Chris Mawson writes: "It’s pretty certain at this point that the next Elder Scrolls game will be landing on the next-gen consoles. In many ways, this is a good thing because it allows for an almost unlimited set of possibilities when it comes to TES VI, one of which includes a huge, robust, and possibly even compelling, online element."
A decade on from its Game of the Year-winning triumph, Todd Howard reminisces on how Fallout 4 changed Bethesda Game Studios, its TV show adaptation and playtesting The Elder Scrolls 6.
They need to look at Morrowind and see what the progression should have been from there instead of the regression we got with the next 2 games. They weren’t horrible games but they could have been so much more.
Fallout 4 just felt too streamlined and accessible to me, the perk system was not as fun as it was in Fallout 3, not saying Fallout 3 didn't have issues but 4 just felt like a complete step back.
So the part where you just sold the same games for the last 10 years while you focused on 76 and merch, was not a reset from the "creative" aspect eh? How very Todd of you.
I bought Fallout 4 (I loved Fallout 3) at launch and I couldn't bring myself to finish it or even get close to finishing it. It was soooo damned boring and bland. I played on a very hard difficulty and I had hundreds of stimpaks. One of the only games I've played for a while and not ended up finishing it. I hated it. Just flat out hated it.
It's been officially over 2,500 days since The Elder Scrolls 6 was revealed, and fans are still waiting for more than a logo and a mountain range.
It will come out in another 1000-2000 days or so. I’d rather they remake Morrowind. After they added quest arrows, sprint button, making stats lesser and the big nerfs to spells Elder Scrolls has been too simplified. They could change that with ES6 but I don’t have much faith in modern Bethesda. I would love to be wrong
Atomfall has delighted players by delivering a dense, story-rich world, with one lesson in particular that The Elder Scrolls 6 needs to learn.
It better not
No multiplayer
No co-op
They can't do it, they can't even do a single player open world game without bugs and glitches on an old engine they should have been able to conquer by now why the hell would people want 100 or so new problems on top. It makes little sense and i really think people don't think about it logically.
They'd waste their time on fixing co-op bugs and most likely will focus on online post launch DLC instead of single player expansions. Seriously no thanks, if they do this especially after Fallout 76 then they haven't learnt a thing.
Don't think so, they seem to be keeping the single player games as such and releasing online only games alongside them. With mixed results.
It'd better fucking not. I'd like to think that Bethesda learned SOMETHING out of the whole Fallout 76 debacle.
They already have ESO which is doing really well, there really is no need for multiplayer. That said, if there was an option for a friend to jump into your game session and control a companion, now that could be interesting.
I really hope not