All Channels
Popular
260°

Gaming Isn't Ready For 8K Resolution Yet

The games industry is not ready to tackle 8K resolution. It should be focusing on performance over pixel counts.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
ziggurcat2328d ago

Gaming won't be 8K - 8K is pretty much just for video output support for the when those TVs eventually become more affordable..

Darkwatchman2328d ago

I’d expect remasters of old games capable of 8K or at least higher than 4K resolutions. Like remasters of 7th gen and prior games will absolutely be capable of running higher up to 8K on next gen machines. Just like how Pro is advertised as a 4K machine, but compared to X, it comes incredibly short with resolution counts, but with last gen and older remasters Pro’s pixel counts tend to be respectable

2327d ago
2327d ago
Eonjay2327d ago

Never mind the fact that no one has an 8k TV and just three years ago they just started pushing 4K sets. If it becomes a focus when almost no one can use it right now then that would be stupid.

rainslacker2328d ago

I'd honestly be surprised if 4K is even the common target. Devs and publishers, tend to know that better looking is usually a better selling point than resolution, and those really good looking images in bull shots for marketing make a bigger impact on the consumer than a 4K logo on the box. 1440 or 1800 is the more likely scenario, with some form of upscalling or checkerboarding technique to get it to render a final 4K image.

8K will be possible on a hardware level, but in the real world, it's just not going to happen. We're talking 4X the resolution of 4K, and every pixel is going to have more rendering effects on it next gen regardless of resolution.

For a rundown on what the whole 8K means, just go look at all the similar articles which discussed what 4K meant this gen when it was being thrown around. Hell, the 4K standard is still barely even finalized for displays, and in some ways, it's not even completely standardized.

gamer78042327d ago

I'm honestly not even looking forward to 8k, I'd rather them push more detailed effects, environments, draw distances and frame rate first. I just got my 2nd 4k tv and not really interested in upgrading again to 8k. They could implement better AA also to achieve this. 8k is just unnecessary right now unless you have like 100+ inch projector screens for movies.

medman2327d ago

Here's the thing though.....4k for the new consoles won't necessarily be the target, but it's going to be the norm simply because the developers are not developing only for the new consoles, but have to develop to get the games to run 1080 30fps on ps4 xbox one. With that target, the games will run 4k 60fps on the new machines, even if that's not the target...it's just the limitation of the current gen consoles.

medman2327d ago

Also, I think it's pretty likely that one, or even both of the new consoles will have a menu option for gamers to choose whether they want a game to run 4k 60, 4k 30, or at a lower resolution with higher framerate, possibly 120 or above for some games.

Larrysweet2327d ago

Native 4k will be standards

rainslacker2327d ago

The biggest truth is that the average customer can't really notice the difference between a scene with high quality visuals rendered at 1080, then upscaled(and usually not even upscaled), and a 4K render with lower visuals. Devs know this. Publishers know this. Marketing knows this.

The hardcore may have trained themselves to notice these differences, especially with the help of comparisons, and they themselves have an interest in really noticing the difference, but even most of the hardcore doesn't really care that much. Those that do care really are a small portion of the market, and I feel it's an even smaller portion of the market which won't play a game because it doesn't meet some benchmark.

I think we'll see more 4K targets and accomplishments next gen. but I think 1440 or 1800 are going to be more common. I'm also hoping that the choice to decide on performance or graphics, and variances in between becomes more common, because that just gives everyone the chance to get what they prefer.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2327d ago
REDGUM2328d ago (Edited 2328d ago )

I think 8K is along way off or may not even take off at all. Not sure if anyone has actually checked out 8K but there really is very minimal differences between 4 & 8K. It's not double resolution as you might think.

You have to be sitting just 2 feet away at the moment to see any real differences. That's really uncomfortable and silly infront of a 65 inch tv.

My opinion of course.

KyRo2327d ago

Most people's eyes can't see the difference between 4K and 8K. It's going to be nothing more than a marketing gimmick to make the consumers shell out for another TV. It will be like the whole gold HDMI cable thing all over again.

FirstSonOfKrypton2327d ago

You’re opinion is shite. 8k looks fabulous. It is minute on small screens but not on big boys. Anything with fine detail looks great. Stop these myths. Even if we can’t notice anymore they’re should always be advancement in res frame rates etc.

medman2327d ago (Edited 2327d ago )

Don't know why you're getting disagrees. Unless your tv screen size is 88 inch and up, the difference between 4k and 8k is impossible to see unless you're literally 1.5 to 2 feet from the screen. So if you look at an 8k tv and a 4k tv in store (or at CES), standing right in front of them, you will see a difference. But back in your home, where you probably sit too far from your television as it is, you will see no difference between the two images, assuming you're looking at two identical tv's with the same processing and feature set.

I have a 77 inch screen, and the ideal/recommended viewing distance for 4k for my size screen is 6-8 feet. https://www.rtings.com/tv/r...
https://www.tomsguide.com/u...
For 8k I would need to sit approximately 1.5 to 3 feet from my screen to see a difference in resolution. That is not practical, and pretty much useless.

dumahim2327d ago

" It's not double resolution as you might think."

You're right, it's four times the resolution.

froy4022327d ago (Edited 2327d ago )

KyRo
Yeah (most people) (you) might not be able to tell the difference between 4k and 8k because you probably have poor eyesight, not everyone's eyesight is the same. I can very well distinguish between 8k and 4k. Don't believe every thing you read, those nerds reviewing 8k have bottles for glasses or probably need them.

