All Channels
Popular
400°

Xbox now allows game preloads before inserting a disc

Have you ever wished to play your newly bought disc game immediately? Starting this week Xbox now allows game preloads before inserting a disc.

Read Full Story >>
lordsofgaming.net
Double_O_Revan2046d ago

That's actually really cool. Sucks to insert a disc, wait for it to install, then wait for it to download and install any updates. When I get a new game I pop it in and walk away for an hour.

xxShadow-Shockxx2046d ago

This is a great feature, I hope we get this from Sony as well

Bruh2046d ago (Edited 2046d ago )

With the power of PS5's SSD's you will wait .1 secs for an install Sony doesn't need this out-dated tech

OMGitzThatGuy2046d ago

The fastest SSD on the planet won't help when Blurays spin and read so slow. There is a reason you can't play off of them in realtime with the size of textures these days.

darthv722046d ago (Edited 2046d ago )

I wish sony did the same as MS for digital games when a disc is inserted. For example, i downloaded DMC5 on gamepass a while ago. It is no longer on the service so I bought a cheap used copy. I didnt remove the previous install and when I popped in the disc... it started playing. So the disc saw the existing data and is just a verifying key.

On PS4, it treats disc different than digital. So if you dl a game from + and then you no longer a member, using the disc causes it to install again. Its like it doesnt see the data is already there and wont use the disc to authenticate.

Seeing as thats how it is on ps4... it may be the same on ps5. So preloading might not work unless they change how it treats the data.

Kados2046d ago

@Bruh:

Doesn't matter how fast the SSD is when it still has to read data from a 6x BD-R drive. @ 27MB/s it will take roughly an hour to install a 100GB game.

VariantAEC2043d ago

Then I recall how many days it took to download MSFS for my PC...
Yeah I'll stick with the much faster physical installation process.
Also did we just forget that PS already has a solution for this non-issue allowing users to install a small portion of the game before allowing play? So you don't have to wait 45 minutes you just install the first few gigs and can get going. 5-10 mins is all you need in most cases.

Granted this option should you use it offers you the opportunity to put the game in and run immediately... Assuming you downloaded the game early enough to do precisely that.
I see cracked consoles shutting this feature down in a few years time.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2043d ago
lukasmain2046d ago (Edited 2046d ago )

How long are you really going to be waiting with an SSD drive?
Sony's would be a lot less time I would assume, but both would not take a long time. But yes, the feature is a good one.

purple1012046d ago

Sonys will be twice as quick indeed.

Double_O_Revan2046d ago

In the case of next gen, the speed limitation i guess would be reading from the Optical drive for physical installs. So It might speed up a good amount next gen. As for Digital, your download speed is still the biggest factor, the actual installation portion will be much faster, but no amount of SSD speed can help if you have slow or even mediocre internet.

darthv722046d ago

You still have to wait for the data to be read from the disc and copied to the SSD or download from the internet and install. There are still those limitations that can't be bypassed. The SSD will show its strength after that fact, when the data is already there.

conanlifts2046d ago (Edited 2046d ago )

Install times would most likely be determined by internet speeds or the disc drive. I believe UHD drivers have a speed up to 144Mbit/s. If so install times could potentially be the same on both consoles as it is determined by the max speed of the slowest component.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2046d ago
CaptainObvious8782046d ago

As a PS gamer, this is a small, but very very awesome feature.

Hope sony follows suite.

2046d ago
VariantAEC2043d ago

I kinda hope they don't... for the sake of the developers.

I think you know where I'm going with this?

UnholyLight2045d ago

Good point. My friend was sorta late to this current gen, and went out and bought an Xbox One with Halo on disc and was not prepared for the game install then they updates they had to download on top of it all to then play the game...as well as having bad internet. Never fun to have to wait.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2043d ago
Petebloodyonion2046d ago

Great idea! Hoping that the same will come to Playstation :)
Good job MS.

chiefJohn1172046d ago (Edited 2046d ago )

Thank you!!!!
I bought rdr2 right before going to work, I came home to have it install while I went to work so I could hop right in when I got off lol.

VariantAEC2043d ago

Right!
No need for this feature, it just makes the game data more vulnerable to pirates. Anyone can download the data freely and the data can be moved off the XSS/X via USB. This isn't respecting developers and only benefits a tiny minority of gamers with seriously fast internet speeds.

My internet isn't bad by any means and it still took more than 2 days to download MSFS which is 140GB. It took longer to download the Gears 4 trial (a few years ago) even though that game is smaller.

So this benefits a tiny number of gamers but puts game data in the cross hairs of hackers which will have first dibs on cracking any game.

