200°

Competitive Multiplayer: Is It Really Necessary?

Paul writes: "I've laid my gaming soul bare. I feel like I've been to an AA meeting - "My name is Paul, and I hate competitive multiplayer!"."

Read Full Story >>
thexboxhub.com
Zombieburger6382302d ago

I love great coop games like l4d but competitive like halo holds a special place in my heart.

2302d ago Replies(1)
Atom6662302d ago

I agree that co-op is great, as are SP experiences. We shouldn't forget that competive MP has been at the heart of gaming from the beginning, though.

Whether it was true versus MP like table tennis/pong, or it was besting each other's scores on SP cabinets, gamers' competive natures have driven the industry over the decades as much as anything else.

The market is so large now, all tastes are well accounted for. Some people don't enjoy these competitive modes and others only play MP. The best thing about modern gaming is that we all can enjoy so many different things.

2302d ago Replies(5)
monkey6022302d ago

I love single player games and competitive online multiplayer. I don't care much for co-op games. Like you said theres a broad enough scope for all preferences

TheEnigma3132302d ago

So because paul hates it he thinks it’s unnecessary. I don’t know why i choose to click on opinion pieces when i know there’s a 85% change of me getting annoyed.

TK-662302d ago

Basically, he doesnt like any multiplayer game that doesnt rely on making the team co-operate, and this is fine if he then didn't go on to praise games that have some of the weakest teamwork elements in the industry.

"I’ve never been able to get into is any of the Call of Duty franchise. The multiplayer fraternity on these games is famously full of kids, trolls and those who take a fancy for my mother – to paraphrase the messages that I have received. With the gameplay being firmly on the arcade end of the scale, it seems that the gamer with the fastest reflexes usually wins, and I’m now far too old to be able to compete in any meaningful way. I think this was why I preferred the Battlefield games to the CoD games; the emphasis in Battlefield is more on teamwork, so it does have that little bit of cooperation in the midst of the chaos. Why can’t we all just get along, eh?"

Battlefield has some of the weakest teamwork elements when it comes to online games. Just because it has more than COD doesnt make it a good team game. The author doesnt even acknowledge how some team games, when they require high amounts of cooperation, actually go the other way and end up generating toxicity when a player doesnt pull their weight. That's the problem with games media when they write these little opinion essays; they never actually explore the full range of the topic.

Show all comments (34)
110°

Star Wars x Destiny Collaboration: Gear & Cosmetics Launching February 4th

Destiny 2 x Star Wars collaboration is here! Get exclusive gear, cosmetics, and accessories when Heresy launches on February 4th. Don’t miss it!

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
coolbeans450d ago (Edited 450d ago )

Fortnite-ification comes for all live-service games.

Neonridr449d ago

now this is an armor set done right.

40°

Destiny Mobile spin-off will reportedly be revealed very soon

The long-rumoured Destiny Mobile game from NetEase may finally be ready for reveal according to multiple leakers.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
280°

Xbox Passed On Destiny & Guitar Hero According To Phil Spencer

Phil Spencer talks candidly about missing out on both Destiny and Guitar Hero

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
anast598d ago

He paid billions for Starfield. This should be the real story.

598d ago Replies(1)
Sciurus_vulgaris598d ago

Microsoft bought all of Zenimax Media for 7 billion, while Sony paid 4 billion for Bungie. I think Microsoft got the better deal due to acquiring Fallout, ElderScrolls and Doom.

598d ago
anast598d ago

This can't be true. They only bought Starfield...

InUrFoxHole598d ago

@anast
Should've thought that one out buddy, lol.

anast598d ago (Edited 598d ago )

Yeah, I thought it out. I'm not sure you did. But since we are buddy's now, you're welcome.

598d ago
anast597d ago

"Clearly your parents didn't teach you"

You know you lost, when you have to resort to this tactic.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 597d ago
Profchaos598d ago

So you're saying that Microsoft has missed out on so many huge gaming franchise in the last 25 years from GTA exclusivity to guitar hero and destiny it's just laughable they had so many misses

Reaper22_598d ago

Yea, but they're still 100 times more wealthy than Sony. I would say it worked out well.

