Marvel’s Avengers both looks and plays well, if the gameplay trailer and prologue level are anything to go by. But, regardless, this is shaping up to be a very interesting superhero title, and not just from a purely technical perspective.

TheGamer writes, "It feels like live service history repeating itself right now, but it's not too late to change that."

Marvel’s Avengers didn’t soar properly on PS5 and Xbox, but Kill the Justice League looks like it will improve on it in every way.
Does that mean it will have a thousand pointless costumes like Avengers did, not related to the game or source?
"Guy who's excited for Suicide Squad to fill the void left by The Avengers' closure."

Here's a look at why so many online-multiplayer games from the past five years have struggled to retain players and their attention.
It's simply FOMO.
Gamers always go back to their staples like COD or Fortnite. Those games have constant content and leaving them for another game means getting left behind. Why start a new game and be behind when you can stay with a game you already excel at.
Because it's not about putting out a fully completed game packed with content and something that actually works
It's about putting something out broken and barebones, slowly drip feed content with a roadmap and offering tons of MTs which they hope people will buy.
I miss when you'd just get games like Killzone or Halo and they'd get a couple of DLC packs then the developers would move onto the next game. Problem is they started to be influenced by COD where future games had to have gimmicks, weapon mods, loadouts, killstreaks and other shit which just become about what you had unlocked rather than skill.
The last multiplayer game I really enjoyed was Uncharted 2s, it was literally just two boosters and everyone started with the same weapons. It was great and felt like it was more about skill but then we got Uncharted 3 and 4 where the COD influence creeped in thinking that everything had to be bigger rather than sticking to the fanbase they had.
Most people don't have the time to invest into playing multiple GAAS and stick to just one. It also doesn't help that so many games in that field only have a roadmap laid out for the first month or so. Hard to keep people invested when you don't give them a reason to stick around after the initial launch month.
My theory , well online gaming just sucks, so many online games recently that if done the right way could've been dope ass single player games. One that comes to mind evil dead. What a waste of the title
Best looking superhero game after the last best looking superhero game that wasn't made at this time but might not be as good as all of them but we need a "best" of something title to sell this because just having an analysis of the graphics won't get as much hits.
Honestly, I would still put Spider-Man over this game. It did more for an open world game and has a lot of technical tricks in there. This looks generic for this generation to say the least. There are AA games that, IMHO, put this to shame.
how about anything else for this game? they don't seem to market this game except talking about kamala khan
I can't put my finger on it but for some reason I just don't care for this game. Everything we seen so far just feels a bit underwhelming. Maybe it's the structure I don't like they're going with. Like honestly, I am wondering who the game is meant for? Marvel fans? Single-player fans? Casuals? To me, it feels like they're trying to appeal to as many people as they can which may be the reason why I'm not caring for it currently.