I don't see this feature lasting especially if it starts digging into 3rd party's profits.

darthv722046d ago

Nice. i just pre-ordered Halo Infinite... can't to preload that and then pop in the disc to play.

jukins2046d ago

Man. Day by day xbox looking more attractive.

MatrixxGT2046d ago

Xbox is killing it right now. I was bummed I didn’t get a ps5 preorder but I did get a series X and as someone who still loves physical games (collector) and slow internet this is awesome news.

jukins2046d ago

Yea small things like this i really like. Especially if I have to wait for a game to be delivered I wouldn't have wait for patches and installs.

Sirk7x2045d ago (Edited 2045d ago )

They messed up bad this prior gen and can't afford to again. They know the only way to make it right, is to spend the time to go beyond what competitors are doing. As they say, necessity is the mother of invention. Sony rested on their laurels, and despite not really having changed their game-plan that won everyone over all gen, now seem weaker in comparison in regards to customer goodwill.

jukins2045d ago (Edited 2045d ago )

Why wouldn't sony "rest on their laurels". I get that microsoft has had a bunch of positive news recently but theirs still over 100 million ps4s out there getting supported. I dont see how sony is "weaker" day 1 has exclusives. Launch window has exclusives, 1st year horizon and gow? Yea that sounds really weak. . . And there's still more unannounced.

As I said good news for xbox. But again let's not pretend microsoft didn't basically just abandon this generation to be the first to pish next gen. Sony is still releasing aaa games on current gen. We'll have to see how it all plays out. But telling sony not reat on its laurels is like telling nintendo not to rely on Mario Zelda metroid etc. . .

Show all comments (47)
60°

Final Fantasy X 25th Anniversary Website Launches With New Nomura Artwork and Merchandise

Square Enix launches Final Fantasy X 25th anniversary site, revealing new Nomura art, books, music releases, and merchandise.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
-Foxtrot3d ago

Look I know VIII has its issues and all that but how on earth can the do big anniversary events with new artwork and merchandise for VII, IX and X yet VIII got sweet f*** all.

They could have given it something during its 25th anniversary yet all it got was a single Happy Anniversary post on their social media.

solideagle3d ago

they should know that we are OG fans of VIII as it sold truckload as well. not as much as VII or X. I personally didn't like IX but X and VI are my personal fav.

Shadow Hearts 2 covenant is another game I love. I hope one day someone can make remake, I would be delighted

Relientk772d ago

Final Fantasy VIII is great and you are always the first to defend it in the comments

40°

Star Wars: Bounty Hunter Let Jango Fett Loose

LucasArts gave Jango Fett his own game in 2002, and it pulled Star Wars into a much dirtier, rougher, and more interesting corner of the galaxy.

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
Relientk777d ago

I remember playing this back in the day on PS2. What a sick game!

270°

We Are Xbox

Dear team,

Xbox has always been different.

We started with a simple idea. Games should bring people together through shared experiences. That led to the first Xbox in 2001, Xbox Live in 2002, and new ways to connect, from friends lists and achievements to parties and play across devices. Today, Xbox reaches over 500 million players around the world, with some of the most important franchises in entertainment.

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
8d ago Replies(15)
Outside_ofthe_Box8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it. They would be turning down immediate money for something that will potentially workout in the long term.

Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box. A lot of their base has moved to PC or jumped to PS. So will be a long road to get back on track.

We have been saying this from day one exclusives are a must if you are going to be selling hardware look at Nintendo and Sony before Jim Ryan. That's the proven formula. You had some that were deluded and blinded by loyalty accepting that multiplat was the future and that MS was merely getting ahead of where the industry was headed, but at least they can finally see the light and agree with what everyone has been saying for a decade+

pwnmaster30008d ago

True, blame it on the rabid fanboys. MS can do no wrong and spinner this multiplatform move. While the actual fans moved on.

I feel like with the new Xbox coming they are hoping to bring back those old fans and then if it goes well. Bring back exclusives.

If the new console is performing like series x and one. Naw they staying multiplatform.

darthv728d ago

Actual fans dont move on... they can add to their hobby while waiting for the next new release. If you believe what you typed then I guess PS fans moved on too.... you know, since its been a Sahara for 1st party games this gen.

S2Killinit7d ago

The fans didn’t tell them to go multilat. MS was forced to after the 82 billion they spent to destroy gaming. Then, while xbox fans cheered, MS realized they can’t justify the price tag by selling through xbox only, so they went multiplat and in the process began to downplay console gaming.

8d ago Replies(4)
CrashMania8d ago

I think it's too late, xbox sales were diving even before ABK, they got even worse since then even long before the full multiplatform push. I'd be surprised if they even went back to timed exclusivity at this point, Helix is basically a PC and is going to be expensive, they already struggle to sell cheaper xbox consoles, it will be low volume and they'll have a very small 'console' base to sell to, which has already been conditioned to just play via gamepass anyway.