Gamingsince1981598d ago

Xbox is dead all that money doesn't help.

Hypertension140598d ago

What has work out well? It sure as hell had nothing to do with Xbox.

andy85598d ago

That isn't because of Xbox though. This is a gaming page, not an I get supplemented by father Windows page

Bathyj598d ago

Microsoft's money has nothing to do with Xbox.
Xbox is a money pit to them they would love to ditch but are after some ROI first.

Let's face it, Xbox is like a red headed stepchild that steals from you to buy drugs.

Hofstaderman598d ago (Edited 598d ago )

MIicrosoft is NOT XBOX. The current situation illustrates this. And Microsoft wants its ROI.

@Bathyj and daddy Satya has just force admitted Phil to rehab.

gold_drake598d ago

you know why MS has so much money, and it aint cause of the gaming xbox branch.

so lets not kid ourselves.

PhillyDonJawn598d ago

Xbox was shown to be more profitable than ps

jznrpg598d ago

@PhillyDownJawn not more profitable. More revenue with ABK acquisition but them going multiplat shows they are not making much profit

ocelot07597d ago

That's great for Xbox gamers ain't it that Microsoft are more wealthy than Sony. Is that really a argument use are using now lol?

Imagine me in my job. Arguing with a fellow security guard at another company. Hahah well the company I work for is worth £800m the one you work for is only work £600m!

597d ago
Knightofelemia597d ago

Microsoft may have more money but Sony has the talented studios and the games to back up those studios.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 597d ago
Chevalier597d ago

Plus turning down Marvel too. Spiderman is only exclusive to Playstation because of that

Hedstrom598d ago

Best deal deal in gaming must be when Sony bought Insomniac for 229 million dollars. They made over 800 millions on Spiderman for the ps4 alone. Thats just crazy!

XBManiac598d ago

More in the 1.000 million now.

gold_drake598d ago

another Interview?

how is he the only one who loves the spotlight as much as he does lol

Futureshark598d ago

Let's not forget he also famously passed on Spider-man, Genshin Impact and GTA3.

However it's almost kind of cute how he can keep that sh1t-eating grin and say he's a 'no regrets' kind of guy, especially when you think how much just these 5 titles could have swung the world in Xbox's favour instead of Sonys.

How he's kept his job I don't know, he must sure be keeping Papa Nadella's shaft warm somehow.

"But, but Gamepass, he introduced that!!!"

Yes he did, and now look at Xbox, all it's exclusives are coming to Playstation now rendering the platform obsolete.

DarXyde598d ago

Honestly, with that kind of track record, you can't convince me Spencer hasn't eaten it from the back in the name of self preservation. Probably unwashed...and at least twice.

That aside, my interpretation of everything here is Xbox has been mismanaged a bit too much and Nadella came down from his throne. The way it is now, I don't believe for a minute the multiplatform move was Spencer's idea. I don't even think the acquisitions was Spencer's work. At this point, I reckon he's got as much power in his role as Hunter Biden at a Ukrainian energy company.

DivineHand125597d ago

You can never tell how things will turn out if he had said yes to those games. Xbox already has access to some great IPs, however, they hardly do anything with them or fail to deliver. It's also possible their presentation wasn't good at the time, and they made sure the next presentation was better.

I believe that part of being successful is releasing things in the right place at the right time.

Many major corporations have a story similar to passing on successful business ideas. Let us look at Sony Pictures for example. Back when Marvel went bankrupt, they had the opportunity to buy the entire Marvel for only $25 Million but turned them down. An unnamed big shot at Sony reportedly claimed that “nobody gives a shit about any of the other Marvel characters,”. They ended up taking Spiderman for $10 Million instead.

https://www.avclub.com/sony...

Fast forward to today, we can see what the Marvel brand has done for Disney. Is it possible the same success would have been possible had Sony acquired those IPs. We can't say that for sure and it is possible most of those IPs that are successful today may not have been used.

Show all comments (35)