, running servers and services, and running a company overall goes up.

In other developed countries minimum wage are adjusted with inflation automatically, but in US you gotta pass bills for minimum wage to go up, and the minimum wage haven caught up with inflation for years until a minimum wage raising bill gets passed.
That's why so many people are poor (in terms of the standard of living) in US even though they get paid the same numbers. The numbers of the money you own gets weaker over time.

First you need to understand the above, to understand why good jobs and good companies, they raise wages over time so people would stay, rightfully so due to inflation and cost of living. They don't wait for minimum wage bill to get passed because they don't pay minimum wage, but recognize that wages are getting higher somewhere else.

Mean while for many folks that their wages are gauged according to the over due adjustments of minimum wage in the US, they just get that much poorer with inflation.

People put time and work in, and companies risk investing that money, and these companies with stock have to keep raising the profit so stock would go up & stock holders wouldn't complaint. That's economics for ya.

Somebody somewhere's gotta crunch the numbers to balance the economy out in everybody's country, but video game is an luxury and not necessity to living. But the price of games going up is just the same as the price of everything else going up and will keep going up. Pay if you can afford or don't pay if not, or just use this to motivate you to get a better job perhaps?

Complaining without understanding or providing a solution is just, complaining...

2010d ago
FinalFantasyFanatic2010d ago

The problem with inflation is that minimum wage should have increases along with it, not only that, how much inflation are you factoring it? Before covid, Australia sat at 2% a year, I believe America is much higher than that (almost double?).

SpeedDemon2010d ago

"just use this to motivate you to get a better job perhaps?"

Or how about people like yourself, pull their pants up and stop letting greedy companies take what they want from you?

bovandy2010d ago

If you want entertainment, get a better job is a heck of an argument.

Drithe2010d ago

By your logic milk should be 100 dollars a gallon now.

Rachel_Alucard2010d ago

You seem to be under the impression they raised prices due to inflation or something out of their control. You know damn well they make way too much off other factors beyond the sale of a game, and the digital takeover will remove any of the physical cost associated with it. It doesn't even cost $60 to make a copy, yet they want to increase the cost anyway. Must be easy being a businessman when you have consumers blaming themselves for anything you pull on them.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2010d ago
neutralgamer19922010d ago

Blastoise

i can't believe your comment has disagrees

Geronosaur

yes 30 years ago there also wasn't digital revenue, post launch dlc, micro transactions etc, raising the game price to $70 is fine but than remove all the other nonsense. What is actually happening is even with price being raised these greedy publishers will keep pushing MT and gamers like you will keep saying it's cosmetics only. Big media outlets won't lower the score even if they reviewed the game using XP boosters and gamers would have to pay $10 extra

chop

exactly

RGR

companies spent more on advertisement than actual game development

SmokinAces2010d ago

We didn't NEED subscription services either. Its odd to me that people will complain about spending another ten dollars to own their game but praise paying forever to rent them and loose access to them if they stop paying. Matter of perspective I guess and whatever side of the fence one is hurling their criticisms from.

milohighclub2010d ago

No one praised sub services. They're pretty my chain universaly hated here.

2010d ago
Pretentious2010d ago

I would only be okay with this price point if no DLC was ever released. Give us the game in its entirety, and you've got a deal. If not, then, I guess we're just going to have to spend the money anyway because if the game is good, we're gonna buy it. Damn it!

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2010d ago
2011d ago Replies(2)
Lore2011d ago

Well we don’t know if Microsoft is taking this same approach because they don’t have any exclusive next gen games set to release until 2024. So we won’t know until then

Shane Kim2011d ago

They will. That way, gamepass will look even more attractive wich is all MS is concerned about.

RickRoland2011d ago

Gamepass prices will slowly increase ala Netflix.

Rude-ro2010d ago

Game pass is paying for it.
You have access to games.. but where you play and for how long dictates it success.

And instead of loot boxes you now have season passes and micro transactions.

I can not fathom someone saying paying for the online service, paying for the game rental service, and season passes with micro transactions is any better than $70

Microsoft offered what should have been indie or free to play games at AAA prices to make game pass look like a deal.

