260°

J.J. Abrams Celebrates Hideo Kojima and Death Stranding

IGN: The Star Wars director discusses the work of Hideo Kojima, his role as a narrative game creator, and what that means to Death Stranding.

Zeke682228d ago

Why is IGN posting this when they clearly think exactly the opposite of the opinions presented in this video? Hypocrites !! Are they trying to save their face now ? Death Stranding was game of the year for pretty much everyone I talk games with and we were all confused about the low IGN score, and now this video.. Hilarious imho.

SamPao2228d ago

they still are a gaming website. so no matter their opinion they can still cover the game itself.

naruga2228d ago

JJ Abrams the man who destroyed Star Wars by its roots ....lame director (in contast to Kojima who is really a genius)

TK-662228d ago (Edited 2228d ago )

@Narugo

If anyone looks at the new Star Wars movies and the first thing they say is "I think JJ is the problem" you're really jumping the gun. JJ isnt the best storyteller, but Awakens was decent; nothing amazing, but an acceptable reboot. However, The Last Jedi is a narrative clusterfuck of inconsistencies and bad characters.

Nah, JJ didn't destroy it. Star Wars still held a good reputation when all we had was Awakens and Rogue One, but once TLJ released all that changed. Rian Johnson is who your anger should be directed towards.

Brave_Losers_Unite2228d ago (Edited 2228d ago )

naruga how come every comment you make is stupid? I really do think you've got some serious mental health issues

Godmars2902228d ago

@TK-66:
And then there's Star Trek Into Darkness...

I mean, while the 2009 was also "decent", into Darkness was a mess. Not of the same caliber as TLJ, but a mess still. Proof enough that the man's a franchise wrecking hack who managed to hand off TLJ to, if not a bigger less competent hack, then someone who should have been vetted better.

TK-662227d ago (Edited 2227d ago )

@Godmars290

No you're misremembering history. Into Darkness actually brought in more money than ST09. He didn't wreck the franchise if the movie you're referencing as a "franchise wrecking ball" ade it more popular.

"Proof enough that the man's a franchise wrecking hack who managed to hand off TLJ to, if not a bigger less competent hack, then someone who should have been vetted better."

JJ didn't choose Rian Johnson to direct VIII; that was Kathleen Kennedy. Are you just completely ignorant of what actually happened to Star Wars? You cant blame him for a decision he had no part in.

UltraNova2227d ago (Edited 2227d ago )

Yes they can and they should. They should also tell us why they removed Death Stranding from their recent best of year poll right when it was clear DS was winning?

@Zeke

They did this for DS with other directors as well.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2227d ago
2228d ago Replies(6)
mgszelda12228d ago

The problem is ign has multiple reviewers.

shabz6662228d ago

I wouldn’t even bother man. Just let it be

TK-662228d ago

It's a major problem. We cant have people thinking IGN has lots of different reviewers, both good and bad. Better to believe it's one giant hive mind... /s

rainslacker2228d ago

Multiple reviewers isnt the reason they removed it from consideration for goty despite their user base apparently liking the game. That was a statf decision, so they obviously have some animosity towards the game or kojima.

darthv722228d ago

IGN is in multiple regions with various reviewers. One region didn't care for it (or more specifically that one reviewer) and yet the other regions/reviewers did. I wouldn't read much more into it than there is no one voice of all IGN that has the final say. Some like this game, others dont... it is what it is.

2228d ago
TK-662228d ago (Edited 2228d ago )

@silvershiptrip

So when we have MULTIPLE reviews from them is it not better to look at the overall picture if you're claiming you want to look at what the organization as a whole thinks? Also, reviewers are not customer service or public relations reps...

darthv722228d ago

@silver, what you said would make sense IF it was just one score but it wasnt. So, yes... each region is able to reflect their own individual score regardless of them being part of a multinational organization. the person who submitted that score is representing that region but not the overall view of the company as a whole. The US wing just didnt like it. No harm, no foul.

KwietStorm_BLM2228d ago

So you're saying because they gave the game a low score, which conflicts with everyone *you* know who played the game, that this means they are supposed to now be exempt from posting any *news* at all regarding said game? And because someone else gives Kojima praise, it makes them hypocrites, as if JJ Abrams works at IGN? You want to know what's really hilarious?

SyntheticForm2228d ago

"They" don't clearly think anything, dumb-dumb.

Tristan Ogilvie is not IGN, and does not represent IGN as a whole. Did you hear the opinions of many of the other IGN folk? You should. They're mixed, but a few really liked it.

How many times do people need to be reminded of this?

Also, what Sam said.

Hardiman2228d ago

Trying to walk it back. "Hey look at us, we're not against DS!"

KickSpinFilter2228d ago

lol, they are reporting on news dude...relax.
Plus one should never look a one score for the end-all-be-all of a game, much better to look at an average like Metacritic.