S2Killinit7d ago

They will do what they always do, they will promise the world at the beginning of next GEN and then failed to deliver all generation long. But there will always be some gamers who will buy into their promises.

ocelot077d ago

Absolutely agree, Do people genuinely believe Microsoft are now going to go. Hang on how's about we go back to 2020. Then GP was stagnating, Games sold where awful because of GP. Outsold by Playstation by a landslide.

They have sold 5m of Forza I believe on PS5. Spite it being a old game. I think Starfield is going to sell well in the end. Halo is deffinetly going to sell well as is Fable and Forza Horizon 6.

I think at best (for Xbox fans). Single player titles like Clockwork will have a timed exclusivity. Multiplayer centric games like Forza, E Day will release day and date on all platforms.

Or all games will release on all platforms day and date. But maybe Xbox and Windows Store copies will have exclusive bonuses. Or may even get timed exclusive dlc like Fallout and Elder Scrolls and COD use to do.

I think they will treat Xbox players like the premium customers or at least act the way. But will serve just the Playstation and Switch 2 customers as well.

Neonridr8d ago

I don't see them removing PC from the equation. Considering MS has a heavy enough investment in the PC market, it would be foolish to abandon them. I could see them taking away games from PlayStation or ensuring they are timed exclusives at the very least. Say what you will but if Call of Duty ends up becoming a timed exclusive to Xbox machines, that would hurt PlayStation, don't pretend like those games don't sell millions.

Outside_ofthe_Box8d ago

They would lose out on a lot of CoD sales tho. Doesn't PS make up most of the sales?

Neonridr7d ago

@Outside - possibly, but it might push people to want Xbox hardware so they can play with their buddies day one.

Who knows.

S2Killinit7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

it would but remember doing that can splinter the COD fan base and in the process damage the call of duty brand which is probably the only franchise in that $82 billion purchase that in anyway gets even close to delivering what Microsoft thought they bought. If Microsoft fudges around too much with the COD franchise, you might even see a competitor franchise show up on the scene and that would be a catastrophe after the huge debt that Microsoft put itself into with the ABK purchase.

But Its almost guaranteed that Microsoft will want to do something drastic at the beginning of the next generation as they always do. We will see.

Pyrofire958d ago

Their lifeline of solely the Xbox consoles is dry. Good-Great games on a 1st party scale can't be made at a loss so willingly - sent to the Xbox to only sell limited copies.
They invested billions scooping up studios and need to start making returns.
Sucks that nearly every company is publicly traded and have to be so shareholder biased but that's how it is.
Their words are strong but it'll take time to see what their actions accomplish. Lowering the cost of Game Pass and taking CoD off of it was a good clear start.

darthv728d ago

More like, allot of their base just played game pass. So now they need to encourage them to start buying again.

S2Killinit7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

A lot of their base left for greener (bluer?) pastures.

--Onilink--8d ago

What exactly is the long term goal with exclusives though?

Because for the most part, the hardware side of things has never been the most profitable, even sometimes being subsidized for a period before breaking even. And that’s before the hardware component nightmare we currently live in.

The whole point of exclusives was to get more people to buy your console in order to have a bigger install base, which meant even bigger software sales.

But if their ports to PS5 are selling (for the most part it seems) quite well, then other than negating the cut Sony takes there, unless you are REALLY increasing your software sales on your own console, it probably doesn’t make that much of a difference?

Honestly I don’t even understand Sony’s decision to scale back on it for PC unless they weren’t even recouping the port expenses. They released ports when the hardware sales never really dropped, and now that all consoles will undoubtedly take a noticeable drop in sales due to the ridiculous prices, that’s when they decide they don’t want to sell to a larger install base to more easily recoup dev costs… it’s just weird

Outside_ofthe_Box7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

I agree. I mean once they went multiplat, in theory there should be no going back especially when you have games that have sold really well on other platforms.

Microsoft are the ones that announced that they are reevaluating. So I'm just guessing on what their end goal is. Right now Xbox as a hardware is not a must buy for anyone but fans of the brand because their games can be played elsewhere. Going exclusive would solve this, but you lose out on a ton of money instantly which has always been what the company does not want to do so not really sure what their "reevaluating exclusives" means unless they are pulling a Phil Spencer and are just saying what people want to hear and will continue to do what they are currently doing.

darthv727d ago

Their ports to PS5 are selling because Sony's output has been so dry... the fans are thirsty, and MS is the oasis.