I assure you.. profits are flowing a plenty

chrisoadamson2010d ago

@RickRoland Phil Spencer has come out on record stating there will be no increases to gamepass for the foreseable future . The current model is highly sustainable .

porkChop2011d ago

2024? Is that supposed to be a joke?

Lore2011d ago

Yes. I’m sure Avowed and Fable (the only two reasons thus far I plan to get the XSX) will be out by 2022 but I made the joke because I have empathy for dedicated fans who only prefer to play on Xbox. Xbox 1st party offerings have been shit for the past decade. I have no stake in either company so it doesn’t matter to me, just digging a bit at Msft in this instance.

purple1012011d ago

Microsoft's game line up is the only joke arround here. Wait till e3..he says....5 years in a row he says....

glennhkboy2010d ago

The article is about the price of PS5 game. If you buy all the major launch exclusives (4 to 5 games between November to December), it will cost you US$300 to US$400. For the same price from GamePass, you can play thousands of games. There is no competition from the costing perspective.

Lore2010d ago (Edited 2010d ago )

Does Xbox game pass get every single new release on day 1? Open your eyes

“You can play thousands of games”

Game Pass has 100 games. If you want to mention a service that has “thousands” of games, then i believe you’re referring to PSNow with about 800 games.

glennhkboy2010d ago

@Lore
"Does Xbox game pass get every single new release on day 1?" Yes, we do.

milohighclub2010d ago

Is there still anything worth playing....? No there isn't.

Petebloodyonion2011d ago

It's been said often in past article that the 70$ price tags come from market research that showed that PPL were expecting to pay more and wanted to pay more for a video game so companies will suit themselves.

Now all the argument brought by the gaming industry for the needs of price Increase has been debunked.
The CEO's of Activision, Take Two, Ea, ect all got huge bonus in the last couples of years due to the large profit made.
Monetisation will still be there and it's still bringing huge amount of cash.
2020 will probably be one of the best year for video games due to Covid 19.

purple1012011d ago

Yeh i think when these companies make millions in profit....an increase is not needed.

If they did need it to cover their are costs of development that would be another situation, but the fact they're turning out millions and profit that after all costs have been taking into consideration, there is absolutely no need for this rip-off pricing.

Phoenix762011d ago

It's already payday over @ activision. They saw 1.2bil made within 3 months from Mt's alone!
https://www.pcgamer.com/uk/...

Bathyj2011d ago

Just quit gaming you tightarses.

2011d ago
FunAndGun2011d ago (Edited 2011d ago )

Didn't think I would ever agree with ya, but bam, there it goes, I clicked it.

wwinterj2010d ago

Nah. I'll just buy more games in a sale and guess what? That's my choice and I win whatever I do.

Show all comments (180)
80°

Sony's Bluepoint Closure Should Concern Every PS Studios Fan

Sammy: "Sony disastrously and disgracefully shuttered Texas-based fan favourite Bluepoint yesterday. The long-time PS Studios partner never got a chance to ship a game under its new parent company.

This news hit me particularly hard because I believe it reflects the erosion of once-great PlayStation management that I think we’ve all been feeling for quite some time."

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
CrashMania84d ago

How was this allowed to happen? A studio know for excellent remakes and remasters were put on a GOW live service game? Something nobody wanted? There are so many other, more interesting projects, for me they were the prime studio who should have remastered or remade Bloodborne, what an absolute waste, I'm really annoyed about this.

Hulst should have followed Jim Ryan out the door, especially after his failed concord brainchild, execs really do only fail upwards.

Extermin8or3_84d ago

You say "no body wanted" but we don't actually know if the Devs were the ones to pitch it. For all we know

Elda84d ago

If that was the case you would have thought Sony would have told Bluepoint no & had them make the God Of War trilogy remake instead while having Santa Monica Studios concentrate on the next God Of War & what ever else they're working on. A Bloodborne remake/remaster would have definitely printed Sony millions. It seems the upper management doesn't care what the fans think including them making awful business decisions. To take Bluepoint under their wing for 5 years & dismantle them is crazy work, Sony should have auctioned Bluepoint off to to a company that could really use them.

-Foxtrot84d ago

If the really did pitch it then they would have wanted their own IP for being a brand new game, not using someone else’s IP when it’s not a remake this time.

CrashMania84d ago

I mean I guess, but doubt that a small team of 70 wanted to do a live service game, I don't buy it personally, but we'll never 100% know.