Imalwaysright2228d ago

"much better to look at an average like Metacritic"

And even then...

2228d ago
+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 2227d ago
Ratchet752228d ago

It's funny how JJ praise hideo Kojima for trying something new and making that speach about creativity and taking risks while all his work has mainly been reboots.
Lmao 🤣🤣🤣

carcarias2228d ago

I'm not that fussed about what JJ 'Star Wars Saboteur' Abrams has to say about...well, anything really ;)

ReVibe2228d ago

Death Stranding reminds me of that one time JJ was truly creative; Cloverfield.

2BlackBelt2228d ago

I thought JJ was making Half Life and Portal films!?! Maybe now Alyx is on the way they will come too, or Kojima Productions can collaborate. Exciting times.

Show all comments (52)
40°

ESO's director says doing the same-old yearly patch cycle wasn't 'going to cut it'

"Nothing is off the table right now."

40°

An Update to Our Shared Commitment to Safer Gaming

Discover how Sony Interactive Entertainment, Nintendo, and Microsoft continue to collaborate to improve player safety across our platforms.

Read Full Story >>
sonyinteractive.com
110°

There's an Underrepresented Majority That Wants Entertainment Without Agendas, Says Ex Tripwire CEO

Ex-Tripwire CEO John Gibson shares his 'Entertainment First' vision to capture the agenda-free magic of classics like Star Wars, Zelda, and Metroid.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
Goodguy012d ago

Yes. Just make a good game instead of worrying it should make some kind of stupid social/political differences in the world... we've got enough of that in the real world. Games are places we can escape to and just have fun.

z2g2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

How about you make a game that’s important to you and the people who are interested in that buy it and the ones that don’t like it don’t have to buy it. Just because something bugs some people doesn’t mean there aren’t other people who it doesn’t bug. Someone’s hangups shouldn’t be other people’s problems.

Don’t want a game that features a political or cultural statement or an underrepresented group of people? Don’t buy it.

Not all of us just want vapid, mindless fantasy all the time. Sometimes we want something that represents us or means something. There’s nothing wrong with that. Look how many movies in the world have covered so many types of stories, people or historical controversies to huge successes. Games are no different.

Eonjay2d ago

The plot to remove representation or ideas and content that you dont approve of is an agenda within itself. Its also censorship. People need are trapped in this main- character syndrome where they believe that the world and all of its happens are fashioned for them alone.

crazyCoconuts2d ago

"Don't buy it"
Exactly what people do.
And then big companies are reminded why if you want to make money you may not want to do things like villainize half your market. If you want to preach one side of an argument you're gonna lose people. At least do the Deus Ex/GTA thing and show the warts on both sides so everyone has something to agree with

senorfartcushion2d ago

We’re still waiting on that Splinter Cell remake…

raWfodog2d ago

On the flip side of that, good games can have characters of different ethnic and social backgrounds without thinking that some agendas are trying to be pushed. I've played many, many great games throughout my life with many different characters (male, female, white, people of color, even some animal characters) and loved them all simply for the story and entertainment they provided me while I escaped into those worlds.

senorfartcushion2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

That’s not possible.

Being a child doesn’t remove the political points of OLD GAMES, we were just kids. In fact, older media was decidedly more political than some of the cowardly, childish efforts we have today.

This is precisely why we are still to get that Splinter Cell remake. We can’t have a fun Splinter Cell game with AAA graphics because a few virgins don’t want “politics in their games.”

neutralgamer19922d ago

Keep gaming free of nonsense. Agenda pushing in social media age has gotten worst

senorfartcushion1d 9h ago

Name a game and I’ll tell you what the agenda was

Notellin1d 23h ago

"While our first game is faith-based"

Yeah you guys want to get rid of all the politics and play a nice Southern Baptist game. We get it.

Christopher1d 21h ago

He should follow his own words, then.

*** That changed around two years ago, when he started consulting for Bible X, the studio behind the Christian-based game project Gate Zero. Last month, Gibson, through his recently established publisher Templar Media, acquired the developer.***

Not sure there's anything more political in history than religion.

S2Killinit1d 19h ago

But his statement is also an agenda. Hope people are intelligent enough to know that.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 1d 9h ago
z2g2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I fail to see how representing actual underrepresented or making them feel included is an “agenda”. This is an extremely self centered selfish viewpoint. Those actual underrepresented people just want to be recognized as valid. The privileged majority who are always represented take that for granted and can’t deal with the fact that “other” types of people or views exist. Inclusion or awareness isn’t an agenda. It’s representing reality and making those “other” people or stories be seen and align with actual reality.

There are literally thousands and thousands of games to choose from, and if you are annoyed that some have cultural or topical relevance, that’s your problem and you don’t have to buy them. Meanwhile other people who want that actually have games that speak to them. So sick of this “my way or the highway” attitude.

