140°

PS3 controller adds touchpad interaction

Sony is introducing a new accessory for the PS3 controller. Soon, gamers will be able to snap on a wireless keypad that supports typing on the Playstation 3, including texting in the new Home environment and games like LittleBigPlanet.

In addition to the QWERTY keyboard, there are a couple of shortcut buttons – a Message Box button and a Communication button. But what's most interesting from a interaction standpoint is the new Touch Pad feature.

Read Full Story >>
adaptivepath.com
Bob Dole6320d ago

Pointless if you have a usb/blutooth keyboard. But whateva.

monfa6320d ago

Obviously if you have a keyboard that you are happy with this is pointless but I personally will be getting this because I rather not sit on the couch with a bulky keyboard.

SL1M DADDY6320d ago

Agreed. I did not buy the Logitech 90 dollar huge keyboard that would look super gaudy next to my sofa but this one will be mine, oh yes, it will be mine. I like how small it is and being Sony, it will beat out that other small keypad that was put out by MadCatz.

Milky Joe6320d ago

Nice one Dole, thank god there are geniuses like you about to guide us morons... xD

Anyway, I will be getting this little piece of kit although the lack of 'F' buttons means I won't be able to use it for my MGO macros. Nevermind...

Daver6320d ago

@1

im having a wireless keyboard for my ps3 but i prefer this keypad, its gonna be great

uie4rhig6320d ago

but.. ive always wondered how they would manage the touchpad part .. with all those buttons there, i wonder if it even will be easy to use .. guess ill have to find out..

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 6320d ago
UnwanteDreamz6320d ago

I'm confused is the touchpad feature gonna be like the touchpad on a laptop but covering the entire keypad? Neither one of you mention this feature, which is what the story is about.

Raoh6320d ago (Edited 6320d ago )

"The Touch Pad button allows PS3 users to use the entire surface of the keypad as a touch pad, allowing them to easily maneuver the pointer while web browsing, simply by sliding their finger on the keypad surface."

pressing buttons will work like a normal keyboard. gliding your fingers will work like a mouse.

at least that's what i got from it.

_____________________________ _________________

i would have said pointless too. but lately with the flash 9 push i've been using the browser more often. redeem codes etc

it sucks to have to get up and grab the keyboard to do some typing...

this can be kept nearby..

with games like white knight story and other MMO's coming out i could see this becoming more useful as well...

Panthers6320d ago

Im pretty sure WKC is not an MMO, it just has online Co-Op play.

INehalemEXI6320d ago

Yah, the co op plays like an MMO but its not a Massive Persistant World.

Panthers6320d ago

I hate that it is above the controller. It needs to be where your thumbs are.

6320d ago
Karum6320d ago (Edited 6320d ago )

It really doesn't NEED to be where your thumbs are.

I've never understood this logic, I have the madcatz keypad which is positioned the same way and it is perfectly fine where it is.

Having it on the bottom on the PS3 controlller would be more of an inconvenience imo.

lokiroo4206320d ago

You are very wrong, it needs to be by the power supply, unless you like two usb cables on one controller.

Karum6320d ago

Why would it need to be beside the power supply?

You're not another one of these people that think it's going to plug into that mini usb slot are you?

When they announced this device they said it would be compatible with other portable bluetooth enabled devices that have keyboard functionality such as a smart phone.

It's a bluetooth device that will charge via it's own USB cable and operate off it's own internal power source, there's no inherent need for it to be beside a power supply except for when you need to rehcrage it.

ud6320d ago

Does it affect the L1/R1/L2/R2 buttons? are they harder to reach or anything?

Karum6320d ago (Edited 6320d ago )

The Madcatz version? No not at all in my experience.

Here's a couple of shots I just took of mine.

http://img363.imageshack.us...

http://img363.imageshack.us...

http://img49.imageshack.us/...

I think the Sony one looks like it fits the controller a lot better, I don't really like the madcatz one but it idn't top heavy, doesn't interfere with the controller and does a job.

ud6320d ago

I only saw the pics from the front so I wasn't sure how it was placed. Bubbles for the info ;)

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 6320d ago
Capt CHAOS6320d ago

The keypad should be below the controller like on the 360, that'd work without getting in your way.

Kush_Reaper6320d ago

First comment and its a negative attitude. Why comment if you know you aint gone buy one huh? geez, do people think before they speak.

PLAY BEYOND NOT BEHIND

Show all comments (39)
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel664d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga663d ago (Edited 663d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow664d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo182663d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie662d ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow662d ago (Edited 662d ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

662d ago
Hereandthere662d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 662d ago
Notellin662d ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

662d ago
Hereandthere662d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow661d ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere662d ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow661d ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX663d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney661d ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody663d ago (Edited 663d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno663d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Sheppard7t3663d ago

How did Sony kill the series?

Inverno663d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

662d ago
fsfsxii662d ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno662d ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)
320°

Most Offensive Video Games That Would Never Cut It Today

Times are changing, and these games would have never been made in today's climate.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
thorstein716d ago (Edited 716d ago )

Every single time someone uses this phrase whether it's music, movies, books, comics, video games, etc it's always the same claim.

The ubiquitous "they" won't allow it to be made. And every decade these claims are made the claimant completely ignores all the "offensive" material that is published when the claim is made.

In ten years, you can write a new article about how you can't make games like Helldivers 2, Resident Evil VIII, Mortal Kombat I, Dragon's Dogma 2, Alan Wake 2 etc etc etc any more.

MrBaskerville715d ago

Yeah, people wouldn't be constantly outraged if there weren't games that people found enraging. The whole SBI discourse shit wouldn't be a thing if all games were inoffensive. A game like Starfield can make a guy froth at his mouth, so there will always be room for a list like this.