Scissorman84d ago (Edited 84d ago )

i think you are half right. sony became hyper-focused on live service games and given that, studios would then pitch live service games because those projects were the most likely to be greenlit by the higher ups. now, as for what the hell bluepoint was working on since their god of war game was cancelled is beyond me. it's just increasingly frustrating when sony just announced a god of remake which is still in its infancy when bluepoint could have been working on it for years and likely would have shipped it by now.

MDTunkown84d ago

We had a god of war mp in the past and it didn’t do well back then with less competition so doubtful people wanted a live service game especially from devs that made some top tier remakes

Michiel198983d ago

Copium like this is the reason they're in this position. Sony could do no wrong and when something did go wrong, it's never the corporate suits at sony who are to blame.....its either: devs bad or ms/phil spencer bad while their own backyard is on fire. This is the result of not caring what your fav company does just because another company does (way) worse and automatically condoning everything. I hope they can turn it around without having to fuck over their customers more because especially some of the games on ps1 through ps3 were absolutely amazing.

Can't really say im surprised it's gotten to this point although I didn't expect them to close Bluepoint who has always delivered stellar work.

1nsomniac83d ago

The devs didn’t pitch it. It’s already been discussed publicly. They had literally just started on a new undisclosed project they were still in the initial ideas phase when they were asked to stop and do GoW instead.

Extermin8or3_73d ago

Love the downvotes considering it's since become public knowledge that yes bluepoint DID infact pitch the god of war game. They also eventually pitched a Bloodborne remake but from software torpedoed the project, sadly.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 73d ago
neutralgamer199283d ago (Edited 83d ago )

Everyone keeps asking for a Bloodborne remaster or remake — a game that genuinely deserves preservation and modernization. Instead, we got a remake of The Last of Us and then a remaster of The Last of Us Part II, both of which were already recent and widely available. That decision feels tone-deaf. It’s hard not to question priorities when so many legacy titles are untouched.

Bluepoint built its reputation on honoring PlayStation’s history. They were masters at remakes and remasters. There is an entire catalog — from PS1, PS2, and PS3 eras — that fans would celebrate. Yet instead of leveraging that strength, they were redirected toward live service ambitions. Six years later, there’s nothing to show, and now the studio is gone. That’s not just disappointing — it feels like wasted potential.

Sony Bend is another example. Days Gone 2 wasn’t greenlit, and the studio was reportedly shifted toward live service. Years later, that project was canceled, and they’re back at square one. That’s years of development time lost in a generation that already feels light on first-party output.

What’s even more concerning is the broader shift. PlayStation used to thrive on bold, risk-taking single-player projects and strong Japanese creative influence. Now the strategy appears more Western-focused and heavily driven by the live service model — where multiple failures are acceptable as long as one becomes a breakout success.

Competition used to push Sony to take creative risks. The PS3 vs. Xbox 360 era forced innovation. Today, Xbox has shifted direction, Nintendo operates independently in its own lane, and Sony doesn’t feel the same competitive pressure. Without that tension, the urgency to push boundaries seems diminished.

The frustration many fans feel isn’t just about one remake or one canceled project — it’s about a sense that PlayStation’s identity is drifting. And while loyalty is natural, defending every decision without criticism doesn’t help the platform grow.

It’s not anger because we hate PlayStation. It’s frustration because we care about what it used to represent

Jack tretton
Shawn laden
Andrew house
Kaz
Shu Yoshida

These people aren't walking through the doors anymore

Relientk7784d ago

It does concern me that they think closing amazing studios like Bluepoint and Japan Studios is smart.

I'm honestly surprised Media Molecule is still around. They put out what 1 game in the past 10+ years? I personally wasn't interested in Dreams, so they have been a wash for me since the PS3 era. Are they working on a new game? What are they doing?

Stevonidas84d ago

I immediately recalled when they shut down Japan Studio. I don’t understand why any studio would agree to be acquired by Sony, EA, or Microsoft with their history of studio closures.

Reaper22_69d ago

Because of money. Most game studios need financial backing in order to develop games.

84d ago
MrNinosan82d ago

MM is most likely next to close down, and my guess it's sooner than later

FTLmaster84d ago

Frustrating news, for sure. Hulst is on a major losing streak. Baffling decisions....