And there are plenty of games out there, if that privileged majority have an issue or don’t want a game based on cultural relevance. Pick up a Switch. Most games are g-rated, noncontroversial cartoons with stories fit for tweens. No reality to get mad at.

2d ago Replies(2)
KyRo2d ago

It's always me me me me me with you lot. There's a difference between representation and forcing it for the sake of forcing something to a very very loud but very small minority.

Christopher2d ago

You really are only proving their point with this sort of response to the idea of people feeling included in some games versus the plethora of games without it.

Outside_ofthe_Box2d ago

We need to define what "forcing" is because I've seen people say things like Aloy being female in Horizon is pushing an agenda or catering to a "very very loud but very small minority" before.

dveio2d ago

@z2g

I personally think you've nailed it here.

For decades, wether in film or music, there had been ONE primary target group.

And if you're looking further, even in economy, laws, courts or any other area there had been only one target group.

While others, let's be real, were surpressed.

It's "funny" though - why do we all think personalities like David Bowie, Mick Jagger, Freddy Mercury, etc., have had such a huuuge impact on cultures and society? Because they were 1:1 depicts of the Demon Slayer or the Duke?

No, because they were different. Because we all are different.

The only people time and time again that are complaining, whining and moaning about everything (while highly likely even been a fan of Queen or something) are prejudiced people.

Are people that "But it's never been any different, and I want it to stay that way!".

There's nothing highly hidden here. It's always been the same. After decades, even centuries of rules written by and for the "one primary target group", they are now the loudest that complain & moan.

Inverno2d ago

Y'all could also, ya know, just not buy games you feel have an agenda? This constant bitching coming from all these whiney men every time they see a game that isn't catering to them specifically is tiring. They latch themselves onto these games and throw endless amounts of harassment as if there aren't another thousand games releasing before/around/after. I'm usually outspoken when it comes to forced diversity in games, but the issue here is you're all bigoted as hell and need to learn to be a little less offended. Y'all become the snowflakes you mocked so much lol.

MrDead2d ago

This guy is one of the biggest most delicate snowflakes out there, I'm sure he'll be crying on Tucker Carlson or Fox "News" again soon.

Michiel19891d 23h ago

@christopher cater to and include are two very different things. Played most of the games you mentioned and had no issue with any of em because they just include it. I have no issue with inclusion of that, but if in the next god of war, Kratos would all of a sudden hyperfocus on being a strong independent man or a hypermasculine one, I would give them shit for it as well. It has nothing to do with the inclusion of x or y group, but about the integrity of the game.

@inverno stop putting words in my mouth . It's actually the opposite of what you say, I said there can be no conversation because as soon as you criticize them, a whole angry mob comes at you and tries to cancel you. Thankfully it's become less and less over time and people actually realize now they can voice their opinion without having the fear of losing their job.
You really can't see that a lot of companies are now backpeddalling about the woke bs? They finally realize making your product worse to cater to a group who doesn't buy your product anyway is terrible.

Michiel19892d ago ShowReplies(4)
PitbullMonster1d 17h ago

Who was crying about kingdom come deliverance, Stellar Blade and the first descendant? White Hetero men Or leftards?

Inverno1d 6h ago

Leftards but those games still went on to release and become financially and critically successful. This dood, who was a CEO, went on social media to voice an opinion that at the time was controversial. Just cause you have freedom of speech and expression doesn't mean you hafto always voice your opinions publicly. He had to step down because it was more about the company than just him. Now he's back talking bout "unrepresented majority", as if there aren't different audiences to cater to. Since people from both sides can't seem to escape getting fired for voicing opinions then I guess everyone's got to equally face the consequences of their inability to shut up.

MrBaskerville2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Star wars, anti agenda? Lol. I don't think Lucas would agree.

Inverno2d ago

One of the most politically charged movies in existence. They can pretend it's all about space wizards with swords but the space nazis are still in the movies and they're still the bad guys. It's ironic as hell.

JEECE2d ago

More evidence that if the agenda feels legitimate within the story's world, people don't even notice that it is an agenda and they don't complain.

Elit3Nick2d ago

This one gave me a chuckle, too.

JEECE2d ago

As ever, this is a misguided expression of the speaker's issue. While of course there are some games (pure puzzle games, etc) that have no agenda, any game with a narrative is conveying some type of message. What people who say they don't like "woke" or "politics in games" actually mean is that they don't like hamfisted, poorly written narratives/characters that are thin veneers for modern political messages that feel out of place in the game's universe. It's why all these people complain about the Veilguard and not Baldur's Gate 3. They both have "woke" characters but in BG3 they feel like they belong in the universe, while in the Veilguard they just feel like generic fantasy skins for modern American 20-somethings.

Show all comments (61)