All Channels
Popular
210°

Red Dead Redemption 2 Stadia vs Xbox One X vs PC Analysis!

Digital Foundry: The most in-depth analysis of Red Dead Redemption 2 on Stadia that you'll get.

Read Full Story >>
digitalfoundry.net
Jin_Sakai2378d ago

Looks like crap. Horrible video compression with added input lag. It’s was the same with OnLive, Gaikai, PS Now, now Stadia, and soon XCloud.

2378d ago Replies(1)
2378d ago Replies(6)
THC CELL2377d ago

Ps now and x is not as bad as google

MadLad2377d ago Show
stuna12377d ago

You do know what garnered you so many disagrees don't you? Next time don't add XCloud too your list, and those who agree with you will go way up!

The truth of the matter some gamers have poor memories. Remember how it was when "The Cloud" was the big thing? No one could do it bigger or better than company "M". How has that turned out? Quiet as a whisper! The same is playing out now, only difference is for the most part Stadia has shown its cards early. So therefore it is only natural that its going to shoulder the majority of the scrutiny and negative backlash.

I'm not saying any of these or those services work or don't work. The question everyone should be asking is.... Do these services work when I, You and Everyone else needs them to work? What are the guarantees on digital purchases, what are the guarantees of the service itself, meaning if the uptake isn't as great as the company that provides the service envisioned, will they continue to support it or, at the very least make some type of restitution to the gamers who do take advantage of what said service offers.

IMO any streaming based service has certain Cons about them that simply can be ignored, especially when you are putting your hard earned money into it.

As gamers we should always expect the best, and that means never settling for anything other than that.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2377d ago
chiefJohn1172377d ago

Stadia looks legit. A lot of ppl worry streaming will replace the way we game but I see it as a "temp" was to game. Maybe in the future when internet speeds are quicker, steady, cheaper or even free!!! Maybe till then no

NeoGamer2322377d ago

I just don't get why there are all these comparisons between local consoles/pcs and Stadia.

First, it should be compared to other streaming services.

Second, I think for most gamers, Stadia is more a supplement to gaming then it is their primary platform. I certainly would not use Stadia as a primary platform. But, I will definitely use a streaming service when I am out and about.

With that said, I doubt Stadia will ever be used by me at all. I consider XBox my primary platform because I like XB Live's network stability, achievements, and gamer privacy settings. So, I will wait for xCloud and will only use it when I am not at home and maybe on secondary TVs in my home where I don't game on them enough to justify buying a console.

Christopher2377d ago

***First, it should be compared to other streaming services.***

Because people interested in Stadia might be thinking of moving away from consoles/PC in general and they want to see the comparisons between them and whether or not the change in what they get is enough to deter them or perhaps just enough to encourage them to move towards a Streaming Only option?

***Stadia is more a supplement to gaming then it is their primary platform.***

That's not what Google wants, though. If it was supplemental to gaming, why are there mostly major titles on there that obviously play much better on other platforms? The goal for Google is to replace hardware like consoles entirely, not just give an option for supplemental gaming. Both Sony (PS Now), Microsoft (XCloud), and PC (Steam Streaming) have options for supplemental gaming that combines with their core gaming as it is that would fit the concept of Stadia.

I think you're inferring your view of it for you personally as the overall goal of the product itself. That's not their goal.

babadivad2377d ago

Google invited the comparisons. They said 4K60. They said the input lag would be just like playing on a local console. They came up with all the hyperbole about "negative input lag".

People are reviewing their claims and found them wanting. And the line up of gamea available lacking.

NeoGamer2322376d ago

I can agree with your comment for sure...

But, if anyone believes anything from any company's marketing department they should be sent into a mental institution.

30°

Red Dead Redemption 2 Turns Into Elden Ring in New Mod, Featuring Uncle as Final Boss

Red Dead Redemption 2 mod turns the game into Elden Ring, adding spells, boss fights, and Uncle as the final boss.

110°

GTA5 Has Sold Over 220 Million Copies, Red Dead Redemption 2 Has Sold Over 79 Million Units

Take-Two announced its financial results for Q2 of fiscal year 2026, and shared an update on the sales of GTA5 and Red Dead Redemption 2.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
TheDreamCorridor201d ago

You think Rockstar views Red Dead 2 as a failure because it didn't sell 150m copies?

jznrpg201d ago

3 billion or so in revenue not including online stuff I’m sure they don’t

SethNW200d ago

I am pretty sure they don't. It was profitable and made them a lot of money. Not GTA5 money but far from failure. Maybe it is lower priority franchise, due to being smaller, but that is about the lowest they would put it as. Only thing they do consider failure is RDR2 Online, unlike GTA5 Online, that RDR2 Online flopped. Hence why it got less support. And when it come to profits, sales for both combined don't come close to GTA Online microtansactions. Hence why everything very quickly got canceled and GTA Online was top priority, so no GTA6 for a long time, no DLC for GTA5, despite there being 5 DLCs planned, at least I think it was 5, give or take one. But as I see it, they needed to rejuvenate interest and all, hence why GTA6 eventually is getting made. But what they are really looking forward to is refresh of Online.

ZeekQuattro200d ago

Only in terms of the online aspect of the game. They didn't support it as much as they did GTA V Online. I remember people being pissed about that.

jznrpg201d ago

I own a few GTAs but never played them. I love Red Dead though

Yui_Suzumiya195d ago (Edited 195d ago )

Boring and overrated. Red Dead Redemption is pretty good though. The Hundred Line: Last Defense Academy is my personal GOAT. We need more stuff like that from TooKyo.

victorMaje201d ago

I must be one of the few who are fine with the GTA6 delay. People treat that game like it’s the 2nd coming lol.

FIELDMARSHALL_P200d ago

My daughter asked me how I felt about I shrugged and said I don't care gives me time to finish up games I already have. It's all good let them make the best game they can.

RedDevils200d ago

Wish they make another Manhunt or Bully.

gold_drake200d ago

damn, thats a ridiculous number

Show all comments (11)
160°

Dan Houser: RDR2 was "behind schedule" and "over budget so much I didn’t want to think about it"

Dan Houser opens up about Red Dead Redemption 2’s rocky development, calling it behind schedule, massively over budget, and full of pressure to prove doubters wrong.

Read Full Story >>
thegamepost.com
Storm23205d ago (Edited 205d ago )

The world they built is pretty amazing. Unfortunately, the game was mostly boring to me. I definitely had fun in some parts, but it didn't do it for me as a whole like the first one did. I loved RDR so much.

The budgets and time it takes to make games these days is out of control. Such a big risk. If a game isn't a huge hit, it is often it for a studio. Scary. I really miss the PS2 and PS3 days where studeios could make 4 games in a generation and take risks in making something new. And so many were using their own engines. Those were the days.

neutralgamer1992205d ago

Agreed. I love RDR but couldn't get into RDR2. The animations take forever and game slows you down on purpose. It won't let you have fun because R* want us to play the game they want to. I know millions love RDR2 and I even bought and own it. But just wasn't for me.

It's like comparing GTA4 to saints row 2. One game was about fun while the other was about realism and that's coming from someone who beat GTA4 many times. I much rather a game be fun to play than chase realism

YodaCracker205d ago

GTA IV’s realism is what made it so much more fun for me. I loved experimenting with the physics.

Storm23204d ago

I bought RDR2 also. Put 100+ hours into it and beat it our of respect for Rockstar and all the people saying it was the greatest game ever. RDR blew my mind but might also have been the best time in gaming for me personally. l loved that PS3 gen so much.

I am excited to see what GTA6 is like.

205d ago Replies(1)