Lightning7784d ago

They could of let them do a Remakes of Sly, Jak and Daxter maybe the old Killzone games. Ported Demon Souls to other platforms. Steady revenue for growth becoming a 70 team to 100+ eventually.

toxic-inferno83d ago

Precisely! PlayStation have a rich back catalogue that is screaming out for a talented team like those at Bluepoint to work their magic upon.

Such wasted potential. And a terrible thing to happen to those talented workers at Bluepoint.

Demon's Souls remake was the gateway to FromSoft games for me. I'd fully beaten Bloodborne, but had struggled to get into Dark Souls. Demon's Souls - as a launch title - showed me how these games are meant to be played.

Miacosa84d ago

As a PS Fan and someone that looks to new exsperiences not rehashing old ones I can feel for the devs but it does not move the needle as far as getting new video games.

Show all comments (34)
270°

Sony Shuts Down Video-Game Studio Bluepoint

Sony Group Corp. is shutting down Bluepoint Games, the PlayStation subsidiary responsible for developing remakes of video games such as Demon’s Souls.

Roughly 70 employees will lose their jobs amid the studio closure, a PlayStation spokesperson said, writing in a statement that the decision was made “following a recent business review.” Bluepoint will officially shutter next month.

Read Full Story >>
bloomberg.com
Neonridr85d ago

Well this sucks. Were they working on anything lately?

BlackCountryBob85d ago

They’d been working on a God of War GaaS game that got shut down I think. Had been hoping they would be taking the lead on the remake of the original trilogy as their next project instead.

Neonridr85d ago

damn, loved their work on the Uncharted series remasters. That would have been great as I missed the earlier GoW entries.

Popsicle85d ago (Edited 85d ago )

Same. I figured they may have created some useful assets while working on the scrapped GaaS game that could have been transferred for use in the trilogy remake. Such a shame, Bluepoint did a phenomenal job with the Demon Souls remake. A transition to the GoW remake seemed like a perfect match for their talent.

VenomUK85d ago

The only reason Sony would've shut down Bluepoint is because it's not profitable. But the reason it's not profitable is because the studio has spent years working on a GaaS game that wasn't released - that's not its fault!

With a ready made accomplished team Sony could've had them work on anything, how short-sighted to dismantle them. This move is a bad move from the highest level of management and accountants and it's a worrying signal that behind the scenes PlayStation is being mismanaged.

badz14984d ago

God damnit Sony! These guys are so talented and you guys criminally misused them! And for what? Jim Ryan's crazy GAAS future that was hated by gamers from the get go and never materialized??

I hope that guy rot in gaming hell for what he has done but why didn't Sony put them onto another remake project? They are very good at that and whatever they come up with will surely sell, come on! Why the sudden closure? This sucks balls!

I am very worried about Bend Studio now.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 84d ago
darthv7285d ago (Edited 85d ago )

DAMN... I say we stick it to Sony and all jump ship to Xbox.

/s

Yes, that was a joke. What isn't a joke is where will these guys go now? They are really talented at remaking games. So any publisher would be wise to scoop them up. Lord knows there are tons of quality games from years gone by that could use a bit of modern TLC and re-introduced to new generations of players.

Profchaos84d ago (Edited 84d ago )

Nintendo has a ton of old games that could use remakes fingers crossed

@lightning pretty rare for Nintendo to shut studios down

repsahj85d ago

is there a way to save this studio? MS or Nintendo?

Lightning7784d ago

Uuh no Nintendo would turn then into a Nintendo retro shop reselling remastered games for 60 or 70$. MS? Would shut them down also. None of these companies are your freakin friends.

1Victor84d ago

There’s a impostor among us 🤣

With what I’m going to say I want you to understand first that I’m raging inside but I also understand that there is a lot that don’t get published about studios closures like monetary burdens, management issues, quality issues, are some of the one that come to mind.
I wish the best for those that lost their jobs and hope that Sony compensate them more than appropriately.and they get hired fast by other developers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 84d ago
-Foxtrot85d ago

Go f*** yourself Sony

Your stupid management are the ones who made them waste years on a God of War live service title only to cancel it.

This is insane, they’ve really screwed up here, what the actual f*** man.

