@VerminSC and DaDrunkenJester

You're actually both making good points. If a company is going to get blasted for doing something bad, we should praise when something good happens if all things are to be equal.

But at the same time, we all know they're doing "good" simply because of all the heat they've been taking. Not for the sake of doing the right thing. Remember, this is EA we're talking about. If this game gets big, don't think they won't try to shoehorn some MT's in if possible

@Vermin

I'm not saying you should exonerate them from their past sins, or even buy this game. But if EA is just doing this for good grace points then let them keep that up. And if they decide to add them a year later, the community should blast them again and not buy a sequel. But consumers need to show that we want to support games like Fallen Order vs Battlefront.

@Vermin

I don't care WHY any company decides not to use MT's. If they make a good game with no MT's they deserve praise and my money. Period. It doesn't mean I have to think they are swell guys.

I've been saying all along that this is EA's chance. Possibly their last chance, to get back in the good Grace's of a lot of gamers. So if they do the right thing here, we need to show them its appreciated.

Or disney exerted their influence after the last star wars game didnt do as well after all the backlash.

@jester

Acknowledge sure, but support them with a purchase is less required. One right step doesnt absolve the ten wrongs they did to get there.