I think he is talking about a sliding scale and not explicitly 4K 240 FPS. Just doesn't seem doable without a ton of sacrifices.

144 hz is more than enough, even 120 hz is really good. I have 240 hz monitor and there is a difference but it's only really useful for games like Counter Strike or something. For a racing game even 90hz is amazing.

By the time Polyphony releases that game 5 or 6 years from now must games will run at that target.

I just don't understand why for at least the last 2-3 GT iterations, the developers have compromised visual fidelity (AA, shadow quality, geometry etc.), over "numbers", be it target resolution or fps. Just seems like a flex more than a practical solution...

I hope many understand that the cpu will be the biggest jump next gen a long with the ssd. Its not 50 or 100% more powerfull then the jag cpu. Its much, much more

240fps
..
Hahhaahah

Let’s nail native 4k locked at 60fps then we can talk about 240fps lol

I'd take a fully fleshed out GT7 in VR with the current geometry and shaders seen in GT Sport, but at a minimum of 120hz native on a high PPI 4k per eye panel in a new PSVR. That'd look amazing.

tbh im more than happy with a locked 60fps its perfect for every type of game. i would prefer locked 60 with visual settings turned up off the scale rather than 120fps or 240fps with detail levels lowered. either way GT next will be the best looking driving game. ive just been playing assetto corsa on PC its nothing compared to gt sport

Shout out who's got a 4K monitor that supports 4K, HDR AND 240fps at the same time? *crickets*

Is not referring to this but Gran Turismo Future is actually a good title name for the next iteration :D

Thats and odd target cause the human eyes can only see 60fps