0hMyGandhi715d ago

Normally, I'd be inclined to agree with you, but there are massive caveats.
TV shows like Venture Bros, Ren and Stimpy, and Aqua Team wouldn't/couldn't be made today. Hell, Ren and Stimpy was a *children's* show, same thing with Rocko's Modern Life.

It's not for some arbitrary reason, either. It's branding and IP alignment. Companies are far more risk-averse than they were when I was kid in the 90's. Of course, you have companies coming out of the woodwork to hell spur on similar content, but remember: Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon and some incredibly provocative material.

And for movies? it's pretty obvious. American Pie/Wedding Crashers/Eurotrip among many other "raunch coms" have fallen out of style, and are absolutely outside what the modern day film industry is willing to stand by.
Ace Ventura 1 and 2, Dumb and Dumber, Freddy Got Fingered, Rat Race, Harold and Kumar, and Van Wilder follow suit.

Remember: I am not explicitly talking about films put onto streamers. I am talking wide-releases in actual theaters. Same thing goes for games: Carmageddon, Duke Nukem, Manhunt, Six Days In Fallujah (with their original concept), Hatred, and so on and so forth. Of course, I'd be inclined to mention most tactical shooters like Rainbow Six and Joint Ops as well, due to cultural sensitivity regarding *who* you are shooting and why.

And not all of it is bad (obviously). Tastes change, and perspectives change to fit the demographic.
I should add that I'm a lefty, living in L.A. Working in film.

thorstein715d ago

The Boys, Invincible, Jojo Rabbit, Deadpool, Gen V, Last of Us, Banshee... There are plenty of media being made today that people will claim "can't be made today".

Profchaos715d ago

Yeah but if you consider manhunt which was basically a snuff film could you seriously make that game with high than PS2 era graphics.

thorstein714d ago

The Outlast Trials just came out.

But the storyline of Manhunt was that you were executed. But then lived. And if you didn't do as you were told, you'd die. And the people you killed were not innocents.

It was all filmed by a psychopath.

As we speak GTA VI is being finished up for a release. You get to play a Bonnie and Clyde type of protagonist who run up against the law.

Bodycam looks so real.

People are making those games. Articles like this will always exist no matter how incorrect they are, no matter how many times they blame "them" for whatever it is "they" do to prevent "those" games from being made.

ZycoFox715d ago

The UK is the biggest junk country pandering to that nonsense as well, with laws against free speech and expression to match. It got so bad even Rowan Atkinson made a video on free speech about it.

Now the UK raises the age rating on harmless films like Mary Poppins, it's just a load of pansy weak ass nonsense.

MrDead715d ago (Edited 715d ago )

The right wing Tories have been in power in the UK for the 14 years you know the ones that are "anti-woke", blame them for your perceptions.

Killer2020UK715d ago (Edited 715d ago )

Are these snowflakes in the room with us now?

This is more faux outrage designed to get hits. The consequences are unfortunately creating hysteria amongst those willing to buy into it and blame "them" or "the left" or "liberals" meanwhile the left are kicking off about genocide, actual real world abhorrent acts. Nobody is campaigning to censor this shit.

Huey_My_D_Long715d ago

Not too mention the fact that some of these game are controversial for you know, underage porn and encouraging rape.

So either the guy just came in to comment snowflakes without reading anything, or he is calling people snowflakes for having a problem with said titles. Crazy how much brain rot someone can have.

banger88716d ago

Dead Island: "The early PC version of the zombie game swapped the playable character Purna’s Gender Wars skill with a prototype name, which shouldn’t be mentioned directly. The skill name made fun of both Purna as a character and feminists."

"Feminist Whore" lmao

gold_drake715d ago

ill add one more to the list.
drakengard 1.

its ridiculous tho, especially since they'd still be able to find their place in alot of places in the world. except america of course ha. and maybe Australia.

ppl are so sensitive these days. ha. but it is what it is.

Barlos715d ago (Edited 715d ago )

They're not offensive.

And we need another Fat Princess. Fantastic little game!

Some people just have no sense of humour if this sort of thing offends them. They need to lighten up and stop taking themselves so seriously.

Deeeeznuuuts715d ago

Would love a new fat princess game 🤟

CantThinkOfAUsername715d ago

Games literally about sexual assault, mass genocide, bombing civilians, and school shooting. None of which is satirical.

isarai715d ago

Actually it's about fat princesses

Huey_My_D_Long715d ago (Edited 715d ago )

Its crazy that people are fixated on Fat princess when clearly the list is going over controversies, and not all of them are equal. Like way worse examples but pretend the entire list is like that.

Show all comments (37)
70°

Top 20 Best PlayStation 3 Games (20-11)

Alex DS. from Link Cable Gaming writes: "Is the PlayStation 3 retro? This is a surprisingly hard question to answer as the system definitely has the age to be considered retro, having launched in 2006, over 15 years ago now. But with it being home to so many massive games, many of which still hold up today and in fact were released for the PlayStation 4 when that console was released, make the PS3 a retro console that doesn’t feel retro."

Read Full Story >>
linkcablegaming.com
shinoff21831402d ago

No ps3 is not retro. I dont even consider ps2 era retro. All imo.

shinoff21831402d ago

Typically, the term retro is given to items which are at least 20 years old (but not yet 40 years old).

Quick google search

badz1491402d ago

No the PS3 is not yet a retro console. But if you're gonna put 1 game from a series in this list, then LBP2 should be there instead of the original, Motorstorm PR is also an overall better game than the 1st game and to put Tools of Destruction over A Crack in Time is a blasphemy when ACiT is the best game in the series.