KiRBY300085d ago

Sony has been sabotaging themselves for the whole generation. their focus on live service has been an absolute disaster for everyone involved, the gamers, the studios, the investors. where are the solo games? what did Bluepoint do to deserve this? they done a brilliant job remastering and remaking games for sony and this is how sony treat them? after years wasted for a crap GOW live service nobody wanted.

man, fuck sony. they're so dumb it's incredible.

Profchaos85d ago (Edited 85d ago )

I've been hardcore PlayStation since the PS1 but man If Xbox was legitimately competitive and not just giving their games away I might consider switching hell Nintendos been more appealing than Sony lately at least they are putting games out

This live service push has killed so much of my hype for Sony this gen

Outside_ofthe_Box85d ago

"Sony has been sabotaging themselves for the whole generation. their focus on live service has been an absolute disaster for everyone involved"

This is it. This is why you stick to what you are good at. If a studio themselves have a genuine interest in live service, sure let them have at it, but to push it on to developers is exactly how not to handle a studio.

Like you said BluePoint didn't do anything to deserve this. It was Sony's mismanagement of forcing them to do something that isn't their strength that led to the closure. They have done nothing but great things till the live service push and would still be here had it not been for that.

How much money have they lost since this live service push? So much wasted time and money on cancelled games and failures as a result.

Lightning7784d ago

@Prof

Not sure what you mean. Ever since Xbox started PS fanboys been wanting Xbox gone. They barely competing anymore this is what it looks like now. Been telling ppl for years but fanboys just make stupid excuses. So welcome to the outcome.

The_Hooligan84d ago

Seriously fuck Sony. People in charge of making the decision to push GAAS are all safe but the actual developers who had no say are all fired. Great work Jimbo/Herman!!

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 84d ago
isarai_lee85d ago

I hate Jim so damn much for his GAAS push, this is absolute bullsh*t!

Cacabunga85d ago

I think we can sadly say that we are witnessing the PlayStation fortress collapse before our eyes..

GamingSinceForever84d ago

@Profchaos you sound dumb as Hell. What are you like 12? What do you mean by you might consider switching? For what reason can’t your grown ass buy whatever console you want? No one has forced you to be a loyalists to a single platform but yourself.

Grow up bro. All jokes aside.

slate9184d ago

Respect for being consistent on this take. Not sure why sony has been self-destructing since 2020

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 84d ago
Johnh522385d ago

This really sucks they couldve did Socom remaster or live service instead of milking gow to get shut down this sucks a good studio.

Show all comments (124)
230°

Top 10 Soulslikes You're Not Playing

Soulslikes are punishingly difficult but amongst the most compelling games. Power Up Gaming goes through the top ten Soulslikes you're likely not playing.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
thorstein460d ago

Demon's Souls isn't Soulslike. It's the original Souls game. WTF? And Elden Ring?

Another Crab's Treasure simply is not.

All the journos claiming things are "Soulslike" simply don't know what that word means.

GeeEssEff459d ago

The term “Soulslike” has become ridiculously diluted. I have seen it used for games just because they are difficult.

Cacabunga459d ago

Reminds me of Doom like back in the days for every FPS game

blackblades459d ago (Edited 459d ago )

Yeah, souls, souls lite, souls like same goes for rogue.

anast458d ago

It's either AI or the writer doesn't know the subject matter.

robtion459d ago

I've played all of these bar the Crab one so not a very accurate title.

Goodguy01459d ago (Edited 458d ago )

Nioh 1+2 imo are the best souls clone. Love the melee combat and ki system, really hoping team ninja doesn't abandon the IP and continue with a new title, hell just give us your take on the western fantasy setting for a new nioh game.

robtion458d ago

Yes Nioh 2 in particular is great. Also Wo Long (which is basically Nioh 3).

qalpha458d ago

Should have included 'Lies of P'. Seriously fun game.

Nacho_Z458d ago

That's what I was going to say, great game. Best non From Soulslike I've played.

jznrpg153d ago

Lies of P and Wuchang Fallen Feathers are best soulsikes to me. I slightly prefer Wuchang ut they’re both awesome. I’d say Black Myth Wukong too but it’s a little more action than most souls games but it could fit in there as well.

458d ago