SIdepocket8d ago

Unfortunately, the studios they buy wither under their leadership.

mcstorm7d ago

Microsoft still has a name with Xbox the issue is the casual games are not looking at the console because its not the same console their friends have. Look at that poll on how many users upgraded from xbox 365 to one and then the X. Part of Microsoft's downfall was thinking that the Wii was the market they had to be in when really it was the core market. If you get the core gamers you then get the market to. As I posted a few minuets ago on another post Microsoft putting exclusives on PS this gen could bold well if they hit next gen with all our games are staying exclusive from this new gen. They will then get gamers wanting Halo, Forza Gears but this is also where Microsoft fell over with the xbox one and X in terms of they did not have may quality 1st party games affter they fell into the Gears, Forza and Halo cycle. If they can get some old IPs back to bring back the old core gamers as well as fresh ips to bring in new gamers things could improve next gen. But as I said in my last post its all if buts and maybes at the moment. No one knows if the next home consoles will be to expensive that people move to pc as we are now seeing or look at the stem deck as a cheepier alternitive.

DarXyde7d ago

"Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box."

That's very optimistic. It's not the only issue, far from it. There is a serious rupture between Microsoft generally and the public caused by their weird Game Pass price fluctuations, taking down physical game space in stores, and being the first to go nuts on hardware price hikes that they themselves played a big part in.

They're also charging beyond a premium for Helix which is just vile at a time when the economy is in shambles.

The company itself is really not doing itself any favors with the approach they're taking Windows. Even France is looking to ditch Windows in favor of Linux.

But the most offensive thing is this AI push. They're doubling, tripling, and quadrupling down on the very technology they're using to replace a considerable proportion of their workforce... And the slap in the face is how they bake copilot into everything when nobody likes it—they couldn't even make Bing stick, so why on earth are they trying so hard? You know it's bad when people would rather use ChatGPT than Copilot which is killing their OS. But aside from their snatching up of farmland to build data centers (and reduce the agriculture capacity of whichever country allows them to build them), they made an AI-generated gamer gurl that loves AI the head of Xbox.

Even if we grant them the full benefit of the doubt, it hardly matters what Xbox wants to do if Nadella says no, and that includes exclusive games. Microsoft's relationship with Xbox is the opposite of Sony's relationship with PlayStation—Microsoft pulls the reins of Xbox, but Sony damn near went under for the PS3.

Tanktopmaster927d ago (Edited 7d ago )

“If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it.”

Great strategy, especially after Forza selling 5 million on PlayStation and sea of thieves selling at least another million (2 million) for example. In March 2026, Xbox consoles sales ratio vs PS was 10:1.

In addition to that, with Gamepass, which unequivocally cuts out chunks of sales (Cannibalizing revenue from 1st month sales especially).

I’m sure going exclusive again after releasing everything on Ps5 is going to work out great for business.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 7d ago
maximusprime_8d ago

Despite all of that, it's clear that Microsoft's Xbox division is broken beyond repair.

8d ago
BeHunted8d ago

PlayStation is currently draining money on flop after flop. It's Sony that needs to re-evaluate their strategy

8d ago
CrashMania8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

Wonder how much money was lost on perfect dark, hellbalde 2, 300 million lost revenue
by putting cod on gamepass. The recent Jason schrier news that Xbox has cancelled dozens of projects, spent 70 billion just to see Xbox sales further collapse and gamepass see little growth.

The fact is this has been PlayStation's most profitable generation and they are making loads of money and selling plenty of consoles and games. While MS won't give you any sales figures or profit numbers for Xbox, says it all really.

S2Killinit7d ago

Sony PlayStation has deservedly dominated xbox. Facts

Tanktopmaster927d ago (Edited 7d ago )

Ok tween.

Xbox series SX got outsold 10:1 last month. lol.

7d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 7d ago
shadowT8d ago

"Our presence on PC isn’t strong enough."

Fishy Fingers8d ago

It isnt. But I dont think they mean in 'games', rather, footprint.

They own the OS but as far as gaming is concerned, Steam dominate. I imagine the VAST majority of people who use the Xbox app/launcher are PC gamepass subs. No ones buying their 3rd party PC games through Xbox PC.

badz1498d ago

and many gamers prefer SteamOS for gaming over Windows too. If only Valve would be more uncompromising to the anti-cheat makers that locked out non-windows players, more pc gamers would have moved onto SteamOS by now and not looking back to Windows. overall, Win11 is a terrible, bloated, unoptimized OS which is not what many people want

ocelot077d ago

Agreed and I think that's where they are going to focus on more. I think cheaper games on Windows/Xbox store (MS IP) compared to Steam and Epic and maybe even compared to PSN store as well.

Show all comments (107)