KyRo2327d ago

Krypton my opinion is shit for stating facts... What? You need a 90 inch-ish TV for the human eye to see the difference. So no your reply was absolute shit.

@Medman, talking sense don't get you far on N4G. That being said people disagree like the bubble system is still in place. A disagree on here means absolutely nothing anymore. Pointless having it.

specialguest2327d ago

If you live in the US or Canada, go to a Best Buy and see the 8K for yourself. I could tell the difference, but that's because I know where the optimal viewing distance is.

Those who say 8K only works with a giant screen are wrong. 8K will work very well for PC monitors. The optimal viewing distance for a 32" 8K screen is 1.1 ft. That's basically the average distance of a PC monitor on a desk. Even if you go lower to a 27" monitor, it would still be within the optimal viewing distance

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2327d ago
SyntheticForm2327d ago

8K streaming capability gives Microsoft the excuse to stamp 8K on the chip even though it's a game machine and little-to-no 8K gaming will occur.

Even if Microsoft specify this, it's a bit misleading, but so long as it isn't an outright lie they can get away with it.

Profchaos2327d ago

4k was considered to be exactly the same in fact there was a number of heated argument's that took place on this site alone stating that it was impossible to deliver 4k content via streaming and the Spiderman 4k Blu ray that was used to promote the tech was 50gb and it was impossible to deliver to people and content wasn't shot for 4k etc.

Lots of voices here declared the tech dead on arrival now it's commonplace especially for movies

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2327d ago
isarai2328d ago

People said the same this gen about 4K when the pro and X were announced. Pretty sure this is just them trying to be more prepared than they were this gen.

FinalFantasyFanatic2328d ago

But we don't really have native 4k, the X sometimes gets there, but there's a good portion of games where it can't either. I'm expect next gen to make 4k more common place if it doesn't become standard.

isarai2327d ago (Edited 2327d ago )

True but we get resolutions well above 1080p (usually 1440p), maybe it'll be the same next gen where 4k will be the majority but will be able to render natively somewhere between 4k-8k for when 8k displays become more popular.

Kribwalker2327d ago

the X gets there quite a bit. And it’s 6.2 teraflops. The Navi RDNA 2.0 architectures vs current architectures is way more efficient, they say a 4 teraflops Navi could do the 6.2 teraflops of a oneX.

Now make a 12 teraflops Navi RDNA 2.0 and a better cpu chip and it’s definitely possible, at lower frame rates for sure, to hit 8k

RazzerRedux2327d ago

"they say a 4 teraflops Navi could do the 6.2 teraflops of a oneX."

"They" say a lot of stuff. When we see some benchmarks and not just some theoretical guessing then we will know.

Kribwalker2327d ago

@Razzer
digital foundry did a test back in september and saw big gains with RDNA 1.0 (which is what the ps5 is rumoured to use). The Xbox XS is rumoured to use the next generation with RDNA 2.0
https://www.eurogamer.net/a...

RazzerRedux2327d ago

@Kribwalker

Looking forward to seeing the real specs and the real hardware (not PC). I'm putting no stock into rumors, but you do you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2327d ago
Gardenia2327d ago

This gen was not true 4K. Next gen will be the first time we see native 4K on most games. Also most people don't even have a 4K TV or monitor yet.

onisama2327d ago

Xbox X achieved native 4k in most games but i think there was somw cuting in term of graphics... Anyway 8k surely wont be possible next gen execpt on indie games

BlackIceJoe2328d ago

As a gamer, I'd personally prefer to have guaranteed 60fps over 8K any day of the week. A higher Frames per second is more beneficial for games than a greater resolution.

Ratty2328d ago

Both are important but I have to agree that 60FPS should be standard.

Profchaos2327d ago

I would like the option at the very least to select what I want to proritise

ibrake4naps2328d ago

At some point, there has to be enough pixels. I think I'm good at 4k...

NeoGamer2322327d ago

Pixel count makes sense as TVs get more affordable at larger sizes.

Anything below 42" HD is usually good enough...

Anything less than 70" 4K is good enough...

But as people start buying TVs 70" and larger, 8K will make sense. I have a 75" TV at home and 4K looks OK, but 8K would make the TV display games a lot better. (Too bad my TV isn't 8K... LOL)

Show all comments (66)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio28d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing28d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9228d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit28d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing28d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9228d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
50°

Report: Injustice 3 in Development at NetherRealm Studios

Thanks to the slip-up of an artist working on the title, we now have more evidence that a new Injustice game is in the works.

80°

Playstation Plus Monthly Games for May: EA Sports FC 26, Wuchang: Fallen Feathers, Nine Sols

All available May 5.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
FPSRUSSIA28d ago

What's Point in commenting your basicly closing down the site.

LiViNgLeGaCY28d ago

I'm surprised it's still the old site. I thought he said starting today?

Eonjay28d ago

Its like the final episode of the Sapranos. You gonna go to make a comment and when you click add th-

Profchaos28d ago

Timezone thing maybe.... RIP

darthv7228d ago

Insert the Ferris Bueller end scene... "You're still here? It's over.."

LiViNgLeGaCY28d ago

I think the only game here for me is Nine Sols. Was always interested in that game.

TheColbertinator28d ago

Glad I don't buy FIFA games anymore

Rebel_Scum28d ago

Hey now! Thats a great month.

Nacho_Z28d ago

Good month for me, I wanted that particular footy game and thought it might be due. Anyway who cares, shame about the site I'll miss the comment sections. All the best everyone.

Show all comments (16)