The writing. Instead of listening to SJWs that are in the ambassador program, how about make a great female character?

Jill had so much "male toxicity". Carlos...my god how many times was he gunna make sure we knew that "jill can do it! Shes supercop".

Ooof

I been playing it. I’m having a great time with it. Those are the best graphics I have ever seen.

Nothing went wrong. The game is fine. Stop looking for trouble when there isn't any.

In short? Rushed, cash grab to play off the success of RE2, tried too hard to be "cool" when the unwritten rule when it comes to survival horror is "less is more." Oh and this might not be a contributing factor but Jill was just ugly and unappealing to look at, down vote me all you want but looks and physical appeal do matter when connecting with a character. I don't make the rules.

Everything. The reality of the sitution is that you FAKE Resident Evil fans bought into the lies put out by Capcom and now you're defending this trash because you threw away your cash on a five hour game (e.g. Capcom said said this game would have more exploration, lol). You jumped off that bus from Fortnite and said "uhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhu...we gonna shoot everything that moves in Raccoon city. This is going to suit us just fine. We don't need puzzles. We can throw our thinking caps away right now. We don't care about puzzles because we have ADHD. Thank you Capcom"

What else have you got besides that incredibly short, utterly disposable, single player? That's right, you've got that utter trash, Resistence. A buggy, unbalanced, laggy af, crappy MP experience. But you don't care. You never have and you never will because you were too busy going "Shut up and take my money, Capcom."

Lack of giving a s**t, from what I've seen. B team creates lesser, but serviceable product, banking on the good will the series has created recently.

I’m actually replaying this one and couldn’t get passed the first play through with Claire after Leon.
I feel RE3r is a better overall product despite the length and the body dismemberment mechanics.
RE2r has the shock value so there will always be complainers about the follow up.

If you liked RE2r you will love re3r

just the length, just that, nothing else, please move on people i hated its shortness as well but we dont have to keep bringing it up, capcom is going back to being shit

The clock tower and grave digger from the original being cut was bad form plus I was hoping for hoping they would at least put in giant spiders to battle against. Game was rushed which is a shame as Capcom have been on a good run Lately

It's definitely worth a playthrough, however, since it's so short just wait for a price drop.

The lack of content is what went wrong. It’s also clunkier than RE2R. RE2R was far better. This ones more like DLC.

It's a good game in it's own right but not a very faithful remake. The amount of needlessly cut content from the original is shocking. Some stuff they didn't include like the clock tower area and dead factory would have made this game much better. Also cutting enemies out from the original and turning nemesis into a mostly scripted threat really hurt the game overall. I would personally give it a 7/10. Good but not great. I think people who never played the original will have a much better time with it because they don't have the same expectations. Resident Evil 2 remake did a much better job at staying faithful to the original.

The biggest problem with RE3 remake is that it’s simply not faithful enough to the original. Way too many story beats were missing with this remake. The clock tower and the park needed to be here but were skipped over. The pacing also moves far too quick and we don’t get enough time with Nemesis in his first form. The result is a remake that feels rushed and edited to be overly simplistic.

RE2R had a bunch of cut content as well that was dashed over after 3R released. That just highlights how bad of a job it was beyond all the needless changes that affected the overall length.

I am loving it

Honestly there's nothing wrong with RE3 Remake. I thoroughly loved it and it was well polished without any bugs of sort that most games have these days. The main complaint alot of people seem to have is that it was short clocking in at around 5-7 hours for most people. For the sake of argument, I won't be bringing up any DLC.

Here's what I don't get though, RE2 Remake and RE7 were also both relatively short games that clocks in around 5-7 hours. Sure, with RE2 you have 2 characters with A & B scenario that increases the amount of playtime, but the thing that alot of people seem to forget is that they're roughly 75-80% the same thing aside from minor changes in the RPD. Yet no one complained. In RE7, the game didn't have some route B or different scenario so why wasn't anyone complaining about length in that one when it's roughly the same length as RE3?

RE2 has 2 characters with scenario A & B with majority of the content being the same in the all the playthroughs with slight variations. It also had 3 difficulties with but none of them truly change things around all that much (although hardcore mode does shake things up just a little bit). RE7 had 1 character, but with Madhouse mode it changes things up a bit in the campaign and is super difficult.

RE3 has 1 character, but has 5 difficulties total, an extra 2 which are harder than hardcore mode. These two difficulties VASTLY changes the game up compared to hardcore mode form RE2 and madhouse from RE7. Enemies are insanely fast, less ammo, item placements are different, and it also places alot of new enemies in areas that aren't present in the standard/hardcore difficulties in huge bulks as well.

To me, RE3 has alot more replay value in terms of perfecting it due the Nightmare and Inferno difficulty. They truly do change the game up, and I highly recommend those who complained about length try those difficulties out. It's not just a more health/less ammo mode. It's alot more than that. You also have alot of mini-challenges to do so you can unlock stuff for use in the campaign. None of those were present in RE2.

While I do think RE2 is the slightly better game I feel like everyone complaining about RE3 is being clown out of proportion and they're making it sound like a terrible game while it's far from it. Yet no one complains about other games that runs like garbage such as Control. It doesn't make any sense.

Nothing, the game is awesome!
If you loved RE2 Remake you’ll love this.
It may be a bit on the short side, but it has plenty of replay value.

Everybody's complaining about how short this game is but like....Aside from 5 and 6 they're all fairly short.

I thought it was great, it was just short as hell. The problem lays in the source material. RE2 was just a better game than 3 in alot of ways.

Man I must be trippin because I came away actually enjoying the game tremendously and it invoked the same feeling I got when I played RE4 as a kid almost to the T. Its a phenomenal gamr that while even though is short, is packed with so much game and replay value Im working on my third playthrough. It has the kind of pacing that makes it easy to play over and over. I would dare say that removed from its lofty expectations it is a classic of our generation.

What went wrong? Capcom saw all the money they made with the surprise success of the remake of Resident Evil 2, and that inspired them to botch production of the remake of Resident Evil 3 for a quick buck. Simple as that.
Also, I doubt they bothered making sure they were surrounded by the right people, namely the ones who had worked on the original game in 1999, contrary to what Square-Enix did with the remake of Final Fantasy VII.